Re: rpm-buildroot-usage

2011-01-22 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:54:13 -0800, Brad wrote: On 11:59 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 06:57:09 -0800, Brad wrote: I am using the compile directive -I%{buildroot}%{_includedir} during the test phase of a projects rpm build. This tests the installed copy of the

Re: @core in F14 pulls in libX11

2011-01-22 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Garrett Holmstrom gho...@fedoraproject.org wrote: It seems that the core yum group pulls in X11 libraries, at the very least on x86_64, via the following dependency chain: policycoreutils dbus-glib gobject-introspection cairo libX11 Does that much

Re: @core in F14 pulls in libX11

2011-01-22 Thread Mamoru Tasaka
Garrett Holmstrom wrote, at 01/22/2011 03:54 PM +9:00: It seems that the core yum group pulls in X11 libraries, at the very least on x86_64, via the following dependency chain: policycoreutils dbus-glib gobject-introspection cairo libX11 Does that much seriously need to be in what we

rawhide report: 20110122 changes

2011-01-22 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Jan 22 08:15:21 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit) beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit)

Re: noexec on /dev/shm

2011-01-22 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 05:54:22PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: The FHS is kinda old these days, and it has been a while since it was last updated. The LSB added some additional rules on top of it: As long as we keep in mind that we don't follow the LSB at points where it is ridiculous. --

Re: Re: rpm-buildroot-usage

2011-01-22 Thread Brad Bell
The www.coin-or.org server seems to be down, so I have placed a copy of the CppAD spec file at http://www.seanet.com/~bradbell/cppad.spec On 11:59 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:54:13 -0800, Brad wrote: ... snip ... Can you upload the spec file to some public place?

Re: rawhide report: 20110122 changes

2011-01-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
There's just one OCaml package left for the feature, which requires some work upstream: coccinelle-0.2.5-0.rc1.2.fc15.x86_64 requires ocaml(Osetb) = 0:8f21a0a4f771662673604ed92a237d79 This package is orphaned: ocaml-camlimages-3.0.2-2.fc13.x86_64 requires ocaml(Bigarray) =

Re: rawhide report: 20110122 changes

2011-01-22 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
RWMJ == Richard W M Jones rjo...@redhat.com writes: RWMJ I thought that was all I had to do, but apparently there's RWMJ something else needed to drop it entirely. Did you delete all of the files and add a dead.package file? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Re: noexec on /dev/shm

2011-01-22 Thread John Reiser
On 01/22/2011 06:22 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 05:54:22PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: The FHS is kinda old these days, and it has been a while since it was last updated. The LSB added some additional rules on top of it: As long as we keep in mind that we don't

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

2011-01-22 Thread Ben Boeckel
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com wrote: In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: * desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install 'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic

Re: rawhide report: 20110122 changes

2011-01-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 09:55:34AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: RWMJ == Richard W M Jones rjo...@redhat.com writes: RWMJ I thought that was all I had to do, but apparently there's RWMJ something else needed to drop it entirely. Did you delete all of the files and add a dead.package

Re: rpm-buildroot-usage

2011-01-22 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 06:42:38 -0800, Brad wrote: The www.coin-or.org server seems to be down, so I have placed a copy of the CppAD spec file at http://www.seanet.com/~bradbell/cppad.spec Okay, got it. In %prep, you patch the source code to use includedir=%{buildroot}%{_includedir} As

Should I bump cryptopp soname?

2011-01-22 Thread alekcejk
Hi, Need help with soname for new libcryptopp build. One of previous cryptopp versions built with disabled SSE2 for x86 because it doesn't built with SSE2. See http://groups.google.com/group/cryptopp-users/browse_thread/thread/d639907b0b1816b9 This was done by adding in config.h line (only

/etc/mtab is listed in setup and util-linux

2011-01-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
febootstrap doesn't like: febootstrap: error: /etc/mtab is a config file which is listed in two packages (setup-2.8.30-1.fc15.noarch.rpm, util-linux-2.19-0.2.fc15.x86_64.rpm) Is it OK for a %config file to exist in two RPMs? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat

Re: Should I bump cryptopp soname?

2011-01-22 Thread nucleo
No need to bump soname now. Problem fixed by patching config.h both for i686 and x86_64. Thanks Kevin Kofler for patch. Alexey Kurov nuc...@fedoraproject.org Hi, Need help with soname for new libcryptopp build. One of previous cryptopp versions built with disabled SSE2 for x86 because it

Re: Updating waf to 1.6

2011-01-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:28:10 +0100 Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com wrote: It's not a matter of 'forcing' updates: As I said in my first post, waf had, and has incompatible api changes (1.4 - 1.5 in the bug mentioned, and 1.5 - 1.6 in this thread). Our policies

Re: Updating waf to 1.6

2011-01-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Simo Sorce wrote: As far as I know the waf author himself considers embedding the right way to go for projetcs. That shows that that upstream is completely wacky and it's idiotic for ANY project to rely on his code! Samba4 (and soon talloc, tdb tevent, we are building them these days) do

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

2011-01-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: Configuration from 0.8 does not migrate to 0.9. You'll have to re-do your configuration. This isn't a consequence of the gconf stuff mentioned above, it's just an upstream change: for all config storage backends, there was a clean break from 0.8 to 0.9 and configuration

Re: Removing -fexceptions from $RPM_OPT_FLAGS

2011-01-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Tom Lane wrote: Hmm ... so what should I do with mysql? Since approximately forever, upstream has recommended using -fno-exceptions (and also -felide-constructors -fno-rtti) in CXXFLAGS. I now realize that it's a bit silly to do that when the plain-C files (of which there are plenty) are

[perl-local-lib] update to 0.008001

2011-01-22 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 1cf5d8c13f9593771920809349737d176300d972 Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Sun Jan 23 05:38:30 2011 -0500 update to 0.008001 .gitignore |1 + perl-local-lib.spec | 10 +- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6

[perl-local-lib] update requires perl(Module::Build) = 0.3600

2011-01-22 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 43e5246d334de99869f2adcb1d82fc0e3ea4bc54 Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Sun Jan 23 05:43:12 2011 -0500 update requires perl(Module::Build) = 0.3600 perl-local-lib.spec |9 ++--- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[perl-Plack/f14/master] - Upstream update. - Hack around incorrect hard-coded path to mod_perl.so. - Activate Apache2 test.

2011-01-22 Thread corsepiu
commit ec712e84d5acaec60255d6add3f561319f70c8a9 Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org Date: Sun Jan 23 06:24:17 2011 +0100 - Upstream update. - Hack around incorrect hard-coded path to mod_perl.so. - Activate Apache2 test. .gitignore |1 + perl-Plack.spec |

[perl-Plack/f13/master] - Upstream update. - Hack around incorrect hard-coded path to mod_perl.so. - Activate Apache2 test.

2011-01-22 Thread corsepiu
commit 6cf7bd95c18bd68f6ed744bf1a6c70aa2b93cbfb Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org Date: Sun Jan 23 06:31:48 2011 +0100 - Upstream update. - Hack around incorrect hard-coded path to mod_perl.so. - Activate Apache2 test. .gitignore |1 + perl-Plack.spec |