On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> it would be really good if people can pencil in this event on their
> calendars so we can get some testing of Fedora 15's IPv6 preparedness,
> and it would also be great if those who understand what the hell they're
> doing with IPv6 could
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #563 suggested policy: all daemons must
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 06:24:08AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I am co-maintaining boswars-addons which has been setup to not use dist
> as part of the versions, since the package is noarch and the same build
> is usable accross releases. It's 48 MB, so it has been considered large
> enough to
I will be pushing GeOS 3.3.0 to buildroots in the next 24 hours. I will
also rebuild PostGIS. If you have a package that depends on GeOS, you
might want to work on it, since there are bunch of API changes.
Changelog is here:
http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/browser/tags/3.3.0/NEWS
Regards,
--
Devrim
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 12:23:42AM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:16:02AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:24:08AM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:19:43AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:2
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:16:02AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:24:08AM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
> > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:19:43AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:23:44PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > > As I understand it, the
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jerry James wrote:
>> I need a new package to do an update on another package I maintain:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707819
>> DSDP: Software for semidefinite programming
>>
>> Let me
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:27:21AM +0200, Peter Vrabec wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 08:07:32 PM Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Peter Vrabec wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 05:25:44 PM Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > >> On Tue, May 24,
Hey, folks. If you follow the trac ticket notifications on test@ you may
have noticed this already, but I know it's easy to tune those out, and
I'm CCing devel@ so people following that list know about this too.
We're planning a Fedora IPv6 Test Day to coincide with World IPv6 Day on
June 8. This
Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL wrote:
> I'm following the procedure at:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
>
> Does anyone know how to contact Lubomir Rintel? He is not answering
> e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzilla reports:
>
> https
I'm following the procedure at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Does anyone know how to contact Lubomir Rintel? He is not answering
e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzilla reports:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668513
h
On 5/31/11 11:23 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> gmyth-0:0.7.1-14.fc15.i686
> linux-igd-0:1.0-10.fc15.i686
> djmount-0:0.71-3.fc15.i686
Rebuilds done.
> gmediaserver-0:0.13.0-7.fc15.i686
> ushare-0:1.1a-7.fc15.i686
Coming eventually. Apparently libupnp decided to rewrite an entire API
surface betwe
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:24:08AM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:19:43AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:23:44PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > As I understand it, the best way to do this in Fedora, with respect to
> > > > same ideas in this
Hi,
What does it occur when an update is revoked and is deleted?
I've done an updated version of package, made a build and when I write
the name in Package field I've found a bit odd that new build doesn't
appear in the combo box. I wonder if I did something wrong...
What do you think?
Thanks in
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> I need a new package to do an update on another package I maintain:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707819
> DSDP: Software for semidefinite programming
>
> Let me know what I can review for you in exchange.
I'm tempted to tak
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nspr-4.8.8-1.fc14,nss-util-3.12.10-1.fc14,nss-softokn-3.12.10-1.fc14,nss-3.12.10-1.fc14
Thanks in advance
Elio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I need a new package to do an update on another package I maintain:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707819
DSDP: Software for semidefinite programming
Let me know what I can review for you in exchange.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
Hi,
we're going to import KDE Platform 4.7 to Rawhide soon but as upstream
reorganized tarballs, it's going to be a little bit more difficult (it's mess!)
and it means Rawhide is going to broken for a couple of days.
We were considering own build target but it's not going to be hopefully so bad
Greetings!
As previously announced, the town hall for the Fedora Engineering
Steering Committee (FESCo) is today, May 31, 2011.
The town hall will be taking place at 1800 UTC (2pm US-Eastern).
For information on how to participate, please see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections#How_to_Join
The following packages will be affected:
djmount-0:0.71-3.fc15.i686
gmediaserver-0:0.13.0-7.fc15.i686
gmyth-0:0.7.1-14.fc15.i686
linux-igd-0:1.0-10.fc15.i686
ushare-0:1.1a-7.fc15.i686
and possibly more in third-party repos. I'll handle rebuilds for the
above, I don't expect any will need more t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628655
--- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper 2011-05-31
11:01:02 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of lif
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 10:17 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> rasterview-1.3-2.fc16.x86_64 requires libfltk.so.1.1()(64bit)
> rasterview-1.3-2.fc16.x86_64 requires libfltk_images.so.1.1()(64bit)
Fixed.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
deve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2011 04:52 AM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
> I'm experimenting with a package that needs to have rsyslog write to a
> named fifo pipe (so log data can be handed off from rsyslog to an
> external program). As I see it the options are:
>
> 1) apologiz
On 05/27/2011 08:14 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> So, can we have updates included for upgrades then? (IMHO, this should be
> the default, or even better, required. Upgrading without updates enabled
> just won't work reliably.)
We'd certainly be willing to entertain a patch to enable the repo in case
I am co-maintaining boswars-addons which has been setup to not use dist
as part of the versions, since the package is noarch and the same build
is usable accross releases. It's 48 MB, so it has been considered large
enough to be worth not triggering updates when updating between Fedora
releases.
S
On 05/28/2011 08:11 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> the key is that we don't test any kind of real-world configuration, with
>> anything other than default apps, actual user data in place and so on.
>
> And it shows. :-( My user account has been through many upgrades, and I've
Compose started at Tue May 31 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.4.0-2.fc15.i686 requires libvomsapi.so.0
CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.4.0-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libvomsapi.so.0()(64bit)
OpenEXR_Viewers-1.0.2
The license has changed to GPLv2+ (from GPLv2). Unlike boswars itself, the
upstream notice and copyright notices in the data both say version 2 or later,
so I am marking the package that way in Fedora.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
28 matches
Mail list logo
