Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-SDL is out of date 2.1.3-13 (~2007)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679313
Summary: perl-SDL is out of date 2.1.3-13 (~2007)
- Original Message -
Hi list,
I'm new in rpm building and want to prepare a package for webapp
Habari
(review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673630)
but.. I
have a problem with locale files, which are situated in
%{_datadir}/habari/system/locale. When I use
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SDL:
445950ca7b9991f34ec792bbac8386b6 SDL_Perl-v2.2.6.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679313
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-22
04:21:16 EST ---
perl-SDL-2.2.6-1.fc15 has been
Le Lun 21 février 2011 22:27, Hedayat Vatankhah a écrit :
On ۱۱/۰۲/۲۲ 12:30, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le lundi 21 février 2011 à 21:42 +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah a écrit :
Now, as is being discussed in [1], which fonts should be pulled by a
desktop environment as its dependencies?
A DE
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:57:20 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On a more abstract level one may consider perl's META.yml-machinery to
be a package dependency tracking machinery of its own, in parallel to
rpm's dependency tracking machinery, with the essentially the same
issues, problems and
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
ac3ba29a1f4d0d2f837668dd3bbb83ec Mojolicious-1.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 157efecf23344ac0b6c3c47b8bef47a90392e208
Author: Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com
Date: Tue Feb 22 12:55:14 2011 +0200
Update to latest upstream 1.11
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec | 10 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7
On Mon, 21.02.11 22:45, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:54:14PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Updated to this morning's rawhide. Rebooted. Now, I get to mounting my
filesystems, which works succesfully, and then it just sits there.
I need more
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Coro-5.371 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679380
Summary: perl-Coro-5.371 is available
Product: Fedora
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 09:29 -0300, Domingo Becker wrote:
2011/2/19 Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com:
I think that a just installed Fedora box should have the ability to
install software from an usb stick without the need of an internet
connection.
Think about a computer with F14 for
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 13:40 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Or maybe the whole problem set goes away by doing nothing since btrfs
has no fsck? ;-)
When I spoke with Josef a couple of weeks ago he said btrfs would be
getting a fsck very soon.
borne out by this comment from Chris:
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 13:52 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote:
On 22.02.2011 05:00, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 00:57 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote:
Is David still around?
Yes, and hacking on GNOME 3.
And no five minutes to care about older duties or at least reply? Too bad.
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 21 février 2011 22:27, Hedayat Vatankhah a écrit :
Thanks for the answer. I also thought that it is reasonable, but wanted
to make sure before calling others for it. I just wonder if it is
possible to have group dependencies in comps.xml or by packages! What is
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 02:05:07PM +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Most of the people in the maintainers list are members of the desktop
team at Red Hat, the group which owned the package when it was migrated
from Fedora Core to Fedora. I doubt any of them are interested in
maintaining it.
I'm
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Andre Robatino
robat...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
Fedora 15 Alpha RC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 01:40:51PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
the same time. That should give you a minimal idea on what is going
on. However no progress bar. In the syslog output the progress bar would
not make much sense probably. fsck (at least in the ext234
implementation) supports
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
= Weekly KDE Summary =
Week: 08/2011
Time: 2011-02-22 15:00 UTC
Meeting page:
On Tue, 22.02.11 12:55, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 01:40:51PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
the same time. That should give you a minimal idea on what is going
on. However no progress bar. In the syslog output the progress bar would
not make much
Hi,
I wonder what is the actual state of Fedora systemd integration? I
hope that there is more systemd native services than listed on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Johannbg/QA/Systemd/compatability
Currently I have quite a lot of work, but I make a systemd services
pledge - I'll write
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (12:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #516 Updates policy
Hello,
So we're getting close to having a working fsck tool so I wanted to
take the opportunity to talk about the future of BTRFS in Fedora.
Coming up in F15 we're going to have the first release of Fedora where
we don't need the special boot option to have the ability to format
you filesystem as
Hi,
2011/2/22 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (12:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:51:50 -0500
Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote:
Hello,
So we're getting close to having a working fsck tool so I wanted to
take the opportunity to talk about the future of BTRFS in Fedora.
...snip...
1) GRUB support. Edward Shishkin did GRUB1 patches for BTRFS a
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:55:26 +0100
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
...snip...
#544 List of services that may start by default
.fesco 544
Please post a log after the meeting
I always do. ;)
Note that I wasn't sure if we are even going to discuss that this week,
as
1) Fedora 16 ships with BTRFS as the default root filesystem.
2) Fedora 16 ships without LVM as the volume manager and instead use
BTRFS's built in volume management, again just for the default.
2) Anaconda support. I've already talked with Will Woods about this
some. Really anaconda will
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:51:50 -0500
Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote:
Hello,
So we're getting close to having a working fsck tool so I wanted to
take the opportunity to talk about the future of BTRFS in Fedora.
1) GRUB support. Edward Shishkin did GRUB1 patches for BTRFS a while
ago, but they were obviously never merged upstream and were also not
included into fedora. These would either need to be cleaned up and
put into our grub package, or we'd need to put /boot on a different
filesystem.
On 02/22/2011 02:51 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Hello,
So we're getting close to having a working fsck tool so I wanted to
take the opportunity to talk about the future of BTRFS in Fedora.
Coming up in F15 we're going to have the first release of Fedora where
...
So what are your thoughts?
Hi,
With some effort, and help from the guys on #anaconda@freenode (thanks!),
today I finally installed a bare-metal F15 system (part of the complication
was my existing partitions).
Then I updated it to rawhide. However, the whole point of this was to
be able to compile and test some things,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679313
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Tue, 22.02.11 14:51, Josef Bacik (jo...@toxicpanda.com) wrote:
Hello,
So we're getting close to having a working fsck tool so I wanted to
take the opportunity to talk about the future of BTRFS in Fedora.
Coming up in F15 we're going to have the first release of Fedora where
we don't
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 20:40 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I wonder what is the actual state of Fedora systemd integration? I
hope that there is more systemd native services than listed on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Johannbg/QA/Systemd/compatability
I'm planning on review and
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679589
--- Comment #1 from Simon Lachance simon...@yahoo.ca 2011-02-22 17:20:27 EST
---
Created attachment 480282
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [abrt] perl-Padre-0.64-1.fc14: Process /usr/bin/perl was killed by
signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679589
Summary: [abrt]
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:38:24 +0100
Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net wrote:
With some effort, and help from the guys on #anaconda@freenode
(thanks!), today I finally installed a bare-metal F15 system (part of
the complication was my existing partitions).
Then I updated it to rawhide. However,
[...btrfs and read-only root,/etc...]
Music to my ears.
Glad you're working on this.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Josef Bacik writes:
2) Fedora 16 ships without LVM as the volume manager and instead use
BTRFS's built in volume management, again just for the default.
Just to clarify -- F16 will still have LVM, but not used by default.
I believe that there's a huge number of existing systems that are
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 14:51 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
So what are your thoughts? Thanks,
Will there be any performance penalties making this move?
I ran it on my workstation when F13 came out with updates+snapshots and while
updating my desktop responsiveness was well not so good.
Novice
2011/2/22 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I wonder what is the actual state of Fedora systemd integration? I
hope that there is more systemd native services than listed on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Johannbg/QA/Systemd/compatability
Currently I have quite a lot of work,
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 22:38 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
Hi,
With some effort, and help from the guys on #anaconda@freenode (thanks!),
today I finally installed a bare-metal F15 system (part of the complication
was my existing partitions).
Then I updated it to rawhide. However, the whole
Here's the list of packages, with reasons:
- gnome-launch-box, replaced by gnome-shell's builtin features (mostly,
filed bugs for the rest)
- libgalago, libgalago-gtk, replaced within GNOME with session-wide
features, but could still be used by supported applications.
First come, first serve.
On Tue, 22.02.11 12:19, Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) wrote:
2011/2/22 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I wonder what is the actual state of Fedora systemd integration? I
hope that there is more systemd native services than listed on
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Tue, 22.02.11 14:51, Josef Bacik (jo...@toxicpanda.com) wrote:
Hello,
So we're getting close to having a working fsck tool so I wanted to
take the opportunity to talk about the future of BTRFS in Fedora.
2011/2/22 Jóhann B. johan...@gmail.com:
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 14:51 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
So what are your thoughts? Thanks,
Will there be any performance penalties making this move?
Who knows, thats what testing is for :). There are some things that
suck with BTRFS, but so it goes
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 14:51 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
2) Fedora 16 ships without LVM as the volume manager and instead use
BTRFS's built in volume management, again just for the default.
In my personal opinion, this is a poor design decision. Yes, BTRFS can
do a lot of volume-y things, and
I just got an ABRT bug for a Fedora 12 package [1]. Can we prevent bugs
being filed for EOL products? Who needs to handle this? Is this a
known issue?
Thanks!
- Orion
[1] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679584
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 14:51:50 -0500,
Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote:
3) All the various little tools that we have for putting together
LiveCD's that are very ext* centered. I've not even looked at this
yet, but I assume it's going to be kind of a pain.
I like to see live CDs
perl-Kwiki-RecentChanges has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Kwiki-RecentChanges-0.14-12.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
On i386:
perl-Kwiki-RecentChanges-0.14-12.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras
perl-Kwiki-Search has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Kwiki-Search-0.12-14.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
On i386:
perl-Kwiki-Search-0.12-14.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-Kwiki-Revisions has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Kwiki-Revisions-0.15-14.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
On i386:
perl-Kwiki-Revisions-0.15-14.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-JSON-RPC has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-JSON-RPC-0.96-7.fc15.noarch requires perl(MyApp)
On i386:
perl-JSON-RPC-0.96-7.fc15.noarch requires perl(MyApp)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple-0.03-11.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Declare::Constraints::Simple-Library)
On i386:
perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple-0.03-11.fc15.noarch requires
perl-Data-ObjectDriver has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.08-2.fc15.noarch requires perl(DBD::Oracle)
perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.08-2.fc15.noarch requires perl(DBI::db)
On i386:
perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.08-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl-Kwiki-Users-Remote has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Kwiki-Users-Remote-0.04-12.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
On i386:
perl-Kwiki-Users-Remote-0.04-12.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl
perl-Kwiki-UserName has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Kwiki-UserName-0.14-14.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
On i386:
perl-Kwiki-UserName-0.14-14.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.007-4.fc15.noarch requires
main_module)
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.007-4.fc15.noarch requires
perl(tmpl_var)
perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp-0.01-10.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::Dialog)
On i386:
perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp-0.01-10.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::Dialog)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-Object-InsideOut has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Object-InsideOut-3.56-5.fc15.noarch requires perl(t::Imp1)
perl-Object-InsideOut-3.56-5.fc15.noarch requires perl(t::Imp2)
On i386:
perl-Object-InsideOut-3.56-5.fc15.noarch requires
perl-Ace has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Ace-1.92-7.fc15.noarch requires perl(Ace::Browser::LocalSiteDefs)
On i386:
perl-Ace-1.92-7.fc15.noarch requires perl(Ace::Browser::LocalSiteDefs)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl
perl-CSS-DOM has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CSS-DOM-0.14-3.fc15.noarch requires perl()
On i386:
perl-CSS-DOM-0.14-3.fc15.noarch requires perl()
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-8.fc15.noarch requires perl(v6-alpha)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-8.fc15.noarch requires perl(v6-alpha)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras
perl-Net-SSH-Perl has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Net-SSH-Perl-1.34-10.fc15.noarch requires perl(Crypt::IDEA)
On i386:
perl-Net-SSH-Perl-1.34-10.fc15.noarch requires perl(Crypt::IDEA)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-bioperl has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-bioperl-1.6.1-6.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Expression::FeatureSet)
On i386:
perl-bioperl-1.6.1-6.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Expression::FeatureSet)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
perl-DateTime-Set has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-DateTime-Set-0.28-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Set::Infinite) =
0:0.5502
On i386:
perl-DateTime-Set-0.28-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Set::Infinite) =
0:0.5502
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
perl-Kwiki-UserPreferences has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Kwiki-UserPreferences-0.13-13.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
On i386:
perl-Kwiki-UserPreferences-0.13-13.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
perl-Kwiki-Raw has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Kwiki-Raw-0.02-13.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
On i386:
perl-Kwiki-Raw-0.02-13.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch-1.03-11.fc15.noarch requires perl(DBI::st)
perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch-1.03-11.fc15.noarch requires perl(DBI::db)
On i386:
perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch-1.03-11.fc15.noarch
perl-Kwiki has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Kwiki-0.39-10.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
On i386:
perl-Kwiki-0.39-10.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-Kwiki-NewPage has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Kwiki-NewPage-0.12-14.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
On i386:
perl-Kwiki-NewPage-0.12-14.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-Catalyst-Controller-FormBuilder has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-FormBuilder-0.05-7.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Catalyst::View::HTML::Template)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-FormBuilder-0.05-7.fc15.noarch requires
Hi!
RPM doen't generate proper version numbers for Dev. releases of modules. For
example, perl(CPAN) of f14 is actually 1.94_56 which just means 1.9456. But
the version generated by RPM is 1.94, much smaller than the actual version.
So I hope RPM can manipulate the underscores in version numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493424
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=480295action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
73 matches
Mail list logo
