On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 18:15 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi Milan,
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Milan Crha wrote:
> >Hi,
> > Evolution team drops support for gtk2 in 2.91.6 release of
> > evolution-related packages (gtkhtml3, evolution-data-server and
> > evolution) which might
I some how goofed an thought I still was the owner for glade3, there are
just some old bugs sitting in my queue apparently. Appologies to
huzaifas (current owner of glade3).
-AdamM
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello all,
I hate to do this, but I'm running out of spare time these days and
I am going to have to start dropping some of the packages I just don't
use anymore because keeping up with them is added time and effort.
I will be orphaning the following packages, please feel free to pick
them up:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:43:11 +0100
philippe makowski wrote:
> about the fact that "services must not be enabled by default"
> I'm not sure to understand well
>
> You mean that the initscript provided by upstream should be changed ?
Yeah.
Basically there are several things to think about:
*
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672068
--- Comment #8 from Matej Cepl 2011-01-26 17:00:42 EST ---
Suggesting http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/suexec.html for more
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672068
--- Comment #7 from Matej Cepl 2011-01-26 16:59:28 EST ---
a) SuexecUserGroup context needs to be in VirtualHost, not in plain D
> "pm" == philippe makowski writes:
pm> You mean that the initscript provided by upstream should be changed
pm> ?
Yes.
pm> chkconfig: 345 80 20
pm> chkconfig: - 80 20
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
about the fact that "services must not be enabled by default"
I'm not sure to understand well
You mean that the initscript provided by upstream should be changed ?
for example with firebird we have this in the init script :
# chkconfig: 345 80 20
# description: Start/Stop firebird database server
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:58:36PM +, mike cloaked wrote:
> I wonder how long it will be before the RTL8192SU driver will be
> regarded as stable enough to go into mainstream? This works without
> any problems at all for me. Or is that a question to ask in the
> kernel list?
>
My guess is n
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:15 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Richard wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:29:44PM +, mike cloaked wrote:
>>> I was recently testing an f14 install on an old laptop without wifi
>>> hardware - so I bought a small usb wifi adapter (Micro
On 01/27/2011 01:12 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 09:30:24AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> Disappointingly the slashdot story paraphrased another site that went
>> with a sensationalized headline and was low on facts. They didn't even
>> point to the actual announcement for
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 09:30:24AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:25:40 +1300
> Al Reay wrote:
>
> > Looks like it's made the news
> >
> > http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/01/25/1723259/Fedora-Infrastructure-Compromised
>
> Disappointingly the slashdot story paraphrased ano
commit dd6fe8fbb5d9a641daf7cf60f3bdd22da7c8f405
Merge: aa4ed7e 2258698
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet
Date: Wed Jan 26 12:00:31 2011 -0700
Merge remote branch 'origin/master' into el5/master
dspam-3.9.0-docs.patch | 45 +++
dspam-3.9.0-dspamsock
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-01-26)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-01-26/fesco.2011-01-26-17.30.log.html
Meeting summary
-
commit b0bf55a540fef7594b83236a9967024f1534af71
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet
Date: Wed Jan 26 11:42:21 2011 -0700
forgot to bump the release
dspam.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec
index bc20193..334e412 100644
--- a/d
Hi Milan,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Milan Crha wrote:
> Hi,
> Evolution team drops support for gtk2 in 2.91.6 release of
> evolution-related packages (gtkhtml3, evolution-data-server and
> evolution) which might make trouble for dependent packages which are
> still gtk2. I expect th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672068
--- Comment #2 from Nathanael Noblet 2011-01-26 12:29:33
EST ---
I'll take a look.. I put it in /usr/share/dspam as other proje
Hi,
Evolution team drops support for gtk2 in 2.91.6 release of
evolution-related packages (gtkhtml3, evolution-data-server and
evolution) which might make trouble for dependent packages which are
still gtk2. I expect there will follow gtk3 updates for them in the near
future too, if not don
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:58:52 -0600
Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> Trying to build a new Asterisk package in rawhide this morning I'm
> getting this:
>
> DEBUG backend.py:745: /usr/bin/yum --installroot
> /var/lib/mock/dist-f15-build-966033-145591/root/ groupinstall build
> DEBUG util.py:281: Executin
Trying to build a new Asterisk package in rawhide this morning I'm getting this:
DEBUG backend.py:745: /usr/bin/yum --installroot
/var/lib/mock/dist-f15-build-966033-145591/root/ groupinstall build
DEBUG util.py:281: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot
/var/lib/mock/dist-f15-build-966
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:25:40 +1300
Al Reay wrote:
> Looks like it's made the news
>
> http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/01/25/1723259/Fedora-Infrastructure-Compromised
Disappointingly the slashdot story paraphrased another site that went
with a sensationalized headline and was low on facts. The
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:13:18 +0100
Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
> 2011/1/25, Marian Ganisin :
> > Hi,
> Hi
>
> > Is anyone in contact with this person:
> > Account Name: jima
> I see jima daily chatting on #ipv6 on freenode.
And he updated conserver as well yesterday. ;)
kevin
signature.asc
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 16:40 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:36:00 -0500, seth wrote:
>
> > I just want to make sure I have this:
> >
> > 1. rpm -qR foo
> >
> > 2. take each of those resolve it out to what provides them
> > 3. return the buildtime + pkg name of each of tho
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:36:00 -0500, seth wrote:
> I just want to make sure I have this:
>
> 1. rpm -qR foo
>
> 2. take each of those resolve it out to what provides them
> 3. return the buildtime + pkg name of each of those, sorted by buildtime
>
> correct?
Yes.
$ repoquery --qf '%{buildtime:
2011/1/26 Devrim GÜNDÜZ :
> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 00:16 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> There is a PostgreSQL 9.1alpha3 for i686, but I can't find one for
>> x86_64. Can I get SRPM for 9.1?
>
> Uh. Seems like I forgot to upload them.
>
> I don't have access to master RPM buildfarm ATM. May I ask
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672839
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672665
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672839
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672665
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672839
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672839
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar 2011-01-26 10:12:30 EST ---
Created attachment 475413
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachmen
Just remove the line 'BuildArch: noarch' from your specfile?
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Erik Blankinship wrote:
> In my python application, I need to include a .so binary I built of a
> custom gstreamer plugin. My python application works fine with this plugin
> when launching from th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Upgrade perl(version) to 0.88
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672839
Summary: Upgrade perl(version) to 0.88
Product: Fedora
Ve
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 08:52 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 08:36 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 12:52 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > Scenario:
> > >
> > > Assume I have package "foo". It's installed already, and the local RPM
> > > database covers it and
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 00:16 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> There is a PostgreSQL 9.1alpha3 for i686, but I can't find one for
> x86_64. Can I get SRPM for 9.1?
Uh. Seems like I forgot to upload them.
I don't have access to master RPM buildfarm ATM. May I ask you to build
you own package using
In my python application, I need to include a .so binary I built of a custom
gstreamer plugin. My python application works fine with this plugin when
launching from the command line.
Now that I am packaging my python application into a fedora rpm, I need to
compile the plugin as part of the packa
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 08:36 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 12:52 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Scenario:
> >
> > Assume I have package "foo". It's installed already, and the local RPM
> > database covers it and all its dependencies.
> >
> > App "foo" used to run fine a mont
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 12:52 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Scenario:
>
> Assume I have package "foo". It's installed already, and the local RPM
> database covers it and all its dependencies.
>
> App "foo" used to run fine a month ago, but a rebuild no longer does.
> Dependencies have been updat
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 01:24:09 pm Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 01/26/2011 02:56 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > I think there should be way
> > how to confugure from for example Gnome and same would be great for Gnome
> > Applications to be configurable from other environments. Plasma, Shell
On 01/26/2011 02:56 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> I think there should be way
> how to confugure from for example Gnome and same would be great for Gnome
> Applications to be configurable from other environments. Plasma, Shell
> whatever
> are just the face, what does matter are applications.
>
> repoquery --tree-requires ... [...] seems to be broken here,
Ah, it's just Adobe's packages that are broken and confuse the
depsolving. For example:
$ repoquery --whatprovides libgcc_s.so.1
libgcc-0:4.5.1-4.fc14.i686
AdobeReader_nor-0:8.1.7-1.i486
AdobeReader_ita-0:8.1.7-1.i486
AdobeReader_suo-
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:56:43 +, Richard wrote:
> No, but I have a script which can list all the dependencies of a
> package recursively [using data from yum, not rpm] if that is helpful:
>
> http://git.annexia.org/?p=febootstrap.git;a=blob;f=febootstrap_yum_rpm.ml;h=e70940df06edb87b616d739bf0
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:52:52PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> I'd like to run an RPM query on "foo" that displays the %{buildtime}
> for all of foo's Requires, sorted by buildtime.
>
> Does anyone know of an existing tool that can do exactly this already?
No, but I have a script which can l
Scenario:
Assume I have package "foo". It's installed already, and the local RPM
database covers it and all its dependencies.
App "foo" used to run fine a month ago, but a rebuild no longer does.
Dependencies have been updated. Too many for "rpm -qa --last|less" or
yum's log to be helpful.
I'd l
> -Original Message-
> From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-
> boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of David Woodhouse
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 7:01 AM
> To: Michael Chan
> Cc: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org; KM, Paniraja; Iyer, Shyam; Rose,
> Charles; jla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672665
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 06:40:00 pm Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 01/25/2011 10:58 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > reconsider the OnlyShowIn=KDE; for System Settings
> > * ''AGREED'' to not enable it by now and ask upstream what they think
> > * reasons are
> > ** we cannot add KDE to the name as
47 matches
Mail list logo
