Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710568
--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2011-06-04 11:32:30
EDT ---
Jerry, if you're a proven packager, just
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Michael Wiktowy
michael.wikt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/3/11, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
The existence and the proliferation of extensions indicates that a lot of
people simply are not happy with what gnome shell does out of the box, and
that's
Am 04.06.2011 05:22, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
It is not our job to work around bugs (or gratuitous incompatibilities with
long-established Free Software packages) in proprietary software
WTF - Nobody said that
but let the peopole out there fuck in peace with more and more per
default installed
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 04.06.2011 05:22, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
It is not our job to work around bugs (or gratuitous incompatibilities with
long-established Free Software packages) in proprietary software
WTF - Nobody said that
but
Am 04.06.2011 10:38, schrieb drago01:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 04.06.2011 05:22, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
It is not our job to work around bugs (or gratuitous incompatibilities with
long-established Free Software packages) in proprietary
On 06/03/2011 12:44 PM, David Howells wrote:
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my
upstream hat on I expect things to further improve before
On 06/03/2011 06:25 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Since you are asking...I have a suggestion since I've used
bash-completion for a few years:
- make it modular (perhaps depending on environment variables?)
why? Because some completions take a lot of time to load, as has
already been
On 06/02/2011 04:51 PM, Petr Sabata wrote:
Why would you include an optional functionality (a quote from Packaging
guidelines) package in the default installation?
I don't think being optional functionality alone prevents something
being installed by default. And the point of the quoted part
Am 04.06.2011 12:57, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
Looking at what's currently in the @base group in comps-f16.xml.in tells
me that there's a *lot* of optional functionality already in it
yes, it is currently too much and should be reviewed instead
taken as argument to put more stuff there
On 06/02/2011 05:47 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
From a size perspective, it's not a huge deal - 500k with no deps that
aren't already in @core. From a functionality perspective, it would be
good to fix the issues it has with disconnected machines, etc. - I've
always removed it personally
On 06/04/2011 02:20 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
I'd invite people to try out the latest packages, and if the issues are
still present, filing bugs about them (preferably upstream at
https://alioth.debian.org/projects/bash-completion/ if it's not
packaging related, otherwise in Red Hat Bugzilla).
On 06/03/2011 05:52 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Anyway, I'll tell Jeremy he'll need to manually remove/update.
In my opinion this is a good (or bad?) example how users' life is made
harder due to irrational fear of the Epoch. Telling Jeremy won't help
people who don't know that the problem
Am 04.06.2011 13:20, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
but it seems to me that most of the negative feedback is also
coming from people who haven't been using bash-completion for a while
no - i am using bash-completion since years on all machines
but i do not like making default-install bigger as really
Hi,
I somehow missed the top post, so sorry for replying in the middle of
the thread. Adding bash-completion by default gets a +1 from me.
Note that Ubuntu has been doing this for ages AFAIK, so it is being
used by a large group of users without very vocal complaints for years
now.
Regards,
On 06/04/2011 02:38 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.06.2011 13:20, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
but it seems to me that most of the negative feedback is also
coming from people who haven't been using bash-completion for a while
no - i am using bash-completion since years on all machines
Note
Le samedi 04 juin 2011 à 10:46 +1000, Chris Jones a écrit :
But whilst installing the Java web-browser plugin, I observed that
it's not its dependancies that suck up the size but rather the
physical java packages themselves. And I just don't understand what
makes Java packages so big
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 04.06.2011 13:20, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
but it seems to me that most of the negative feedback is also
coming from people who haven't been using bash-completion for a while
no - i am using bash-completion since
Compose started at Sat Jun 4 08:15:25 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadmsslutil.so.1
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadminutil.so.1
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.x86_64
Michael Wiktowy wrote:
The cognative dissonance required to misconstrue an extension
framework that has provided people with a previously impossible amount
of customization in Gnome as something negative is quite astounding.
The complaint is not about the fact that GNOME 3 is extensible, but
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 01:32 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:25 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
sooo... although the situation *right now* is that nobody in the
commercial world is the slightest bit interested in LSB because they
all do custom builds of
On Sat 4 June 2011 10:54:13 Reindl Harald wrote:
but is here idiot-day today?
Please stop with this tone, it is very unexcellent behavior towards everyone
involved in this disucssion.
--
Ryan Rix -- http://rix.si
== OpenSource.com: Where Open Source Happens! ==
signature.asc
Description:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Michael Wiktowy wrote:
The cognative dissonance required to misconstrue an extension
framework that has provided people with a previously impossible amount
of customization in Gnome as something negative is quite
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:24 PM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com
tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
The latest version of gnome-tweak-tool can enable/disable installed extentions
http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/files/pics/tweek-tool.png
That is excellent. I would assume that disabled extensions are just
On 06/04/2011 01:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
what makes me [crazy] is the arrogant we do not support third party software
[...]
First, saying We do not support third-party software is not arrogance,
but simply a statement of fact about our community.
--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
Folks,
If you're interested in getting involved in the armv7hl[0] bringup,
please do subscribe to the ARM list and follow along/join us Fri for the
first of what will hopefully be several sessions dedicated to bootstrap
of F15 hardfp bits, followed by building the universe around those.
Jon.
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 20:53 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
[0] We're making a one time incompatible ABI switch in F-15 bringup to
the hard float ABI defined in section 6 of the ARM AAPCS (commonly
referred to as the ARM EABI - but that doesn't actually exist as a
name). The procedure call standard
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 21:10 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 20:53 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
[0] We're making a one time incompatible ABI switch in F-15 bringup to
the hard float ABI defined in section 6 of the ARM AAPCS (commonly
referred to as the ARM EABI - but that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.1602 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710723
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.1602 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Text-Table-1.122 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710725
Summary: perl-Text-Table-1.122 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-MIME-EncWords-1.012.3 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710727
Summary: perl-MIME-EncWords-1.012.3 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706878
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-61 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710724
Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-61 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707826
--- Comment #4 from Adam Huffman bl...@verdurin.com 2011-06-04 07:48:01 EDT
---
I've already done perl-bioperl for EL5, which
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-INI:
ae4c470d71364b82bc29dacf7e16074d Config-INI-0.018.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 451c371f195b56b86c44151dbd24afc45f17aec8
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Jun 4 21:13:40 2011 +0200
update to 0.018
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Config-INI.spec | 10 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MIME-EncWords:
9a699d8d3be90fb76e10d5176532633e MIME-EncWords-1.012.3.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c45c1cd4b6d23a500ea15f57157e0f686887816c
Author: Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org
Date: Sat Jun 4 23:12:55 2011 +0200
update to 1.012.3
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MIME-EncWords.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710727
Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Your following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
package:
39 matches
Mail list logo
