On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 10:13 +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
> Hi FESCo,
>
> Can we orphan his packages now? I'd like to take scons, I don't think
> waiting more time will be helpful.
Hi,
I am still alive.
I had always hoped to find the time to resume work on the packages,
however it turned out that circu
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
= Followups =
#topic #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351
#topic #382 Imp
2010/6/18 Chen Lei :
> Hi all,
>
> Following the process
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> Is someone able to get in touch with Gérard Milmeister.(gemi)
>
> I can't find any activity of him from koji and bugzilla in the past
> eight months, I also g
Once upon a time, Stepan Kasal said:
> I have orphaned perl-TermReadKey, for Fedora 11-devel, EPEL 4,5.
>
> Anyone interested, please take it.
I use this on both Fedora and RHEL, so I'll take it.
It looks like psabata has taken it in current Fedora, so I guess I'll
just grab it for EPEL.
--
C
Subject says it all.
Cheers,
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
This seems to be happening a lot lately regarding maintainers and/or
co-maintainers losing interest in their projects somewhere along the
line and just stopping development without any warning and
notification to other members who may be interested.
I am wondering, is the process efficient enough
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm initiating a fast track procedure for libsndfile -- a security bug
> has been reported for over a year, and there has been no response from
> maintainer
We made many attempts to reach him last year. See:
https://www.re
Hi all,
I'm initiating a fast track procedure for libsndfile -- a security bug
has been reported for over a year, and there has been no response from
maintainer:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488364
Here is the fesco ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/412
Regards,
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607982
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607982
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-05
18:05:13 EDT ---
perl-Number-Compare-0.01-15.fc12 has been pushed to the Fe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607982
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607982
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-05
18:04:13 EDT ---
perl-Number-Compare-0.01-15.fc13 has been pushed to the Fe
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 13:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> In practice, packages still have maintainers who are recognized for
> practical reasons and generally you would check with the listed
> maintainer of a package before making a change to it. (But, hey, if they
> don't reply in a day or two
libproxy is done too
2010/7/5 Simon Wesp :
> Am Freitag, den 02.07.2010, 10:36 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
>> surf
> done, thank you for this info!
>
> --
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen aus dem schönen Hainzell
> Simon Wesp
>
> http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/SimonWesp
>
> --
> devel mailing list
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 03:18 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I think we need to get rid of the concept of ownership entirely, that'd also
> make orphaned or de-facto orphaned packages less of a problem. You see a
> problem, you fix it. Who cares whether the package has an active maintainer
> or not
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 18:18 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> What would do if "John Doe" would apply for proven packager and write
> access to 1500 packages?
>
> Seriously, you'd likely tell him he's nuts.
Suggesting what you think would 'likely' happen seems a weak argument.
Can you cite an *act
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 21:58 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:55 +0200, Léon Keijser wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> > >
> > > > IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
>
Am Freitag, den 02.07.2010, 10:36 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
> surf
done, thank you for this info!
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen aus dem schönen Hainzell
Simon Wesp
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/SimonWesp
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
because I saw, that the current maintainer of gnustep-make
hast orphaned this package, I would like to take over this
package.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG
I have not been keeping up with my package ownership responsibilities
and Kalev Lember contacted me about libp11. He has graciously offered
to step up and take over maintainership of libp11, but engine_pkcs11
is still looking for a maintainer if anyone is interested.
Thanks to Kalev, and the rest
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Class-Accessor/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10355
Modified Files:
perl-Class-Accessor.spec sources
Log Message:
sync with RHEL
Index: perl-Class-Accessor.spec
=
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Class-Accessor/EL-5
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7710
Modified Files:
perl-Class-Accessor.spec sources
Log Message:
0.34
Index: perl-Class-Accessor.spec
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 06:06:53PM +0200, Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 18:00 +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
>
> > I faced similar problems while doing performing several updates to a
> > couple of packages, starting Friday evening and during the night to
> > Saturday (EET)
>
>
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 18:00 +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> I faced similar problems while doing performing several updates to a
> couple of packages, starting Friday evening and during the night to
> Saturday (EET)
Thanks for the info. I have to say that under the current conditions,
the common
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
>
> I'm currently trying to perform the initial CVS import of a package that has
> quite a bunch of patches with ./common/cvs-import.sh.
>
> All my attempts (for more than one hour!) were unsuccessful because at least
> one of the connection
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 07:13:00PM +0800, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
> Sorry for my late joining.
>
> A Zope specific mailing list may not be in urgent need by now. We can
> just use this mailing list, which is for Python packaging in general.
> The traffic of this mailing list is low and some of
On 07/05/2010 05:54 PM, Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
I'm currently trying to perform the initial CVS import of a package
that has quite a bunch of patches with ./common/cvs-import.sh.
All my attempts (for more than one hour!) were unsuccessful because at
least one of the connection to cvs.fedorap
I'm currently trying to perform the initial CVS import of a package that
has quite a bunch of patches with ./common/cvs-import.sh.
All my attempts (for more than one hour!) were unsuccessful because at
least one of the connection to cvs.fedoraproject.org from the script
results in a connection ti
On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 03:34 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > We need groups, with "grouped privileges/acls" etc. It's essentially
> > what e.g. the "perl-sig" originally was meant to be.
>
> Yes, group ACLs are definitely needed, but in addition to that technical
> feature,
Compose started at Mon Jul 5 08:15:11 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
1:anerley-0.2.14-1.fc14.i686 requires libmx-1.0.so.0
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires l
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extra
perl-DBI-Dumper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
On i386:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extra
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 10:36 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> gimp-help-browser
rebuilt gimp
--
Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
n...@redhat.com nor Safety." -- Benjamin Fran
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 12:30:19PM +0100, Mark Chappell wrote:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> It takes three weeks which can be frustrating, the initial "can we
> push this update to testing" might count as the initial ticket
> creation, dropping i
On 5 July 2010 12:33, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> If we include the absence of reaction in this review:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585817
> (last comment on Mai 08th) then we are over these 3 weeks.
Yeah, just depends if pinging on those tickets is sufficient. In which case
"After a
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 12:30:19PM +0100, Mark Chappell wrote:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> It takes three weeks which can be frustrating, the initial "can we
> push this update to testing" might count as the initial ticket
> creation, dropping i
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 12:30 +0100, Mark Chappell wrote:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> It takes three weeks which can be frustrating, the initial "can we
> push this update to testing" might count as the initial ticket
> creation, dropping it down
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
It takes three weeks which can be frustrating, the initial "can we
push this update to testing" might count as the initial ticket
creation, dropping it down to 2 weeks from here...
Mark
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
Top two FAS account holders who have completed reviewing "Package
review" components on bugzilla for last week ending 4th July were Mark
Chappell and Emmanuel Seyman.
Mark Chappell : 5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607875
perl-Net-IMAP-Simple-SSL
https://bugzil
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 11:16 +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If someone could have a look at this review I would be pleased. I need
> it to update R-BSgenome which is needed for R-hgu95av2probe.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609079
>
No taker ?
Pierre
__
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 09:22 +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Does someone know how to contact Cheese ?
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/cheese
>
> I have tried to join him by the bugzilla:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585817
>
>
> He has two packa
Thomas Spura wrote:
> I don't see a benefit of that... When a build fails, it kills all
> other current builds of other architectures, so you need to check that
> architecture, that fails first and the diff would not contain the error.
Even just comparing successful builds can be useful, e.g. to m
43 matches
Mail list logo
