Hi, all.
As the primary maintainer of Fedora's WebKitGTK+ stack, allow me first
to apologize for my lack of diligence here. Let me simply say that I
know now that almost maxing-out one's unit counts for a semester,
double-majoring, and severe bouts of procrastination without cause are
three
On 08/04/2010 11:33 AM, Peter Gordon wrote:
Alas, the usage of ABRT over the past few months or so has significantly
increased the count of bugs reported against WebKitGTK/Midori, and
continued assistance in squashing/triaging these would be greatly
appreciated!
I think it would be useful
Hi,
Due to a drive falling over dead (it held my /home directory) and then the
computer's RAID software deciding it knew how to fix the problem by
duplicating the /dev/sda drive (where my boot loader and lvm partitions sit)
instead of it asking, I've just about managed to get my computer up and
Thanks everybody for info and sorry for missing the original thread.
Please could Jesse or somebody also fix this for me?
Thanks regards
Jaroslav
- Original Message -
From: Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2010 10:37:30
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7
I have a machine which run rawhide since F11 times. Recently upgrade to
python2.7 failed because of rhpl package. rhpl
Compose started at Wed Aug 4 08:15:11 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
LuxRender-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
LuxRender-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires
On 08/03/2010 11:49 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Björn Perssonbj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Would it be nice to stick this customization into fedora-packager, or
would it just confuse/surprise people?
Is it fast enough to not delay the prompt noticeably even on old
Summary of changes:
8350841... - new upstream version - update build requires
991de5e... fix typo
c2732d5... Rebuilt for EPEL-6
74ab313... Merge branch 'el6/master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/p
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
commit 8350841938c82d6fb08d94f3fe2b8c8bc4e5562d
Author: Štěpán Kasal ka...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Oct 7 16:59:49 2009 +
- new upstream version
- update build requires
.cvsignore|2 +-
perl-Perl-Critic.spec | 22 +++---
sources |
commit 991de5ebd49f1d2a3216e2e8633f50a9eda96beb
Author: Štěpán Kasal ka...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Oct 7 17:00:41 2009 +
fix typo
perl-Perl-Critic.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Perl-Critic.spec b/perl-Perl-Critic.spec
index
commit c2732d518f29cdc8271ffe4ec69dde6e136510c3
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Aug 4 13:33:39 2010 +0100
Rebuilt for EPEL-6
This package is included in RHEL-6 but not for all architectures
(e.g. ppc64). It is needed to satisfy dependencies in EPEL-6 and
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 05:01 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
Is this hidden somewhere, missing or not included any longer? I can't
seem to find it at all.
Parts of it will reappear soon, in different form.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 08/03/2010 01:08 PM, Conan Kudo (???) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net
mailto:l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
On 08/02/2010 09:58 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
2010/8/3 Jon Cieslal...@jcomserv.net mailto:l...@jcomserv.net:
Also I think that with
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:55:09AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
I'm not having any problems submitting builds and
On 08/04/2010 02:43 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Also I think that with
wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged
into mainline. So wouldn't it be better to concentrate on wordpress 3?
Well, yes, probably.
On 08/04/2010 08:59 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On 08/04/2010 02:43 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Also I think that with
wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged
into mainline. So wouldn't it be better to
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
And here's another addition: you might also want to run this command
when upgrading from older rwahide to current F-14/rawhide:
# systemctl enable graphical.target
This makes sure the default.target link is created properly
I still
On 08/04/2010 09:03 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On 08/04/2010 08:59 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On 08/04/2010 02:43 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Also I think that with
wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged
into
On Wed, 04.08.10 10:51, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
And here's another addition: you might also want to run this command
when upgrading from older rwahide to current F-14/rawhide:
# systemctl enable graphical.target
On 04/08/10 16:08, Lennart Poettering wrote:
# systemctl enable graphical.target
This makes sure the default.target link is created properly
I still believe that for this particular one (and a few of the others) we
should make the trivial changes to the spec to have it done automatically.
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 16:23 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 01:17:26PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Would it be nice to stick this customization into fedora-packager, or
would it just confuse/surprise people?
If it's there as something that's easily enabled with an
On Wed, 04.08.10 16:27, Frank Murphy (frankl...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 04/08/10 16:08, Lennart Poettering wrote:
# systemctl enable graphical.target
This makes sure the default.target link is created properly
I still believe that for this particular one (and a few of the others) we
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:17:27AM +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7
I have a machine which run rawhide since F11
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 00:13 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
http://blog.vagmim.com/2009/04/git-branch-on-command-prompt.html
Would it be nice to stick this customization into fedora-packager, or
would it just confuse/surprise people?
Please no. In addition to being
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 11:46 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:17:27AM +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
Rawhide (dist-f14) now
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620937
Michal Jaegermann mic...@harddata.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 04/08/10 16:41, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Well, can you be more precise? Can you try this bodhi build?
Just got my daughter to take a video of start up,
so will try grab snaps from it and or upload somewhere.
seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org writes:
I think I had suggested it, multiple times, and each time fesco had a
problem with it.
maybe even the package was named package-swift
http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/package-swift.spec
You can also use package-cleanup --orphans.
Andreas.
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 15:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
I have a modified package locally and want to install and test it. Since
it's a biarch package, I need to build the i686 version too. How?
Is there a reason not to use mock locally? That's how I'd do it - just
'fedpkg srpm' then 'mock -r
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 11:29 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net
wrote:
don't want malware landing on my machine because someone did a MITM
attack on a Fedora maintainer's unencrypted git fetch and inserted
some extra patches
On 04/08/10 17:28, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 15:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
I have a modified package locally and want to install and test it. Since
it's a biarch package, I need to build the i686 version too. How?
Is there a reason not to use mock locally?
I might
Hi.
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:30:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote
Clearly Linus stood out even in his youth =)
He is a bit obsessed with the number 5, though.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:18 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 05:01 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
Is this hidden somewhere, missing or not included any longer? I can't
seem to find it at all.
Parts of it will reappear soon, in different form.
The whole of it will reappear
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 22:10 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 16:25 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
Ok, so this compose seems to have anaconda-14.14. When trying to do an
nfs install, once I put in the server/directory information, it shows it
connecting and trying to pull up
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:03:23AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
facepalmYeah, I forgot that bit. Adrian(CCd), if you like, orphan
both wordpress and wordpress-mu, and I'll take over. If I do, I plan to
update wordpress to 3.0.1 and EOL wordpress-mu.
I orphaned it for EL-5 and EL-6. I
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:53:55AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
I think I had suggested it, multiple times, and each time fesco had a
problem with it.
maybe even the package was named package-swift
http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/package-swift.spec
Would it make sense for the obsolete list
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 01:33 -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 22:09 +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net wrote:
No. If the attacker MITMs the entire connection, they can lie about the
values of the remote refs too, so there is no need to find a
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:33 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:18 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 05:01 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
Is this hidden somewhere, missing or not included any longer? I can't
seem to find it at all.
Parts of it will
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 12:40 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:53:55AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
I think I had suggested it, multiple times, and each time fesco had a
problem with it.
maybe even the package was named package-swift
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:31 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 04/08/10 17:28, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 15:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
I have a modified package locally and want to install and test it. Since
it's a biarch package, I need to build the i686 version too.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
On 08/03/2010 01:08 PM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
On 08/02/2010 09:58 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
2010/8/3 Jon Cieslal...@jcomserv.net:
Also I think that
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 12:32:23 -0400, Bill wrote:
Unblocked orphan librsvg2
What's going on here?
More than a dozen Red Hat people with commit access, but access
was denied to one other Red Hat employee. Why?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/librsvg2
| xiphmont's Info | xiphmont's
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 13:01 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:44:23PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
Would it make sense for the obsolete list to be specified with versions?
yes, of course - it was just a sample.
google for package-swift and/or look at the fesco discussions
Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said:
Unblocked orphan librsvg2
What's going on here?
The procedure used to be for various gnome-y packages in the days
before provenpackager to just assign a single maintainer and
a whole slew of co-maintainers, so anyone in the Desktop SIG could
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:47:43 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:31 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 04/08/10 17:28, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 15:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
I have a modified package locally and want to install
It's been an exciting ride so far and we're embracing the peaks and
valleys of the Fedora release process in real time. Even with all the
recent changes and bugs we still have a shot at creating the Fedora 14
Release Candidate on schedule TOMORROW. Failure to successfully build
the RC
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 18:29 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
That's a neat trick, since 1.1.1 didn't even have configs for Fedora
14.
I roll all of my own mock configs, with different names from the bundled
ones so they don't disappear when a new mock version comes around.
They were added
Hi,
I have been working for a few years (with Fabio Checconi) on a disk
scheduler providing definitely lower latencies than cfq, as well as a
higher throughput with most of the test workloads we used (or the same
throughput as cfq with the other workloads). We named this scheduler
bfq (budget fair
This from an F13.x86 F14-Rawhide F14-Branched Guest
(Host if F13.x86_64)
Some still from the video:
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185144.php
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185343.php
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185650.php
MS == Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com writes:
MS More than a dozen Red Hat people with commit access, but access
MS was denied to one other Red Hat employee. Why?
You'll find that for some odd reason xiphmont has commit set to Denied
on several packages. I've never understood why it ended
On 08/04/2010 01:58 PM, Paolo Valente wrote:
Hi,
I have been working for a few years (with Fabio Checconi) on a disk
scheduler providing definitely lower latencies than cfq, as well as a
higher throughput with most of the test workloads we used (or the same
throughput as cfq with the other
Hi,
pycairo has *14* co-maintainers, one of them should step up and take
ownership.
I took gconfmm26 (required by bakery and glom), glademm24 (bakery), as
usual co-maintainers are welcome.
best regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
My response got rejected by list. Now I have subscribed to the list.
Hoepefully it will go through this time.
Vivek
- Forwarded message from Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com -
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:18:45 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com
To: Paolo Valente posta_pa...@yahoo.it
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 07:00:16PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
| xiphmont's Info | xiphmont's Packages (328)
| https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/xiphmont
How is that package count to be interpreted?
It is the amount of all packages that match any of the selected
On 08/04/2010 06:05 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
This from an F13.x86 F14-Rawhide F14-Branched Guest
(Host if F13.x86_64)
Some still from the video:
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185144.php
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185343.php
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:42:01AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I suspect it might short-circuit the 'ahhh, but what about...' 'oooh,
but then I can...' nature of the conversation if you just put together a
proof-of-concept attack and document it somewhere. I suspect the git
maintainers
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:33 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:18 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 05:01 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
Is this hidden somewhere, missing or not included any longer? I can't
seem to find it at all.
Parts of it will
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 22:36 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:33 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:18 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 05:01 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
Is this hidden somewhere, missing or not included any
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 13:47 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 22:36 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:33 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:18 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 05:01 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
What is the policy on creating private branches under fedpkg/git? Can it
be done by anyone with acl commit or do you need special permissions?
My interest is that I had a private branch of the kernel package under CVS
which I used to build pvops enabled kernels so that the more adventurous
I believe the manifest ACL behavior is that you are permitted to push to a
branch called fN/anything if you are on the pkgdb ACL for fN, and to
anything not matching fN/* if you are on the pkgdb ACL for devel/rawhide.
So the practical answer is probably that whatever the maintainers for a
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Unblocked orphan xautolock
I use this; taken. Co-maints welcome.
--Ben
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:35:23AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 03:05:42PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
I don't think git hashes are an equivalent to the nvr tags though. I may
have multiple commits for each nvr, a tag that explicitly specifies which
version ended up as
Vivek Goyal ha scritto:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 02:44:21PM -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
On 08/04/2010 01:58 PM, Paolo Valente wrote:
Hi,
I have been working for a few years (with Fabio Checconi) on a disk
scheduler providing definitely lower latencies than cfq, as well as a
higher
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Orphan: nas
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libaudio.so.2
speech-dispatcher requires libaudio.so.2
speech-dispatcher requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12
I suggest that these be just
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620937
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary of changes:
163c4e2... Rebuilt for EPEL-6
14442ac... Merge branch 'el6/master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/p
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 163c4e2ce1c02be15e8d3c1228cf11901a7794d0
Author: Dennis Gregorovic dgre...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Aug 4 09:09:50 2010 +0100
Rebuilt for EPEL-6
This package is included in RHEL-6 but not for all architectures
(e.g. ppc64). It is needed to satisfy dependencies in EPEL-6 and
commit 14442ac5af22d00eead602ec116de75378b2adb9
Merge: 163c4e2 8badd78
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Aug 4 09:13:30 2010 +0100
Merge branch 'el6/master' of
ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/perl-Test-Memory-Cycle into el6/master
---
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit 83a4f4df1ac1f5f1c2c4dd5a87e62977f18e6420
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Aug 4 10:18:33 2010 +0200
* Wed Aug 4 2010 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 1.16-3
- rename pip to perl-pip because it conflicts with python-pip 616626
perl-pip.spec |9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620410
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620413
Bug 620413 depends on bug 620410, which changed state.
Bug 620410 Summary: perl-Devel-Cycle - Request for EL-6 branch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620423
Bug 620423 depends on bug 620413, which changed state.
Bug 620413 Summary: perl-Test-Memory-Cycle - Request for EL-6 branch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620413
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620411
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620419
Bug 620419 depends on bug 620411, which changed state.
Bug 620411 Summary: perl-Pod-Spell - Request for EL-6 branch
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon
perl-Config-Model has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) =
0:0.303
On i386:
perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) =
0:0.303
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620423
Bug 620423 depends on bug 620420, which changed state.
Bug 620420 Summary: perl-String-Format - Request for EL-6 branch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620423
Bug 620423 depends on bug 620419, which changed state.
Bug 620419 Summary: perl-Test-Spelling - Request for EL-6 branch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620420
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620419
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620421
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620937
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
It's been an exciting ride so far and we're embracing the peaks and
valleys of the Fedora release process in real time. Even with all the
recent changes and bugs we still have a shot at creating the Fedora 14
Release Candidate on schedule TOMORROW. Failure to successfully build
the RC
86 matches
Mail list logo
