hi guys,
This is Yuguang Wang from Red Hat Beijing QE Team.
I'm currently working on nitrate, a test case management system.
It's an open-source project and is available here:
https://fedorahosted.org/nitrate
I'm trying to make this project a Fedora Approved Package, following
is the review reque
As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Beta RC1 is now available
for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and
testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Result
So I think I'll stick with the current development build that is in F14
until F15 is finalized and released. Then I'll just upgrade I think.
It's seriously not worth the mucking around trying to get it running in a
F14 environment. It's just not worth my time and effort when F15 is really
not that
Dne 6.4.2011 15:35, Tim Niemueller napsal(a):
> Be careful what you wish for, I ended up becoming the maintainer of
> lua-xmlrpc when filing patches ;-)
OK, so I will be careful and ask somebody else to package lua-dbi (from
http://code.google.com/p/luadbi/downloads/list). It is new dependency of
On 04/06/2011 09:46 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 02:35 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> - I've made an oct2spec packaging script, package submission is here:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692257
Built and updates submitted for F14 and F15.
--
Orion Poplawski
Techn
Compose started at Thu Apr 7 13:15:58 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit)
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlc
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 11:52 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:44, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 05:11:00PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> >> On 7 April 2011 16:02, Matt Domsch wrote:
> >> > Question is, is it valuable enough to the Project as a wh
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:44, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 05:11:00PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>> On 7 April 2011 16:02, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> > Question is, is it valuable enough to the Project as a whole, that
>> > someone else should take it on now?
>>
>> Absolutely!
I
drago01 wrote:
> No because it would require updates to many core parts of the system.
It requires at the very least updates to:
* gobject-introspection (to a version not binary-compatible with the one in
F14, so ALL packages with introspection info would have to be rebuilt, too)
* glib2 (which i
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 05:11:00PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> On 7 April 2011 16:02, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > Question is, is it valuable enough to the Project as a whole, that
> > someone else should take it on now?
>
> Absolutely!
>
> Actually, have you published you use to BFS the scrip
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Matt Domsch wrote:
> FTBFS cuts across Packagers, BugZappers, QA, Developers, and Release
> Engineering. As such, I think it needs to be part of standard
> processes for the Project.
+1
Paul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-SOAP-Lite-debuginfo 0.712-2 is empty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694559
Summary: perl-SOAP-Lite-debuginfo 0.712-2 is empty
Produ
On 7 April 2011 16:02, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Question is, is it valuable enough to the Project as a whole, that
> someone else should take it on now?
Absolutely!
Actually, have you published you use to BFS the scripts anywhere?
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:02:31 -0500, Matt wrote:
>
>
>> I think FTBFS has been valuable.
>>
>
> But of course!
>
>
>> Sure, I get the occasional "why are you filling my mailbox with this"
>> message, [...]
>>
>
> Wow. Unbelievable.
>
How dare you provide m
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:02:31 -0500, Matt wrote:
> I think FTBFS has been valuable.
But of course!
> Sure, I get the occasional "why are you filling my mailbox with this"
> message, [...]
Wow. Unbelievable.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
Matt Domsch wrote:
> As my job and family responsibilities have shifted over time, I have
> been giving less and less attention to the FTBFS (fails to
> build from source) process that I started 5 years ago on a "see, it
> _can_ be done" lark.
>
> I think FTBFS has been valuable. Through the pro
As my job and family responsibilities have shifted over time, I have
been giving less and less attention to the FTBFS (fails to
build from source) process that I started 5 years ago on a "see, it
_can_ be done" lark.
I think FTBFS has been valuable. Through the process, hundreds, maybe
even a c
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456357
Marcela Mašláňová changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
> Well when I installed Gnome-Shell just the other day it was only a ~10MB
> download and the installation was simple and didn't seem to alter anything.
>
> Am I getting confused or something between Gnome 3 and Gnome-Shell. Are they
> two differe
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Two subsequent attempts to reboot failed because even though I got
> to the grub kernel-selection menu, I was unable to get a response
> out of the interface, so couldn't select any other kernel or even
> edit a grub stanza. Luckily for me, on the third attempt, grub's
> UI
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:12:11 +0200
Johannes Lips wrote:
> Hi,
>
> perhaps it is possible to add the overall count of packages available
> in fedora. So we could calculate the number of updates relative to
> the total number of packages. To me this seems to be a very helpful
> indicator to see i
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 04/07/2011 07:46 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I updated my rawhide VM today (on F15 host), but it failed to reboot
>> using the new kernel, vmlinuz-2.6.39-0.rc1.git5.0.fc16.x86_64
>> I got a failure (VFS diagnostic complaining that the UUID-specified
>> root partition was n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/07/2011 07:46 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I updated my rawhide VM today (on F15 host), but it failed to reboot
> using the new kernel, vmlinuz-2.6.39-0.rc1.git5.0.fc16.x86_64
> I got a failure (VFS diagnostic complaining that the UUID-specified
> r
3 or my packages are now parentless:
qct
igraph
python-igraph
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Jeffrey Ness wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As I'm new to the community and RPM Package Review (and development), I
> figured a tool to assist with reviews would be a nice time saver.
>
> With that said I have a simple Python tool (still in early beta stages)
> which
I updated my rawhide VM today (on F15 host), but it failed to reboot
using the new kernel, vmlinuz-2.6.39-0.rc1.git5.0.fc16.x86_64
I got a failure (VFS diagnostic complaining that the UUID-specified
root partition was not available), then panic.
Two subsequent attempts to reboot failed because eve
On 04/07/2011 03:46 PM, Chris Jones wrote
> Well when I installed Gnome-Shell just the other day it was only a ~10MB
> download and the installation was simple and didn't seem to alter anything.
>
> Am I getting confused or something between Gnome 3 and Gnome-Shell. Are they
> two different package
-Original Message-
From: drago01 [mailto:drag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: Gnome-Shell and F14
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Chris Jones
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> From: drago01 [mailto:drag...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 7:47 PM
> Subject:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
>
>
>
>
> From: drago01 [mailto:drag...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 7:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Gnome-Shell and F14
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Chris Jones
> wrote:
>
> Is the final Gnome-Shell going to be made availa
From: drago01 [mailto:drag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: Gnome-Shell and F14
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Chris Jones
wrote:
Is the final Gnome-Shell going to be made available for Fedora 14 or solely
for Fedora 15?
The later.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
> Is the final Gnome-Shell going to be made available for Fedora 14 or
> solely for Fedora 15?
>
>
>
The later.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Is the final Gnome-Shell going to be made available for Fedora 14 or solely
for Fedora 15?
Is yes for F14, what sort of time frame would we be looking at for
availability?
CD99E035AC72E359508CD3A58A335BD6
--
PHOTO RESOLUTIONS - Photo - Graphic - Web
C and L Jones - Proprietors
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:38 +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
> I've been putting something similar together [1], to simplify the
> process.
> It doesn't do much at the moment (a checklist with mock/koji rebuild
> support)
> and is quite ugly :)
>
> I like your config files idea. I currently just use CSV
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:11:26PM -0500, Jeffrey Ness wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As I'm new to the community and RPM Package Review (and development), I
> figured a tool to assist with reviews would be a nice time saver.
>
> With that said I have a simple Python tool (still in early beta stag
34 matches
Mail list logo
