Re: bodhi auto-obsoleting disabled?

2011-04-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:28:44 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:53:24 -0600, Kevin wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 10:27:05 +0200 > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > > Caution, everyone! > > > > > > It seems that bodhi no longer obsoletes update tickets when > > > submittin

Firefox releases, going forward

2011-04-11 Thread Chris Smart
Given that Mozilla is dramatically changing the development of Firefox and making releases much more frequent - i.e. Firefox 5 due in July, 6 later in the year, are Firefox updates going to change in Fedora? Are we still going to stick with the major version series at the time of Fedora release, or

gnuchess license changed from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+

2011-04-11 Thread Christopher Aillon
gnuchess v5.08 is now licensed under the GPLv3+. Already built in rawhide. Will push builds to F15,F14,F13 later this week. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

RE: A "whatuses" command for yum?

2011-04-11 Thread Chris Jones
-Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 4:56 AM Subject: A "whatuses" command for yum? A humble, basic question for you experts... Given a library, such as jansson (C JSON lib), how does one automatically list all packages in the F14 repo which require jansson? Must be able to

Re: A "whatuses" command for yum?

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 00:36:02 +0300, Ville wrote: > On 04/11/2011 10:15 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:59:11 -0500, Jon wrote: > >> repoquery --whatrequires , which could be a name of an RPM, or a > >> solib name, like libfoo.so.0. > > > > Note that --alldeps option is the

Orphaning gpointing-device-settings

2011-04-11 Thread Gianluca Sforna
Hi I'm not using this package anymore so I'd like to orphan it; bugs and all other data at: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/gpointing-device-settings Regards G. -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://identi.ca/giallu - http://twitter.com/giallu -- devel maili

Re: A "whatuses" command for yum?

2011-04-11 Thread Ville Skyttä
On 04/11/2011 10:15 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:59:11 -0500, Jon wrote: >> repoquery --whatrequires , which could be a name of an RPM, or a >> solib name, like libfoo.so.0. > > Note that --alldeps option is the default for some time, so if you > really want to be "a name

Re: dependencies on mod_perl-devel in rawhide

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:00:07 +0200, Marcela wrote: > > mod_perl-devel erroneously provides perl(warnings), which means that > > anything containing a perl script with "use warnings;" in it is liable > > to pull it in. Should be easily fixable - I'll get on it. > > > > Paul. > Fixed in mod_perl-

Re: Non-responsive maintainer - Chris Ricker

2011-04-11 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:53:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 11:14:54 -0700 > Christopher Aillon wrote: > > I'd like to propose we orphan all his packages. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/kaboom as > > nothing's really changed since the nonresponsive

[Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting Wednesday, April 13, 2011 @ 21:00 UTC

2011-04-11 Thread Robyn Bergeron
Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting. Wednesday, April 13, 2011 @ 21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT) "Before each public release Development, QA, and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This meeting is call

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

2011-04-11 Thread Lars Seipel
On Monday 11 April 2011 13:58:21 Tomasz Torcz wrote: > So people with cellphone as only internet connectivity option will > be unable unable to download fixed packages? Nope. They just have to enter their connection settings manually. Instructions were provided by their ISP, probably along wit

[Test-Announce] Announcing 389 Directory Server version 1.2.8.1 Testing

2011-04-11 Thread Rich Megginson
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of 389-ds-base-1.2.8.1. This release has fixes for bugs found in 1.2.8 testing and bugs from earlier releases. Installation yum install --enablerepo=updates-testing 389-ds # or for EPEL yum install --enablerepo=epel-testing 389-ds

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

2011-04-11 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > - Anything goes, up to the maintainer. > > This gave us major updates in stable releases, That's a feature. :-) > things that weren't tested very well or widely, Yet they worked… > lots of smaller updates for minor things leading to churn, etc. Very few updates were genui

Re: A "whatuses" command for yum?

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:59:11 -0500, Jon wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > A humble, basic question for you experts... > > > > Given a library, such as jansson (C JSON lib), how does one > > automatically list all packages in the F14 repo which require jansson? > > > > Must be able to find packages

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

2011-04-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:41:25 +0900 TASAKA Mamoru wrote: > Tomasz Torcz wrote, at 04/09/2011 07:57 PM +9:00: > > On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 05:32:04AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Will Woods wrote: > >>> In fact, there's plenty of approvers available, but you're not > >>> engaging with them. They

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

2011-04-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:07:21 +0200 Kevin Kofler wrote: > While I welcome those changes, I don't understand why we need to make > the update rules to be enforced by Bodhi more and more complicated > (and in fact, too complicated for Bodhi to implement correctly, there > are already several corner

Re: A "whatuses" command for yum?

2011-04-11 Thread Mohamed El Morabity
Le lundi 11 avril 2011 à 14:55 -0400, Jeff Garzik a écrit : > A humble, basic question for you experts... > > Given a library, such as jansson (C JSON lib), how does one > automatically list all packages in the F14 repo which require jansson? > > Must be able to find packages which are not insta

Re: A "whatuses" command for yum?

2011-04-11 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jeff Garzik wrote: > A humble, basic question for you experts... > > Given a library, such as jansson (C JSON lib), how does one > automatically list all packages in the F14 repo which require jansson? > > Must be able to find packages which are not installed on the current system. > > Thanks, > >

A "whatuses" command for yum?

2011-04-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
A humble, basic question for you experts... Given a library, such as jansson (C JSON lib), how does one automatically list all packages in the F14 repo which require jansson? Must be able to find packages which are not installed on the current system. Thanks, Jeff -- devel mailing

Re: Non-responsive maintainer - Chris Ricker

2011-04-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 11:14:54 -0700 Christopher Aillon wrote: > On 11/15/2010 08:57 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 05:16:43 -0500 (EST) > > Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > > >> Please could any FESCo member approve the takeover of rrdtool > >> (according to nonresponsive package main

Broken dependencies with Fedora 15 + updates-testing - 2011-04-11

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == package: perl-EV-devel-4.03-3.

Re: bodhi auto-obsoleting disabled?

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
And here's the analysis for libinfinity: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libinfinity-0.5.0-1.fc15 * bodhi - 2011-04-05 13:10:32 This update has been submitted for testing by tbzatek. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libinfinity-0.5.0-2.fc15 * bodhi - 2011-04-05 13:51:07

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

2011-04-11 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: > O rly? Are you *sure*? Sure it's not at all possible there could be a > bug somewhere in NM which causes it to crash because it misparses an odd > character in one of the files, for instance? "It's just a > configuration / data file, it can't possibly break anything!" is on

Re: bodhi auto-obsoleting disabled?

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:53:24 -0600, Kevin wrote: > On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 10:27:05 +0200 > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > Caution, everyone! > > > > It seems that bodhi no longer obsoletes update tickets when submitting > > newer ones. Currently, there are several competing test-updates, where > > a

Re: bodhi auto-obsoleting disabled?

2011-04-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 10:27:05 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote: > Caution, everyone! > > It seems that bodhi no longer obsoletes update tickets when submitting > newer ones. Currently, there are several competing test-updates, where > a ticket exists for an old and a new release. But only the older >

[perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize] Add Test-WWW-Mechanize-1.30-svn.r712.diff (Fix FTBS on f13/f14/f15). Add Test-WWW-Mechanize-1.30-Tes

2011-04-11 Thread corsepiu
commit 520c9060015390df5712c702113212a2b8ffce58 Author: Ralf Corsépius Date: Mon Apr 11 17:44:33 2011 +0200 Add Test-WWW-Mechanize-1.30-svn.r712.diff (Fix FTBS on f13/f14/f15). Add Test-WWW-Mechanize-1.30-Test-LongString.diff (Fix FTBS on f16). Spec file cleanup. Test-WWW-Mechaniz

Re: Vala 0.12 is out -- thoughts on updating the F-14 package?

2011-04-11 Thread Brian Pepple
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> >> Why is this update a benefit for Fedora 14?  Does it break any >> compatibility?  Have you done any testing with the affected packages? > > With the question of "would the packag

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

2011-04-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 13:43 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: > Dne 10.4.2011 23:07, Adam Williamson napsal(a): > > (What I'd like to be able to do in this kind of case is have Bodhi > > explain, hey, this package is critpath because $THIS_OTHER_PACKAGE > > depends on it, and if $THIS_OTHER_PACKAGE is worki

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

2011-04-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 23:21 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > I had a closer look at the raid setup on my f15-box and as the raid was > > up as expected and poking at the raid with mdadm didn't turn up any > > issues, I've given it positive karma which has made it "Critpath > > approved". > > Thanks

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

2011-04-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 18:19 -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote: > I just realized today for the first time that our nightlies are based on > stable, not testing. I think that's something we need to address. It's > probably still useful to have nightlies based on stable, but I think > it's rather

AutoQA vs Bodhi – round 2

2011-04-11 Thread Kamil Paral
As you probably noticed not so long ago we announced [1] that AutoQA [2] would be sending comments to Bodhi [3] and inform package maintainers about the results of important test cases (depcheck and ugpradepath). We enabled the functionality and disabled it again very soon due to a number of pro

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

2011-04-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 00:18:24 -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote: > > But not having a set of nightlies based on testing is a problem, and I > think we really really need to fix that. I see no reason we need to > pick one or the other, let's do both! That's probably an issue for infrasctruc

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

2011-04-11 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 01:43:14PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: > I have posted some updates to mobile-broadband-provider-info. These are > just data files for NetworkManager, they need frequent updates, and the > biggest disaster which can happen in case of their brokenness (which is > quite low, a

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

2011-04-11 Thread Matej Cepl
Dne 10.4.2011 23:07, Adam Williamson napsal(a): > (What I'd like to be able to do in this kind of case is have Bodhi > explain, hey, this package is critpath because $THIS_OTHER_PACKAGE > depends on it, and if $THIS_OTHER_PACKAGE is working okay, then this > package has fulfilled its critpath respo

Re: Vala 0.12 is out -- thoughts on updating the F-14 package?

2011-04-11 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/11/2011 12:54 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 04/11/2011 04:02 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> >>> Now that Vala 0.12 is out, Renich has inquired whether we can updat

[Bug 695294] New: perl-Math-MatrixReal-2.08 is available

2011-04-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Math-MatrixReal-2.08 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695294 Summary: perl-Math-MatrixReal-2.08 is available Product: Fe

[Bug 695295] New: perl-Mozilla-CA-20110409 is available

2011-04-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Mozilla-CA-20110409 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695295 Summary: perl-Mozilla-CA-20110409 is available Product: Fedo

Re: Vala 0.12 is out -- thoughts on updating the F-14 package?

2011-04-11 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 04/11/2011 04:02 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> Now that Vala 0.12 is out, Renich has inquired whether we can update the >> F-14 package. >> >> I wouldn't push an update unless all packages that require Valencia ca

Re: Vala 0.12 is out -- thoughts on updating the F-14 package?

2011-04-11 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 04/11/2011 04:02 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > Hello all, > > Now that Vala 0.12 is out, Renich has inquired whether we can update the > F-14 package. > > I wouldn't push an update unless all packages that require Valencia can > be built against 0.12 without a major update -- F-14, after a

Vala 0.12 is out -- thoughts on updating the F-14 package?

2011-04-11 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
Hello all, Now that Vala 0.12 is out, Renich has inquired whether we can update the F-14 package. I wouldn't push an update unless all packages that require Valencia can be built against 0.12 without a major update -- F-14, after all, is a stable release -- so if possible, would the package maint

Re: dependencies on mod_perl-devel in rawhide

2011-04-11 Thread David Tardon
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:00:07AM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > On 04/11/2011 10:42 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > Fixed in mod_perl-2.0.5-3.fc16 > Thanks! D. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

rawhide report: 20110411 changes

2011-04-11 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Apr 11 08:15:02 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- GMT-4.5.6-1.fc15.i686 requires libnetcdf.so.6 GMT-4.5.6-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libnetcdf.so.6()(64bit) HippoDraw-python-1.21.1-14.fc15.x86_64 re

Re: dependencies on mod_perl-devel in rawhide

2011-04-11 Thread Paul Howarth
On 11/04/11 07:30, David Tardon wrote: > In current rawhide, > > repoquery --whatrequires mod_perl-devel > > returns > > mod_perl-devel-0:2.0.5-1.fc16.i686 > mod_perl-devel-0:2.0.5-1.fc16.x86_64 > BackupPC-0:3.1.0-17.fc15.x86_64 > MySQL-zrm-0:2.2.0-2.fc15.noarch > Perlbal-0:1.78-1.fc15.noarch > Spr

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

2011-04-11 Thread Tim Flink
On 04/11/2011 01:21 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote: > On 04/11/2011 12:13 AM, Tim Flink wrote: >> On 04/10/2011 07:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 18:19:26 -0700, >>>Christopher Aillon wrote: I just realized today for the first time that our nightlies are

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

2011-04-11 Thread Tim Flink
On 04/09/2011 05:31 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 05:32:04AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> Will Woods wrote: In fact, there's plenty of approvers available, but you're not engaging with them. They might not know how

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

2011-04-11 Thread Christopher Aillon
On 04/11/2011 12:13 AM, Tim Flink wrote: > On 04/10/2011 07:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 18:19:26 -0700, >>Christopher Aillon wrote: >>> >>> I just realized today for the first time that our nightlies are based on >>> stable, not testing. I think that's something w

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

2011-04-11 Thread Christopher Aillon
On 04/10/2011 06:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 18:19:26 -0700, >Christopher Aillon wrote: >> >> I just realized today for the first time that our nightlies are based on >> stable, not testing. I think that's something we need to address. It's >> probably still usefu

Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

2011-04-11 Thread Tim Flink
On 04/10/2011 07:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 18:19:26 -0700, > Christopher Aillon wrote: >> >> I just realized today for the first time that our nightlies are based on >> stable, not testing. I think that's something we need to address. It's >> probably still usef