Re: Review swap request: dexter and postler

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On 04/06/2011 02:53 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
 Am Mittwoch, den 06.04.2011, 02:11 +0200 schrieb Michel Alexandre Salim:

 These are part of the Elementary OS project, and were recently
 featured in OMG Ubuntu:
 Dexter --
 http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/12/meet-dexter-elementarys-new-address-book-app/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693921

 Already reviewed at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690953

 Postler --
 http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/03/postler-update-adds-docky-badge-port-options-and-more/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693931

 Already reviewed at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690954

 If you like, apply for co-maintainership.

I will, thanks -- if Thomas does not mind.

I've added some comments to both review requests, and applied for 
comaintainership for dexter. Waiting until postler gets an SCM request 
to do that too.

Thanks,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proven testers for Lua update

[Matej Cepl]

Dne 30.3.2011 11:48, Tim Niemueller napsal(a):
 I'd like to push a minor update of Lua, which incorporates a small
 bugfix patch, and some cosmetic fixes to the builds script. First
 testing by a proven tester has been done successfully, but I need more
 testing to be able to push it, please have a look, try it and comment:

Sorry for hijacking the thread, but having an attention of Lua fans ... 
could somebody do something about 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551763 (most likely porting 
luasec to use luasocket, IMHO)? I believe further development of Lua in 
Fedora will be probably hindred by unavailability of SSL support (not 
mentioning I would like to move prosody from 
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/mcepl/prosody/epel-prosody.repo to 
real Fedora).

Thanks,

Matěj
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?

[Bruno Wolff III]

I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proven testers for Lua update

[Tim Niemueller]

On 06.04.2011 13:21, Matej Cepl wrote:
 Dne 30.3.2011 11:48, Tim Niemueller napsal(a):
 I'd like to push a minor update of Lua, which incorporates a small
 bugfix patch, and some cosmetic fixes to the builds script. First
 testing by a proven tester has been done successfully, but I need more
 testing to be able to push it, please have a look, try it and comment:
 
 Sorry for hijacking the thread, but having an attention of Lua fans ... 
 could somebody do something about 
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551763 (most likely porting 
 luasec to use luasocket, IMHO)? I believe further development of Lua in 
 Fedora will be probably hindred by unavailability of SSL support (not 
 mentioning I would like to move prosody from 
 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/mcepl/prosody/epel-prosody.repo to 
 real Fedora).

So lua-sec contains a modified version of lua-socket? Have you contacted
upstream about the required patches and modifications? If you provide a
proper patch, which maintains compatibility with the current version of
lua-socket, i.e. it only extends it, I'd be willing to take it into the
lua-socket package until upstream accepts the patch.

Be careful what you wish for, I ended up becoming the maintainer of
lua-xmlrpc when filing patches ;-)

Tim

-- 
Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de  www.niemueller.de
=
 Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert Einstein)
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?

[Petr Machata]

Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:

 I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
 for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
 want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too.

It's not our plan te revert this in rawhide, but we plan to rebase again
later in the cycle, probably for 1.48.  I see that nothing has been
rebuilt against 1.46.1 yet, so what I could do is keep the patchlevel
and just drop the SONAME back to 1.46.0.  The changes between 1.46.0 and
1.46.1 _should_ be safe--not quite safe enough for pushing to F15, in my
opinion, but rawhide has seen worse.  That way boost users shouldn't
have to rebuild twice.

PM
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?

[Jon Ciesla]

Petr Machata wrote:
 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:

   
 I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
 for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
 want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too.
 

 It's not our plan te revert this in rawhide, but we plan to rebase again
 later in the cycle, probably for 1.48.  I see that nothing has been
 rebuilt against 1.46.1 yet, so what I could do is keep the patchlevel
 and just drop the SONAME back to 1.46.0.  The changes between 1.46.0 and
 1.46.1 _should_ be safe--not quite safe enough for pushing to F15, in my
 opinion, but rawhide has seen worse.  That way boost users shouldn't
 have to rebuild twice.

 PM
   
Except I just rebuilt ogre a few days ago, because though it had been 
rebuild for 1.46.1, it got 1.46.0.

-J

-- 
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2011/4/6 Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com:
 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:

 I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
 for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
 want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too.

 It's not our plan te revert this in rawhide, but we plan to rebase again
 later in the cycle, probably for 1.48.  I see that nothing has been
 rebuilt against 1.46.1 yet, so what I could do is keep the patchlevel
 and just drop the SONAME back to 1.46.0.  The changes between 1.46.0 and
 1.46.1 _should_ be safe--not quite safe enough for pushing to F15, in my
 opinion, but rawhide has seen worse.  That way boost users shouldn't
 have to rebuild twice.

I personnally have a bad experience about reverting ABI version name
against upstream, specially in the case of DirectFB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673842

The best is to continue to try to educate upstream about this problem,
specially if this update 'sounds like' a bugfix update. I would be
more in favour to have a dedicated dist-tag used for the rebuilt of
dependent packages (done preliminary in rawhide) and not to create a
SONAME deviating from upstream.

Nicolas (kwizart)
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 16:18:34 +0200,
  Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote:
 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
 
  I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
  for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
  want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too.
 
 It's not our plan te revert this in rawhide, but we plan to rebase again
 later in the cycle, probably for 1.48.  I see that nothing has been
 rebuilt against 1.46.1 yet, so what I could do is keep the patchlevel
 and just drop the SONAME back to 1.46.0.  The changes between 1.46.0 and
 1.46.1 _should_ be safe--not quite safe enough for pushing to F15, in my
 opinion, but rawhide has seen worse.  That way boost users shouldn't
 have to rebuild twice.

I don't have a problem rebuilding twice. I'd like to get a heads up that
a soname bump is comming, rather than finding out after the fact. This makes
scheduling the work a bit easier. Boost is used by enough stuff, that I think
a heads up to devel is warranted.

In this particular case I was concerned, because of the previous reversion in
F15 and didn't want to make things worse by starting rebuilds before I
knew this change was going to stick.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?

[Petr Machata]

Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:

 On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 16:18:34 +0200,
   Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote:
 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
 
  I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
  for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
  want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too.
 
 It's not our plan te revert this in rawhide, but we plan to rebase again
 later in the cycle, probably for 1.48.  I see that nothing has been
 rebuilt against 1.46.1 yet, so what I could do is keep the patchlevel
 and just drop the SONAME back to 1.46.0.  The changes between 1.46.0 and
 1.46.1 _should_ be safe--not quite safe enough for pushing to F15, in my
 opinion, but rawhide has seen worse.  That way boost users shouldn't
 have to rebuild twice.

 I don't have a problem rebuilding twice. I'd like to get a heads up that
 a soname bump is comming, rather than finding out after the fact. This makes
 scheduling the work a bit easier. Boost is used by enough stuff, that I think
 a heads up to devel is warranted.

 In this particular case I was concerned, because of the previous reversion in
 F15 and didn't want to make things worse by starting rebuilds before I
 knew this change was going to stick.

Yes, the soname bump in F15 was done by mistake, and obviously the
testing caught that, so it was reverted right away.

The bump in F16 was the result of the same mistake, but there I thought
it might as well stay.  Except I should have mailed to devel list about
it, I'm sorry I didn't.

So 1.46.1 is there for real, later to be replaced most probably by
1.48.0, or whatever the upstream manages to finish in the mean time.

PM
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

How to debug a broken suspend/hibernate ?

[Andrew Haley]

Under Fedora 14, my computer, an Asus U31J, cannot suspend/hibernate.
It attempts both, but hangs and has to be hard powered off.  (I have
only tried F14.)

How do you debug something like this?  I guess I'd need to have some
tracing through the shutdown sequence to understand where it stops.

Andrew.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Octave status update

[Orion Poplawski]

On 03/30/2011 02:35 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
 - octave-3.4.0-5.fc15 has been submitted:

 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/octave-3.4.0-5.fc15

 This contains the latest macros and moves package to %{_libdir}/octave from
 %{_libexecdir}/octave. Please test.

This is pushed to stable now.

 - I've made an oct2spec packaging script, package submission is here:

 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692257

Updated.


 - I've put a list of octave forge packages here:

 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OrionPoplawski/Octave_Packages

 Perhaps people can sign up there for what packages they want to own. We're
 going to need to make and review a bunch of packages.

I've signed up for image and octcdf and put links to the review requests on 
the above page.

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane  or...@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301  http://www.cora.nwra.com
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: How to debug a broken suspend/hibernate ?

[Jaroslav Skarvada]

- Original Message -
 Under Fedora 14, my computer, an Asus U31J, cannot suspend/hibernate.
 It attempts both, but hangs and has to be hard powered off. (I have
 only tried F14.)
 
 How do you debug something like this? I guess I'd need to have some
 tracing through the shutdown sequence to understand where it stops.
 
 Andrew.
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

In case you used the pm-utils, consult the logs:
/var/log/pm-powersave.log
/var/log/pm-suspend.log

There is also script that can present you interesting information:
# pm-utils-bugreport-info.sh

something useful can be also found in syslog:
/var/log/messages

Test suspend from runlevels 3, 5 by:
# pm-suspend
and also directly through sys interface:
# echo mem  /sys/power/state

If the last one fails from runlevel 3 it is probably the kernel
and it will require more advanced debugging.

Please file bug about it. And also please try the F15, there are 
various improvements

regards

Jaroslav Škarvada
SIG/PowerManagement
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 16:57:36 +0200,
  Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote:
 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
 
 So 1.46.1 is there for real, later to be replaced most probably by
 1.48.0, or whatever the upstream manages to finish in the mean time.

Thanks for the explanation. I'll get updates done for the packages I can
tonight.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: How to debug a broken suspend/hibernate ?

[Andrew Haley]

On 04/06/2011 05:01 PM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
 - Original Message -
 Under Fedora 14, my computer, an Asus U31J, cannot suspend/hibernate.
 It attempts both, but hangs and has to be hard powered off. (I have
 only tried F14.)

 How do you debug something like this? I guess I'd need to have some
 tracing through the shutdown sequence to understand where it stops.
 
 In case you used the pm-utils, consult the logs:
 /var/log/pm-powersave.log
 /var/log/pm-suspend.log
 
 There is also script that can present you interesting information:
 # pm-utils-bugreport-info.sh

 something useful can be also found in syslog:
 /var/log/messages
 
 Test suspend from runlevels 3, 5 by:
 # pm-suspend
 and also directly through sys interface:
 # echo mem  /sys/power/state
 
 If the last one fails from runlevel 3 it is probably the kernel
 and it will require more advanced debugging.

That's how it looks.  The machine clearly tries to suspend, but after
a while the fan comes on at full power, so I suppose the processor is
stuck in a tight loop.

 Please file bug about it. And also please try the F15, there are 
 various improvements

OK, I will.  Thanks.

Andrew.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Outage: hosted servers 2011-04-12 04:00 UTC

[Stephen John Smoogen]

There will be an outage starting at 2011-04-12 04:00  UTC, which will last
approximately 6 hours.

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:

date -d '  2011-04-12 04:00 UTC'

Reason for outage:

Serverbeach (our service provider for our hosted and other servers)
are upgrading switches in their San Antonio (SAT) Datacenter. The
outage for our systems are supposed to be 15 minutes but can be
anywhere within that 6 hours.

Affected Services:

Email system
Fedora Hosted - https://fedorahosted.org/
Fedora People - http://fedorapeople.org/

Unaffected Services:

Most services should stay up, however various items depending on
fedorahosted will be affected (which may then affect other services,
etc etc.)

Contact Information:

Please join #fedora-admin in irc.freenode.net or respond to this email to
track the status of this outage.

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance.
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle. -- Ian MacLaren
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: How to debug a broken suspend/hibernate ?

[Andrew Haley]

On 04/06/2011 05:35 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
 On 04/06/2011 05:01 PM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
 
 Please file bug about it. And also please try the F15, there are 
 various improvements
 
 OK, I will.  Thanks.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694191

The bug is still present in fedora 15.

Andrew.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Updates stats help wanted

[Johannes Lips]

Hi,

perhaps it is possible to add the overall count of packages available in 
fedora. So we could calculate the number of updates relative to the 
total number of packages. To me this seems to be a very helpful 
indicator to see if there really were more updates or just more packages 
which of course would need more updates.

Should be easy to implement, or?

johannes (hannes)
On 04/06/2011 08:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
 Greetings.

 A bit of history: When The Board came up with their updates vision
 statement, it included:

 Project members should be able to transparently measure or monitor a
 new updates process to objectively measure its effectiveness, and
 determine whether the updates process is achieving the
 aforementioned vision statements.

 (see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Stable_release_updates_vision )

 We have some status available to use from Bodhi.
 We would like to add more, but aren't sure which are feasable to
 implement or would be good to meet the above goal.

 We have a FESCo ticket:
 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/517

 open with an example of the bodhi output and some ideas on what might
 be worth collecting, but it's been stalled due to lack of time and
 driver.

 Would there be someone out there willing to work on making a list of
 'nice to have' stats and possibly helping implement collecting them?

 Thanks.

 kevin

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Fedora SPEC Review Tool

[Jeffrey Ness]

Hello everyone,

As I'm new to the community and RPM Package Review (and development), I figured 
a tool to assist with reviews would be a nice time saver.

With that said I have a simple Python tool (still in early beta stages) which 
does just that.

Keeping with the concept of sharing, I wanted to hand this tool out to the 
community and get any feedback from y'all:

  https://github.com/jness/spec_checks

This tool uses the Package Review Guidelines written by Tom 'spot' Callaway:

  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines

Thanks for your time
Jeffrey-

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Updates stats help wanted

[Robyn Bergeron]

On 04/06/2011 11:05 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
 Greetings.

 A bit of history: When The Board came up with their updates vision
 statement, it included:

 Project members should be able to transparently measure or monitor a
 new updates process to objectively measure its effectiveness, and
 determine whether the updates process is achieving the
 aforementioned vision statements.

 (see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Stable_release_updates_vision )

 We have some status available to use from Bodhi.
 We would like to add more, but aren't sure which are feasable to
 implement or would be good to meet the above goal.

 We have a FESCo ticket:
 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/517

 open with an example of the bodhi output and some ideas on what might
 be worth collecting, but it's been stalled due to lack of time and
 driver.

 Would there be someone out there willing to work on making a list of
 'nice to have' stats and possibly helping implement collecting them?
Might make a nice GSoC project, if someone is willing to mentor.

-Robyn
 Thanks.

 kevin

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Updates stats help wanted

[Kevin Fenzi]

Greetings. 

A bit of history: When The Board came up with their updates vision
statement, it included:

Project members should be able to transparently measure or monitor a
new updates process to objectively measure its effectiveness, and 
determine whether the updates process is achieving the 
aforementioned vision statements.

(see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Stable_release_updates_vision )

We have some status available to use from Bodhi.
We would like to add more, but aren't sure which are feasable to
implement or would be good to meet the above goal. 

We have a FESCo ticket: 
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/517

open with an example of the bodhi output and some ideas on what might
be worth collecting, but it's been stalled due to lack of time and
driver. 

Would there be someone out there willing to work on making a list of
'nice to have' stats and possibly helping implement collecting them?

Thanks. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora SPEC Review Tool

[Richard Shaw]

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com wrote:
 Hello everyone,

 As I'm new to the community and RPM Package Review (and development), I 
 figured a tool to assist with reviews would be a nice time saver.

 With that said I have a simple Python tool (still in early beta stages) which 
 does just that.

 Keeping with the concept of sharing, I wanted to hand this tool out to the 
 community and get any feedback from y'all:

  https://github.com/jness/spec_checks

 This tool uses the Package Review Guidelines written by Tom 'spot' Callaway:

  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines

I'll test it out on mine tonight when I get home from work!

Richard
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Minutes/Summary from today's FESCo meeting (2011-03-06)

[Kevin Fenzi]

===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-04-06)
===

Meeting started by nirik at 17:30:51 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-04-06/fesco.2011-04-06-17.30.log.html

Meeting summary
---
* init process  (nirik, 17:30:56)

* #515 Investigate a features repo for stable releases  (nirik,
  17:34:16)

* #517 Updates Metrics  (nirik, 17:36:58)
  * interested parties wanted to help with updates stats.  (nirik,
17:38:49)
  * ACTION: nirik to mail devel list asking for interested stats folks.
(nirik, 17:40:15)

* #563 suggested policy: all daemons must set RELRO and PIE flags
  (nirik, 17:41:27)
  * kylem will update ticket this week with news.  (nirik, 17:43:41)

* #576 Encourage to be package maintainers to introduce themselves in
  devel list  (nirik, 17:43:59)
  * AGREED: looks good to us for now.  (nirik, 17:49:17)

* #577 FHS exception for Heimdal  (nirik, 17:49:37)
  * AGREED: this exception is not granted at this time.  (nirik,
18:07:08)

* #578: Guidance on systemtap 1.5 feature  (nirik, 18:07:23)
  * AGREED: ask feature owner to retarget for f16  (nirik, 18:13:48)

* Open Floor  (nirik, 18:15:33)

Meeting ended at 18:17:47 UTC.




Action Items

* nirik to mail devel list asking for interested stats folks.




Action Items, by person
---
* nirik
  * nirik to mail devel list asking for interested stats folks.
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---
* nirik (80)
* kylem (21)
* ajax (11)
* rbergeron (10)
* zodbot (10)
* notting (10)
* cwickert (5)
* SMParrish (4)
* gholms|work (1)
* LinuxCode (1)
* mjg59 (0)
* mmaslano (0)
* mclasen (0)
--
17:30:51 nirik #startmeeting FESCO (2011-04-06)
17:30:51 zodbot Meeting started Wed Apr  6 17:30:51 2011 UTC.  The chair is 
nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:30:51 zodbot Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link 
#topic.
17:30:52 nirik #meetingname fesco
17:30:52 zodbot The meeting name has been set to 'fesco'
17:30:54 nirik #chair mclasen notting nirik SMParrish kylem ajax cwickert 
mjg59 mmaslano
17:30:54 zodbot Current chairs: SMParrish ajax cwickert kylem mclasen mjg59 
mmaslano nirik notting
17:30:56 nirik #topic init process
17:31:10 * notting is here
17:32:36 ajax hellos
17:32:45 * nirik waits for a few more folks.
17:32:47 kylem herro.
17:33:32 nirik one more for quorum
17:33:55 * cwickert is here
17:34:07 nirik cool. ;) I guess we can go ahead and start in...
17:34:16 nirik #topic #515 Investigate a features repo for stable releases
17:34:17 nirik .fesco 515
17:34:18 zodbot nirik: #515 (Investigate a features repo for stable 
releases) - FESCo - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/515
17:34:23 nirik cwickert: any news on this one?
17:35:53 nirik shall I leave it on the agenda? or move it off until there is 
news for it?
17:36:08 cwickert no news, I'm still busy with dayjob
17:36:16 cwickert even in this very moment :(
17:36:58 nirik #topic #517 Updates Metrics
17:36:58 nirik .fesco 517
17:37:00 zodbot nirik: #517 (Updates Metrics) - FESCo - Trac - 
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/517
17:37:04 * SMParrish here
17:38:05 nirik any news here?
17:38:08 kylem sigh, i keep getting distracted and i completely forgot about 
that. someone else take it over, please? :\
17:38:49 nirik #info interested parties wanted to help with updates stats.
17:39:00 nirik perhaps we could send a plea to the list asking for interested 
folks?
17:39:43 nirik I could do that, unless someone wants to step up to work on 
this now?
17:40:15 nirik #action nirik to mail devel list asking for interested stats 
folks.
17:40:23 nirik I'll leave it on the agenda for now...
17:40:29 kylem sounds sensible. :\
17:40:30 nirik anything more? or shall we move on?
17:40:34 ajax i'm not going to have time to look into it any time soon
17:41:12 nirik I hope we can find a few folks that are interested enough to 
at least complie a list of nice to have things.
17:41:27 nirik #topic #563 suggested policy: all daemons must set RELRO and 
PIE flags
17:41:28 nirik .fesco 563
17:41:29 zodbot nirik: #563 (suggested policy: all daemons must set RELRO and 
PIE flags) - FESCo - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/563
17:41:33 nirik where are we on this one?
17:42:04 kylem news here -- the disk on the machine i was using inside rh 
(ihatethathostname) died over the weekend, so i've been re-building the chroot 
i was using locally, hope to be done today
17:42:38 nirik bummer.
17:42:54 nirik so, defer to next week again?
17:42:58 kylem please.
17:43:07 kylem it's been a major pain in my side since saturday. :\
17:43:12 kylem it's what i get for trying to work on the weekend. :
17:43:41 nirik #info kylem will update ticket this week with news.
17:43:46 nirik thanks for working on it.
17:43:54 kylem np. thanks for your patience. :\
17:43:59 

[Test-Announce] 2011-04-08 @ 17:00 UTC - F-15-Beta blocker bug review #5

[James Laska]

# F15-Beta Blocker Review meeting #5
# Date: 2011-04-08
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net

Mark your calendars, the fifth (and hopefully last) Beta blocker review
meeting will be this Friday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers.  We'll
review proposed and accepted F-15-Beta blocker bugs.  

NOTE: The F-15-Beta RC1 compose, scheduled [2] for Thursday April 7th
(TOMORROW), *cannot* proceed until all approved blockers are resolved.

An updated list of blocker bugs is available at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers.  The list of
bugs is also attached to this mail.  We'll be reviewing the bugs to
determine ...
 1. whether they meet the Beta release criteria [2] and should stay
on the list
 2. are getting the attention they need

For guidance on Blocker and Nice-to-have (NTH) bugs, checkout ...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process and
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_nth_bug_process

== Suggested Meeting Preparation ==

Maintainers ...
  * If your bug is *not* MODIFIED ... this issue is at risk of
slipping the F15 Beta release date
  * If your bug is in MODIFIED ... please make sure a build with the
fix exists, and is available as a bodhi update.

Testers ...
  * If you REPORT a bug ... please be responsive to any requests for
additional information.
  * If a bug is in ON_QA ... please take a moment to apply the
update, and post karma feedback

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
[2]
http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-15/f-15-releng-tasks.html
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Beta_Release_Criteria

Thanks,
James

== Approved Blockers ==
The following list of bugs are approved blockers that must be resolved.  There
are 6 bug(s) affecting 4 component(s).

=== NetworkManager ===
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/678553 (ON_QA) - NetworkManager doesn't start 
successfully on bootup after upgrade from F14 - F15
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/691139 (NEW) - NetworkManager 0.8.997  doesn't 
connect to hidden wireless network

=== gnome-icon-theme ===
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/692029 (MODIFIED) - package conflict between 
fedora-logos and gnome-logos on 15 Beta TC1 DVD
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/692103 (MODIFIED) - No such file or directory: 
'.../boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz'

=== preupgrade ===
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/646843 (ON_QA) - images/install.img will no 
longer exist in F-15 and newer

=== xorg-x11-xauth ===
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/679486 (ASSIGNED) - Unable to start graphical 
installer on RC1 KDE live image

== Proposed Blockers ==
The following list of bugs are not yet approved to block the release.  There
are 5 bug(s) affecting 5 component(s).  For guidance on reviewing the following
bugs, refer to [[QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process]].

=== gdm ===
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/678236 (NEW) - User list sometimes not visible on 
greeter

=== gnome-shell ===
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/693588 (MODIFIED) - NetworkManager applet cannot 
scroll the list of wireless networks

=== libselinux ===
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/692573 (ON_QA) - SELINUX=disabled in 
/etc/selinux/config causes failure to boot; libselinux lies to systemd about 
SELinux state

=== selinux-policy ===
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/694239 (NEW) - Live image built with latest 
systemd/selinux-policy etc fails to boot with selinux enabled

=== systemd ===
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/694079 (POST) - GDM starts while firstboot is 
still running

== Approved NICE-TO-HAVE ==
The following list of bugs are approved nths that must be resolved.  There are
7 bug(s) affecting 7 component(s).

=== anaconda ===
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/629311 (ASSIGNED) - install allows use of 
preexisting root filesystem without reformat

=== gnome-settings-daemon ===
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/688305 (NEW) - Update notification period should 
be shorter for pre-releases

=== gnome-user-share ===
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/679814 (NEW) - [abrt] 
gnome-user-share-2.30.2-4.fc15: do_pre_parse_initialization: Process 
/usr/libexec/gnome-user-share was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

=== isomd5sum ===
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/692135 (NEW) - Image failed media check

=== libmtp ===
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/684214 (MODIFIED) - [abrt] 
libmtp-examples-1.0.5-2.fc15: op_reset_device: Process /usr/bin/mtp-detect was 
killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

=== mesa ===
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/691461 (MODIFIED) - nouveau: bug with shader used 
in gnome-shell applications view

=== nautilus ===
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/689260 (NEW) - [abrt] nautilus-2.91.91-1.fc15: 
gtk_action_group_add_action: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 
(SIGSEGV)

== Proposed NICE-TO-HAVE ==
The following list of bugs are not yet approved to block the release.  There
are 3 bug(s) affecting 3 component(s).  For guidance on reviewing the 

Best Practice to revert a version on F-15

[Jochen Schmitt]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hallo,

I'm planing to revert the version of blender in the F-15 repository
from 2.56 to 2.49.

The reseaon is, that there are several packages depending on blender
which are not
compatible to blender-2.56 or beyond.

I plan to create a feature to F-16 to coordinate the migration of the
packages,
which are depending on blender to the blender-2.56 branch.

So I want to ask, what I have to consinder when I revert to 2.49 on
the F-15 branch.

Best Regards:

Jochen Schmitt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iJwEAQECAAYFAk2c0UIACgkQZLAIBz9lVu+v/AQAxlRO/ymIJVUUOABbrqJKoDjA
lXRxMj7Av7tFAQB6wq/lVf4uAdlPDLIXBnDwEzIkyUOeIfEseETCo+mUbmEkNJzS
MzzrW5Pw3tKOdBD5WAQMsRQPwVeq661UKd6ibYkimE070w+7jqcOITPGejVmdvj7
vtl0+Ygn5m+ZdRG0w7k=
=tDev
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Beta TC1 Live images now available

[Carl Byington]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 11:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
 http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/15-Beta.TC1/Live/

 Now we can get down to the desktop validation testing:

 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_15_Beta_TC1_Desktop

Is USB 3.0 testing part of this?

Dell Vostro 230ST, two dual port pci - usb3.0 cards, two usb 3.0 hubs,
and some Western Digital usb3.0 disks. Without the hubs (disks attached
directly to the ports on the pci cards, everything works nicely. I have
lsusb/lspci output but am unsure where to post that.

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.general/43664 might be
applicable.

Filed Bug 694293

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFNnNkhL6j7milTFsERApLDAJ4j08kDoC3SylfFIZAUThMz3KJfXgCfR/C3
t2dAxoMlq6ojRNsPS/1YlQA=
=45UN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Best Practice to revert a version on F-15

[Michael Schwendt]

On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 22:47:19 +0200, Jochen wrote:

 Hallo,
 
 I'm planing to revert the version of blender in the F-15 repository
 from 2.56 to 2.49.
 
 The reseaon is, that there are several packages depending on blender
 which are not
 compatible to blender-2.56 or beyond.
 
 I plan to create a feature to F-16 to coordinate the migration of the
 packages,
 which are depending on blender to the blender-2.56 branch.
 
 So I want to ask, what I have to consinder when I revert to 2.49 on
 the F-15 branch.

There are nearly the same things to do as with a version upgrade. Except
that you will need to bump the Epoch to downgrade from 2.56 to 2.49. Check
all dependencies carefully. They might need a rebuild or even a downgrade,
too.

Alternatively, albeit a little bit of a hack, it would be possible to package
two releases of blender in a single src.rpm and keep the 2.49 version in
a subpackage with a different name. This would need dependencies to be
adjusted, of course.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Best Practice to revert a version on F-15

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2011/4/6 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Hallo,

 I'm planing to revert the version of blender in the F-15 repository
 from 2.56 to 2.49.

 The reseaon is, that there are several packages depending on blender
 which are not
 compatible to blender-2.56 or beyond.
Can you list them ?

Because I was planning to port LuxRender to the new blender25x...


Nicolas (kwizart)
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Bug 656317] libwx_gtk2u_stc-2.8.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656317

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.15-2.f
   ||c14
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-04-06 18:28:40

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 656317] libwx_gtk2u_stc-2.8.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656317

--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-04-06 18:28:33 EDT ---
perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.15-2.fc14, perl-5.12.3-142.fc14, perl-Wx-0.98-5.fc14 has
been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: esting zsh completion for fedpkg

[Ben Boeckel]

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 02:31:49PM -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote:
 Just installed another machine and realized this isn't yet in Fedora.
 Any luck getting this upstream?  We should probably at the least see
 if we can get this into the fedpkg package.  It already adds bash
 completion foo and would be nice to get zsh completion too.  It
 should simply install into /usr/share/zsh/site-functions for now and
 we can remove it if/when it gets added somewhere else.

I have a bug opened[1].

--Ben

[1]https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-packager/ticket/81


pgpIoRlPlnWon.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

File MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-0.02.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

[Petr Pisar]

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for 
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes:

502f45cf99cedc76d58f6f5035d3a449  MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-0.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes] Import

[Petr Pisar]

commit 48f3c115057613b0b34a2a1edd28ac58a91f4873
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Apr 6 09:07:01 2011 +0200

Import

 .gitignore |1 +
 perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes.spec |   57 
 sources|1 +
 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..7d0bb84 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-0.02.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes.spec 
b/perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes.spec
new file mode 100644
index 000..3e13f42
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes.spec
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+Name:   perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes
+Version:0.02
+Release:1%{?dist}
+Summary:Track dirtied attributes
+License:LGPLv2+
+Group:  Development/Libraries
+URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes/
+Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/R/RS/RSRCHBOY/MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-%{version}.tar.gz
+BuildArch:  noarch
+BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Moose) = 0.90
+BuildRequires:  perl(namespace::autoclean) = 0.08
+# Tests only:
+BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
+BuildRequires:  perl(English)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Moose::Exporter)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Moose::Role)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Moose::Util::MetaRole)
+BuildRequires:  perl(FindBin)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Moose)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) = 0.92
+Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
+Requires:   perl(Moose) = 0.90
+Requires:   perl(namespace::autoclean) = 0.08
+
+%description
+MooseX::TrackDirty::Attributes does the necessary metaclass fiddling to
+track if attributes are dirty; that is, if they're set to some value not
+from a builder, default, or construction. An attribute can be returned to a
+clean state by invoking its clearer.
+
+%prep
+%setup -q -n MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-%{version}
+
+%build
+%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+make %{?_smp_mflags}
+
+%install
+make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
+%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+
+%check
+make test
+
+%files
+%defattr(-,root,root,-)
+%doc Changes README
+%{perl_vendorlib}/*
+%{_mandir}/man3/*
+
+%changelog
+* Mon Apr 04 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 0.02-1
+- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
+- Remove BuildRoot stuff
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e69de29..8738ea8 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+502f45cf99cedc76d58f6f5035d3a449  MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-0.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-SOAP-Lite

[buildsys]

perl-SOAP-Lite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-1.fc16.x86_64 requires perl(Comppress:Zlib)
On i386:
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-1.fc16.i686 requires perl(Comppress:Zlib)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-Config-Model

[buildsys]

perl-Config-Model has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Config-Model-1.235-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(AptPkg::System)
perl-Config-Model-1.235-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(AptPkg::Version)
perl-Config-Model-1.235-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) = 
0:0.303
perl-Config-Model-1.235-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(Fuse)
perl-Config-Model-1.235-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(AptPkg::Config)
On i386:
perl-Config-Model-1.235-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(AptPkg::System)
perl-Config-Model-1.235-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(AptPkg::Version)
perl-Config-Model-1.235-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) = 
0:0.303
perl-Config-Model-1.235-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(Fuse)
perl-Config-Model-1.235-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(AptPkg::Config)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-SOAP-Lite] Fix Requires typo

[Petr Sabata]

commit a35bc2b49f65c8e82ee1272b98caf939cfe2f582
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Apr 6 11:58:12 2011 +0200

Fix Requires typo

 perl-SOAP-Lite.spec |9 ++---
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-SOAP-Lite.spec b/perl-SOAP-Lite.spec
index c80a5a0..9eed3a6 100644
--- a/perl-SOAP-Lite.spec
+++ b/perl-SOAP-Lite.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-SOAP-Lite
 Version:0.712
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
 Summary:Client and server side SOAP implementation
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Requires:   perl(Apache2::Const)
 Requires:   perl(Apache2::RequestIO)
 Requires:   perl(Apache2::RequestRec)
 Requires:   perl(Apache2::Util)
-Requires:   perl(Comppress:Zlib)
+Requires:   perl(Compress::Zlib)
 Requires:   perl(Encode)
 Requires:   perl(Errno)
 Requires:   perl(HTTP::Daemon)
@@ -91,7 +91,10 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man1/*
 
 %changelog
-* Tue Apr  5 2011 Petr Sabata psa...@redhat.com - 0.712-1
+* Wed Apr  6 2011 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 0.712-2
+- Fix Requires typos
+
+* Tue Apr  5 2011 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 0.712-1
 - 0.712 bump
 - Removing clean section
 - Removing 'defined hash' patch (included upstream)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 692060] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.7.1 is available

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692060

Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org 
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.7 |perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.7
   |is available|.1 is available

--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-06 06:57:31 EDT ---
Latest upstream release: 1.7.1
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.4
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-OpenSSL-X509/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 694058] New: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-51 is available

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-51 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694058

   Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-51 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Severity: unspecified
  Priority: unspecified
 Component: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp
AssignedTo: ppi...@redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com,
mmasl...@redhat.com, ppi...@redhat.com,
psab...@redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---


Latest upstream release: 51
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 46
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl-Critic-Pulp/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 694057] New: perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL-0.02 is available

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL-0.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694057

   Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL-0.02 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Severity: unspecified
  Priority: unspecified
 Component: perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL
AssignedTo: ppi...@redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com,
mmasl...@redhat.com, ppi...@redhat.com,
psab...@redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---


Latest upstream release: 0.02
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.01
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL-0.02.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

[Petr Pisar]

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for 
perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL:

2bf3a94cefef5e320483215e54429072  Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL-0.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL] 0.02 bump

[Petr Pisar]

commit 4f318da0388cebe1671ec67e83a7fee31bb1ffcf
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Apr 6 14:18:17 2011 +0200

0.02 bump

 .gitignore|1 +
 perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL.spec |   10 +++---
 sources   |2 +-
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 6d79514..80ea9d1 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 /Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL-0.01.tar.gz
+/Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL-0.02.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL.spec 
b/perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL.spec
index b29b45d..daa51ac 100644
--- a/perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL.spec
+++ b/perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL
-Version:0.01
+Version:0.02
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Policies to prohibit/require my pet peeves
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -7,15 +7,16 @@ Group:  Development/Libraries
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/J/JT/JTRAMMELL/Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildArch:  noarch
-BuildRequires:  perl(Data::Dumper)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Build)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Perl::Critic::Utils)
 # Tests only:
 BuildRequires:  perl(Perl::Critic::Config)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Perl::Critic::Policy)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Perl::Critic::Utils)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod) = 1.14
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) = 1.04
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
+Requires:   perl(Perl::Critic::Policy)
 
 %description
 Module Perl::Critic::PetPeeves::JTRAMMELL provides policies that I want
@@ -43,6 +44,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 
2/dev/null \;
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Apr 06 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.02-1
+- 0.02 bump
+
 * Wed Jan 26 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 0.01-1
 - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
 - Remove BuildRoot stuff
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 328be8f..276dcd8 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-7273e6b416aae06966925350bbb536b1  Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL-0.01.tar.gz
+2bf3a94cefef5e320483215e54429072  Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL-0.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 694057] perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL-0.02 is available

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694057

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 CC|mmasl...@redhat.com,|
   |ppi...@redhat.com,  |
   |psab...@redhat.com  |
   Fixed In Version||perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-
   ||JTRAMMELL-0.02-1.fc16
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2011-04-06 08:25:15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 694058] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-51 is available

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694058

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||694099

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File Package-Stash-0.29.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

[Paul Howarth]

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Package-Stash:

d7d2ee9dde5c0109c3a6d229458405f9  Package-Stash-0.29.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Package-Stash] Update to 0.29

[Paul Howarth]

commit bd2a1de4df8c4b68893bc2c18af43a2d72df7a07
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Wed Apr 6 14:18:04 2011 +0100

Update to 0.29

- New upstream release 0.29
  - Really skip the package-stash-conflict script in the compile test

 .gitignore  |2 +-
 perl-Package-Stash.spec |6 +-
 sources |2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 5bcb42b..f803d19 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1 @@
-/Package-Stash-0.28.tar.gz
+/Package-Stash-0.29.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Package-Stash.spec b/perl-Package-Stash.spec
index b1d1374..6176497 100644
--- a/perl-Package-Stash.spec
+++ b/perl-Package-Stash.spec
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 %global old_eumm %(perl -MExtUtils::MakeMaker -e 'printf %d\\n, 
$ExtUtils::MakeMaker::VERSION  6.31 ? 1 : 0;' 2/dev/null || echo 0)
 
 Name:  perl-Package-Stash
-Version:   0.28
+Version:   0.29
 Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   Routines for manipulating stashes
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/Package::Stash::PP.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Apr  6 2011 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.29-1
+- Update to 0.29
+  - Really skip the package-stash-conflict script in the compile test
+
 * Wed Mar 30 2011 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.28-1
 - Update to 0.28
   - META.json fixes
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 3b63d70..05e1844 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-5e66c46a4a5efd0d816ef455a931b944  Package-Stash-0.28.tar.gz
+d7d2ee9dde5c0109c3a6d229458405f9  Package-Stash-0.29.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Package-Stash/f15/master] Update to 0.29

[Paul Howarth]

Summary of changes:

  bd2a1de... Update to 0.29 (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Package-Stash] Created tag perl-Package-Stash-0.29-1.fc15

[Paul Howarth]

The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-0.29-1.fc15' was created pointing to:

 bd2a1de... Update to 0.29
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Package-Stash] Created tag perl-Package-Stash-0.29-1.fc16

[Paul Howarth]

The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-0.29-1.fc16' was created pointing to:

 bd2a1de... Update to 0.29
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.013.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

[Emmanuel Seyman]

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for 
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools:

c02dc4e7995db045b2bff7da70b3b1e7  CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.013.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File NetAddr-IP-4.042.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by mmaslano

[Marcela Mašláňová]

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-NetAddr-IP:

7d99676c93a53ed4f3b1504665a060a4  NetAddr-IP-4.042.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-NetAddr-IP] update to 4.042

[Marcela Mašláňová]

commit fae952bcc964597253fff4cdefd218f1690ed6d0
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Apr 6 16:30:07 2011 +0200

update to 4.042

 .gitignore   |1 +
 perl-NetAddr-IP.spec |7 +--
 sources  |2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 7d319b9..df751da 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 NetAddr-IP-4.027.tar.gz
+/NetAddr-IP-4.042.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-NetAddr-IP.spec b/perl-NetAddr-IP.spec
index e06991b..87e10a7 100644
--- a/perl-NetAddr-IP.spec
+++ b/perl-NetAddr-IP.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-NetAddr-IP
-Version:4.027
-Release:6%{?dist}
+Version:4.042
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets
 # Upstream explicitly gave permission for us to distribute under Artistic 2.0
 # Will be reflected in next release.
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Apr  6 2011 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 4.042-1
+- update to 4.042, because we had terribly old release
+
 * Tue Feb 08 2011 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 4.027-6
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 258e00a..6a99af8 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-c4a21a76e5b1b9f4c8e9810b78559d7b  NetAddr-IP-4.027.tar.gz
+7d99676c93a53ed4f3b1504665a060a4  NetAddr-IP-4.042.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools] Update to 0.013

[Emmanuel Seyman]

commit ef177df2c943d9164cea3f84a68e50ca2a86ccae
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date:   Wed Apr 6 16:36:13 2011 +0200

Update to 0.013

 .gitignore |2 ++
 perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools.spec |9 +++--
 sources|2 +-
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 723b025..a3608bf 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,3 @@
 CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.007.tar.gz
+/CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.011.tar.gz
+/CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.013.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools.spec 
b/perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools.spec
index 49c69b2..238bfb6 100644
--- a/perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools.spec
+++ b/perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools
-Version:0.007
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Version:0.013
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Tools to generate and maintain CGI::Application::Structured 
based web apps
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Starter)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Starter::Plugin::Template)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Starter::Simple)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Pod::Coverage)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Probe::Perl)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::WWW::Mechanize::CGIApp)
@@ -80,6 +81,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 %{_bindir}/cas-starter.pl
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Apr 06 2011 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr - 0.013-1
+- Update to 0.013
+- Add perl(Probe::Perl) as a BuildRequires.
+
 * Tue Feb 15 2011 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr - 0.007-5
 - Improve filtering.
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 9a5518a..7db4671 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-d290b1e7a5c3a0418a162f41ce9f1895  CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.007.tar.gz
+c02dc4e7995db045b2bff7da70b3b1e7  CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.013.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 656317] libwx_gtk2u_stc-2.8.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656317

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.15-2.f |perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.15-2.f
   |c14 |c13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 656317] libwx_gtk2u_stc-2.8.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656317

--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-04-06 18:33:15 EDT ---
perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.15-2.fc13, perl-5.10.1-122.fc13, perl-Wx-0.98-5.fc13 has
been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 691451] Rebuild required to work correctly with perl 5.012003.

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691451

--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-06 
18:35:55 EDT ---
perl-Devel-Cover-0.66-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 691451] Rebuild required to work correctly with perl 5.012003.

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691451

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Devel-Cover-0.66-2.fc1
   ||4
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-04-06 18:36:00

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File Shipwright-2.4.24.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by cheeselee

[cheeselee]

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Shipwright:

8de809cc237df96ba22b4cae35b84ce8  Shipwright-2.4.24.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Shipwright] Initial import

[cheeselee]

commit 317e84e4ec3f56694282f0b4240d0ba79156e894
Author: Robin Lee cheese...@fedoraproject.org
Date:   Thu Apr 7 10:33:14 2011 +0800

Initial import

 .gitignore   |1 +
 perl-Shipwright.spec |   85 ++
 sources  |1 +
 3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..7a4a6b8 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/Shipwright-2.4.24.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Shipwright.spec b/perl-Shipwright.spec
new file mode 100644
index 000..5aaaec7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-Shipwright.spec
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+Name:   perl-Shipwright
+Version:2.4.24
+Release:1%{?dist}
+Summary:Build and Manage Self-contained Software Bundle
+License:GPL+ or Artistic
+Group:  Development/Libraries
+URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Shipwright/
+Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SU/SUNNAVY/Shipwright-%{version}.tar.gz
+BuildArch:  noarch
+BuildRequires:  perl = 1:5.8.8
+BuildRequires:  perl(Algorithm::Dependency::Ordered)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Algorithm::Dependency::Source::HoA)
+BuildRequires:  perl(App::CLI)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Archive::Extract)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Archive::Tar)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Class::Accessor::Fast)
+BuildRequires:  perl(CPAN)
+BuildRequires:  perl(CPAN::DistnameInfo)
+BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires:  perl(File::Copy::Recursive)
+BuildRequires:  perl(File::Slurp)
+BuildRequires:  perl(File::Which)
+BuildRequires:  perl(IO::Uncompress::Bunzip2)
+BuildRequires:  perl(IO::Uncompress::RawInflate) = 2.012
+BuildRequires:  perl(IPC::Cmd)
+BuildRequires:  perl(IPC::Run3)
+BuildRequires:  perl(List::MoreUtils)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Log4perl)
+BuildRequires:  perl(LWP::UserAgent)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Build)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Module::CoreList)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Info)
+BuildRequires:  perl(UNIVERSAL::require)
+BuildRequires:  perl(version)
+BuildRequires:  perl(YAML::Tiny)
+Requires:   perl(Algorithm::Dependency::Ordered)
+Requires:   perl(Algorithm::Dependency::Source::HoA)
+Requires:   perl(Archive::Tar)
+Requires:   perl(IO::Uncompress::Bunzip2)
+Requires:   perl(IO::Uncompress::RawInflate) = 2.012
+Requires:   perl(LWP::UserAgent)
+Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
+
+# a wrong Requires
+%filter_from_requires /perl(that)/d
+%{?perl_default_filter}
+
+%description
+Shipwright is a tool to help you bundle your software with all its 
dependencies,
+regardless of whether they are CPAN modules or non-Perl modules from elsewhere.
+Shipwright makes the bundle work easy.
+
+%prep
+%setup -q -n Shipwright-%{version}
+
+%build
+%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+make %{?_smp_mflags}
+
+%install
+make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
+
+%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+
+%check
+make test %{?_smp_mflags}
+
+%files
+%defattr(-,root,root,-)
+%doc AUTHORS Changes README TODO
+%{_bindir}/shipwright*
+%{perl_vendorlib}/*
+%{_mandir}/man3/*
+
+%changelog
+* Wed Apr  6 2011 Robin Lee cheese...@fedoraproject.org - 2.4.24-1
+- Update to 2.4.24
+- Initial import (#690359)
+
+* Thu Mar 24 2011 Robin Lee cheese...@fedoraproject.org - 2.4.23-1
+- Initial packaging with help of cpanspec 1.78
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e69de29..d17641f 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+8de809cc237df96ba22b4cae35b84ce8  Shipwright-2.4.24.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Shipwright/f14/master] Initial import

[cheeselee]

Summary of changes:

  317e84e... Initial import (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Shipwright/f13/master] Initial import

[cheeselee]

Summary of changes:

  317e84e... Initial import (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-EV] Re-add the header files to the main package.

[Mathieu Bridon]

commit e3280d548e548a5c83d55a0cb4d2492a0bbdc091
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date:   Thu Apr 7 11:03:05 2011 +0800

Re-add the header files to the main package.

Reviewer suggested those two .h files should be moved to a -devel
subpackage.

However, the Fedora packaging guidelines indicate the contrary:
 - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#.h_files_in_module_packages

 perl-EV.spec |   22 ++
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-EV.spec b/perl-EV.spec
index 4f244f9..9666e5e 100644
--- a/perl-EV.spec
+++ b/perl-EV.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-EV
 Version:4.03
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:4%{?dist}
 Summary:Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library
 
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -33,15 +33,6 @@ specific backend with LIBEV_FLAGS, or just about in any 
case because it has
 much more detailed information.
 
 
-%package devel
-Summary:Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library
-Requires:   %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
-
-
-%description devel
-This package provides the development headers for the Perl EV module.
-
-
 %prep
 %setup -q -n EV-%{version}
 
@@ -83,16 +74,15 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/*
 %{perl_vendorarch}/EV.pm
 %{perl_vendorarch}/EV
-%exclude %{perl_vendorarch}/EV/*.h
-%{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
-
-
-%files devel
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
 %{perl_vendorarch}/EV/*.h
+%{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Apr 07 2011 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org - 4.03-4
+- Readded the header file to the main package, as per guidelines:
+  - 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#.h_files_in_module_packages
+
 * Tue Mar 08 2011 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org - 4.03-3
 - Some more fixes as part of the review process:
   - Fix the license tag to be only the license of perl-EV, and add a note about
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-EV/f15/master] Re-add the header files to the main package.

[Mathieu Bridon]

Summary of changes:

  e3280d5... Re-add the header files to the main package. (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Config-MVP] update to 2.200001

[Iain Arnell]

commit 12570cd54d775244377c7f33701ae5a5fe83d005
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date:   Thu Mar 31 16:48:12 2011 +0200

update to 2.21

 .gitignore   |1 +
 perl-Config-MVP.spec |   41 +
 sources  |2 +-
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 914c110..6599a1d 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 Config-MVP-2.101650.tar.gz
+/Config-MVP-2.21.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Config-MVP.spec b/perl-Config-MVP.spec
index a575bf1..8e59f70 100644
--- a/perl-Config-MVP.spec
+++ b/perl-Config-MVP.spec
@@ -1,24 +1,34 @@
 Name:   perl-Config-MVP
-Version:2.101650
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:2.21
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Multivalue-property package-oriented configuration
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Config-MVP/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/R/RJ/RJBS/Config-MVP-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildRoot:  %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 BuildArch:  noarch
+BuildRequires:  perl(Class::Load) = 0.06
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires:  perl(File::Spec)
+BuildRequires:  perl(lib)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Pluggable::Object)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Moose) = 0.91
+BuildRequires:  perl(Moose::Role)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints)
+BuildRequires:  perl(MooseX::OneArgNew)
+BuildRequires:  perl(overload)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Params::Util)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Role::HasMessage)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Role::Identifiable::HasIdent)
+BuildRequires:  perl(StackTrace::Auto)
+BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Fatal)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) = 0.96
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Throwable)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Tie::IxHash)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Try::Tiny)
-# Tests
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod)
-# Failing Tests
-# BuildRequires:  perl(Pod::Coverage::TrustPod)
-# BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)
+BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
 
 %{?perl_default_filter}
@@ -36,8 +46,6 @@ things that do.
 make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
 make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
@@ -46,18 +54,19 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 
2/dev/null \;
 %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
 
 %check
-RELEASE_TESTING=1 make test
-
-%clean
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+make test
 
 %files
 %defattr(-,root,root,-)
-%doc Changes dist.ini LICENSE META.json README
+%doc Changes LICENSE README
 %{perl_vendorlib}/*
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Mar 31 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2.21-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+- clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
+
 * Tue Feb 08 2011 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 2.101650-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index d31a57b..10bee32 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-b89fee1eae822fd75f61b7be932f0e40  Config-MVP-2.101650.tar.gz
+f07790e8f0f00c3d2a048bde29799c97  Config-MVP-2.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel