Hi,
I wrote a small program, that works as frontend for filesystem
defragmentation tools (ext4, xfs and btrfs)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=464699action=edit
I want to execute it from nautilius context menu - unfortunately
nautilius-actions-config-tool seems to be busted on
Dne 3.12.2010 23:19, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
sigh. typo. I meant Evince not Zarafa. If you're wondering how I can
possibly screw that up, I tested Evince by loading the Zarafa user
manual. =)
Hmm, apparently there are not that many bugs against evince. So, that's
just my personal curse that
Dne 4.12.2010 06:33, Garrett Holmstrom napsal(a):
Why tie branch names down to specific releases? While that scheme makes
it easy for fedpkg to guess what release to attempt to build against
when one only cares about one release, it makes little sense to call a
branch f14-rh123456 when in
On 12/04/2010 12:19 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Related issue I have with the Fedora git repositories is that one cannot
remove any branch once it is created. After I have created in bitlbee
repo two topic branches, only to find out that I cannot remove them
after the merge. I can understand need
I see [1] the libical is not orphaned yet, neither in devel, nor in F14,
as I only can add myself to the package, but not take ownership as
with other orphaned packages.
I think what happens is when the owner orphans a package one of the
co-maintainers automatically get promoted.
Cheers,
Compose started at Sat Dec 4 08:15:03 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
balsa-2.4.9-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libesmtp.so.5()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Debarshi Ray debarshi@gmail.com wrote:
I see [1] the libical is not orphaned yet, neither in devel, nor in F14,
as I only can add myself to the package, but not take ownership as
with other orphaned packages.
I think what happens is when the owner orphans
Hello all,
I've noticed that since the release of F14 a fairly large [1] number of
OO updates came down the wire - non of them in deltarpm/presto form
(read: a 100MB download per release).
Is it bug or intended behavior?
If its a bug, wouldn't it be wise to hold off on releasing
On 12/04/2010 06:54 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Hello all,
I've noticed that since the release of F14 a fairly large [1] number of
OO updates came down the wire - non of them in deltarpm/presto form
(read: a 100MB download per release).
Is it bug or intended behavior?
If its a bug, wouldn't
- Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm working on fixing a few long standing bugs in fedpkg that have to
do
with our branch structure
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619979 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622592).
This has me examining our branch
Package impressive used to be available for F13 but is orphaned; it
got marked retired for F14 and rawhide (master) because of maintainer
inactivity.
I took over ownership for F13, see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/impressive
I fedpkg-cloned it, synced with upstream and ran
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
To prevent overzealous maintainers, who believe to understand what they
are doing but actually don't, from doing harm to packages.
Trust me, after I'm done yelling at them, they won't do that ever again. ;-)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 16:34:05 -0800,
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
f14/user/fred/topic/mybranch or other such craziness. When I went to
test this, I realized that git won't allow you to have both f14 and
f14/topic as branches, because of the way the git metadata works on
Does
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 14:06:53 +0100,
Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:59:25 +0100 Rudolf Kastl wrote:
As you can see with a current rawhide install you might end up with
filesystems that have multible entries in mtab:
http://fpaste.org/Z7Ne/
df also
I'm not sure if there's a better list for this to go to, but there seems
to be a problem generating deltarpms for F14 OOo (and a few other
packages) on releng2. Specifically, the updates-updates deltarpms
aren't being generated, while the GA-updates deltarpms are.
When I checked the mash.out log
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501227
I'm writing to devel list just if anybody can say will there be any
chance to get nautilus and tracker integration working? Is this on
anybody's radar?
Thanks,
Valent.
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
blog:
On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:50:11 +0200
Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com wrote:
...snip...
As far as I can see, this only affected the openoffice.org* and
autocorr* packages in the 101202 push, and the rest of the packages in
the push had all the proper deltarpms generated.
I'm not sure where
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [abrt] perl-Padre-0.64-1.fc14: Process /usr/bin/perl was killed by
signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659941
Summary: [abrt]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659941
--- Comment #1 from Roberts Klotins robe...@latnet.lv 2010-12-04 05:21:17 EST
---
Created attachment 464722
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Net-Patricia 1.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659996
Summary: perl-Net-Patricia 1.19 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659996
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-04
15:32:01 EST ---
perl-Net-Patricia-1.19-1.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659996
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-04
15:33:07 EST ---
perl-Net-Patricia-1.19-1.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657015
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-04
19:35:13 EST ---
perl-Sub-WrapPackages-2.0-4.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657015
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657015
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-04
19:38:10 EST ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657015
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
400企业热线
400电话 400企业热线通 大连40 --- 提升企业形象，完善公司销售、客服水平，提升业绩
来电咨询赠送网络传真试用账户（可发送20-30份传真）
网通最新推出4000号码号段，多达百万号码供您选择
您想对外公布一个统一的号码吗？
您想来电即刻弹出客户资料吗？
您想记录、监控公司来去电吗？
您想不错过任何来电、商机吗？
您想分支机构之间免费通话吗？
您想群发短信、语音、传真吗？
您想花300元就拥有自己的网站？
不
要
犹
豫
抢
占
先
机
访问网站
发邮件给我
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519395
Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511770
Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510466
Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438244
Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
31 matches
Mail list logo
