Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
Hi All, Does anyone know if the new Broadcom drivers are in a state where they would be in the Fedora 14 kernel? I've seen the release but i've not seen any comment as to the state of them other than they already support mac80211. These are quite a common device and I think it would be nice to see them available in F-14. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:16 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Does anyone know if the new Broadcom drivers are in a state where they would be in the Fedora 14 kernel? I've seen the release but i've not seen any comment as to the state of them other than they already support mac80211. These are quite a common device and I think it would be nice to see them available in F-14. That's up to John to decide, so I added him to CC. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Does anyone know if the new Broadcom drivers are in a state where they would be in the Fedora 14 kernel? I've seen the release but i've not seen any comment as to the state of them other than they already support mac80211. These are quite a common device and I think it would be nice to see them available in F-14. IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot distribute unlike say the Intel firmwares. I could be wrong though. -- Sent from my Android phone. Please excuse my brevity. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote: pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Does anyone know if the new Broadcom drivers are in a state where they would be in the Fedora 14 kernel? I've seen the release but i've not seen any comment as to the state of them other than they already support mac80211. These are quite a common device and I think it would be nice to see them available in F-14. IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot distribute unlike say the Intel firmwares. I could be wrong though. You are ;) The firmware required is part of linux-firmware (i.e fine to ship). -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ogre3d lagging behind more than half a year
heyyas, ogre3d, one of the most important 3d engines we have in fedora is already lagging behind over half a year in rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576286 would be nice to see it finally updated atleast in rawhide so it can go atleast in f15... which means we are only 1 year behind by then. kind regards, Rudolf Kastl -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: FF 3.6.9 update for F-13
Christopher Aillon venit, vidit, dixit 14.09.2010 00:49: On 09/12/2010 08:39 PM, Elio Maldonado wrote: On 09/12/2010 12:50 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote: How did this slip through the cracks? Isn't that a security related update? No, it didn't slip trough the cracks. Some problems with the nss 3.12.7 update on which it depends have held up the release for f13 and f12. That needs to get resolved, indeed. However, this is a security release, and Bojan is right. We need to get this released. Broken libraries typically means we disable system libraries, build with the in-tree copy so we can get the bulk of the code out to users, and then when the system library is fixed, we can build against the system copy. Martin/Jan, can one of you handle that please if nss is still not yet ready? FWIW, Remi Collet has a build like that in his remi-testing repo for F-13. Michael -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot distribute unlike say the Intel firmwares. I could be wrong though. That's still true of the b43 firmware for older (pre-802.11n) devices, but the firmware to go with their new driver is now in linux-firmware.git. Their *original* offering of that new firmware had a stupid licence -- you could only distribute it if you promised to indemnify and defend Broadcom from all related third-party lawsuits. They fixed that though, and I merged it. -- dwmw2 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: koji client does not work through proxy
On 09/14/2010 12:18 AM, Mike McGrath wrote: On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Ralph Lange wrote: Hi, Today I had to learn that the koji client, while being the only way to request a build, does not support proxies. In a university like environment with no open ports whatsoever, with an increasingly paranoid IT group in charge of the firewall and proxy, that does not leave a lot of options. While I was able to ssh tunnel my way out of this miserable situation, I think this approach does not work as a general solution. I realized that this issue has been discussed two years ago [1], but I did not find any newer statements. Is there any work being done (or an intention to do so) to improve the situation? Thanks, Ralph [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-August/msg00665.html You'll need at least some open ports. 443 and 80 I think are the only ones required for koji builds. and exactly those are the ones proxied almost everywhere where a mandatory proxy is in use. 80 at least. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rawhide report: 20100914 changes
Compose started at Tue Sep 14 08:15:26 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit) antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 avogadro-libs-1.0.1-6.fc15.i686 requires sip-api(7) = 0:7.1 avogadro-libs-1.0.1-6.fc15.x86_64 requires sip-api(7) = 0:7.1 claws-mail-plugins-geolocation-3.7.6-5.fc15.x86_64 requires libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0()(64bit) clutter-gst-devel-1.2.0-1.fc15.i686 requires pkgconfig(clutter-1.0) 0:1.3.0 clutter-gst-devel-1.2.0-1.fc15.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(clutter-1.0) 0:1.3.0 clutter-gtkmm-0.9.5-1.fc14.i686 requires libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0 clutter-gtkmm-0.9.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0()(64bit) clutter-gtkmm-devel-0.9.5-1.fc14.i686 requires pkgconfig(clutter-gtk-0.10) = 0:0.10.2 clutter-gtkmm-devel-0.9.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(clutter-gtk-0.10) = 0:0.10.2 cyphesis-0.5.21-2.fc13.x86_64 requires libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) emerillon-0.1.2-7.fc14.x86_64 requires librest-0.6.so.0()(64bit) emerillon-0.1.2-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0()(64bit) entangle-0.1.0-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit) ethos-0.2.2-7.fc15.i686 requires libmozjs.so ethos-0.2.2-7.fc15.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.2()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.17()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libgtkhtml-editor.so.0()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-provider-1.2.so.17()(64bit) evolution-mapi-0.31.5-1.fc14.i686 requires libcamel-provider-1.2.so.18 evolution-mapi-0.31.5-1.fc14.i686 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.3 evolution-mapi-0.31.5-1.fc14.i686 requires libedata-cal-1.2.so.8 evolution-mapi-0.31.5-1.fc14.i686 requires libcamel-1.2.so.18 evolution-mapi-0.31.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.3()(64bit) evolution-mapi-0.31.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.18()(64bit) evolution-mapi-0.31.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libedata-cal-1.2.so.8()(64bit) evolution-mapi-0.31.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-provider-1.2.so.18()(64bit) firstaidkit-plugin-openscap-0.2.16-1.fc15.noarch requires openscap-python = 0:0.6.3 frysk-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-devel-0.4-26.fc14.i386 requires libgcj.so.10 frysk-devel-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-gnome-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) gjs-0.7.1-3.fc14.i686 requires libmozjs.so gjs-0.7.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit) 1:gnome-bluetooth-2.90.0-5.fc15.x86_64 requires libgnome-control-center.so.1()(64bit) 1:gnome-games-extra-2.31.91.1-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0()(64bit) gnome-media-2.31.5-5.fc15.x86_64 requires libgnome-control-center.so.1()(64bit) gnome-panel-2.31.90-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit) gnome-python2-brasero-2.31.1-5.fc14.x86_64 requires libbrasero-media.so.1()(64bit) gnome-python2-brasero-2.31.1-5.fc14.x86_64 requires libbrasero-burn.so.1()(64bit) gnome-python2-totem-2.31.1-5.fc14.x86_64 requires libgnome-media-profiles.so.0()(64bit) gnome-shell-2.31.5-5.fc14.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit) gpx-viewer-0.1.2-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-gtk-0.4.so.0()(64bit) gpx-viewer-0.1.2-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0()(64bit) gpx-viewer-0.1.2-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-0.4.so.0()(64bit) gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras-0.10.20-1.fc15.i686 requires libWildMidi.so.0 gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras-0.10.20-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libWildMidi.so.0()(64bit) gxine-0.5.905-3.fc13.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit) hornsey-1.5.2-0.3.fc15.x86_64 requires libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0()(64bit) intellij-idea-9.0.1.94.399-11.fc14.x86_64 requires jna-examples jana-0.4.5-0.7.20100520gitacd72f2.fc14.i686 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10 jana-0.4.5-0.7.20100520gitacd72f2.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit) libchamplain-gtk-0.6.1-4.fc14.i686 requires libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0 libchamplain-gtk-0.6.1-4.fc14.x86_64 requires libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0()(64bit) libchamplain-gtk-devel-0.6.1-4.fc14.i686 requires pkgconfig(clutter-gtk-0.10) libchamplain-gtk-devel-0.6.1-4.fc14.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(clutter-gtk-0.10) libglade-java-2.12.5-12.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10
Re: ogre3d lagging behind more than half a year
I don't think it would have been too late for Fedora 14. It isn't a core package that needs to be available in a spin, afaik... On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote: heyyas, ogre3d, one of the most important 3d engines we have in fedora is already lagging behind over half a year in rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576286 would be nice to see it finally updated atleast in rawhide so it can go atleast in f15... which means we are only 1 year behind by then. kind regards, Rudolf Kastl -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[perl-Test-Most] New release, 0.23
commit fa6df7dc7af1ba736cb2c9ee809b8d367e1ae3f9
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 14 15:11:21 2010 +0200
New release, 0.23
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-Most.spec | 17 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 3c2bda2..a331c36 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
Test-Most-0.21.tar.gz
+/Test-Most-0.23.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Test-Most.spec b/perl-Test-Most.spec
index 468e187..61f1939 100644
--- a/perl-Test-Most.spec
+++ b/perl-Test-Most.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Test-Most
-Version:0.21
-Release:6%{?dist}
+Version:0.23
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Perl module with test functions and features
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(Data::Dumper::Names) = 0.03
BuildRequires: perl(Exception::Class) = 1.14
BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Deep)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Differences)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Exception)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Deep) = 0.106
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Differences)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Exception) = 0.29
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Harness) = 3.07
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Simple) = 0.82
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Warn) = 0.1
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.88
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Warn) = 0.11
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
%description
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Sep 14 2010 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 0.23-1
+- New release, 0.23
+
* Thu May 06 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 0.21-6
- Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index df74605..fd57985 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-8066a15a40154d011296b33ce02a1cf8 Test-Most-0.21.tar.gz
+e36de54581fa2248c37f9e30e814769c Test-Most-0.23.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633719] perl-CPAN-Checksums-2.05 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633719 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|mmasl...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com AssignedTo|mmasl...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633751] perl-Test-Most-0.23 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633751 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Most-0.23-1.fc15 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-09-14 09:28:13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: koji client does not work through proxy
Ralph Lange ralph.la...@bessy.de writes: Today I had to learn that the koji client, while being the only way to request a build, does not support proxies. yes; like most python programs it does not have proper proxy support. In a university like environment with no open ports whatsoever, with an increasingly paranoid IT group in charge of the firewall and proxy, that does not leave a lot of options. While I was able to ssh tunnel my way out of this miserable situation, I think this approach does not work as a general solution. try transconnect[1]; unfortunately with the switch to 'fed-pkg', you can not wrap the 'koji' program anymore but have to wrap whole 'fed-pkg' which calls other tools (git, ssh, curl) with http proxy support. This might interfere so you might have to play with your parameters. Enrico Footnotes: [1] http://transconnect.sourceforge.net/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
File PAR-1.002.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PAR: 789a0768881cd051ad7bc2b9d89a56fb PAR-1.002.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-PAR] New version, v1.002
commit 5306c715b4e1f3c44bbcae0a17feaf9fb5cf2115
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 14 15:37:50 2010 +0200
New version, v1.002
perl-PAR.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-PAR.spec b/perl-PAR.spec
index fa7d29d..320a00d 100644
--- a/perl-PAR.spec
+++ b/perl-PAR.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-PAR
-Version:1.000
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:1.002
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Perl Archive Toolkit
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Sep 14 2010 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 1.002-1
+- New release, v1.002
+
* Tue Aug 24 2010 Adam Tkac atkac redhat com - 1.000-2
- rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-PAR] Sources file change
commit 80ad7fb2c468a71a74efb568caacf6d8ec8bba87 Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com Date: Tue Sep 14 15:39:41 2010 +0200 Sources file change .gitignore |1 + sources|2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 47e9275..37055bf 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1 +1,2 @@ PAR-1.000.tar.gz +/PAR-1.002.tar.gz diff --git a/sources b/sources index 406bb6e..5d6290f 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -db64d89784c1b6de41a587837c9fca25 PAR-1.000.tar.gz +789a0768881cd051ad7bc2b9d89a56fb PAR-1.002.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633738] perl-PAR-1.002 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633738 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-PAR-1.002-1.fc15 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-09-14 09:47:38 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File CPAN-Checksums-2.05.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-Checksums: c977fc3a10855d1d48f2b0a78a91467b CPAN-Checksums-2.05.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:31:44PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot distribute unlike say the Intel firmwares. I could be wrong though. That's still true of the b43 firmware for older (pre-802.11n) devices, but the firmware to go with their new driver is now in linux-firmware.git. Their *original* offering of that new firmware had a stupid licence -- you could only distribute it if you promised to indemnify and defend Broadcom from all related third-party lawsuits. They fixed that though, and I merged it. Nevertheless, everyone I know that has reviewed the newly released driver code is being treated for eye cancer. I wouldn't expect to see it in F-14. John -- John W. LinvilleThe truth will set you free, but first it will linvi...@redhat.com make you miserable. -- James A. Garfield -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ogre3d lagging behind more than half a year
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:43:03 +0200, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote: heyyas, ogre3d, one of the most important 3d engines we have in fedora is already lagging behind over half a year in rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576286 would be nice to see it finally updated atleast in rawhide so it can go atleast in f15... which means we are only 1 year behind by then. Get volunteers for the Spins SIG lead and Spins Wrangler to free up some of my time and there is a good chance it will get done for F15. It's really too late to try to do this for F14. There are some related packages (e.g. mygui) that also need updating. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ogre3d lagging behind more than half a year
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 08:21:33 -0500, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) ngomp...@gmail.com wrote: I don't think it would have been too late for Fedora 14. It isn't a core package that needs to be available in a spin, afaik... It wasn't when I was going to try to work on it, but I got swamped with Spins SIG / livecd-tools work and didn't have time to do it. It's really too late to be doing soname bumps for this package for F14. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 633720] perl-Date-Manip-6.11 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633720 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|mmasl...@redhat.com | AssignedTo|mmasl...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Pod-Abstract] New release, v0.20
commit 02e8358d8813b23e137d240b5ed11f235c1e872c
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 14 16:32:05 2010 +0200
New release, v0.20
perl-Pod-Abstract.spec | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Pod-Abstract.spec b/perl-Pod-Abstract.spec
index 2deb8dc..75db106 100644
--- a/perl-Pod-Abstract.spec
+++ b/perl-Pod-Abstract.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Pod-Abstract
-Version:0.17
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Version:0.20
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(IO::String)
+BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Parser)
+BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util)
+BuildRequires: perl(Task::Weaken)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
@@ -51,6 +54,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man1/paf.1.gz
%changelog
+* Tue Sep 14 2010 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 0.20-1
+- New release, v0.20
+
* Tue May 04 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 0.17-5
- Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:13 PM, John W. Linville linvi...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:31:44PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot distribute unlike say the Intel firmwares. I could be wrong though. That's still true of the b43 firmware for older (pre-802.11n) devices, but the firmware to go with their new driver is now in linux-firmware.git. Their *original* offering of that new firmware had a stupid licence -- you could only distribute it if you promised to indemnify and defend Broadcom from all related third-party lawsuits. They fixed that though, and I merged it. Nevertheless, everyone I know that has reviewed the newly released driver code is being treated for eye cancer. I wouldn't expect to see it in F-14. Thanks for the update. That's what I suspected as it seems to be the norm for vendor code dumps. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F-14 Branched report: 20100914 changes
Compose started at Tue Sep 14 13:15:38 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires /usr/local/bin/php RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(File::FnMatch) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libwebkit-1.0.so.2 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libdevhelp-1.so.1 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libgladeui-1.so.9()(64bit) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libdevhelp-1.so.1()(64bit) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libwebkit-1.0.so.2()(64bit) antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 cyphesis-0.5.21-2.fc13.x86_64 requires libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) empathy-2.31.90-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.19()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.2()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.17()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libgtkhtml-editor.so.0()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-provider-1.2.so.17()(64bit) evolution-sharp-0.21.1-9.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.19()(64bit) fmt-ptrn-java-1.3.20-5.fc13.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 fmt-ptrn-java-1.3.20-5.fc13.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-devel-0.4-26.fc14.i386 requires libgcj.so.10 frysk-devel-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-gnome-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) gnome-python2-evolution-2.31.1-5.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.19()(64bit) gpx-viewer-0.1.2-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-gtk-0.4.so.0()(64bit) gpx-viewer-0.1.2-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-0.4.so.0()(64bit) intellij-idea-9.0.1.94.399-11.fc14.x86_64 requires jna-examples libglade-java-2.12.5-12.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 libglade-java-2.12.5-12.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) libgnome-java-2.12.4-12.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 libgnome-java-2.12.4-12.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) libopenvrml-0.18.6-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0 libopenvrml-0.18.6-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0 libopenvrml-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) libopenvrml-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) libopenvrml-gl-0.18.6-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0 libopenvrml-gl-0.18.6-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0 libopenvrml-gl-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) libopenvrml-gl-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) libvte-java-0.12.1-15.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 libvte-java-0.12.1-15.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) matahari-0.0.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libqmf.so.1()(64bit) mingw32-OpenSceneGraph-2.8.2-4.fc14.noarch requires mingw32(libpng-3.dll) openvrml-java-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) openvrml-java-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) openvrml-javascript-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) openvrml-javascript-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) openvrml-nodes-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) openvrml-nodes-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) openvrml-xembed-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) openvrml-xembed-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) ovirt-server-0.100-4.fc12.noarch requires qpidd ovirt-server-0.100-4.fc12.noarch requires qpidc perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-6.fc14.15.x86_64 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.9.2.4 plee-the-bear-0.4.1-5.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) plee-the-bear-0.4.1-5.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) plee-the-bear-0.4.1-5.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) pokerth-0.7.1-4.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) pokerth-0.7.1-4.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) pokerth-0.7.1-4.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) pokerth-0.7.1-4.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
On 09/14/2010 08:33 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the update. That's what I suspected as it seems to be the norm for vendor code dumps. It is nevertheless a massive step forward. I heard OEM systems were favouring other, even slightly more expensive wireless cards because of the poor Linux support from Broadcom in this particular area and their change removes one of the major barriers in the near future. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/14/2010 08:33 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the update. That's what I suspected as it seems to be the norm for vendor code dumps. It is nevertheless a massive step forward. I heard OEM systems were favouring other, even slightly more expensive wireless cards because of the poor Linux support from Broadcom in this particular area and their change removes one of the major barriers in the near future. Which OEMs care enough about Linux support to use a more expensive part? -- Sent from my Android phone. Please excuse my brevity. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: Which OEMs care enough about Linux support to use a more expensive part? Seriously. I will go buy their stuff right now. -- Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional Research Computing Services Harvard School of Engineering Applied Sciences -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
On 09/15/2010 12:49 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: Which OEMs care enough about Linux support to use a more expensive part? Seriously. I will go buy their stuff right now. I read that HP was doing this but haven't verified. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/15/2010 12:49 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: Which OEMs care enough about Linux support to use a more expensive part? Seriously. I will go buy their stuff right now. I read that HP was doing this but haven't verified. From supporting Sugar related deployments using the Fedora Sugar on a Stick with HP laptops I've not exactly seen that but I'm not sure if its pertaining to particular models. I know Dell in the past has offered their re branded Broadcom wifi with an option of Intel wifi for a £5 premium. No idea if HP does similar. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/14/2010 08:33 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the update. That's what I suspected as it seems to be the norm for vendor code dumps. It is nevertheless a massive step forward. I heard OEM systems were favouring other, even slightly more expensive wireless cards because of the poor Linux support from Broadcom in this particular area and their change removes one of the major barriers in the near future. I'm not denying the massive step forward, its certainly a valued contribution. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 457760] perl-HTML-Format not available for EL-4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457760 Bug 457760 depends on bug 457759, which changed state. Bug 457759 Summary: perl-Font-AFM not available for EL-4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457759 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 457759] perl-Font-AFM not available for EL-4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457759 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(xav...@bachelot.o | |rg) | Last Closed||2010-09-14 16:16:42 --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2010-09-14 16:16:42 EDT --- Most likely not. This is probably a left over from when I was working on pushing RT3 to EPEL. The EL4 perl stack is too old for a number of modules, and I've not much interest in EL4 anymore anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
something's up with auth in rawhide
Folks, Just did an install of rawhide from today using mirrors.kernel.org and F14-Alpha installer media for the Anaconda runtime. 1). There is no default runlevel 2). I'm dropped into a confused shell on boot. 3). User accounts such as root are not recognized after init 3 4). init 5 starts gdm and I can then login as normal. It might just be broken deps or something. Did anyone else see this? Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: something's up with auth in rawhide
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:23 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: 1). There is no default runlevel 2). I'm dropped into a confused shell on boot. 3). User accounts such as root are not recognized after init 3 4). init 5 starts gdm and I can then login as normal. It might just be broken deps or something. Did anyone else see this? Ok. So I remember now that there was a recent Anaconda bug to change the /etc/systemd/system/default.target symlink and of course I was using the alpha media. I'll fix that. But still, should not init 3 have resulted in things like passwd working? :) Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 01:01 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 09/15/2010 12:49 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: Which OEMs care enough about Linux support to use a more expensive part? Seriously. I will go buy their stuff right now. I read that HP was doing this but haven't verified. Ones who pre-load Linux could presumably calculate that shipping a better supported chip may cost them slightly more initially but save them maintenance headaches and hence eventually work out cheaper, so that would be Dell and HP. I think some of their pre-loaded systems do come with Intel chipsets rather than Broadcom, which are indeed slightly more expensive to procure. I haven't directly heard the rumours Rahul had, though. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
I read that HP was doing this but haven't verified. Ones who pre-load Linux could presumably calculate that shipping a better supported chip may cost them slightly more initially but save them maintenance headaches and hence eventually work out cheaper, so that would be Dell and HP. I think some of their pre-loaded systems do come with Intel chipsets rather than Broadcom, which are indeed slightly more expensive to procure. I haven't directly heard the rumours Rahul had, though. Some HP laptops pre-loaded with FreeDOS, and comes with a Broadcom chip (BCM4312 rev 01), and the website/manual said: it's certified for SuSE Enterprise Linux and RedFlag Linux (Asian distro based on RHEL) however the wifi is supported by propriety driver from Broadcom (broadcom-wl). So when HP (and others) say that a laptop (or other hardware) is certified for Linux this include hardware with propriety drivers. Another exemple is EmperorLinux they sells some Linux-certified laptops with nVidia hardware. Regards. -- Athmane Madjoudj -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F12/ Cannot update
Hi all, If I try to update F12 I get the following error: # yum update Plugin abilitati:presto, refresh-packagekit Impostazione processo di aggiornamento Risoluzione dipendenze -- Esecuzione del controllo di transazione --- Pacchetto firefox.x86_64 0:3.5.12-1.fc12 settato per essere aggiornato --- Pacchetto xulrunner.x86_64 0:1.9.1.12-1.fc12 settato per essere aggiornato --- Pacchetto xulrunner-devel.x86_64 0:1.9.1.12-1.fc12 settato per essere aggiornato -- Elaborazione dipendenza: pkgconfig(nspr) = 4.8.6 per il pacchetto: xulrunner-devel-1.9.1.12-1.fc12.x86_64 -- Risoluzione delle dipendenze completata Errore: Pacchetto: xulrunner-devel-1.9.1.12-1.fc12.x86_64 (updates) richiede: pkgconfig(nspr) = 4.8.6 Installato: nspr-devel-4.8.4-2.fc12.x86_64 (@updates) pkgconfig(nspr) = 4.8.4 Disponibile: nspr-devel-4.8.2-1.fc12.i686 (fedora) pkgconfig(nspr) = 4.8.2 Si può provare ad usare --skip-broken per aggirare il problema Provare ad eseguire: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest What's going on? nspr-4.8.6 is still in testing (with a bad karma). Why xulrunner has been built against this and pushed to stable? This brakes the update process in F12. Regards, Andrea. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: F12/ Cannot update
Andrea Musuruane wrote: Why xulrunner has been built against this and pushed to stable? Because Firefox/Thunderbird maintainers have the ability to Push-To-Stable regardless of what the Fedora package policies say. Harrumph. I have previously complained of this fact before when these packages broke things but my complaints fell on deaf ears. What is the correct course of action to stop this nonsense? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-09-14) === Meeting started by nirik at 19:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-09-14/fesco.2010-09-14-19.30.log.html Meeting summary --- * init process (nirik, 19:30:01) * pjones and ajax are traveling today, will not be able to attend. (nirik, 19:30:30) * Updates policy status (nirik, 19:33:02) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft (nirik, 19:34:12) * ACTION: nirik (and anyone else who wishes) to work on the updates policy wiki page for next week. (nirik, 20:02:44) * ACTION: SMParrish to work on metrics (nirik, 20:02:53) * ACTION: SMParrish and mjg59 to work on ideas for kde updates in stable releases. (nirik, 20:04:09) * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNSSEC_on_workstations (nirik, 20:05:55) * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GoldLinkerDefault (nirik, 20:10:07) * #461 F14 blessing for systemd (nirik, 20:12:29) * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_basic and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_tools (nirik, 20:38:06) * ACTION: : will defer systemd to f15 release to give more time to fix small issues and docs and general polish. (nirik, 21:12:43) * ACTION: notting will look at what's required to flip the default in f14 (notting, 21:13:44) * #464 - Fix nss update issues (nirik, 21:15:31) * Open Floor (nirik, 21:32:28) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 (nirik, 21:33:57) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2387 (nirik, 21:34:06) Meeting ended at 21:38:58 UTC. Action Items * nirik (and anyone else who wishes) to work on the updates policy wiki page for next week. * SMParrish to work on metrics * SMParrish and mjg59 to work on ideas for kde updates in stable releases. * : will defer systemd to f15 release to give more time to fix small issues and docs and general polish. * notting will look at what's required to flip the default in f14 Action Items, by person --- * mjg59 * SMParrish and mjg59 to work on ideas for kde updates in stable releases. * nirik * nirik (and anyone else who wishes) to work on the updates policy wiki page for next week. * notting * notting will look at what's required to flip the default in f14 * SMParrish * SMParrish to work on metrics * SMParrish and mjg59 to work on ideas for kde updates in stable releases. * **UNASSIGNED** * : will defer systemd to f15 release to give more time to fix small issues and docs and general polish. People Present (lines said) --- * nirik (177) * notting (61) * mjg59 (61) * mclasen (46) * SMParrish (17) * emaldona_mtv (15) * jsmith (14) * drago01 (13) * gholms (12) * zodbot (11) * fenris02 (7) * poelcat (5) * lmacken (4) * adamw (2) * jankratochvil (2) * mclasen_afk (1) * pjones (0) * ajax (0) * kylem (0) * cwickert (0) -- 19:30:01 nirik #startmeeting FESCO (2010-09-14) 19:30:01 zodbot Meeting started Tue Sep 14 19:30:01 2010 UTC. The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:30:01 zodbot Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 19:30:01 nirik #meetingname fesco 19:30:01 nirik #chair mclasen notting nirik SMParrish kylem ajax pjones cwickert mjg59 19:30:01 nirik #topic init process 19:30:01 zodbot The meeting name has been set to 'fesco' 19:30:01 zodbot Current chairs: SMParrish ajax cwickert kylem mclasen mjg59 nirik notting pjones 19:30:30 nirik #info pjones and ajax are traveling today, will not be able to attend. 19:30:55 * mclasen present 19:31:02 notting pjones also said he'd be out next week too 19:31:04 * notting is here 19:31:05 * SMParrish here 19:31:08 * nirik nods. yep. 19:31:36 mjg59 Here 19:31:51 nirik cool. I think thats enough of us to get started... 19:32:18 nirik We have 3 updates related tickets. Should we just do them in one Updates policy status section? ;) 19:32:38 mjg59 Seems reasonable 19:33:02 nirik #topic Updates policy status 19:33:11 nirik .fesco 351 19:33:12 zodbot nirik: #351 (Create a policy for updates) - FESCo - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351 19:33:16 nirik .fesco 382 19:33:17 zodbot nirik: #382 (Implementing Stable Release Vision) - FESCo - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/382 19:33:22 nirik .fesco 454 19:33:23 zodbot nirik: #454 (pre-release update acceptance criteria) - FESCo - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/454 19:33:36 nirik so, on the first one we are just waiting for autoqa. 19:33:54 nirik on the second one, I whipped up a wiki page for docs the other day: 19:34:12 nirik https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft 19:34:37 nirik this is based on Ajax and notting's work for the stable
15 or rawhide?
Folks, I was going to file an automated bug report, but it wants to file against 15, which doesn't exist, rather than Rawhide (which obviously does). I can email and ask for a version 15 to be added to Bugzilla, etc. but is that the solution, or should ABRT be always realizing to use rawhide and it's just a bug in that tool? Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 457760] perl-HTML-Format not available for EL-4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457760 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2010-09-14 18:22:26 --- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2010-09-14 18:22:26 EDT --- Leftover from trying to push RT3 to EPEL4. The perl stack is too old for a number of modules, so let's close this one too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Linux and application installing
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 22:39 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: On 13 September 2010 21:49, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote: So Seth spent half a day implementing a proof of concept: http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/fedora-app-market-proof-of-concept/ Translations? They were part of the half day hack PoC, but yes to expand your answer in a nice way: If/when you propose this for inclusion as repodata, will you be adding a bunch of information that wasn't in the half-day PoC ...and the answer is: Yes, there's lots of interesting data that could be added. Offline queries? What about offline queries? I assume you know you can do them just fine with yum on the current repodata, and I assume you haven't worked out a way to magically install your repodata in a package packages when it isn't installed and there is no network/CD. So, again, what are you trying to say? Co-operating with other distros? For the half-day PoC, really? But even then, Seth co-operated with Fedora rel-eng's desire that repo-metadata actually be repo-metadata. Which is the only thing anyone said is a must fix for Fedora. It's hard to see what other distros. have required as must fix with app-install, given that none are using it. Call me biased, but doing things in yum because it's the way it always used to be carries little weight when the user experience just sucks really hard. Ok, you're biased. As you've been told numerous times, putting repodata in packages is a terrible idea due to a bunch of known problems, including: 1. How do you keep it in sync. with the repo? 2. How do you deal with the reality of multiple repos? 3. How do you deal with disabling repos? Temporarily? 4. How does anadonda see it? ...this is why repodata is repodata, and we don't just ship fedora-primary.rpm etc. This is not specific to yum, and would still be the case if you finish Zif and Fedora moves to it (or apt/zypper/whatever) instead. I've been working on app-install now with other distro people for nearly two years. I'm not sure I'd be rushing to tell everyone that a half-day PoC was better than my 2 years of work, but each to his own. And, again, it begs the question ... why is no other distro. using it? But then maybe you didn't mean all those two years were spent doing something which is fundamentally impossible to put in repodata, which is the only required change I've seen from anyone in Fedora ($DEITY help us with any of the other things we just wanted). Sometimes I wonder why I should deal with Fedora and all the politics when Ubuntu and Suse just ship something that works. Ubuntu recently got high praise from LWN for Software Center in 10.10 betas. It doesn't use PackageKit at all AFAICS (no PackageKit packages are installed in my VM). It integrates tightly with apt (you know, like showing package history ... like yumex does). Also their package install/remove tool is not gpk-application, and their update tool is not gpk-update-viewer. So I'm having a hard time working out what you mean. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora 14 Blocker Bug Meeting Recap 2010-09-14
A last minute blocker bug meeting was held in #fedora-bugzappers to review the state of the open Fedora 14 Beta Blocker bugs. In order to create the Fedora 14 Beta Release Candidate on Thursday (2010-09-16), test, and release on time, this list MUST be empty by 2010-09-15 (tomorrow)! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=611991hide_resolved=1 YOU can help by re-testing bugs in MODIFIED or helping to debug bugs yet to be fixed. == #fedora-bugzappers: interim beta blocker bug review meeting 2010-09-14 == Meeting started by adamw at 18:05:56 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-09-14/fedora-bugzappers.2010-09-14-18.05.log.html . Meeting summary --- * intro (adamw, 18:06:07) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608992 (adamw, 18:07:23) * AGREED: 633827 adamw will test bcl's proposed fix and feed back to him (adamw, 18:13:53) * ACTION: adamw to test bcl fix for 633827 (adamw, 18:14:04) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621027 (adamw, 18:14:49) * AGREED: 621027 fix is in but problem with live image bootloader background, jlaska to test potential fix from mizmo (adamw, 18:19:08) * ACTION: jlaska to test 621027 fixes from mizmo (adamw, 18:19:16) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622927 (adamw, 18:21:12) * AGREED: 622927 ask tester to verify fix in TC1 and close the bug (adamw, 18:24:01) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627014 (adamw, 18:24:33) * AGREED: 627014 looks like major issues are fixed, we can drop it from blocker list or close it when 10-1+ is accepted (adamw, 18:30:15) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627401 (adamw, 18:30:32) * AGREED: 627401 is fixed in anaconda 14.17.1-1, anaconda team need to submit that or a later build to bodhi (adamw, 18:34:02) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628239 (adamw, 18:34:26) * AGREED: 628239 does not appear to be valid as described, waiting on more info from reporter, but unless we learn something new, looks like this isn't a blocker (adamw, 18:38:34) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628241 (adamw, 18:39:38) * LINK: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firstboot-1.113-1.fc14 - i posted a comment asking mgracik to push it (adamw, 18:41:31) * AGREED: 628241 is fixed in firstboot-1.113-1, needs to be pushed stable (adamw, 18:44:17) * ACTION: mgracik or notting to push firstboot-1.113-1 stable (adamw, 18:44:30) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629719 (adamw, 18:44:40) * AGREED: 629719: we suspect reporter malfeasance, plan is to try and replicate in office, send out ml call to see if anyone else can, and ask reporter to try once more; if we get no more info on this bug will demote it (adamw, 19:06:20) * ACTION: adamw or jlaska to send out ml testing call for 629719 (adamw, 19:06:33) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630490 (adamw, 19:07:00) * AGREED: 630490 testing indicates this is fixed in systemd-10, can be closed when that goes stable (adamw, 19:09:50) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630952 (adamw, 19:10:32) * AGREED: testing indicates 630952 fix is good, bug can be closed when systemd/initscripts update goes stable (adamw, 19:12:35) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631620 (adamw, 19:12:58) * AGREED: 631620 fix looks good in all important respects, can be closed when hal update is pushed (adamw, 19:18:26) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632321 (adamw, 19:18:45) * AGREED: 632321 is fixed in systemd 10, can be closed when it goes stable (adamw, 19:29:40) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632489 (adamw, 19:29:51) * AGREED: 632489 fix has been tested in updates.img, next anaconda build will include it (adamw, 19:32:20) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632510 (adamw, 19:32:40) * AGREED: 632510 fix is in, needs a new build to test it; can either be a quick test boot.iso or we can test it in rc1 (adamw, 19:37:56) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633234 (adamw, 19:38:05) * AGREED: 633234 is a blocker, top priority for anaconda team, it seems reproducible by at least two testers (adamw, 19:47:29) * ACTION: anaconda team to try and investigate and fix 633234 (adamw, 19:47:37) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633315 (adamw, 19:48:19) * AGREED: 633315 doesn't seem like a blocker, we will reject it for now and ask radek to re-propose if he has a reason for it to be one (adamw, 20:02:24) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633523 (adamw, 20:06:45) * AGREED: 633523 is an accepted blocker, we cc
Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
On 09/14/2010 10:13 AM, John W. Linville wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:31:44PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot distribute unlike say the Intel firmwares. I could be wrong though. That's still true of the b43 firmware for older (pre-802.11n) devices, but the firmware to go with their new driver is now in linux-firmware.git. Their *original* offering of that new firmware had a stupid licence -- you could only distribute it if you promised to indemnify and defend Broadcom from all related third-party lawsuits. They fixed that though, and I merged it. Nevertheless, everyone I know that has reviewed the newly released driver code is being treated for eye cancer. I wouldn't expect to see it in F-14. John Can we use the firmware that they have for the existing broadcom wireless driver? Ric -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
On 09/14/2010 10:01 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: * ACTION: : will defer systemd to f15 release to give more time to fix small issues and docs and general polish. (nirik, 21:12:43) What are you kidding me! Gnome-shell better be sparkling out of aunt Tilly pony eyes before we ship it..sigh JBG -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
On Tue, 14.09.10 16:01, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote: * #461 F14 blessing for systemd (nirik, 20:12:29) * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_basic and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_tools (nirik, 20:38:06) * ACTION: : will defer systemd to f15 release to give more time to fix small issues and docs and general polish. (nirik, 21:12:43) * ACTION: notting will look at what's required to flip the default in f14 (notting, 21:13:44) Nice move. So, we closed all blocker bugs, we worked through the vast majority of other bugs. I dealt with almost all issues raised in Bill's list, only few small issues left. While there are some bugs open, we did our homework. I was kept in the impression during the last week that these are the criteria to get systemd into F14. But what happens? Out of nowhere completely new criteria are created, and used to bring this project down. Why do we have the blocker bugs scheme if it apparently is irrelevant for final decisions? This is a really unfriendly move: I cannot win a game where the moment the game nears it ends completely new rules are created. Quite frankly, this is a recipe to piss people off, not to make people love developing for Fedora. Yes, I am very disappointed, Fedora. It's also nice to not even bother to ping me for the FESCO discussion. This all reads like a page from the book How to piss people off and scare them away in 7 days. You make up new rules, and then don't bother to invite the folks mostky affected when you apply them. Oh, and next time, if you guys plan a move like that, then please do it a couple of weeks earlier, so that I can find funnier things to do then make you folks happy, since that's apparently not possible. Everybody has a different idea of what Fedora should be, but mine is definitely not one where people with negative energy make the rules and then win by them. There's something seriously wrong with the Fedora development process, folks. And with you, FESCO. You excelled in erratic behaviour, not in steering engineering. Lennart (Well, and I guess this will create a flamefest, but I won't reply to the thread.) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:01 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: * #461 F14 blessing for systemd (nirik, 20:12:29) * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_basic and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_tools (nirik, 20:38:06) * ACTION: : will defer systemd to f15 release to give more time to fix small issues and docs and general polish. (nirik, 21:12:43) * ACTION: notting will look at what's required to flip the default in f14 (notting, 21:13:44) Am I mistaken in thinking that this is largely a messaging issue for Fedora 14? What I mean is, the exciting work Lennart has done will be available at release. Based on the test day results, it will likely be operational. However, we may not have all the bells and whistles (documentation and more complex use cases) at release, and therefore it will not be the default init system. Much like we introduced and communicated btrfs support in F-11, should we communicate systemd as a technology preview in Fedora 14? Thanks, James signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:56 PM, James Laska jla...@redhat.com wrote: Much like we introduced and communicated btrfs support in F-11, should we communicate systemd as a technology preview in Fedora 14? I would agree with this. I certainly plan to run F14 with systemd in anticipation of seeing it become the default at some point. -jef -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: 15 or rawhide?
Jon Masters said the following on 09/14/2010 03:17 PM Pacific Time: Folks, I was going to file an automated bug report, but it wants to file against 15, which doesn't exist, rather than Rawhide (which obviously does). I can email and ask for a version 15 to be added to Bugzilla, etc. but is that the solution, or should ABRT be always realizing to use rawhide and it's just a bug in that tool? Jon. No, please do not create version 15. Shouldn't ABRT be looking to a file like /etc/fedora-release to determine the release version? Rawhide is the repo where the packages and the version the bug was found in are until the repo branches and becomes 15, at which time version 15 will be created and the open rawhide bugs that aren't features will be changed to 15. John -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
On 09/15/2010 12:01 AM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:56 PM, James Laskajla...@redhat.com wrote: Much like we introduced and communicated btrfs support in F-11, should we communicate systemd as a technology preview in Fedora 14? I would agree with this. I certainly plan to run F14 with systemd in anticipation of seeing it become the default at some point. Should gnome-shell and every other feature fall under technology preview and stay like that for sometime as well before becoming the default or does this just applied to certain features maintained by certain people. . . JBG -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
2010/9/15 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com: Should gnome-shell (..) becoming the default I hope that there will be the option to disable this default and return to classical gnome desktop. Regards, Michal -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
2010/9/14 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com: Should gnome-shell and every other feature fall under technology preview and stay like that for sometime as well before becoming the default or does this just applied to certain features maintained by certain people. . . I'm making lemonade out of lemons here. I'm not stating an agreement or disagreement with the decision to punt. What I am saying is that I am personally going to be using systemd in an anticipation of and to what extent my usage can, hasten it becoming the default. And again.. without stating whether or not I agree or disagree with this decision.. I will say its precedent setting. For good or ill, the decision to punt this feature is going to be held up as a measuring stick in future feature discussions.. most assuredly. -jef -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
Am Dienstag, den 14.09.2010, 16:01 -0600 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: Meeting summary --- * init process (nirik, 19:30:01) * pjones and ajax are traveling today, will not be able to attend. (nirik, 19:30:30) So am I, sorry i didn't make note earlier. I will be back next Tuesday and should be able to attend the meeting. Regards, Christoph -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Linux and application installing
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:28 PM, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Ubuntu recently got high praise from LWN for Software Center in 10.10 betas. It doesn't use PackageKit at all AFAICS (no PackageKit packages are installed in my VM). It integrates tightly with apt (you know, like showing package history ... like yumex does). Also their package install/remove tool is not gpk-application, and their update tool is not gpk-update-viewer. I had mentioned earlier that Canonical is pushing their Software Center as a big feature, I don't see them replacing it with something cross-distro any time soon. -- Fedora 13 (www.pembo13.com) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
Hi FESCo members, On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:01 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-09-14) === Meeting started by nirik at 19:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-09-14/fesco.2010-09-14-19.30.log.html Meeting summary --- * init process (nirik, 19:30:01) * pjones and ajax are traveling today, will not be able to attend. (nirik, 19:30:30) Only 5 of the 9 FESCo members voted on this issue. If all 9 had voted, even with the current 3 for / 2 against vote, systemd could easily have enough votes for inclusion in F14. I have a couple of questions for you, FESCo, since I honestly don't know and maybe would feel more comfortable knowing: - Has there been any consideration for formalizing the acceptable of absentee votes? - How many members must be present at a meeting for a voting decision to be considered valid? - Is it possible to collect the votes of the folks who were not present? Let me make one thing clear: if FESCo decides that this is the best decision in the interest of Fedora, I trust you all completely to make the right call. I am just coming away with the feeling that this is a little closer to a dice roll - depending on who how many showed up - than I feel is really fair given the magnitude of the issue. This decision while pending has come up as a topic time and time again in Board meetings community QA so it seems a major issue for a lot of folks in Fedora. Therefore, I feel it should be something FESCo is quite sure about. Again, either way the decision goes - fine. It would be nice to hear from the FESCo members not present on how they feel about the decision, though. Is anyone else feeling a little uncomfortable about the voting process, irregardless of its conclusion? ~m -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 01:05:34 +0200 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: On Tue, 14.09.10 16:01, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote: * #461 F14 blessing for systemd (nirik, 20:12:29) * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_basic and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_tools (nirik, 20:38:06) * ACTION: : will defer systemd to f15 release to give more time to fix small issues and docs and general polish. (nirik, 21:12:43) * ACTION: notting will look at what's required to flip the default in f14 (notting, 21:13:44) Nice move. ...snip... Lennart (Well, and I guess this will create a flamefest, but I won't reply to the thread.) I hope you still read it. I have some advice for you, which of course you're welcome to take or leave: Please don't take everything personally. This is not about you as a person. I think systemd is cool and needed, and I think you have been doing a fine job fixing bugs and issues. As a whole, fesco decided to wait to make it default until next release. There should not be any angst here, everyone wins: - Users get a more polished/documented/ready thing. - You don't have to spend crazy hours working on blockers before releases in a hurry, you can perhaps also spend some time on pulseaudio this cycle too? Anyhow, please don't take things personally please? lets all just work to make a better fedora. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:48:13 -0400 Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hi FESCo members, ...snip... Only 5 of the 9 FESCo members voted on this issue. If all 9 had voted, even with the current 3 for / 2 against vote, systemd could easily have enough votes for inclusion in F14. I have a couple of questions for you, FESCo, since I honestly don't know and maybe would feel more comfortable knowing: ok. - Has there been any consideration for formalizing the acceptable of absentee votes? no, but perhaps there should be? - How many members must be present at a meeting for a voting decision to be considered valid? My understanding: A quorum (ie, 5 of 9). - Is it possible to collect the votes of the folks who were not present? yes. And I filed a ticket last week to do so: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/461 I'm pretty bummed that only 3 fesco members bothered to vote there. Let me make one thing clear: if FESCo decides that this is the best decision in the interest of Fedora, I trust you all completely to make the right call. I am just coming away with the feeling that this is a little closer to a dice roll - depending on who how many showed up - than I feel is really fair given the magnitude of the issue. This decision while pending has come up as a topic time and time again in Board meetings community QA so it seems a major issue for a lot of folks in Fedora. Therefore, I feel it should be something FESCo is quite sure about. I'm happy to look for ways to make the other fesco voices heard. Any ideas? I could try making the tickets have some more descriptive subject like HEY VOTE ON THIS PLEASE BEFORE NEXT MEETING: or something. Again, either way the decision goes - fine. It would be nice to hear from the FESCo members not present on how they feel about the decision, though. I'd love to too. Is anyone else feeling a little uncomfortable about the voting process, irregardless of its conclusion? Sure. I wish it was more clear cut too. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 19:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I'm happy to look for ways to make the other fesco voices heard. Any ideas? I could try making the tickets have some more descriptive subject like HEY VOTE ON THIS PLEASE BEFORE NEXT MEETING: or something. Hmm. Here's a couple ideas I could think of: - If you don't place a vote by $DATE, your vote will be assumed to be $POSITION can be scarily motivating. - Nag emails sent out by trac daily until you click on the email's yes no links to vote! (some of the ticket reminder trac hacks might work to provide this) ~m -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 18:57 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I hope you still read it. I have some advice for you, which of course you're welcome to take or leave: Please don't take everything personally. I don't see how Lennart is taking anything personally here. He is merely expressing his frustration about the fact that he worked his butt off for weeks, only to see the goalposts moved at the last minute. A very understandable reaction, if you ask me. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 21:26:41 -0400, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hmm. Here's a couple ideas I could think of: - If you don't place a vote by $DATE, your vote will be assumed to be $POSITION can be scarily motivating. - Nag emails sent out by trac daily until you click on the email's yes no links to vote! (some of the ticket reminder trac hacks might work to provide this) Maybe we should track voting records and make them available publicly so that at election time people can see if and how people pvoted on issues. I would expect that people would be reluctant to keep people in FESCO who miss a lot of votes. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:05:34AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: So, we closed all blocker bugs, we worked through the vast majority of other bugs. I dealt with almost all issues raised in Bill's list, only few small issues left. While there are some bugs open, we did our homework. I was kept in the impression during the last week that these are the criteria to get systemd into F14. But what happens? Out of nowhere completely new criteria are created, and used to bring this project down. The criteria primarily flowed from Notting's discussion of systemd acceptance criteria. Was that well communicated beforehand? No. Did all of those criteria get translated into appropriate bugzilla entries? No. Should we have handled this case better? Absolutely yes. With hindsight it was entirely inappropriate of us to make this decision without attempting to involve you in the discussion. I'm genuinely sorry about that. But since this is the situation that we're in now, I think what we're left with is the opportunity to identify what went wrong with our process and how to avoid this kind of thing in future. Systemd was a relatively unusual feature, in that it's core functionality that impacts every spin, it exposes aspects of its functionality in multiple areas and it didn't exist during our previous release cycle. It's not obvious in advance what criteria we should be using for determining whether this kind of feature is acceptable or not. The right time for doing so would probably have been at the initial feature acceptance stage, and in future I'd like to suggest that for features of a similar scale to systemd we ensure that that's done. It makes the feature acceptance process significantly more difficult and longer, but it's time that will almost certainly otherwise be spent in mailing list discussion of the same thing. Having it presented in a structured manner beforehand is proably a net reduction in difficulty. As an aside, it's also obvious that the degree of scruitiny placed on systemd is grossly disproportionate to features in previous releases. I can see why this is frustrating, but I think it's a necessary part of the development of the distribution. NetworkManager was a disruptive piece of core infrastructure that didn't initially provide feature parity with the nfrastructure it replaced, but NetworkManager was necessary to make Fedora a usable desktop operating system in a large number of use cases. In contrast, we're now at the point where we *have* most of the infrastructure to provide a usable desktop operating system. I think it's entirely justified that our tolerance for churn has diminished, and I think being a little more conservative with new features is entirely in line with modifying our udpate policy to ensure that users have a more consistent experience. This is a really unfriendly move: I cannot win a game where the moment the game nears it ends completely new rules are created. Quite frankly, this is a recipe to piss people off, not to make people love developing for Fedora. Yes, I am very disappointed, Fedora. It's also nice to not even bother to ping me for the FESCO discussion. This all reads like a page from the book How to piss people off and scare them away in 7 days. You make up new rules, and then don't bother to invite the folks mostky affected when you apply them. Oh, and next time, if you guys plan a move like that, then please do it a couple of weeks earlier, so that I can find funnier things to do then make you folks happy, since that's apparently not possible. I absolutely agree with your criticism. We should do better, and I hope that in future we will. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?
Ric Wheeler (rwhee...@redhat.com) said: Can we use the firmware that they have for the existing broadcom wireless driver? 'No' is what I've been told. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
2010/9/14 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com: On 09/15/2010 12:01 AM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:56 PM, James Laskajla...@redhat.com wrote: Much like we introduced and communicated btrfs support in F-11, should we communicate systemd as a technology preview in Fedora 14? I would agree with this. I certainly plan to run F14 with systemd in anticipation of seeing it become the default at some point. Should gnome-shell and every other feature fall under technology preview and stay like that for sometime as well before becoming the default Yes, and please compile out support for spacial gnome while you're at it. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
Máirín Duffy (du...@fedoraproject.org) said: Only 5 of the 9 FESCo members voted on this issue. If all 9 had voted, even with the current 3 for / 2 against vote, systemd could easily have enough votes for inclusion in F14. I have a couple of questions for you, FESCo, since I honestly don't know and maybe would feel more comfortable knowing: - Has there been any consideration for formalizing the acceptable of absentee votes? We have accepted absentee votes either sent to the FESCo list or noted in the ticket before the meeting; in fact, noting votes in meeting item tickets is the de-facto method of participating for members who can't make it. - How many members must be present at a meeting for a voting decision to be considered valid? 5 out of 9 is considered quorum for the meeting, and 5 out of 9 is also required for decisions. - Is it possible to collect the votes of the folks who were not present? We could poll them. But the ticket has been open for ~1 week for them to note their opinion; none of the not-present FESCo members have commented to this point. Again, either way the decision goes - fine. It would be nice to hear from the FESCo members not present on how they feel about the decision, though. Is anyone else feeling a little uncomfortable about the voting process, irregardless of its conclusion? I said as much during the meeting. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
On 09/15/2010 05:50 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: 2010/9/15 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com: Should gnome-shell (..) becoming the default I hope that there will be the option to disable this default and return to classical gnome desktop Yes. GNOME Panel will be available as a fallback for the foreseeable future even if GNOME Shell is included. That has been the plan from the start based on the fact that not all drivers/hardware support the features GNOME Shell needs. GNOME Shell is also different from systemd in the sense that it affects every single user of Fedora and deserves a closer scrutiny. FWIW, I think GNOME Shell deserves extensive testing before made as default as well. FESCo's handling of systemd feature as a process has gaps that needs to be fixed as well. Nevertheless, I would like to thank Lennart for his extensive work on getting systemd where it is now in such a short period and Matthew Miller for playing the role of a very constructive critic and following up on bugs methodologically. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Revisor and live_ram
Excuse me if this is the wrong place to send this. As my fedora ambassador duties, I tend to show other students the neat things you can do with Fedora with my trusty USB drive I always keep on my keychain. More often than not, I'm booting up Fedora into some laptop or university desktop with copious quantities of ram (more than 2G, commonly 4 or more). Also more often than not, I've edited the boot options when it starts up to add the 'live_ram' flag which copies the image into RAM and permits me to unplug the USB drive so I'm not late for class while they explore. I've longed for an option in the stock boot menu to expose this seemingly hidden magic to the general public, so I wrote a tiny patch for python-imgcreate (which is used by revisor). It adds one new option to the isolinux boot menu, labeled Boot and run from RAM. I've tested it by re-spinning the KDE spin and the custom one I use for day-to-day use on my usb drive. Flawless victory. 8 diff --git a/imgcreate/live.py b/imgcreate/live.py index fcb7198..7cfd14c 100644 --- a/imgcreate/live.py +++ b/imgcreate/live.py @@ -518,6 +518,17 @@ menu hiddenrow 5 cfg += self.__get_image_stanza(is_xen, isDracut, fslabel = self.fslabel, isofstype = auto, + liveargs = kern_opts + live_ram, + long = long + and run from RAM, + short = linux-ram + index, + basicvideo = , + xdriver = , + extra = , + index = index) + +cfg += self.__get_image_stanza(is_xen, isDracut, + fslabel = self.fslabel, + isofstype = auto, liveargs = kern_opts, long = long + (Basic Video), short = linux + index, 8 -- Trever Fischer (tdfischer) Fedora Ambassador, KDE Hacker http://wm161.net GPG: C40F2998 hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 633736] New: perl-ORLite-1.45 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-ORLite-1.45 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633736 Summary: perl-ORLite-1.45 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-ORLite AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.45 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.44 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/ORLite/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633738] New: perl-PAR-1.002 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-PAR-1.002 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633738 Summary: perl-PAR-1.002 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-PAR AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.002 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.000 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PAR/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633720] New: perl-Date-Manip-6.11 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.11 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633720 Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.11 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Date-Manip AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 6.11 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 6.07 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Date-Manip/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633727] New: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR-0.06 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR-0.06 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633727 Summary: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR-0.06 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.06 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.05 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-ShareDir-PAR/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633726] New: perl-File-ShareDir-1.02 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-File-ShareDir-1.02 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633726 Summary: perl-File-ShareDir-1.02 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-File-ShareDir AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com, trem...@tremble.org.uk Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.02 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.00 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-ShareDir/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633734] New: perl-MooseX-CascadeClearing-0.03 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-MooseX-CascadeClearing-0.03 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633734 Summary: perl-MooseX-CascadeClearing-0.03 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-MooseX-CascadeClearing AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.03 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.02 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-CascadeClearing/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633729] New: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-0.11 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-0.11 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633729 Summary: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-0.11 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, pertu...@free.fr, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.11 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.09 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-FormatText-WithLinks/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633744] New: perl-pip-1.18 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-pip-1.18 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633744 Summary: perl-pip-1.18 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-pip AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.18 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.16 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/pip/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633737] New: perl-Padre-0.70 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Padre-0.70 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737 Summary: perl-Padre-0.70 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Padre AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.70 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.64 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Padre/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633751] New: perl-Test-Most-0.23 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Test-Most-0.23 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633751 Summary: perl-Test-Most-0.23 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Test-Most AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.23 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.21 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Most/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633748] New: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.010 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.010 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633748 Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.010 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-PPIx-Regexp AssignedTo: ppi...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com, ppi...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.010 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.007 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PPIx-Regexp/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633752] New: perl-Test-NeedsDisplay-1.07 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Test-NeedsDisplay-1.07 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633752 Summary: perl-Test-NeedsDisplay-1.07 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Test-NeedsDisplay AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.07 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.05 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-NeedsDisplay/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633721] New: perl-Devel-Dumpvar-1.06 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Devel-Dumpvar-1.06 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633721 Summary: perl-Devel-Dumpvar-1.06 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Devel-Dumpvar AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.06 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.04 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-Dumpvar/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633733] New: perl-Module-Manifest-1.08 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Module-Manifest-1.08 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633733 Summary: perl-Module-Manifest-1.08 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Module-Manifest AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.08 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.07 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Manifest/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633725] New: perl-File-Find-Rule-VCS-1.07 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-File-Find-Rule-VCS-1.07 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633725 Summary: perl-File-Find-Rule-VCS-1.07 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-File-Find-Rule-VCS AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.07 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.05 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-Find-Rule-VCS/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633724] New: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.15 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.15 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633724 Summary: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.15 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com, ppi...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.15 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.12 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/ExtUtils-XSpp/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633740] New: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl-0.13 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl-0.13 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633740 Summary: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl-0.13 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.13 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.11 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Parse-ErrorString-Perl/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633732] New: perl-Math-Symbolic-0.604 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Math-Symbolic-0.604 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633732 Summary: perl-Math-Symbolic-0.604 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Math-Symbolic AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, pertu...@free.fr, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.604 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.510 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Math-Symbolic/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633731] New: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.08 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.08 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633731 Summary: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.08 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.08 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.06 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/JavaScript-Minifier-XS/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633749] New: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.06 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.06 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633749 Summary: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.06 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.06 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.04 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633745] New: perl-Pod-Abstract-0.20 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Pod-Abstract-0.20 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633745 Summary: perl-Pod-Abstract-0.20 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Pod-Abstract AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.20 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.17 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Pod-Abstract/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633754] New: perl-Text-FindIndent-0.09 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Text-FindIndent-0.09 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633754 Summary: perl-Text-FindIndent-0.09 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Text-FindIndent AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.09 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.06 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-FindIndent/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633739] New: perl-PAR-Packer-1.007 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.007 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633739 Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.007 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-PAR-Packer AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.007 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.005 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PAR-Packer/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633756] New: perl-Text-Table-1.116 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Text-Table-1.116 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633756 Summary: perl-Text-Table-1.116 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Text-Table AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.116 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.114 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Table/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633747] New: perl-POE-Filter-HTTP-Parser-1.04 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-POE-Filter-HTTP-Parser-1.04 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633747 Summary: perl-POE-Filter-HTTP-Parser-1.04 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-POE-Filter-HTTP-Parser AssignedTo: ppi...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com, ppi...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.04 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.02 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/POE-Filter-HTTP-Parser/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633757] New: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C-0.26 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C-0.26 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633757 Summary: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C-0.26 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.26 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.24 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633750] New: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6-0.86 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6-0.86 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633750 Summary: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6-0.86 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.86 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.78 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Syntax-Highlight-Perl6/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633753] New: perl-Text-Aligner-0.07 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Text-Aligner-0.07 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633753 Summary: perl-Text-Aligner-0.07 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Text-Aligner AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.07 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.03 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Aligner/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633760] New: perl-XXX-0.17 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-XXX-0.17 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633760 Summary: perl-XXX-0.17 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-XXX AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.17 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.12 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/XXX/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633739] perl-PAR-Packer-1.007 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633739 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|mmasl...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633738] perl-PAR-1.002 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633738 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|mmasl...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 633746] perl-Pod-Coverage-0.21 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633746 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|mmasl...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
