On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:42:02 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
> this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
> e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
> the open floor topic.
I find th
Here are the current open Fedora 14 Beta Blocker bugs.
We need built packages and submitted to Bodhi that address each of these
bugs in order to start the Fedora 14 Beta Release Candidate compose on
2010-09-16.
If we are unable to start the RC compose on 2010-09-16 it could further
delay the F
On 09/13/2010 03:42 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
This fix allows the datainterop tests to pass at 100%
ack.
--noriko
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-
On 09/12/2010 08:39 PM, Elio Maldonado wrote:
>On 09/12/2010 12:50 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
>> How did this slip through the cracks? Isn't that a security related
>> update?
>>
> No, it didn't slip trough the cracks. Some problems with the nss 3.12.7
> update on which it depends have held up th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2010 08:55 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Ah. I remember some talk about getting a VCS tag in rpm. This is where
> it'd belong IMO. Maybe fedpkg can implement it until rpm gets it?
>
The rpm spec could have a vcs tag, now. RPM just doesn't do any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2010 04:35 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> What I remember from FUDCon Toronto was that fedpkg could download the
> tarball, explode it into /tmp or something, do a `git init; git commit
> -a -m "Tarball"` and then there'd be some way to export patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2010 08:30 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Every one who is use a git everyday knows that it has support of
> joining several repositories in one local repository (especially if it
> has a common base). I would use such feature for packages hoste
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625014
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447045&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447045&action=edit
Description: adding a check if the newsuperior is the entry itself
or its descendent. If it is, modrdn returns L
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:42 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
Apologies, I won't be able to make this, I'll be on a plane headed to
France for XDS.
-
On 13 September 2010 20:42, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
> this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
> e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
> the open floor topic.
Could you discuss
On 13 September 2010 21:49, James Antill wrote:
> So Seth spent half a day implementing a proof of concept:
> http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/fedora-app-market-proof-of-concept/
Translations?
Icons?
Offline queries?
Co-operating with other distros?
Formal database schema?
Call me biased,
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Ralph Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I had to learn that the koji client, while being the only way to
> request a build, does not support proxies.
>
> In a university like environment with no open ports whatsoever, with an
> increasingly paranoid IT group in charge of the fire
One more I would like to add:
#464 Fix nss update issues
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/464
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 09:36 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/08/2010 02:43 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On 8 September 2010 13:16, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> First off, I think this is a great idea and very much needed, thanks for
> >> working on it.
> >
> > Cool, thanks. Some positi
Hi,
Today I had to learn that the koji client, while being the only way to
request a build, does not support proxies.
In a university like environment with no open ports whatsoever, with an
increasingly paranoid IT group in charge of the firewall and proxy, that
does not leave a lot of optio
commit a892b97fb4a655717fa4c97e8bbc92909cef9857
Author: Mark Chappell
Date: Mon Sep 13 21:50:41 2010 +0200
import from RHEL6 SRPM
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/5.90Workstation/optional/source/SRPMS/perl-Test-MockObject-1.09-3.1.el6.src.rpm
.gitignore|1 +
perl
commit b0b2c86b3963a6c2371e03346cf6bab00a8000a5
Author: Mark Chappell
Date: Mon Sep 13 21:49:08 2010 +0200
import from RHEL6 SRPM
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/5.90Workstation/optional/source/SRPMS/perl-MIME-Types-1.28-2.el6.src.rpm
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MIME-Types.
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
= Followups =
#topic #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351
#topic #382 Imp
W dniu 11.09.2010 20:53, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> Dear all,
>
> I unfortunately have to start the non-responsive process for thomasvs
> again [1]. The bug to update twisted to the latest upstream version has
> been opened for several months now [2], and I have also prepared the
> updates myself on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631862
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447020&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447020&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev
John Poelstra said the following on 09/09/2010 05:19 PM Pacific Time:
> When: Friday, 2010-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT)
> Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
>
> Without these bugs fixed we can't compose the Fedora 14 Beta Release
> Candidate on 2010-09-16.
>
==
Start End Name
Tue 07-Sep Tue 14-Sep Software: Rebuild all translated packages
Tue 14-Sep Tue 14-Sep Beta Change Deadline
Tue 14-Sep Tue 14-Sep Features 100% Complete Deadline
Tue 14-Sep Tue 28-Sep Beta Infrastructure Change Freeze
Thu 16-Sep Thu 16-Sep Compose Beta Candidat
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Thomas Janssen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i tested today why stfl FTBFS. I found out that it doesn't installs a
> file into /usr/lib.. but lib/..
> That happens just for the ruby part of stfl, the perl parts getting
> installed into /usr/lib.. just fine.
>
> http://koji.fedor
Hi,
i just orphaned 'incollector'.
I do maintain a similar software (basket) which is miles better. If
someone thinks there has to be a gtk alternative around, feel free and
pick it up.
--
Best regards
Thomas
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
Compose started at Mon Sep 13 13:15:33 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires /usr/local/bin/php
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(File::FnMatch)
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc1
Compose started at Mon Sep 13 08:15:27 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
avogadro-libs-1.0.1-6.fc15.i686 requires sip-api(7) >= 0:7.1
avogadro-libs-1.0.1-
On 2010-09-08, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:59 PM, drago01 wrote:
>> Well ideally every app that allows font selection should have a button
>> / option "add new font" that opens a font installation dialog.
>
> To be clear this dialog should not be re implemented by every
> applicatio
On 13 September 2010 08:36, Hans de Goede wrote:
> But Adam is not the only one I love this idea too! And I would like to
> think there are other silent admirers of this idea too!
Cool, thanks.
> I've even considered taken the review for the app data package and approving
> it, but then decided
Top FAS account holder who has completed reviewing "Package review"
components on bugzilla for last week ending is Parag AN(पराग).
Parag AN(पराग) : 12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225973 krb5-auth-dialog
(Merge Review)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i
Hi,
On 09/08/2010 02:43 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 8 September 2010 13:16, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> First off, I think this is a great idea and very much needed, thanks for
>> working on it.
>
> Cool, thanks. Some positive feedback at last! Too... much... stop... energy...
>
Oh,
But Adam i
30 matches
Mail list logo
