Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:30:41AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: I have uploaded preliminary versions of the unit files I put together for the various services of our default install. I think they give an indication how simple these files actually are:

Re: krb5-auth-dialog 0.16 for F-13

2010-07-15 Thread Bojan Smojver
Bojan Smojver bojan at rexursive.com writes: Could someone with enough karma rebuild krb5-auth-dialog 0.16 for F-13 (this is in relation to bug #597669). The 0.15 is leaking memory like there is no tomorrow and I'm not getting much traction from the assignee of the bug... Thank you!

Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.

2010-07-15 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:47:40PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: There are sometimes such obvious errors and missing labels that I cannot imagine not catching an audit message when program fails to even start! A lot of my Fedora machines are virtualized and I only ever interact with them by ssh.

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Tim Waugh
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 21:41 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Re: cups, if the entire point is to reserve the sockets early with systemd, why would portrelease still be required? Also, re: this comment: # This is evil stuff. CUPS should use proper enumeration instead of # retriggering these

Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.

2010-07-15 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:29:34PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 07/15/2010 02:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:47:40PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: There are sometimes such obvious errors and missing labels that I cannot imagine not catching an audit message

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Tim Waugh
Another question about the cups config: [Install] # This is activated via any of these three triggers: # 1. Somebody connects to its sockets # 2. A file is in the spool directory # 3. A printer is plugged in # This follows the same scheme MacOS uses to spawn CUPS only when necessary

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:54:13PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: Generally I think it is a good idea to ignore errors like this if they are clearly caught by later commands, simply for robustness reasons. i.e. if the command really fails to label the dir properly, then the daemon won't be

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 07/15/2010 07:47 AM, Till Maas wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:54:13PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: Generally I think it is a good idea to ignore errors like this if they are clearly caught by later commands, simply for robustness reasons. i.e. if the command really fails to label

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 14.07.10 21:41, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote: Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said: I have uploaded preliminary versions of the unit files I put together for the various services of our default install. I think they give an indication how simple these

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 07/14/2010 05:02 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: On Wed, 14.07.10 14:07, Jeffrey Ollie (j...@ocjtech.us) wrote: I've been trying to test systemd on my dev box but without success so far. My system boots up and I

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.07.10 11:01, Tim Waugh (twa...@redhat.com) wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 21:41 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Re: cups, if the entire point is to reserve the sockets early with systemd, why would portrelease still be required? Also, re: this comment: # This is evil stuff. CUPS

Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.

2010-07-15 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 07/15/2010 06:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:29:34PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 07/15/2010 02:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:47:40PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: There are sometimes such obvious errors and missing labels that

Re: Broken dependencies: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp

2010-07-15 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:00:58PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:16:26PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:51:38AM +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:

Re: Feature 14: D programming

2010-07-15 Thread Jonathan MERCIER
hi everybody ldc compiler is in testing repos, i search some guy for test and increase his karma thanks link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ldc-0.9.2-1.2.20100706hg1653.fc13 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Enrico Scholz
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes: I suspect the biggest issue here is confined daemons, as they may not have permissions to create their own directories in /var/run is this really an issue? upstart (and systemd probably too) work best with non forking daemons so that the pidfile

Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.

2010-07-15 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:52:39AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: A lot of my Fedora machines are virtualized and I only ever interact with them by ssh. While I would see a program if it failed to start, I don't generally see any SELinux audit messages ever. (The bloated This is a problem.

Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.

2010-07-15 Thread Stephen Smalley
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 09:52 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:47:40PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: There are sometimes such obvious errors and missing labels that I cannot imagine not catching an audit message when program fails to even start! A lot of my Fedora

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.07.10 08:58, Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:30:41AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: I have uploaded preliminary versions of the unit files I put together for the various services of our default install. I think they give an indication how

[Bug 531206] ocaml-docs doesn't install info files because using wrong args to install-info

2010-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531206 --- Comment #5 from RHEL Product and Program Management pm-r...@redhat.com 2010-07-15 10:23:09 EDT --- This issue has been

orphaning igraph/python-igraph

2010-07-15 Thread Neal Becker
I haven't touched this for ages. Anyone interested? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Tim Waugh
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 15:32 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: The right approach here is to enumerate existing devices when CUPS starts up. All programs that care about devices should do that: But CUPS has no interest in what devices are currently attached. It only cares what queues are

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.07.10 09:32, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote: I thought I had checked it in, but I was leaving on Vacation and dropped the ball. Fixed in selinux-policy-3.8.7-1.fc14.noarch I'll bump up the dependency. chcon -t init_exec_t /bin/systemd Will also fix it so you can

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.07.10 15:43, Enrico Scholz (enrico.sch...@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de) wrote: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes: I suspect the biggest issue here is confined daemons, as they may not have permissions to create their own directories in /var/run is this really an

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.07.10 11:04, Tim Waugh (twa...@redhat.com) wrote: Another question about the cups config: [Install] # This is activated via any of these three triggers: # 1. Somebody connects to its sockets # 2. A file is in the spool directory # 3. A printer is plugged in # This follows the

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.07.10 07:33, Chuck Anderson (c...@wpi.edu) wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:58:33AM -0400, James Antill wrote: 1. Leave /etc/inittab functionally as it is in Fed-13, with 3 and 5 doing the obvious thing and the big comment saying stuff about systemd instead of upstart. If

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.07.10 15:44, Tim Waugh (twa...@redhat.com) wrote: The automatically created queues are configured by system-config-printer. This is done using udev rules. Those udev rules cannot perform their job is cupsd is not running at the moment the printer is connected/disconnected.

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Tim Waugh
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 17:25 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: Extend the binary you call from the udev rules so that it also can be called outside of the rules and in that case enumerates what is already there. Then, call that after cupsd is started (for example from a ExecStartPost= line in

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Alexander Boström
tor 2010-07-15 klockan 16:59 +0200 skrev Lennart Poettering: If I added inittab parsing support even when keeping native breaks legacy around, then inittab would matter only if the default.target symlink doesn't exist. Yeah, when saying keep compat you have to define exactly how to do that,

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:49:59 +0200 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: On Thu, 15.07.10 15:43, Enrico Scholz (enrico.sch...@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de) wrote: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes: I suspect the biggest issue here is confined daemons, as they may

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Bill Nottingham
Alexander Boström (a...@root.snowtree.se) said: If I added inittab parsing support even when keeping native breaks legacy around, then inittab would matter only if the default.target symlink doesn't exist. To go back to upstart, one of the reason upstart parses inittab for the default

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:18:06 +0200 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: On Thu, 15.07.10 08:58, Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:30:41AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: I have uploaded preliminary versions of the unit files I put together

Re: recoll review request help : using modified versions of libraries for build

2010-07-15 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/14/2010 09:55 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: It seems he has lifted code from some of these and used it rather than using them as libs? Do I ask them to send these to upstream? These modifications are specific for the recoll package only it seems. I haven't looked closely at this

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com said: We have a bug open with CUPS trying to generate SSL certs on the first connections, being too slow and causing the client to timeout. So no, you can't make assumptions here. Dovecot generating its SSL parameters can take 10 seconds on the

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:59:40 +0200 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: Because it reverses everything. And this is a problem because ? I.e. generally we have the rule that native configuration breaks legacy configuration. Who's we, what is the rationale of this rule ? Looks like

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Rudolf Kastl
2010/7/15 Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com: On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:59:40 +0200 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: Because it reverses everything. And this is a problem because ? I.e. generally we have the rule that native configuration breaks legacy configuration. Who's we, what

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.07.10 17:41, Alexander Boström (a...@root.snowtree.se) wrote: tor 2010-07-15 klockan 16:59 +0200 skrev Lennart Poettering: If I added inittab parsing support even when keeping native breaks legacy around, then inittab would matter only if the default.target symlink doesn't

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 04:18:06PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: To be frank I believe that a big number of the /etc/sysconfig options are simply redundant and should go away. For example, I see little reason why the admin should be able to configure the user id to drop priviliges to for

Latest Rawhide breaks Xorg under VMware

2010-07-15 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
Hello all, I was testing Fedora Rawhide (14) under VMware Player / Server 2 / ESXi 4 (My machines don't support KVM) without problem until now i can't get X running, Phase 1. Problem begin with indefinite restart, i have solved this by generating xorg.conf and put VESA driver instead.

Re: recoll review request help : using modified versions of libraries for build

2010-07-15 Thread Jean-Francois Dockes
Rahul Sundaram writes: I haven't looked closely at this specific case but the general idea is that if a project A is modifying B and not discussing those modifications at all with B, then we end up having duplicated code instead of having project B being enhanced by A's contributions. In

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.07.10 11:52, Simo Sorce (sso...@redhat.com) wrote: How are the SSH host keys supposed to be generated with systemd? Currently the initscript creates them, if they do not exist. Well, I believe the right place to create them would be in sshd itself. I don't think the

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:24, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: On Wed, 14.07.10 21:41, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote: Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said: I have uploaded preliminary versions of the unit files I put together for the various services

[Bug 614980] New: non-responsive maintainer

2010-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: non-responsive maintainer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614980 Summary: non-responsive maintainer Product: Fedora Version:

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:37, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: On Thu, 15.07.10 11:52, Simo Sorce (sso...@redhat.com) wrote: We have a bug open with CUPS trying to generate SSL certs on the first connections, being too slow and causing the client to timeout. So no, you can't

[Bug 611015] perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule fails to build

2010-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 614982] non-responsive maintainer

2010-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614982 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 614982] New: non-responsive maintainer

2010-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: non-responsive maintainer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614982 Summary: non-responsive maintainer Product: Fedora Version:

[Bug 611014] perl-Data-Alias fails to build

2010-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611014 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 614981] non-responsive maintainer

2010-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614981 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 555496] FTBFS perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12

2010-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555496 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 614980] non-responsive maintainer

2010-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614980 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.07.10 11:02, Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) wrote: Once upon a time, Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com said: We have a bug open with CUPS trying to generate SSL certs on the first connections, being too slow and causing the client to timeout. So no, you can't make assumptions

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Bill Peck
On 07/15/2010 12:02 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Simo Sorcesso...@redhat.com said: We have a bug open with CUPS trying to generate SSL certs on the first connections, being too slow and causing the client to timeout. So no, you can't make assumptions here. Dovecot

Re: recoll review request help : using modified versions of libraries for build

2010-07-15 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/15/2010 10:06 PM, Jean-Francois Dockes wrote Especially in the case of Binc, I find it a bit strange that Fedora rules would appear to forbid code reuse. This goes quite a bit against common wisdom. Not all interesting code is published as a library, or maintained, and sometimes the only

Re: rawhide perl-5.12 status

2010-07-15 Thread Iain Arnell
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: On 07/13/2010 10:33 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 07/08/2010 10:13 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: BTW: We are talking about 4 packages, involving these 3 maintainers: perl-DBI-Dumper: Chris Weyl perl-Data-Alias: Chris

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.07.10 13:08, Bill Peck (bp...@redhat.com) wrote: On 07/15/2010 12:02 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Simo Sorcesso...@redhat.com said: We have a bug open with CUPS trying to generate SSL certs on the first connections, being too slow and causing the client to

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/15/10 10:08 AM, Bill Peck wrote: Dovecot generating its SSL parameters can take 10 seconds on the first startup, so that would be another one with a problem. What about generating these in %post of the rpm install? Seems to make

Re: rawhide perl-5.12 status

2010-07-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:11:20PM +0200, Iain Arnell wrote: On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: On 07/13/2010 10:33 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 07/08/2010 10:13 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: BTW: We are talking about 4 packages, involving these 3

[Bug 614981] non-responsive maintainer

2010-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614981 Bug 614981 depends on bug 539046, which changed state. Bug 539046 Summary: FTBFS perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.2-9.fc12

[Bug 614981] non-responsive maintainer

2010-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614981 Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Bill Nottingham
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said: Which is why I was wondering what other daemons are there that use portreserve right now? $ repoquery -q --whatrequires portreserve --alldeps portreserve-0:0.0.4-4.fc13.x86_64 cups-1:1.4.4-5.fc13.x86_64 krb5-server-0:1.7.1-10.fc13.x86_64

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 04:18:06PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Thu, 15.07.10 08:58, Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:30:41AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: I have uploaded preliminary versions of the unit files I put together for the

trouble locally reproducing koji build error

2010-07-15 Thread Zach Carter
Hi: I've got this build error: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2322203 However, on my local machine make mockbuild does not seem to reproduce it. What's a good set of steps for me to reproduce an environment that is the same as koji is using? I'd like to avoid

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.07.10 11:45, Simo Sorce (sso...@redhat.com) wrote: is this really an issue? upstart (and systemd probably too) work best with non forking daemons so that the pidfile hack is not needed anymore. systemd doesn't care about PID files. If daemons still write them it's

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:04:49PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Thu, 15.07.10 11:02, Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) wrote: Once upon a time, Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com said: We have a bug open with CUPS trying to generate SSL certs on the first connections, being too slow

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.07.10 11:01, Stephen John Smoogen (smo...@gmail.com) wrote: I am aware that doing things during package installation instead of first-boot is problematic for system images that are distributed and booted from multiple machines. Maybe for those cases (where r/o root isn't

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.07.10 21:49, Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) wrote: On 07/15/2010 09:17 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Alexander Boström (a...@root.snowtree.se) said: But I do think the %postinstall script, if it's an install and not an update, should check the contents of inittab and

Re: Latest Rawhide breaks Xorg under VMware

2010-07-15 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 05:31:49PM +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: Hello all, I was testing Fedora Rawhide (14) under VMware Player / Server 2 / ESXi 4 (My machines don't support KVM) without problem until now i can't get X running, Phase 2. This week - i forgot the day that i updated

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 14.07.10 21:38, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote: And that comparison is not even fair. The thing that was called service file in sysv is called service file in systemd too (it even has .service is suffix, how obvious!). However since in contrast to sysv we not only

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:51, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: On Thu, 15.07.10 11:01, Stephen John Smoogen (smo...@gmail.com) wrote: I am aware that doing things during package installation instead of first-boot is problematic for system images that are distributed and

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Alexander Boström
ons 2010-07-14 klockan 23:53 +0200 skrev Lennart Poettering: On Wed, 14.07.10 15:42, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote: Because you may have gdm installed and not wish to currently boot with it? I just tried systemd on a test machine here... it came up fine, but it started gdm, even

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Alexander Boström
ons 2010-07-14 klockan 20:54 +0200 skrev Lennart Poettering: On Wed, 14.07.10 13:31, Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) wrote: Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de said: ExecStartPre=-/bin/mkdir -p /var/run/foo ; -/sbin/restorecon /var/run/foo Why would you

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Alexander Boström
ons 2010-07-14 klockan 15:03 -0400 skrev Daniel J Walsh: BTW: restorecon exits silently if SELinux is disabled. Oh. Forget what I said then. I still think - is a nonfeature though. :) /Alexander -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

bash auto completion

2010-07-15 Thread Jonathan MERCIER
why default bahrc do not contain all file in /etc/bash_completion.d ? me i add in bashrc: for file in /etc/bash_completion.d/*; do . $file; done instead . /etc/bash_compeltion = because do not works file do not exist! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: bash auto completion

2010-07-15 Thread Todd Zullinger
Jonathan MERCIER wrote: why default bahrc do not contain all file in /etc/bash_completion.d ? me i add in bashrc: for file in /etc/bash_completion.d/*; do . $file; done instead . /etc/bash_compeltion = because do not works file do not exist! This question is probably better suited the the

Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule

2010-07-15 Thread buildsys
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) Please resolve this as soon

Broken dependencies: perl-DBI-Dumper

2010-07-15 Thread buildsys
perl-DBI-Dumper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) On i386: perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

2010-07-15 Thread buildsys
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora

Re: Broken dependencies: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp

2010-07-15 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:51:38AM +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.12-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Lexer) There is a void `use' of nonexisting package that confuses rpmbuild. I

Re: Broken dependencies: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp

2010-07-15 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:16:26PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:51:38AM +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.12-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Lexer) There

rpms/perl-ExtUtils-XSpp/devel perl-ExtUtils-XSpp.spec,1.5,1.6

2010-07-15 Thread Petr Pisar
Author: ppisar Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-XSpp/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv1736 Modified Files: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp.spec Log Message: Remove private perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Lexer) Requires Index: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp.spec

File Data-Stream-Bulk-0.07.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2010-07-15 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Data-Stream-Bulk: ad2025b37de818309c99316b45d79356 Data-Stream-Bulk-0.07.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

rpms/perl-Data-Stream-Bulk/F-13 perl-Data-Stream-Bulk.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2010-07-15 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Data-Stream-Bulk/F-13 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11666/F-13 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-Data-Stream-Bulk.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE perl-Data-Stream-Bulk.spec

rpms/perl-Data-Stream-Bulk/devel perl-Data-Stream-Bulk.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2010-07-15 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Data-Stream-Bulk/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11666/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-Data-Stream-Bulk.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE

Re: rawhide perl-5.12 status

2010-07-15 Thread Iain Arnell
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:11:20PM +0200, Iain Arnell wrote: Still no response from any of these. I've filed non-responsive maintainer bugs: Daniel - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614981 If anyone

[Bug 605662] package needs to be upgraded

2010-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605662 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-15 17:06:20 EDT --- perl-HTTP-DAV-0.40-1.fc13 has