rawhide report: 20100617 changes

2010-06-17 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu Jun 17 08:15:05 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9 cpanspec-1.78-5.fc14.noarch requires perl(IO::Uncompress::Bunzip2)

Re: dist-git project update

2010-06-17 Thread Karel Zak
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:59:15PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:05:38AM +0530, Rakesh Pandit wrote: I second that, unless there are some obvious advantages which I cannot see. In case there are some it would be great if they get mentioned in

Heads up! CouchDB 0.11.0 will soon hit Rawhide near you.

2010-06-17 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All! I don't aware of any incompatibilities, but, anyway, I would like to warn you all. If everything will be OK, and no incompatibilities will be found (or only easy-to-fix ones), then I'll consider upgrading F-13 (and, perhaps, even F-12) too. Note that EL-5 won't be upgraded from

Re: Heads up! CouchDB 0.11.0 will soon hit Rawhide near you.

2010-06-17 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote: I don't aware of any incompatibilities, but, anyway, I would like to warn you all.  If everything will be OK, and no incompatibilities will be found  (or only easy-to-fix ones), then I'll consider upgrading F-13 (and,

Re: debuginfo for sub packages (Help with RPM SPEC files)

2010-06-17 Thread Trever L. Adams
On 06/16/2010 06:10 AM, Roland McGrath wrote: It's normal to get a single foo-debuginfo package from a foo.src.rpm. Please explain exactly why this is a problem for you. Thanks, Roland Thank you all for responding. Valgrind, gcc, abrt, etc. all seem to not get the symbols (debug info)

Re: dist-git project update

2010-06-17 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Kevin Kofler wrote: Count me as not excited. As I already pointed out several times, I don't see anything obviously wrong with our CVS setup, so I don't see what we have to gain from switching to one of the hardest to use SCM systems out there. Linus can tell you everything that is wrong

Re: debuginfo for sub packages (Help with RPM SPEC files)

2010-06-17 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:55:05 +0200, Trever L. Adams wrote: Valgrind, gcc, abrt, etc. all seem to not get the symbols (debug info) for the subpackages in my project with the subpackages. It was picking them up in the main packages. Is this normal? gcc does not load debuginfo. abrt partially

rpm -q --changelog listing items twice

2010-06-17 Thread David Timms
Hi, with the recent libcurl/curl updates for F12 I tried a: rpm -q --changelog of each. While curl's changelog looks normal, the information is shown twice for libcurl. Is this normal for a subpackage ? Bug in rpm ? Bug in the package (while the .spec in cvs looks normal):

libproxy bundles libmodman, upstream splits into two projects. what now?

2010-06-17 Thread Ian Weller
Presently, libproxy bundles libmodman and includes it in the package. Upstream split libmodman into a separate tarball, and then set up libproxy to build off of a system version of libmodman if it exists (otherwise it uses the version that is bundled with it). Review request for the new

Re: rpm -q --changelog listing items twice

2010-06-17 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 06/17/2010 03:51 PM, David Timms wrote: Hi, with the recent libcurl/curl updates for F12 I tried a: rpm -q --changelog of each. While curl's changelog looks normal, the information is shown twice for libcurl. Likely you have 2 libcurls installed, libcurl.i386 and libcurl.x86_64. Ralf --

Re: rpm -q --changelog listing items twice

2010-06-17 Thread Mogens Kjaer
On 06/17/2010 03:51 PM, David Timms wrote: Hi, with the recent libcurl/curl updates for F12 I tried a: rpm -q --changelog of each. While curl's changelog looks normal, the information is shown twice for libcurl. Do you have two libcurl's? (i686 and x86_64)? That's what I have on a x86_64

Re: libproxy bundles libmodman, upstream splits into two projects. what now?

2010-06-17 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2010/6/17 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org: Presently, libproxy bundles libmodman and includes it in the package. Upstream split libmodman into a separate tarball, and then set up libproxy to build off of a system version of libmodman if it exists (otherwise it uses the version that is bundled

LTSP

2010-06-17 Thread Marcos Saraiva
Hi all, Is Warren Togami still maintaining LTSP on Fedora? It's pretty much broken on Fedora 13, and nobody seems to respond to bug reports. Thanks, Marcos Saraiva -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

gethostbyname() and resolv.conf updates

2010-06-17 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Hello, xchat in Fedora needs to be restarted after switching to a different nameserver or it fails to resolve. The xchat developers say that all xchat does is call gethostbyname(). A Debian user told me that Debian carries a glibc patch to make processes notice resolv.conf updates and reload it.

Re: rpm -q --changelog listing items twice

2010-06-17 Thread David Timms
On 17/06/10 23:59, Mogens Kjaer wrote: On 06/17/2010 03:51 PM, David Timms wrote: Hi, with the recent libcurl/curl updates for F12 I tried a: rpm -q --changelog of each. While curl's changelog looks normal, the information is shown twice for libcurl. Do you have two libcurl's? (i686 and

Re: gethostbyname() and resolv.conf updates

2010-06-17 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
BI == Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org writes: BI A Debian user told me that Debian carries a glibc patch to make BI processes notice resolv.conf updates and reload it. Is there any BI chance we could apply the same patch in Fedora too? I don't know all BI the details, but I guess there

Re: gethostbyname() and resolv.conf updates

2010-06-17 Thread Roland McGrath
nscd and sssd exist in part exactly to address this issue. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: gethostbyname() and resolv.conf updates

2010-06-17 Thread Michal Schmidt
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:41:27 -0400 Bernie Innocenti wrote: xchat in Fedora needs to be restarted after switching to a different nameserver or it fails to resolve. The xchat developers say that all xchat does is call gethostbyname(). A Debian user told me that Debian carries a glibc patch to

Re: gethostbyname() and resolv.conf updates

2010-06-17 Thread Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernie Innocenti wrote: Hello, xchat in Fedora needs to be restarted after switching to a different nameserver or it fails to resolve. The xchat developers say that all xchat does is call gethostbyname(). A Debian user told me that Debian

Re: Heads up! CouchDB 0.11.0 will soon hit Rawhide near you.

2010-06-17 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello! 2010/6/17 Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us: I tried updating my F-12 system to 0.11.x and had problems with Futon when used in conjunction with DesktopCouch.  I never really found a resolution and switched back to 0.10.x. So sad, but I just confirmed this - there are obsolete required

Broken dependencies: cpanspec

2010-06-17 Thread buildsys
cpanspec has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: cpanspec-1.78-5.fc14.noarch requires perl(IO::Uncompress::Bunzip2) On i386: cpanspec-1.78-5.fc14.noarch requires perl(IO::Uncompress::Bunzip2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 598160] genkey segfaults

2010-06-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598160 --- Comment #11 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2010-06-17 03:41:24 EDT --- Yet shorter reproducer: #!/usr/bin/perl -w use

perl 5.12.1 - status

2010-06-17 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Hello again, in test buildroot we have now perl 5.12.1. Only 7 bugs remained in perl modules [1] and other dependent packages have problems not related to perl. I suppose in this or next week we should decide what about the unfixable modules and finally push into rawhide. Thanks all for fixing

Re: perl 5.12.1 - status

2010-06-17 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:55:58AM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: Hello again, in test buildroot we have now perl 5.12.1. Only 7 bugs remained in perl modules [1] and other dependent packages have problems not related to perl. I suppose in this or next week we should decide what about the

rpms/perl-DBI-Dumper/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, 1.2, NONE perl-DBI-Dumper.spec, 1.10, NONE

2010-06-17 Thread Petr Sabata
Author: psabata Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DBI-Dumper/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31167 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: Makefile perl-DBI-Dumper.spec Log Message: Package removal --- NEW FILE dead.package --- Old and unsupported

rpms/perl-SVN-Mirror/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, 1.2, NONE SVN-Mirror-filter-requires.sh, 1.1, NONE perl-SVN-Mirror.spec, 1.13, NONE

2010-06-17 Thread Petr Sabata
Author: psabata Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-SVN-Mirror/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv32100 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: Makefile SVN-Mirror-filter-requires.sh perl-SVN-Mirror.spec Log Message: Package removal. --- NEW FILE

rpms/perl-Regexp-Copy/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, 1.2, NONE perl-Regexp-Copy.spec, 1.6, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE

2010-06-17 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Regexp-Copy/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3538 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: Makefile perl-Regexp-Copy.spec sources Log Message: retiring - doesn't work on perl-5.12 --- NEW FILE

[pkgdb] perl-Regexp-Copy (un)retirement

2010-06-17 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Regexp-Copy in Fedora devel has been retired by iarnell To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Regexp-Copy -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[Bug 598160] genkey segfaults

2010-06-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598160 Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added