On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:25 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> sooo... although the situation *right now* is that nobody in the
> commercial world is the slightest bit interested in LSB because they
> all do "custom builds" of complete software stacks, it could be said
> that *if* the f
On 6/3/11, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> The existence and the proliferation of extensions indicates that a lot of
> people simply are not happy with what gnome shell does out of the box, and
> that's why they use the extensions.
>
> If it were not so, then, by definition, nobody would care about these
Reindl Harald wrote:
> if there is a good reason - OK
> but not if the question is to change a default-setup in a way
> existing and used proprietary will have problems which are not
> existing without an OPTIONAL change
Well, installing bash-completion by default is the best way to ensure the
in
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 10:46:37 +1000,
Chris Jones wrote:
> It seems to me that as a general observation, package sizes are either
> stable or coming down in size. And even the total size of the Fedora
> Live CD has dropped significantly.
The last item is due to using XZ compression with s
It seems to me that as a general observation, package sizes are either
stable or coming down in size. And even the total size of the Fedora
Live CD has dropped significantly.
My example:
I installed Fedora 15 a couple of days ago. After fully updating, I
couldn't help but notice the amount o
Louis Lagendijk writes:
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 22:44 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:19:12 +0200, Louis Lagendijk wrote
>
> > one of the extensions to add the shutdown option, but believe Gnome3
> > needs more configurability so we can avoid all these "corrections" a
Hi all,
I orphaned the following packages below:
- onboard
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/onboard
- gnubiff
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gnubiff
- gpx-viewer
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gpx-viewer
I have stopped using those package
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 22:44 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:19:12 +0200, Louis Lagendijk wrote
>
> > one of the extensions to add the shutdown option, but believe Gnome3
> > needs more configurability so we can avoid all these "corrections" as
> > extensions.
>
> I
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:29:25PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> > Yeah. Bash-completion could stand to be broken up into a few sub-packages.
>> To solve what kind of problem exactly?
>
> Not necessarily sub-rpms. To solve the problem I was replyi
Hi Léon,
I'm also an avid user of Hamster Applet and have been using it
successfully in Gnome Shell.
I suggest you launch it using 'Time Tracker' and then look at the
bottom right bar. If you have it setup to let you know an activity is
currently running, it will remind you in the bottom middle.
Hi.
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:19:12 +0200, Louis Lagendijk wrote
> one of the extensions to add the shutdown option, but believe Gnome3
> needs more configurability so we can avoid all these "corrections" as
> extensions.
I think you missed what Gnome is all about.
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
2011/6/1 Marcela Mašláňová :
> On 06/01/2011 03:28 PM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>>
>> Now that Fedora 15 is out, I was hoping we would work perl 5.14 in
>> rawhide quickly enough as to be able to fix all the resulting bugs in
>> time for Fedora 16 release.
>>
>> Is anything planned?
>>
>> Emmanuel
>
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 12:28 -0300, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am seeing a metric ton of extensions showing up for Gnome shell that
> are enhancing the shell in positive ways. Some are packaged singly;
> some are grouped together in bundles; some are configured by editing
> .js files dir
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:29:25PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> > Yeah. Bash-completion could stand to be broken up into a few sub-packages.
> To solve what kind of problem exactly?
Not necessarily sub-rpms. To solve the problem I was replying to: some
operations are frustratingly slow, and maybe shoul
Hi,
it seems that rpmbuild runs prelink nowadays, since in Fedora 15 I have
run into a problem that I haven't seen before when packaging
proprietary 3rd party software.
The error is
prelink: (file name here) at least one of file's dependencies has
changed since prelinking
The cause of the prob
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Michael Wiktowy
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> >> If this is under way, could extension makers be pointed towards it to
> >> future-proof their extensions.
> >
> > I'm not sure what you mean by this.
>
> Searching around now, it lo
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>> If this is under way, could extension makers be pointed towards it to
>> future-proof their extensions.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by this.
Searching around now, it looks like Looking Glass (alt+f2 "lg")
already registers the extensions
commit 74af7c6e76350c1dfec63586cd9041949a7df7b5
Author: Yanko Kaneti
Date: Fri Jun 3 19:50:08 2011 +0300
Latest from upstream - 1.41
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
di
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
6c4c7b8197d2487ba59a292fda95566a Mojolicious-1.41.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
On 06/03/2011 09:22 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 03.06.2011 18:06, schrieb Peter Gordon:
>> Perhaps that is true; but what I believe Kevin is trying to convey is
>> that we (the Fedora community) should not and cannot stifle our progress
>> for the sake of some 3rd-party proprietary stuff.
>
> a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710290
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Am 03.06.2011 18:06, schrieb Peter Gordon:
> On 06/03/2011 08:49 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 03.06.2011 17:41, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
>>> David Howells wrote:
... and then you install acroread and things go horribly wrong due to
their attempt to work around bash completion of filename
Hi,
First of all, let me apologize if this is the incorrect place to ask.
I've asked on IRC and got little or no response that actually helped me.
In gnome 2 there was an amazing tool called hamster-applet. Now, since
gnome 3 doesn't support applets anymore, i notice i'm missing
functionality. Su
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 17:41 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> David Howells wrote:
> > ... and then you install acroread and things go horribly wrong due to
> > their attempt to work around bash completion of filenames with spaces [BZ
> > 702329].
>
> We do not support third-party proprietary software.
On 06/03/2011 08:49 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 03.06.2011 17:41, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
>> David Howells wrote:
>>> ... and then you install acroread and things go horribly wrong due to
>>> their attempt to work around bash completion of filenames with spaces [BZ
>>> 702329].
>>
>> We do not supp
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 05:41:33PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> David Howells wrote:
> > ... and then you install acroread and things go horribly wrong due to
> > their attempt to work around bash completion of filenames with spaces [BZ
> > 702329].
>
> We do not support third-party proprietary so
Am 03.06.2011 17:41, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> David Howells wrote:
>> ... and then you install acroread and things go horribly wrong due to
>> their attempt to work around bash completion of filenames with spaces [BZ
>> 702329].
>
> We do not support third-party proprietary software.
this is a b
David Howells wrote:
> ... and then you install acroread and things go horribly wrong due to
> their attempt to work around bash completion of filenames with spaces [BZ
> 702329].
We do not support third-party proprietary software.
What's wrong with Okular or Evince?
Kevin Kofler
--
de
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Michael Wiktowy
wrote:
>
> Is there some sort of extension management planned that would handle
> the separate enabling/disabling/configuration of individual extensions
> via the grand unified Settings menu?
In 3.2 we will support whitelisting in addition to
Hello,
I am seeing a metric ton of extensions showing up for Gnome shell that
are enhancing the shell in positive ways. Some are packaged singly;
some are grouped together in bundles; some are configured by editing
.js files directly. I am hesitant to install any of them because of
the manual, bol
Excerpts from Ville Skyttä's message of Wed Jun 01 22:54:05 +0200 2011:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
>
> I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
> my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my
> upstream hat on I ex
Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 05:19 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> So it is ultimately conditioned on fedora version, not foo-devel version.
>
> Just curious, why don't you require the version that doesn't require the
> patch?
>
In the future, let's say the patch will be required.
This
On 06/03/2011 05:19 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> So it is ultimately conditioned on fedora version, not foo-devel version.
Just curious, why don't you require the version that doesn't require the
patch?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:22:48 -0400,
Kyle McMartin wrote:
>
> Yeah, should be fixed in the next build, koji being out of commission
> didn't help get a timely fix pushed.
This build also fixes an issue I had rebuilding dahdi-linux where the
module names were expected to have another .0 in t
2011/6/3 Björn Persson :
> There's no reason why Debian's Popcon couldn't be ported to Fedora, but Popcon
> is something that users enable voluntarily (and it must be, because if it were
> on by default it would be spyware), so it counts only those users who want to
> be counted which may skew the
Compose started at Fri Jun 3 08:15:21 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadmsslutil.so.1
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadminutil.so.1
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.x86_64
Summary of changes:
4012dfa... New upstream release 1.28 (*)
a8d2e71... Add new genomeCoverageBed.pl script (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Aurimas Černius wrote:
> Gnote gives status icon 2 seconds to appear and shows Search All Notes
> window as main, if that fails. If you somehow delay the gnote start
> (wrap to some script for example) until desktop components like tray are
> available, it should st
Summary of changes:
4012dfa... New upstream release 1.28 (*)
a8d2e71... Add new genomeCoverageBed.pl script (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> When set to auto start on a session launch, users expect it to sit on the
> tray (without any wrappers needed) and not show the search all notes
> window.
That would be exactly what I want. I would even be happy with a
command line option t
Am 03.06.2011 15:15, schrieb Björn Persson:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 03.06.2011 10:19, schrieb Ivana Hutarova Varekova:
>>> do Fedora have some statistics of how many users install concrete fedora
>>> package?
>>
>> this is impossible!
>> from where will you get the counts?
>> from yum-downlo
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 12:54:43PM +0100, "Andy Green (林安廸)" wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Maybe it's common knowledge already but the 3.0 / 3.0.0 thing has led to
> the uname -r of the kernel not matching the packaged module path.
>
> Your boot will be a "bit minimal" until you stick a symlink in along the
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 03.06.2011 10:19, schrieb Ivana Hutarova Varekova:
> > do Fedora have some statistics of how many users install concrete fedora
> > package?
>
> this is impossible!
> from where will you get the counts?
> from yum-downloads - well which mirrors?
>
> maybe somebody believ
Hi -
Maybe it's common knowledge already but the 3.0 / 3.0.0 thing has led to
the uname -r of the kernel not matching the packaged module path.
Your boot will be a "bit minimal" until you stick a symlink in along the
lines of -->
ln -sf /lib/modules/3.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc16.x86_64
/lib/modules/3
Le Ven 3 juin 2011 13:12, Marko Myllynen a écrit :
> It seems that Debian has solved this by offering layouts from
> xkeyboard-config during installation and then generating corresponding
> console keymap based on the selection on the fly with console-setup [3].
This is the correct way to go, n
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is < x?
>
> I generally do something like:
>
> %if 0%{?fedora} > NN
> %global have_foo_MMM 1
> %endif
>
> %if 0%{?have_foo_MMM}
> BuildRequires: foo-devel >= MMM
> %else
> BuildRequires: foo-
Hi,
> The mass posting of please check if this bug still happens
> with newer versions to F-13 bugs made me look at:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545738
>
> Which sadly still has not been fixed yet. While trying
> to reproduce 545738 I hit:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
Alle giovedì 2 giugno 2011, Michael Wiktowy ha scritto:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:00 PM, nodata wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > dasher in Fedora has been broken for me since Fedora 12.
> >
> > The bug I entered has recently been automatically closed.
> >
> > dasher doesn't work in 64-bit and can be
Hi All,
The mass posting of please check if this bug still happens
with newer versions to F-13 bugs made me look at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545738
Which sadly still has not been fixed yet. While trying
to reproduce 545738 I hit:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646
Ville Skyttä wrote:
> I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
> my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my
> upstream hat on I expect things to further improve before F-16 is out.
... and then you install acroread and things go horri
Am 03.06.2011 10:19, schrieb Ivana Hutarova Varekova:
> Hello,
> do Fedora have some statistics of how many users install concrete fedora
> package?
> Ivana Hutarova Varekova
this is impossible!
from where will you get the counts?
from yum-downloads - well which mirrors?
maybe somebody believe
Hello,
do Fedora have some statistics of how many users install concrete fedora
package?
Ivana Hutarova Varekova
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> true, but anyone who would have had hulahop installed at F-10 time and did
> the (guaranteed) update to F11, F12, ... F15 at the right times would still
> have this issue now, right?
>
> tbh, it seems to be corner case enough to just say "u
53 matches
Mail list logo
