Re: Evolution update in F13

2010-07-01 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 03:46:29AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > It's only in updates-testing yet. > > Now this is complete nonsense. The update is required to fix broken > dependencies so it should go to stable IMMEDIATELY. people make mistakes. it happens, no big deal. p

rpms/perl-Net-CIDR-Lite/EL-6 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 perl-Net-CIDR-Lite.spec, 1.9, 1.10 sources, 1.3, 1.4

2010-07-01 Thread Paul Howarth
Author: pghmcfc Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-CIDR-Lite/EL-6 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31350 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Net-CIDR-Lite.spec sources Log Message: * Fri Jun 2 2010 Paul Howarth - 0.21-1 - Update to 0.21 - Fix spanner clean() docs (CP

File Net-CIDR-Lite-0.21.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2010-07-01 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-CIDR-Lite: 12280b3754886b876918f03f53aee4f5 Net-CIDR-Lite-0.21.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m

Re: who is Petr Pisar from redhat ?

2010-07-01 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 21:09 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: > > I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR > FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me. > > Petr Pisar seems to mess with my packages. > > It's simply disgusting !! You haven't provi

Re: concept of package "ownership"

2010-07-01 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 23:28 -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > I don't think it really matters what we call it, I just think that > package maintainers are starting to get a sense of entitlement and I > feel that's counter productive to the open environment we're used to > and are trying to help continue

Re: concept of package "ownership"

2010-07-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:44:29 -0400 Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah. There needs to be somebody in the Fedora community with a > long-term commitment to each package. Perhaps the term "owner" is > politically incorrect but nonetheless there is always going to be > somebody who knows more about that packa

Re: concept of package "ownership"

2010-07-01 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 07/02/2010 06:34 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:17:38 -0700 > Jesse Keating wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 7/1/10 6:18 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> I think we need to get rid of the concept of ownership entirely, >>> that'd also make orphan

Re: concept of package "ownership"

2010-07-01 Thread Tom Lane
Kevin Fenzi writes: > Jesse Keating wrote: >> While I agree that package "ownership" should not feel possessive, I >> do strongly feel that there still should be some single person (or >> team I suppose...) who is ultimately responsible for the package. A >> place for bug reports, for autoqa act

Re: concept of package "ownership"

2010-07-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:17:38 -0700 Jesse Keating wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 7/1/10 6:18 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > I think we need to get rid of the concept of ownership entirely, > > that'd also make orphaned or de-facto orphaned packages less of a > > prob

Re: concept of package "ownership"

2010-07-01 Thread Adam Miller
I don't think it really matters what we call it, I just think that package maintainers are starting to get a sense of entitlement and I feel that's counter productive to the open environment we're used to and are trying to help continue to grow. The package "owner" gets emails about cvs commits, s

Re: concept of package "ownership"

2010-07-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 08:16:35 +1000 Dave Airlie wrote: > So I've noticed maintainers of packages in Fedora seem to have a > concept of ownership, and I'm wondering if we could remove that word > from usage about maintainership. ...snip... I agree. I think 'stewards' or 'guardian' or something mi

Re: concept of package "ownership"

2010-07-01 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/1/10 6:18 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I think we need to get rid of the concept of ownership entirely, that'd also > make orphaned or de-facto orphaned packages less of a problem. You see a > problem, you fix it. Who cares whether the package has

Re: Evolution update in F13

2010-07-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 03:46:29 +0200 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > It's only in updates-testing yet. > > Now this is complete nonsense. The update is required to fix broken > dependencies so it should go to stable IMMEDIATELY. It's in stable now. The time in testing allowed us to

Re: rebuild of wxGTK without the internal crash handler in Rawhide

2010-07-01 Thread Kevin Kofler
Dan Horák wrote: > I will rebuild wxGTK without the internal crash handler for the the > devel/F14 branch so we can use ABRT to report crashes from wxGTK-based > apps. This will mean a rebuild of wxGTK with --disable-catch_segvs and > this change affects all applications linked with wxGTK, because

Re: Evolution update in F13

2010-07-01 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > It's only in updates-testing yet. Now this is complete nonsense. The update is required to fix broken dependencies so it should go to stable IMMEDIATELY. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin

Re: Evolution update in F13

2010-07-01 Thread Kevin Kofler
Ralf Corsepius wrote: > To me this is a clear case of package-push which should not have > happened and is not related to karma votes at all. +1. The proper solution to prevent this kind of issues 100% reliably is to implement AutoQA, the only decent part of the Update Proposal and the one which

Re: concept of package "ownership"

2010-07-01 Thread Kevin Kofler
Dave Airlie wrote: > So I've noticed maintainers of packages in Fedora seem to have a concept > of ownership, and I'm wondering if we could remove that word from usage > about maintainership. +1 IMHO any sponsored packager should be free to do changes which benefit the Fedora Project to any pack

Re: concept of package "ownership"

2010-07-01 Thread Roland McGrath
I agree. The relevant concept is not "owner", but "sucker", or "victim". When businessspeak people say someone "owns" a piece of work, what they mean is to identify the person as the recipient of problems, complaints, pleas for help, and perhaps even, rarely, praise, regarding the state of the wor

Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release

2010-07-01 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 11:48 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 05:23:06PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 07:00 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > So in your mind, there is a majority of people on your side, but they > > > > are just too l

concept of package "ownership"

2010-07-01 Thread Dave Airlie
So I've noticed maintainers of packages in Fedora seem to have a concept of ownership, and I'm wondering if we could remove that word from usage about maintainership. I'm come from working as a maintainer in the kernel, and its long been said that kernel maintainers don't *own* the code, they are

Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release

2010-07-01 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/1/10 2:55 PM, Till Maas wrote: > But I guess somehow it boils down to > "the majority wants that other people to work for them", which might > even be true. But in a FOSS community I doubt it is very healthy to > follow this too much. > I bet if

Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release

2010-07-01 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 02:13:59PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On 7/1/10 2:48 AM, Till Maas wrote: > > How do you know who is a minority and who is not? I still wonder why > > there are so many claims that the majority of Fedora maintainers or > > users want to manually test all updates, but stil

Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release

2010-07-01 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/1/10 2:48 AM, Till Maas wrote: > How do you know who is a minority and who is not? I still wonder why > there are so many claims that the majority of Fedora maintainers or > users want to manually test all updates, but still the majority is not >

Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release

2010-07-01 Thread Luke Macken
On 07/01/2010 03:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:38:03 -0400 > Tom Lane wrote: > >> I see that libtiff.fc13 and libpng.fc13 are now showing "critical path >> approved", for which I thank those who did the work. > > Thanks. ;) > >> I remain a bit >> unclear about a couple of th

Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release

2010-07-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:38:03 -0400 Tom Lane wrote: > I see that libtiff.fc13 and libpng.fc13 are now showing "critical path > approved", for which I thank those who did the work. Thanks. ;) > I remain a bit > unclear about a couple of things: > > 1. Bodhi is showing both packages as request

Re: CVS admin requests

2010-07-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:21:06 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote: > The page "Package Change Requests for existing packages" is unclear: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages > > Please expand on what "explanatory text" you

Re: who is Petr Pisar from redhat ?

2010-07-01 Thread seth vidal
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 21:09 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: > Hello there, > > I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR > FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me. > > Petr Pisar seems to mess with my packages. > > It's simply disgusting !! 1.

who is Petr Pisar from redhat ?

2010-07-01 Thread Chitlesh GOORAH
Hello there, I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me. Petr Pisar seems to mess with my packages. It's simply disgusting !! Chitlesh ! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admi

Re: How to lure me to updates-testing

2010-07-01 Thread seth vidal
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 18:47 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 1 July 2010 16:07, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> This would make more sense if PK was a fedora-tool - but PK is targeted > >> to be cross-distro - and integrating bodhi-reporting would not be > >> cross-distro. > >> > >> So, if you want t

Re: How to lure me to updates-testing

2010-07-01 Thread Richard Hughes
On 1 July 2010 16:07, Adam Williamson wrote: >> This would make more sense if PK was a fedora-tool - but PK is targeted >> to be cross-distro - and integrating bodhi-reporting would not be >> cross-distro. >> >> So, if you want to make this work we'll need someway to plugin AROUND >> PK. I disagr

[Bug 582163] Review Request: perl-Test-Smoke - Perl core test smoke suite

2010-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582163 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-07-01 13:33:39 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: h

Orphaned packages (was Re:)

2010-07-01 Thread Siddhesh Poyarekar
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 01:07:02PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > libart_l...@fedoraproject.org, liboil-ow...@fedoraproject.org, > librs...@fedoraproject.org > Bcc: > Subject: A few orphaned desktop/graphics packages > Reply-To: > > The following packages related to graphics and the desktop hav

[no subject]

2010-07-01 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
libart_l...@fedoraproject.org, liboil-ow...@fedoraproject.org, librs...@fedoraproject.org Bcc: Subject: A few orphaned desktop/graphics packages Reply-To: The following packages related to graphics and the desktop have been orphaned by Behdad:: 'eog', 'gthumb', 'libart_lgpl', 'liboil', 'librsvg

Re: Seeking new maintainer for iasl

2010-07-01 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 07/01/2010 11:17 AM, seth vidal wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 17:14 +0100, M A Young wrote: > >> On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> >>> repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires iasl returns >>> nothing. It looks like we may not need it for anything els

Re: Seeking new maintainer for iasl

2010-07-01 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 07/01/2010 09:58 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 08:54:01AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > >> repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires iasl >> returns nothing. It looks like we may not need it for anything else, >> though it may have value to develo

Re: Seeking new maintainer for iasl

2010-07-01 Thread seth vidal
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 17:14 +0100, M A Young wrote: > On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires iasl > > returns > > nothing. It looks like we may not need it for anything else, though it may > > have value to developers for oth

Re: Seeking new maintainer for iasl

2010-07-01 Thread M A Young
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Jon Ciesla wrote: > repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires iasl returns > nothing. It looks like we may not need it for anything else, though it may > have value to developers for other things. For me it finds 3 packages, iasl-0:20090123-3.fc12.src

Re: Seeking new maintainer for iasl

2010-07-01 Thread Don Dutile
Jon Ciesla wrote: > On 07/01/2010 06:36 AM, Till Maas wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:52:29AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:49:27PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: >>> Hi, a long time ago I packaged iasl, because it is a BR for VirtualBox.

Re: libjpeg-turbo conflicts in rawhide

2010-07-01 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 02:26:57PM +0200, Adam Tkac wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:31:45PM -0400, Rich Mattes wrote: > > Hi all, > > Hello, > > > I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in > > Rawhide [1]. I get a message in root.log that libjpeg-turbo-devel

rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding/F-12 perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding.spec, 1.1, 1.2

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding/F-12 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5389/F-12 Modified Files: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding.spec Log Message: * Thu Jul 01 2010 Iain Arnell 1.0-1.2 - disable Module::AutoInstal

rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding/F-13 perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding.spec, 1.1, 1.2

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding/F-13 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5389/F-13 Modified Files: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding.spec Log Message: * Thu Jul 01 2010 Iain Arnell 1.0-1.2 - disable Module::AutoInstal

Re: Feature, Fedora 14: Go Programming

2010-07-01 Thread Brandon Lozza
http://www.pwnage.ca/dist/SRPMS http://www.pwnage.ca/dist/RPMS Working F13 packages are available if anyone wants to try or make comments on them. (Might not meet package guidelines yet) On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote: > I got it setup for the feature wrangler too > > > O

rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding/F-13 perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding/F-13 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3554/F-13 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW F

rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding/devel perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3554/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW

Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release

2010-07-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 01:26 -0400, Luke Macken wrote: > On 07/01/2010 12:47 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Jesse Keating wrote: > >> There is a slight wrinkle in that right now, the bodhi code will > >> automatically request a push of an item that reaches this karma threshold, > >> and I don't believe

rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding/F-12 perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding/F-12 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3554/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW F

File Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding-1.0.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding: ab6a5f204352c8fa56671aa12f33fee9 Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding-1.0.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject

Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release

2010-07-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 18:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > 2. libtiff.fc12 and libpng.fc12 are still lonely with zero karma. Is the > restrictive policy in force for F-12 too? As far as I'm aware, no. We're starting at F-13. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adam

Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release

2010-07-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 06:29 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > ...or convince enough others of your position that they will vote for > > the candidates you favour in our leadership elections. Since there've > > been several of these since you first stated you don't approve of >

rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude/devel perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude.spec, 1.1, 1.2

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3027/devel Modified Files: perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude.spec Log Message: * Thu Jul 01 2010 Iain Arnell 0.09-3 - Require perl(Catalyst

rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude/F-13 perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude.spec, 1.1, 1.2

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude/F-13 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3027/F-13 Modified Files: perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude.spec Log Message: * Thu Jul 01 2010 Iain Arnell 0.09-3 - Require perl(Catalyst)

rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude/F-12 perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude.spec, 1.1, 1.2

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude/F-12 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3027/F-12 Modified Files: perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude.spec Log Message: * Thu Jul 01 2010 Iain Arnell 0.09-3 - Require perl(Catalyst)

Re: How to lure me to updates-testing

2010-07-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 10:52 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 07:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 16:44 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > > Nathanael Noblet wrote: > > > > I presume a fedora account with certs are required for this? > > > > > > Yes, but

[Bug 582163] Review Request: perl-Test-Smoke - Perl core test smoke suite

2010-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582163 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added -

Re: Seeking new maintainer for iasl

2010-07-01 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 08:54:01AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires iasl > returns nothing. It looks like we may not need it for anything else, > though it may have value to developers for other things. Under some circumstances it can e

rpms/perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole/F-12 perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole/F-12 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv325/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE p

rpms/perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole/F-13 perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole/F-13 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv325/F-13 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE p

rpms/perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole/devel perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv325/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE

Re: How to lure me to updates-testing

2010-07-01 Thread seth vidal
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 07:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 16:44 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > Nathanael Noblet wrote: > > > I presume a fedora account with certs are required for this? > > > > Yes, but for your karma to have any merit, you need a Fedora account. >

File Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole-0.14.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole: 7fc32dfeba824185a33ba55b93d8d2f9 Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole-0.14.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: How to lure me to updates-testing

2010-07-01 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Adam Williamson wrote: > Although I think perhaps it would be best to integrate the functions > into PackageKit (perhaps as an optional extension package) than to write > an entirely new tool. That is my intention. I'd quote myself from months back saying this, but then it would reveal my procras

Re: How to lure me to updates-testing

2010-07-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 16:44 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Nathanael Noblet wrote: > > I presume a fedora account with certs are required for this? > > Yes, but for your karma to have any merit, you need a Fedora account. > Non-Fedora account karma does not count. > > I agree a GUI would be

rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude/F-13 perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude/F-13 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31783/F-13 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude.spec Log Message: initial import ---

rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude/devel perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31783/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude.spec Log Message: initial import --

rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude/F-12 perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude/F-12 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31783/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude.spec Log Message: initial import ---

File Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude-0.09.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2010-07-01 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude: 160806960b548fcb02e5ee3209ce48dc Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude-0.09.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedorapr

Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release

2010-07-01 Thread James Antill
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 12:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:31:06AM -0400, James Antill wrote: > > I thought the idea was that critpath packages would be in a critpath > > group in comps? > > I just looked and there are two such groups: > critical-path-base > critical-path-gn

Re: libjpeg-turbo conflicts in rawhide

2010-07-01 Thread Adam Tkac
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 09:55:08PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote: > 2010/7/1 Adam Tkac : > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:31:45PM -0400, Rich Mattes wrote: > >> Hi all, > > > > Hello, > > > >> I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in > >> Rawhide [1].  I get a message in root.

Re: Seeking new maintainer for iasl

2010-07-01 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 08:54:01AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires iasl > returns nothing. It looks like we may not need it for anything else, > though it may have value to developers for other things. Ah, this is a nice query. It is s

[Bug 610055] Broken dependencies: missing perl(GPS::PRN)

2010-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610055 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Re: libjpeg-turbo conflicts in rawhide

2010-07-01 Thread Chen Lei
2010/7/1 Adam Tkac : > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:31:45PM -0400, Rich Mattes wrote: >> Hi all, > > Hello, > >> I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in >> Rawhide [1].  I get a message in root.log that libjpeg-turbo-devel >> obsoletes libjpeg-devel, so yum pulls in l

Re: Seeking new maintainer for iasl

2010-07-01 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 07/01/2010 06:36 AM, Till Maas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:52:29AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:49:27PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> a long time ago I packaged iasl, because it is a BR for VirtualBox. I >>> even received once a

rpms/perl-Net-GPSD/devel .cvsignore, 1.7, 1.8 perl-Net-GPSD.spec, 1.13, 1.14 sources, 1.7, 1.8

2010-07-01 Thread Tom Callaway
Author: spot Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-GPSD/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22967 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Net-GPSD.spec sources Log Message: update to 0.39 Index: .cvsignore ===

File Net-GPSD-0.39.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by spot

2010-07-01 Thread Tom Callaway
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-GPSD: 994a6251b15eea7cf748fe8350a1f94f Net-GPSD-0.39.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

[Bug 610055] New: Broken dependencies: missing perl(GPS::PRN)

2010-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Broken dependencies: missing perl(GPS::PRN) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610055 Summary: Broken dependencies: missing perl(GPS::PRN) P

[Bug 608669] perl-Pod-Strip - Request for EL-6 branch

2010-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608669 Mark Chappell changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 609807] perl-YAML-LibYAML - request for EL-6 branch

2010-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609807 Mark Chappell changed: What|Removed |Added -

Re: my EPEL-6 packages up for takers

2010-07-01 Thread Deji Akingunola
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote: > g2clib > grads I'll take these 2. Cheers, Deji -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release

2010-07-01 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler said: > No. It means there haven't been enough such candidates. People did vote for > me. But alone against 8 people who didn't agree with me, I wasn't able to > achieve anything. > > If you give people ballots with only Evil Dictator on them, of course Evil > Di

[Bug 609807] perl-YAML-LibYAML - request for EL-6 branch

2010-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609807 --- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová 2010-07-01 08:44:19 EDT --- Feel free to take this package in EPEL. -- Configure bugmai

rebuild of wxGTK without the internal crash handler in Rawhide

2010-07-01 Thread Dan Horák
Hello, I will rebuild wxGTK without the internal crash handler for the the devel/F14 branch so we can use ABRT to report crashes from wxGTK-based apps. This will mean a rebuild of wxGTK with --disable-catch_segvs and this change affects all applications linked with wxGTK, because one symbol is rem

Re: libjpeg-turbo conflicts in rawhide

2010-07-01 Thread Adam Tkac
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:31:45PM -0400, Rich Mattes wrote: > Hi all, Hello, > I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in > Rawhide [1]. I get a message in root.log that libjpeg-turbo-devel > obsoletes libjpeg-devel, so yum pulls in libjpeg-turbo-devel instead.

rawhide report: 20100701 changes

2010-07-01 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu Jul 1 08:15:21 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- BackupPC-3.1.0-14.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl 1:NetworkManager-gnome-0.8.1-0.4.fc14.i686 requires libgnome-bluetooth.so.7 1:anjuta-2.30.0.

Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule

2010-07-01 Thread buildsys
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) Please resolve this as soon as

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

2010-07-01 Thread buildsys
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extra

Broken dependencies: perl-Net-GPSD

2010-07-01 Thread buildsys
perl-Net-GPSD has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Net-GPSD-0.37-4.fc14.noarch requires perl(GPS::PRN) On i386: perl-Net-GPSD-0.37-4.fc14.noarch requires perl(GPS::PRN) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedorapr

Broken dependencies: perl-DBI-Dumper

2010-07-01 Thread buildsys
perl-DBI-Dumper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) On i386: perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extra

Re: Seeking new maintainer for iasl

2010-07-01 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:52:29AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:49:27PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > Hi, > > > > a long time ago I packaged iasl, because it is a BR for VirtualBox. I > > even received once a bug report for it, because someone used it for > > somethi

Re: my EPEL-6 packages up for takers

2010-07-01 Thread Marc Bradshaw
Hi Patrice, One of my packages has a dependency on docbook2X, so I will take that one. Thanks, On 2 May 2010 00:51, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Hello, > > I won't, at least for now, maintain the packages I maintain in EPEL-5 in > EPEL-6. I have added a nobranch file in all of them. If you want to t

Re: Seeking new maintainer for iasl

2010-07-01 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:49:27PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > a long time ago I packaged iasl, because it is a BR for VirtualBox. I > even received once a bug report for it, because someone used it for > something else which did not work. Since I do not know what to do with > it and I am no

Seeking new maintainer for iasl

2010-07-01 Thread Till Maas
Hi, a long time ago I packaged iasl, because it is a BR for VirtualBox. I even received once a bug report for it, because someone used it for something else which did not work. Since I do not know what to do with it and I am not involved in packaging VirtualBox anymore, the package might be better

Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release

2010-07-01 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:31:06AM -0400, James Antill wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 00:20 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:50:53PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > You can already view all pending critpath updates in Bodhi's web > > > interface and command line client, as

Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release

2010-07-01 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 05:23:06PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 07:00 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Dave Airlie wrote: > > > So in your mind, there is a majority of people on your side, but they > > > are just too lazy to stand for election and take over the board? > > > > s/

[Bug 608024] perl-Carp-Assert-More - request for EL-6 branch

2010-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608024 Mark Chappell changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 609807] New: perl-YAML-LibYAML - request for EL-6 branch

2010-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-YAML-LibYAML - request for EL-6 branch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609807 Summary: perl-YAML-LibYAML - request for EL-6 branch P

rpms/perl-Test-YAML-Valid/devel perl-Test-YAML-Valid.spec,1.9,1.10

2010-07-01 Thread Mark Chappell
Author: tremble Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-YAML-Valid/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10434 Modified Files: perl-Test-YAML-Valid.spec Log Message: Add missing Build requires YAML::XS YAML::Tiny so all tests now run Index: perl-Test-YAML-Valid.spec =

Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release

2010-07-01 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 07:00 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Dave Airlie wrote: > > So in your mind, there is a majority of people on your side, but they > > are just too lazy to stand for election and take over the board? > > s/too lazy/too busy doing actual work/ > (as opposed to wasting their time

Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release

2010-07-01 Thread Luke Macken
On 07/01/2010 12:47 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: >> There is a slight wrinkle in that right now, the bodhi code will >> automatically request a push of an item that reaches this karma threshold, >> and I don't believe there is a way yet to force it to wait for even >> greater amou