Björn Persson wrote:
> There exist a certain kind of power strips where you plug the computer into a
> special controlling outlet, and all the peripherals into the other outlets.
> When the current drawn through the controlling outlet drops below an
> adjustable threshold, it cuts off power to the
Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Simo Sorce said:
> > Ideally your UPS is smart enough to sense when the load drops to 0,
> > and do whatever it needs to do w/o system intervention of any sort. If
> > your UPS can't do that, maybe it is time to look for alternatives :)
>
> That's nice if yo
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 12:14 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> > The requirement for proventester feedback for critpath updates, when we
> > turn it on, should also catch problems like this in the critpath. Evo
> > isn't critpath, though, I believe.
>
> evolution-data-server is in the critpath, and havi
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 11:59 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/26/2010 11:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > Clearly the maintainer did not allow sufficient time for testing here;
> > there's a grand 4 hour window between the update being 'pushed to
> > testing' and 'submitted to stable'. That
On 06/26/2010 05:10 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> That would only work if the script that does the push to stable (as
> opposed to processing the request to push to stable) checks if any
> negative karma has appeared since the request has happened.
Well, if there is a update push to stable request t
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 22:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> I talked to notting &c about this earlier, and we've hit this situation
>> before. The 'scenario' is simply that there's really no screening
>> between 'submit' and 'push' for stable
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:20:19AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Somebody with full knowledge of the process please update the instructions
> in the Wiki:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
>
> The process described there is incomplete. And there ar
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 22:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I talked to notting &c about this earlier, and we've hit this situation
> before. The 'scenario' is simply that there's really no screening
> between 'submit' and 'push' for stable updates, and this one was
> submitted to stable before any
Compose started at Sat Jun 26 08:15:05 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9
dates-0.4.11-3.fc14.i686 requires li
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 6/25/10 10:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Until AutoQA is in place to tackle this, the obvious option is for there
>> to be a process improvement whereby whoever's doing stable update p
Hi,
is there someone interested in lzip? It is a lmza compression tool, that
was for a short time used by upstream of one other package of mine.
Upstream of lzip is very responsive, but since I do not use it at all, I
have a lack of interest in maintaining it.
So if you would like to take it, I'l
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:20:19AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Somebody with full knowledge of the process please update the instructions
> in the Wiki:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
>
> The process described there is incomplete. And there ar
The page "Package Change Requests for existing packages" is unclear:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages
Please expand on what "explanatory text" you want in addition to the
"Package Change Request" template. If there is
Somebody with full knowledge of the process please update the instructions
in the Wiki:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
The process described there is incomplete. And there are inconsistencies
in the terminology. In pkgdb, a package is called "deprecate
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 01:42:43PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >
> > The fact that you have to use those sed lines shows that there's something
> > wrong somewhere as we normally don't need them to produce rpath-free
> > binaries if we'r
15 matches
Mail list logo
