I will me in a meeting @ work until 1630 ET. I might be able to
monitor the 1st hour but wont be able to join in the discussion till
after the meeting.
Steven
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 13:01 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> Is the effort to make it easy to build RPM's directly from git tags
> related to this or is that a separate project?
That's a different project, and even then we will likely need to
construct a source tarball at some point in the proce
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
= Followups =
#topic #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351
#topic #382 Imp
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:01:16PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/11/2010 03:14 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > It's been a while since I last updated folks on dist-git, and in reality
> > it's been a while since I last worked on it. Fedora 13 took up all my
> > time.
> >
> > Since my last upda
> Also currently I cannot guess what happens if just "yum update"
> is executed. If only deluge-common (in this spec file) is to be
> installed, many users may complain "why deluge gtk cannot be found
> anymore?"
>
This coulld be avoid by filling properly Obsoletes field, I test
splitting amule and
On 06/15/2010 01:27 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
>
> Anyway I think filing a bug is needed beforehand.
>
Ok. Here you go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603906
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 06/15/2010 04:51 AM +9:00:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote, at 06/15/2010 04:37 AM +9:00:
>> On 06/09/2010 09:08 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll check up this part and update the spec.
>>>
>>
>> Since Ankur doesn't have commit access to Deluge, I am going to be
>> doing the buil
On 06/15/2010 01:21 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
>
> I think such changes to split deluge package into several
> subpackages like -gtk -web -console is rather a big
> change and it must be done after filing a RFE bug against
> the component,
>
> (Personally as one of deluge users I don't like this
Rahul Sundaram wrote, at 06/15/2010 04:37 AM +9:00:
> On 06/09/2010 09:08 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>>
>> I'll check up this part and update the spec.
>>
>
> Since Ankur doesn't have commit access to Deluge, I am going to be
> doing the build by tom. Here is the latest spec
>
> http://ankursinha.fed
On 06/09/2010 09:08 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> I'll check up this part and update the spec.
>
Since Ankur doesn't have commit access to Deluge, I am going to be
doing the build by tom. Here is the latest spec
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/deluge/deluge.spec
yell, if you find problems,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:17:18PM +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> As part of the libjpeg-turbo F14 feature
>> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo) I would like
>> to drop the libjpeg.a static library. No package in
Hi all,
announcing pxkxc - a simple utility to boot a PXE target with kexec.
pxkxc combines the simplicity of PXE and the power of kexec to allow
booting of any kernel/initrd image from a PXE server without the need
for HW support, boot images, or even rebooting the system. For example,
one can i
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:17:18PM +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As part of the libjpeg-turbo F14 feature
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo) I would like
> to drop the libjpeg.a static library. No package in the Fedora uses it
> so I don't see any reason for its exist
Compose started at Mon Jun 14 08:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9
cpanspec-1.78-5.fc14.noarch requires perl(IO::Uncompress::Bunzip2)
dates-0.4.11-3.fc14.i6
Hello,
As part of the libjpeg-turbo F14 feature
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo) I would like
to drop the libjpeg.a static library. No package in the Fedora uses it
so I don't see any reason for its existence.
I would like to ask you if you know any external project which w
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 09:58:01AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating
> >> wrote:
> >> > The current url is
> >> > pkgs.stg.fedoraproje
Peter Robinson wrote, at 06/14/2010 05:58 PM +9:00:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
The current url is
pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/and that work
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 10:26 +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 06:48:44PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > I would like to allow deltarpm to split both old and new rpms into block
> > and delta each block separately, but it would involve some very creative
> > reworking on h
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> > The current url is
>> > pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/ and that works with git:// and
>> > ssh://.
>>
>> Any chance of making
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 06:48:44PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> I would like to allow deltarpm to split both old and new rpms into block
> and delta each block separately, but it would involve some very creative
> reworking on how deltarpm uses pseudo-files for all of it's work (see
> cfile.[ch]
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 04:35:42PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 05:27:32PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> > We don't generate deltas for packages with a size of >= 100MB
> > which kind of makes it useless for this case but it seems that delta
> > generation is to expensi
Hello,
2010-06-11 18:44 keltezéssel, Doug Warner írta:
> On 06/11/2010 05:32 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
>> 2010-06-10 15:10 keltezéssel, Rahul Sundaram írta:
>>
>>> On 06/10/2010 04:45 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>>>
>>>
Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598961
>>
Christof Damian writes:
> One question though: will it be possible to create a git repository
> local for packages which are going through the review process (or even
> before that for private packages) and then push this to fedora once
> the review is approved?
You can probably just merge your
Jesse Keating writes:
> I hadn't planned on it. Is there really a need for this? Read only via
> http is do-able, but undesirable. Write via https is going to be a long
> shot.
Recent git supports the smart protocol over http/https, both for fetch
and push.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch.
Jesse Keating writes:
> (people with existing clones will have to blow them away and
> re-clone),
Doing git fetch and git reset --hard should be enough.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for somethin
On 06/11/2010 03:14 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> It's been a while since I last updated folks on dist-git, and in reality
> it's been a while since I last worked on it. Fedora 13 took up all my
> time.
>
> Since my last update we've made great progress on fedpkg, the new tool
> that will replace the
On Sunday, June 13, 2010 06:54:37 pm Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > I hope you are all as excited as I am about this!
>
> Count me as not excited.
>
> As I already pointed out several times, I don't see anything obviously
> wrong with our CVS setup, so I don't see what we have to
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> > The current url is
>> > pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/ and that works with git:// and
>> > ssh://.
>>
>> Any chance of making
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 23:57, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>
> Not necessary at all. The current url is
> pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/ and that works with git:// and
> ssh://. One advantage to using fedpkg clone is that if you like the
> current d
29 matches
Mail list logo
