[Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Beta RC Validation Test Summary

2010-09-26 Thread He Rui
Greetings, It's time to summarize F-14 Beta RC validation tests. Apologies for the absence of some RC3 install testing, but I'm glad to see that it went on smoothly, so special thanks for the ones who helped executing the cases. Though Beta has been declared gold based on the Beta release

kernel building instructions

2010-09-26 Thread Piscium
This question is addressed at those with kernel building experience. The Fedora wiki has instructions on building a custom kernel: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/CustomKernel That's good, thanks. Let's say that someone would like to build a kernel with different configuration options. He or

Will make review for food (again).

2010-09-26 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All! I would like to exchange review requests - someone may pick up each of these three easy-to-review Erlang-related applications, and I will finish your stalled review request. One mine package for one yours - that's quite fair deal! Here is the list of my packages for trade: *

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-26 Thread Thomas Janssen
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:53:49 -0400 Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca wrote: It would be nice to list it somewhere as an exception, to avoid panics :) Well, I personally do not want to say: Hey, anytime you like down the

rawhide report: 20100926 changes

2010-09-26 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun Sep 26 08:15:43 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-14.fc15.i686 requires libgs.so.8 ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-14.fc15.x86_64 requires libgs.so.8()(64bit)

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-26 Thread Gerald Henriksen
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:26:46 -0400, you wrote: I can't tell people Fedora is the best if it's not carrying the latest upstream KDE, its just not possible. I'm constantly recruiting new users. I'm in regular contact with the team of people who run Techrights. If a new release of KDE comes out,

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-26 Thread Thomas Janssen
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:26:46 -0400, you wrote: I can't tell people Fedora is the best if it's not carrying the latest upstream KDE, its just not possible. I'm constantly recruiting new users. I'm in regular contact with

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-26 Thread Gerald Henriksen
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:41:38 +0200, you wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:53:49 -0400 Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca wrote: It would be nice to list it somewhere as an exception, to avoid panics :) Well, I personally do not

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-26 Thread Thomas Janssen
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:41:38 +0200, you wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:53:49 -0400 Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca wrote: It would be nice to list

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-26 Thread Brandon Lozza
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:41:38 +0200, you wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:53:49 -0400 Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca wrote: It would be nice to list

Re: Will make review for food (again).

2010-09-26 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All! I would like to exchange review requests - someone may pick up each of these three easy-to-review Erlang-related applications, and I will finish your stalled review request. One mine package for one yours -

F-14 Branched report: 20100926 changes

2010-09-26 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Sun Sep 26 13:15:21 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.2()(64bit)

Re: Nautilus still no go in rawhide

2010-09-26 Thread Tom London
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, darrell pfeifer darrel...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:55, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 14:04 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: (nautilus:11408): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT

Re: Nautilus still no go in rawhide

2010-09-26 Thread darrell pfeifer
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 09:30, Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, darrell pfeifer darrel...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:55, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 14:04 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:

Fedora 14 Beta corrupts user data

2010-09-26 Thread John Reiser
Compiled code for minimum(), maximum(), etc. suffers from a compiler bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757-O1 wrong-code by cmove Unfortunately this bug can corrupt user data silently. I have hit the bug three times myself (bz 635508, 637303, 637461) and consider myself

Re: Fedora 14 Beta corrupts user data

2010-09-26 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:40:22 -0700, John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote: Compiled code for minimum(), maximum(), etc. suffers from a compiler bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757-O1 wrong-code by cmove Unfortunately this bug can corrupt user data silently. I

Re: Fedora 14 Beta corrupts user data

2010-09-26 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:58:05 +0200, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:40:22 -0700, John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote: Compiled code for minimum(), maximum(), etc. suffers from a compiler bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757-O1 wrong-code by

Re: Fedora 14 Beta corrupts user data

2010-09-26 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 20:32:14 +0200, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote: On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:58:05 +0200, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:40:22 -0700, John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote: Compiled code for minimum(), maximum(), etc. suffers from a

Re: Fedora 14 Beta corrupts user data

2010-09-26 Thread Kalev Lember
On 09/26/2010 09:47 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:41:04 +0200, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 20:32:14 +0200, Jan Kratochviljan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote: gcc-4.5.1-4.fc14: PASS gcc-4.5.1-3.fc14: FAIL gcc-4.5.1-2.fc14: There was no -2.

Re: Fedora 14 Beta corrupts user data

2010-09-26 Thread Ralf Ertzinger
Hi. On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:40:22 -0700, John Reiser wrote Compiled code for minimum(), maximum(), etc. suffers from a compiler bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757-O1 wrong-code by cmove Unfortunately this bug can corrupt user data silently. Please forgive me for

Re: Fedora 14 Beta corrupts user data

2010-09-26 Thread Sven Lankes
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 09:33:49PM +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: Please forgive me for being confused, but isn't the default for Fedora to build with -O2? The issue exists for code compiled with at least -O1 - so -O2 compiled code is affected as well. -- sven === jabber/xmpp: s...@lankes.net

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-26 Thread Björn Persson
Rex Dieter wrote: The kde-sig asked FESCo to consider up to 1 KDE version upgrade per release, and this was generally well-received during the last FESCo meeting, so no reason to panic. That's good to hear. Then I think my strategy for the future will be to mostly stay on the next to latest

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-26 Thread Gerald Henriksen
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:33:25 +0200, you wrote: On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:41:38 +0200, you wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:53:49 -0400 Brandon Lozza

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-26 Thread charles zeitler
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:33:25 +0200, you wrote: On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:41:38 +0200, you

Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?

2010-09-26 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 17:32 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: PostgreSQL 9 was released http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.1235 Are there any chances to get this for F14? Here comes the upstream packager. :) I have done major rewrite in 9.0 spec file, and it now supports parallel

[perl-Perl-Version] update to 1.010

2010-09-26 Thread Iain Arnell
commit def0786b884bd619340a2dab05fc0e6a7c4bd28e Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Sun Sep 26 10:17:56 2010 +0200 update to 1.010 .gitignore |1 + perl-Perl-Version.spec | 17 ++--- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+),

File MooseX-Declare-0.34.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2010-09-26 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-Declare: cb64fb1ac6bf7c52b2b4009502be9a60 MooseX-Declare-0.34.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-MooseX-Declare] update to 0.34

2010-09-26 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 56b5699bbf96497a07bb57f92c02558a56f13355 Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Sun Sep 26 10:44:57 2010 +0200 update to 0.34 .gitignore |1 + perl-MooseX-Declare.spec |9 ++--- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4