>From abrt:
Logging into Bugzilla at https://bugzilla.redhat.com
Checking for duplicates
Bug is already reported: 701604
Logging out
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701604
Should this have resulted in the bug be
Jerry James wrote:
> Given the usage restrictions on nauty (cannot redistribute for profit,
> cannot use in any application with nontrivial military significance),
> we can't have that in Fedora, can we? I presumed not, which is why
> I've been planning to see if I can rip nauty out of polymake
>
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:59:20 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 09:53 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> > Yeah I noticed as well that it tells you you are already logged in if
> > you login in a vt. That seem a much more serious bug.
>
> gdm tells you you're already logged in
On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 02:14 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > There was also possibly some terrifyingly bad interaction with running
> > multiple transactions for split media, but thankfully we've shed that
> > beast of burden.
>
> So, can we have updates included for upgrades then? (IMHO, this shou
Peter Jones wrote:
> It's possible you're remembering correctly, but I doubt it. The only
> issue that sounds similar to your hand-waving here, as I see it, is that
> we (by way of yum) will always choose the newest available package. This
> means if there's a higher version number on a package in
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> If that's the case it should probably be dropped and properly obsoleted
> rather than being shipped as an empty package, but I wouldn't want to
> run ahead of Bastien on this one. He's the totem lead developer as well
> as the Fedora mainta
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 11:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 13:08 -0300, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the clarification.
> >
> > Poking around the Internets led me to believe that the totem-upnp
> > plugin and coherence is dead.
>
> If that's the case it shoul
Am 27.05.2011 20:50, schrieb Panu Matilainen:
> On 05/27/2011 07:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 27.05.2011 17:54, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
>>> Reindl Harald wrote:
yes, 150 MB
>>>
>>> That's not enough. Try again with 1 or 2 GiB of swap space
>>
>> as said, i had a machine with 5 GB sw
On 05/27/2011 07:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 27.05.2011 17:54, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> yes, 150 MB
>>
>> That's not enough. Try again with 1 or 2 GiB of swap space
>
> as said, i had a machine with 5 GB swap and the braindead oom-killer
> started to shoot down pro
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 15:38 -0300, Evandro Fernandes Giovanini wrote:
> Em Sex, 2011-05-27 às 14:20 -0400, Simo Sorce escreveu:
> > On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 10:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 09:53 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yeah I noticed as well that it tell
Em Sex, 2011-05-27 às 14:20 -0400, Simo Sorce escreveu:
> On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 10:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 09:53 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah I noticed as well that it tells you you are already logged in if
> > > you login in a vt. That seem a much mor
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 14:27 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 05/27/2011 02:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 18:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> >>> In the #fedora IRC channel I have seen 100 preupgrade failures for every
> >>> one DVD upgrade fail
On 05/27/2011 11:58 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> On Friday 27 May 2011, Tom Callaway wrote:
>> So the code routines exist, they are just not tied into that method.
>> Should be a straightforward patch, I look forward to seeing it from you.
>
> IIRC, when this originally came up, the Anaconda develope
On 05/27/2011 02:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 18:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
>>> In the #fedora IRC channel I have seen 100 preupgrade failures for every
>>> one DVD upgrade failure roughly, I have nicknamed it preFAILupgrade. So
>>> much so
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 10:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 09:53 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> > Yeah I noticed as well that it tells you you are already logged in if
> > you login in a vt. That seem a much more serious bug.
>
> gdm tells you you're already logged in, but th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696725
--- Comment #4 from Trever Adams 2011-05-27 14:06:34 EDT
---
Created attachment 501354
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attach
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 18:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> > In the #fedora IRC channel I have seen 100 preupgrade failures for every
> > one DVD upgrade failure roughly, I have nicknamed it preFAILupgrade. So
> > much so I already had a draft started and was a bit shocke
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 13:08 -0300, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> Thank you for the clarification.
>
> Poking around the Internets led me to believe that the totem-upnp
> plugin and coherence is dead.
If that's the case it should probably be dropped and properly obsoleted
rather than being shipped as
Hi Michal,
On Fri, 27 May 2011 16:10:50 + (UTC)
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> commit b68c74888ca43310e2f6bea942073ae975fd6050
> Author: Michal Hlavinka
> Date: Fri May 27 18:10:30 2011 +0200
>
> make spec work for epel5 and epel6
>
> dovecot.spec | 16 +++-
> 1 files chang
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 09:53 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Yeah I noticed as well that it tells you you are already logged in if
> you login in a vt. That seem a much more serious bug.
gdm tells you you're already logged in, but that doesn't stop you
logging in again. it's purely informational.
I'm
Am 27.05.11 05:09, schrieb Orcan Ogetbil:
> - pdf-renderer: java library. required by itext-rups subpackage of
> itext. I did not meet anyone who needed itext-rups. did you?
I will take pdf-renderer.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.
Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> In the #fedora IRC channel I have seen 100 preupgrade failures for every
> one DVD upgrade failure roughly, I have nicknamed it preFAILupgrade. So
> much so I already had a draft started and was a bit shocked to read it was
> a DVD upgrade failure... so as always YMMV.
On 05/27/2011 11:58 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> On Friday 27 May 2011, Tom Callaway wrote:
>> So the code routines exist, they are just not tied into that method.
>> Should be a straightforward patch, I look forward to seeing it from you.
>
> IIRC, when this originally came up, the Anaconda develope
On 05/27/2011 10:47 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> A file has been added to the lookaside cache for Macaulay2:
>>
>> 53f83420491a32e3fe9b03a44c559a89 nauty24r2.tar.gz
...
> Given the name and version number, I presume you just uploaded this nauty:
>
Jerry James wrote:
> Given the usage restrictions on nauty (cannot redistribute for profit,
> cannot use in any application with nontrivial military significance),
> we can't have that in Fedora, can we?
Indeed, I'm fairly sure that this is non-Free. (Tom "spot" Callaway can
probably confirm that
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 14:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> You could say Bastien should have stopped the upnp package building at
>> all rather than making it empty, but then if he didn't make something
>> obsolete it, old versions woul
Am 27.05.2011 17:54, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> yes, 150 MB
>
> That's not enough. Try again with 1 or 2 GiB of swap space
as said, i had a machine with 5 GB swap and the braindead oom-killer
started to shoot down process long before the swap was used
the only real solutio
On Friday 27 May 2011, Tom Callaway wrote:
> So the code routines exist, they are just not tied into that method.
> Should be a straightforward patch, I look forward to seeing it from you.
IIRC, when this originally came up, the Anaconda developers said that it isn't
implemented because of some i
Reindl Harald wrote:
> yes, 150 MB
That's not enough. Try again with 1 or 2 GiB of swap space.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 05/27/2011 11:17 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> On Friday 27 May 2011, Tom Callaway wrote:
>> Last time I looked, anaconda supported enabling the updates (and
>> updates-testing) repositories.
>
> Only for new installations, not for upgrades.
So the code routines exist, they are just not tied into
- "Kevin Kofler" wrote:
>
> The DVD does not include updates when doing the upgrade, which means
> it is
> fully expected that some packages will not be updated because they're
> newer
> in Fedora 14 updates than in Fedora 15 GA. Running "yum upgrade" or
> "yum
> distro-sync" after the D
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> A file has been added to the lookaside cache for Macaulay2:
>
> 53f83420491a32e3fe9b03a44c559a89 nauty24r2.tar.gz
> --
> scm-commits mailing list
> scm-comm...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/scm-commi
On Friday 27 May 2011, Tom Callaway wrote:
> Last time I looked, anaconda supported enabling the updates (and
> updates-testing) repositories.
Only for new installations, not for upgrades.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
commit 13f80c7e7492580172d2f62818f664a5160ad05c
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri May 27 16:15:32 2011 +0100
Update to 1.44
- New upstream release 1.44:
- Fix invalid call to inet_pton in verify_hostname_of_cert when identity
should be verified as ipv6 address because it
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL:
c9d23d3398f7c0dfce0a1cf6d21e86c7 IO-Socket-SSL-1.44.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
On 05/25/2011 11:43 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I have been complaining about this brokenness for years, nobody cares about
> fixing it. So I can only recommend to never upgrade from the DVD.
And yet, I've never seen a patch from you on this topic.
Last time I looked, anaconda supported enabling t
On 05/27/2011 10:43 AM, Albert Strasheim wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
>> I just need some time to get updates in. However, that being said, I
>> totally ignore OFED. I pull packages from upstream and I do *not* get
>> anything from OFED. They shipped
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 09:42:26 -0400,
Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> If you click 'other' and type in your username it allows you to login
> right ?
> Does it "remember" your name once you logout ?
>
> If not I call it a bug in gdm.
I wasn't given the other option. Possibly because I have no account
Hello
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> I just need some time to get updates in. However, that being said, I
> totally ignore OFED. I pull packages from upstream and I do *not* get
> anything from OFED. They shipped a custom hacked, incompatible
> libibverbs for over 2 yea
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708377
Marcela Mašláňová changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [PATCH] normalize perl version in build requires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708377
Summary: [PATCH] normalize perl version in build requires
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708377
--- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová 2011-05-27 09:59:21
EDT ---
Created attachment 501308
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/a
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 08:35 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 08:25:21 -0500,
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 00:30:53 -0700,
> >
> > I can tell you they didn't. I can't login with gdm right now, most likely
> > because of this. gdm runs but doesn't li
On 05/25/2011 04:30 AM, Albert Strasheim wrote:
> Hello all
>
> It seems the openfabrics.org people are planning their OFED 1.6
> release which includes most of the useful InfiniBand packages for
> middle of September 2011.
>
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ewg/2011-March/016445.html
>
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 08:25:21 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 00:30:53 -0700,
>
> I can tell you they didn't. I can't login with gdm right now, most likely
> because of this. gdm runs but doesn't list any accounts.
> gdm should be looking at shells, not uids to decide
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 08:25 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 00:30:53 -0700,
> Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:04 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > >> reserved/system IDs are supposed t
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 00:30:53 -0700,
Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:04 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >> reserved/system IDs are supposed to be once that has been done we can
> >> start looking at what is th
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> - frescobaldi: lilypond editor.
> - rumor: Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR. required by
> frescobaldi. has 1 open FTBFS bug #704535. I proposed a patch for the
> bug in the bugzilla.
>
I took these, since I maintain lilypond.
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
On 05/27/2011 03:55 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> I'm trying to use nvidia cuda 4.0. It refuses to even try to compile with
> gcc>4.5.
>
> Any chance of a compat-gcc4.4 on f15?
>
I second the idea. A broader reason would be to provide build compatibility
with RHEL6.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
I'm trying to use nvidia cuda 4.0. It refuses to even try to compile with
gcc>4.5.
Any chance of a compat-gcc4.4 on f15?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am 27.05.2011 12:18, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> tonight on a virtual machine with 512 MB RAM yum-upgrade
>> from fedora 13 to fedora 14, oom-killer played butcher while
>> refreshing the kmod-open-vm-tools while depmod was running
>
> Do you have any swap space configured? Y
Reindl Harald wrote:
> tonight on a virtual machine with 512 MB RAM yum-upgrade
> from fedora 13 to fedora 14, oom-killer played butcher while
> refreshing the kmod-open-vm-tools while depmod was running
Do you have any swap space configured? You should have some.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel
Am 27.05.2011 11:45, schrieb Michael Schroeder:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 06:00:57PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>> You're definitely right that applydeltarpm has a *far* lower memory
>> footprint than createdeltarpm. But, looking at the original traceback,
>> it looks like it isn't getting enou
Compose started at Fri May 27 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
OpenEXR_Viewers-1.0.2-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libfltk.so.1.1()(64bit)
OpenEXR_Viewers-1.0.2-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libfltk_gl.so.1.1()(64bit)
Ope
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 06:00:57PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> You're definitely right that applydeltarpm has a *far* lower memory
> footprint than createdeltarpm. But, looking at the original traceback,
> it looks like it isn't getting enough memory when it's trying to verify
> the sequence.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:09:06PM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> - auto-buildrequires: Work out BuildRequires for rpmbuild automatically.
I took ownership of the Fedora packages (not EPEL).
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
libguestfs lets yo
56 matches
Mail list logo
