Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora
Rahul Sundaram metherid at gmail.com writes: On 06/24/2011 09:55 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote Rahul, Seems he is using references to support contentions...like a scholarly journal article. With respect, just as you are free to criticize on these mailing lists, he is free to speak on them as long as he follows proper netiquette. The proper etiquette would be to use the reference once and state the contention along with it. Not merely copy paste wikipedia article content multiple times in a thread especially ... Now you know what it is ... when you are confusing remote attestation with remote access. I think you are in over your head ... What am I suggesting is a more effective way. and less noise. Exactly, that's all you do ... your thought added value in the thread is zero. Colorado Cops Arrest Man Who Hid Inside Toilet Tank At Yoga Festival http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/toilet/colorado-toilet-tank-arrest-649031 JB -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora
Hi, On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 22:21 +0200, nodata wrote: 2. This seems like Trusted Computing, which got shot down in flames. Who shot it and why ? I don't know about Trusted Computing but this does remind me of the Pentium III processor serial number that wasn't well received - even though in theory it had what many people would consider a reasonable purpose. In other words, tracking down CPUs that were sometimes stolen by the truckload. Does TrustedBoot go against the core values of Fedora? Only if it is not under user control, otherwise it is a very useful feature. In a sense, part of it isn't under user control. There is a secret in there, held against the user, and possibly known by the manufacturer or other third parties. There is also a black box of code that could do anything. I'm not really that paranoid but it is worth considering the worst case, just as a theoretical possibility. What if the device became standard by virtue of being bundled with every consumer device... what if it became crucial to system operation somehow... what if that device could then be disabled remotely, either rendered useless by the secret being disclosed, or some unknown functionality could be triggered in that signed but opaque blob of code. Already there are systems that have whitelisted hardware (eg. wireless cards in netbooks) and the BIOS polices the presence of the right device. If you make unauthorised modifications to the BIOS, you can install any compatible wireless card (or WWAN device). BUT if the BIOS was signed and loaded by a trusted method, this option would not be available. Apart from that there is the aspect of identification - this is as good a way of identifying a system as the processor serial number was. I think it is worth including in open source systems, but only so the devices and methods can be better understood, and probably turned off / disabled at the earliest opportunity if there isn't a compelling benefit to having them. -Cam -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rpaths strike again, please add checker to koji/mock
Hi, currently the existence of RPATHS is only checked when one does a local rpm build. mock and koji still let it slide. As a result we have these bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703636 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716572 I provided a patch for the first one and even applied for package commit access to apply the fix, yet the maintainers choose to ignore me. Forcing the rpath checker on the build system would at least prevent such problems from happening in the future. I don't want to be pointing fingers, but it seems like a long time problem that some @redhat maintainers happily choose to ignore packaging guidelines [1] without consequences. Julian [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora
...snip... Can we move this back to technical, Fedora development related discussion? thanks, kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Security updates for Firefox 4 in F-15
Hallo, I have a spcial question about secirity update of Firefox 4 on F-15. On http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Diskussionen-um-Versionspolitik-von-Firefox-1268009.html you could read, that upstream doensn't release the security update fireforx-4.0.1. Instead users should update to Firefox 5. My question is, how should fedora handle this cas. I can't believe, that we shouldn't get any security updates for Firefox until the release of F-16. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Security updates for Firefox 4 in F-15
Hi, fedora already updated to firefox 5 in fedora 15. btw only german speaking persons could read your reference ;-) Johannes On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.dewrote: Hallo, I have a spcial question about secirity update of Firefox 4 on F-15. On http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Diskussionen-um-Versionspolitik-von-Firefox-1268009.html you could read, that upstream doensn't release the security update fireforx-4.0.1. Instead users should update to Firefox 5. My question is, how should fedora handle this cas. I can't believe, that we shouldn't get any security updates for Firefox until the release of F-16. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Security updates for Firefox 4 in F-15
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.dewrote: Hallo, I have a spcial question about secirity update of Firefox 4 on F-15. On http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Diskussionen-um-Versionspolitik-von-Firefox-1268009.html you could read, that upstream doensn't release the security update fireforx-4.0.1. Instead users should update to Firefox 5. My question is, how should fedora handle this cas. I can't believe, that we shouldn't get any security updates for Firefox until the release of F-16. Check updates-testing. Firefox 5 is already there. If you'd read the devel list threads you would have seen dozens of references to it over the last week or so. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Security updates for Firefox 4 in F-15
On 2011/06/25 15:32 (GMT+0200) Jochen Schmitt composed: I have a spcial question about secirity update of Firefox 4 on F-15. On http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Diskussionen-um-Versionspolitik-von-Firefox-1268009.html you could read, that upstream doensn't release the security update fireforx-4.0.1. Instead users should update to Firefox 5. My question is, how should fedora handle this cas. I can't believe, that we shouldn't get any security updates for Firefox until the release of F-16. FF5 is the security update to FF4.0.1, which incorporates an upstream versioning policy change. -- The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive. Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2011-06-16 x86_64
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 08:38:15AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:17:45PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: virt-mem-0.3.1-9.fc12 (build/make) rjones,virtmaint This is a dead.package, or if it's not then it's supposed to be dead. Please follow the steps on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life to get the package retired and blocked. Thanks, -Toshio pgpIKjbUbf6Ad.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 17:26:08 +0100 Camilo Mesias cam...@mesias.co.uk wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: ...snip... Can we move this back to technical, Fedora development related discussion? I am slightly disappointed with this response, after all, to quote the original message Fesco decided that we should probably have a broader discussion about the topic I take it you / FESCO have had enough now? No. I am saying that I personally have had enough of personal attacks and side discussions on quoting styles. :) I welcome posts back on the technical topic of trusted boot. ;) kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rpaths strike again, please add checker to koji/mock
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 13:56 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: Hi, currently the existence of RPATHS is only checked when one does a local rpm build. mock and koji still let it slide. As a result we have these bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703636 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716572 I provided a patch for the first one and even applied for package commit access to apply the fix, yet the maintainers choose to ignore me. Well, it's fairer to assume the maintainer is simply busy and hasn't got to the bug yet than to assume they're ignoring you. Note that your patch isn't the best fix; it would be better to use the --disable-rpath configure parameter. I meant to push a build this week which would fix this but didn't get around to it yet... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rpaths strike again, please add checker to koji/mock
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 13:56 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: Hi, currently the existence of RPATHS is only checked when one does a local rpm build. mock and koji still let it slide. As a result we have these bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703636 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716572 I provided a patch for the first one and even applied for package commit access to apply the fix, yet the maintainers choose to ignore me. Well, it's fairer to assume the maintainer is simply busy and hasn't got to the bug yet than to assume they're ignoring you. Note that your patch isn't the best fix; it would be better to use the --disable-rpath configure parameter. I meant to push a build this week which would fix this but didn't get around to it yet... https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-3.0.2-4.fc15 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Bernd Stramm bernd.str...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 10:41:36 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: I welcome posts back on the technical topic of trusted boot. ;) Right. So can we have specifics about what it's good for? Not how it is implemented, but what the purposes are. And who the trusted entities are (can be) in the chain of trust. Those sorts of technical topics would be interesting. I agree this would be interesting. On a more practical level I'd like to hear with more specifics about how this fits the definition of a feature as stated here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Definitions Does it meet any of the points 1, 2, or 4? If it is proposed as a feature based on either or both of points 3 and 5 has marketing or anyone outside of FESCo been involved in deciding whether this meets those requirements from their perspective? I ask this because points 3 and 5 don't seem to be based on anything technical. John -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rpaths strike again, please add checker to koji/mock
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:24:47 +0200 drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 13:56 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: Hi, currently the existence of RPATHS is only checked when one does a local rpm build. mock and koji still let it slide. As a result we have these bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703636 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716572 I provided a patch for the first one and even applied for package commit access to apply the fix, yet the maintainers choose to ignore me. Well, it's fairer to assume the maintainer is simply busy and hasn't got to the bug yet than to assume they're ignoring you. Note that your patch isn't the best fix; it would be better to use the --disable-rpath configure parameter. I meant to push a build this week which would fix this but didn't get around to it yet... https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-3.0.2-4.fc15 I'll note here that _removing_ rpath completely breaks gnome-shell. Likely this is something that should be addressed upstream before removing rpath is possible in this case at least. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Some questions - new maintainer
On 06/19/2011 08:27 PM, Damian L Brasher wrote: I noted in Bug 644711 that perhaps it would be more efficient to review one of the dependencies - is this necessarily the case? Not necessarily but I think it is in your self interest to do you. What is important is doing enough reviews or whatever is necessary to demonstrate enough understanding of the packaging guidelines and Fedora process for any sponsor to feel comfortable enough to approve you. This is somewhat subjective but doing more reviews can't hurt and it is a area where not much attention is given and any help would be appreciated. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Status of abrt retrace server?
Hi Seems like the abrt retrace server is not part of Fedora infrastructure yet and is constantly overloaded and I haven't had a single instance where it did what it is supposed to do yet. What is the status of this? Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Status of abrt retrace server?
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:11:09 +0530 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Seems like the abrt retrace server is not part of Fedora infrastructure yet and is constantly overloaded and I haven't had a single instance where it did what it is supposed to do yet. What is the status of this? It currently is a guest in Fedora Infrastructure. I just doubled the amount of memory it had allocated to it yesterday, so hopefully that will help it out some. I also know that dedicated hardware is in the process of being ordered/setup/etc for it, so that should help a lot too. Beyond that, abrt maintainers probably have better info, so hopefully they will chime in here. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora
On 25/06/11 18:52, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Camilo Mesiascam...@mesias.co.uk said: In a sense, part of it isn't under user control. There is a secret in there, held against the user, and possibly known by the manufacturer or other third parties. There is also a black box of code that could do anything. You already have that; it is called System Management Mode. I'm not really that paranoid but it is worth considering the worst case, just as a theoretical possibility. What if the device became standard by virtue of being bundled with every consumer device... what if it became crucial to system operation somehow... Fedora supporting or not supporting it will have zero impact on that outcome happening or not happening. Already there are systems that have whitelisted hardware (eg. wireless cards in netbooks) and the BIOS polices the presence of the right device. If you make unauthorised modifications to the BIOS, you can install any compatible wireless card (or WWAN device). BUT if the BIOS was signed and loaded by a trusted method, this option would not be available. All of that is pre-kernel, so either can or cannot happen no matter what Fedora does. None of that has any bearing on the technical discussion about whether Fedora should or should not include this functionality in the installer. I think there is some misunderstanding about what the discussion is supposed to be about. The supporting open source code is already in Fedora. The feature request is simply to modify grubby/anaconda to set up the boot entries to include the support by default (or when the hardware is found). Please could you update the Feature page to say what exactly Trusted Boot is? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rpaths strike again, please add checker to koji/mock
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 22:06 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 25.06.2011 18:58, Adam Williamson pisze: On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 13:56 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: Hi, currently the existence of RPATHS is only checked when one does a local rpm build. mock and koji still let it slide. As a result we have these bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703636 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716572 I provided a patch for the first one and even applied for package commit access to apply the fix, yet the maintainers choose to ignore me. Well, it's fairer to assume the maintainer is simply busy and hasn't got to the bug yet than to assume they're ignoring you. Note that your patch isn't the best fix; it would be better to use the --disable-rpath configure parameter. I meant to push a build this week which would fix this but didn't get around to it yet... My patch is not the best fix, true. The problem is that --disable-rpath does not work as advertised and using the sed command from the Fedora wiki prevents cheese from building at all. It is all written down in the bug. Last I read, --disable-rpath worked if you did an autoreconf too? That would still be the most preferable option, I believe... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rpaths strike again, please add checker to koji/mock
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 19:24 +0200, drago01 wrote: Note that your patch isn't the best fix; it would be better to use the --disable-rpath configure parameter. I meant to push a build this week which would fix this but didn't get around to it yet... https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-3.0.2-4.fc15 I was actually talking about cheese, not gnome-shell; sorry for not clarifying. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora
Chris Adams cmadams at hiwaay.net writes: ... I think there is some misunderstanding about what the discussion is supposed to be about. The supporting open source code is already in Fedora. The feature request is simply to modify grubby/anaconda to set up the boot entries to include the support by default (or when the hardware is found). Hi, I think Fedora should be careful here - it is a minefield. It is treacherous, as already expressed by other and competent people. Respect them, there was a reason they said that. I personally think that free and open-source product should stay away from TPM entirely. One one hand - it is about trusted boot: This can already be achieved partially now, with open-source tools (GPG, etc), and can be enhanced with e.g. a combination of hardware/software solution that would be *non-hardwired*, *portable*, *open-source* and *free*, and up to machine owner and user to utilize. Signed where appropriate with *your* GPG key. Think of what the trend and the state-of-art-and-mind are in regard to this; Iwao's post is very helpful here. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-June/153456.html This could be achieved now or soon without deep fundamental considerations, by the open-source community itself. On the other hand - it is about OS isolation (OS rings): Ring (computer security) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_%28computer_security%29 This is a separate issue, in my mind. In this sense, TPM is about ring -1, and in the future ring -2, etc :-) This is about virtualization, and more. It goes much deeper into OS design and architecture, hardware and software. It should be addressed fundamentally by competent people, companies and organizations. Leave it to them, but watch and participate. Finally. Btw, TPM, or TXT exactly, can be hacked too (that has been done already). JB -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Proposal: retire bittorrent
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:55 PM, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Heck, I'd be willing to accept ANY bittorrent server that can be both tracker and primary seed and doesn't require a special apache module to do it. The biggest virtue of the old bittorrent client is that it is simple, stand alone and while not fancy, it is straightforward to understand. Why not look into using Web/HTTP seeding rather than running a client for the initial seed? The only downsides that I know of so far: 1) Not supported in rtorrent 2) Transmission doesn't apply any bandwidth limits to Web/HTTP seeds -- Jeff Ollie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Status of abrt retrace server?
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 14:41, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Seems like the abrt retrace server is not part of Fedora infrastructure yet and is constantly overloaded and I haven't had a single instance where it did what it is supposed to do yet. What is the status of this? abrt retrace server is currently not on infrastructure as it is a beta system run by its developers. It currently needs a lot more hardware than we could allocate to it in any form and are waiting for new hardware to be delivered to us. Once that is done, we will install it for the abrt people, but currently we(infrastructure) are not running it nor are there plans for us to at this point. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Stephen J Smoogen. The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance. Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacLaren -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
File XML-Atom-0.39.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-Atom: 5537d57f4d8a64022ecf82265e2a0594 XML-Atom-0.39.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-XML-Atom] update to 0.39
commit 7c93d51eed09a2b0b531d380e019d9200b5684fd
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Jun 25 12:19:40 2011 +0200
update to 0.39
.gitignore |1 +
perl-XML-Atom.spec |6 --
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 78e3d46..673c39b 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
XML-Atom-0.37.tar.gz
/XML-Atom-0.38.tar.gz
+/XML-Atom-0.39.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-XML-Atom.spec b/perl-XML-Atom.spec
index 4fc4bc9..c968e32 100644
--- a/perl-XML-Atom.spec
+++ b/perl-XML-Atom.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-XML-Atom
-Version:0.38
+Version:0.39
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Atom feed and API implementation
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -49,11 +49,13 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {}
2/dev/null \;
make test
%files
-%doc Changes README
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Jun 25 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.39-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
* Wed May 25 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.38-1
- update to latest upstream version
- clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 38fde86..ca60286 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-9a577d7a993e97bc5d8e152551d4ae07 XML-Atom-0.38.tar.gz
+5537d57f4d8a64022ecf82265e2a0594 XML-Atom-0.39.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-XML-Atom] use perl_default_filter and DESTDIR
commit e5fcb065e2313f95c5759badcdb43aa3124dcd91
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Jun 25 12:25:39 2011 +0200
use perl_default_filter and DESTDIR
perl-XML-Atom.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-XML-Atom.spec b/perl-XML-Atom.spec
index c968e32..169fa22 100644
--- a/perl-XML-Atom.spec
+++ b/perl-XML-Atom.spec
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ Requires: perl(URI)
Requires: perl(XML::LibXML) = 1.69
Requires: perl(XML::XPath)
+%{?perl_default_filter}
+
%description
Atom is a syndication, API, and archiving format for weblogs and other
data. XML::Atom implements the feed format as well as a client for the API.
@@ -38,7 +40,7 @@ data. XML::Atom implements the feed format as well as a
client for the API.
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
@@ -55,6 +57,7 @@ make test
%changelog
* Sat Jun 25 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.39-1
- update to latest upstream version
+- use perl_default_filter
* Wed May 25 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.38-1
- update to latest upstream version
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-XML-Atom/f15] (2 commits) ...use perl_default_filter and DESTDIR
Summary of changes: 7c93d51... update to 0.39 (*) e5fcb06... use perl_default_filter and DESTDIR (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-XML-Atom/f14] (2 commits) ...use perl_default_filter and DESTDIR
Summary of changes: 7c93d51... update to 0.39 (*) e5fcb06... use perl_default_filter and DESTDIR (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-XML-Atom] restore doc files
commit c8bd7655ee3838eaf53a353da881b4b72044958c
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Jun 25 12:32:55 2011 +0200
restore doc files
perl-XML-Atom.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-XML-Atom.spec b/perl-XML-Atom.spec
index 169fa22..a05a577 100644
--- a/perl-XML-Atom.spec
+++ b/perl-XML-Atom.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-XML-Atom
Version:0.39
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Atom feed and API implementation
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -51,10 +51,14 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {}
2/dev/null \;
make test
%files
+%doc Changes README
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Jun 25 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.39-2
+- restore doc files
+
* Sat Jun 25 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.39-1
- update to latest upstream version
- use perl_default_filter
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-XML-Atom/f14] restore doc files
Summary of changes: c8bd765... restore doc files (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Test-Spec-0.33.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Spec: 1271d96c3c491fa9cb828f64a329c42e Test-Spec-0.33.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Test-Spec] update to 0.33
commit 9f5aa66b14031e8b6088ca8559d7cec3ae67d629
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Jun 25 12:34:56 2011 +0200
update to 0.33
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-Spec.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 13ed19a..6b29fd0 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
/Test-Spec-0.31.tar.gz
/Test-Spec-0.32.tar.gz
+/Test-Spec-0.33.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Test-Spec.spec b/perl-Test-Spec.spec
index 1c1e0ec..16ec451 100644
--- a/perl-Test-Spec.spec
+++ b/perl-Test-Spec.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Test-Spec
-Version:0.32
+Version:0.33
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Write tests in a declarative specification style
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ BuildRequires: perl(List::Util)
BuildRequires: perl(Package::Stash) = 0.23
BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util)
BuildRequires: perl(strict)
+BuildRequires: perl(TAP::Parser)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Deep) = 0.103
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Trap)
@@ -57,6 +58,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Jun 25 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.33-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
* Sun Jun 12 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.32-1
- update to latest upstream version
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 3bab3b2..45a8d0c 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-6b5a3853457bc949a61ce964098e6dff Test-Spec-0.32.tar.gz
+1271d96c3c491fa9cb828f64a329c42e Test-Spec-0.33.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-XML-Atom/f15] restore doc files
Summary of changes: c8bd765... restore doc files (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Test-Spec/f15] (2 commits) ...update to 0.33
Summary of changes: a564d5f... update to 0.32 (*) 9f5aa66... update to 0.33 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File MooseX-OneArgNew-0.002.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-OneArgNew: 7bd6f8b873427967bc0cd55f14ede3ea MooseX-OneArgNew-0.002.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-MooseX-OneArgNew] update to 0.002
commit 9c79f05c7ad6f4945214d22d7398d6e42a2ebc1a
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Jun 25 12:48:36 2011 +0200
update to 0.002
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MooseX-OneArgNew.spec |6 --
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e90688b..813e645 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
/MooseX-OneArgNew-0.001.tar.gz
+/MooseX-OneArgNew-0.002.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-MooseX-OneArgNew.spec b/perl-MooseX-OneArgNew.spec
index 60dc414..b08cb44 100644
--- a/perl-MooseX-OneArgNew.spec
+++ b/perl-MooseX-OneArgNew.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-MooseX-OneArgNew
-Version:0.001
+Version:0.002
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Teach -new to accept single, non-hashref arguments
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -44,11 +44,13 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {}
2/dev/null \;
make test
%files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc LICENSE README
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Jun 25 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.002-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
* Thu Feb 17 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.001-1
- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.79.
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index ca40bfe..9218bca 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-87675d2bb98525d787e7509e6d581f50 MooseX-OneArgNew-0.001.tar.gz
+7bd6f8b873427967bc0cd55f14ede3ea MooseX-OneArgNew-0.002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-MooseX-OneArgNew/f15] update to 0.002
Summary of changes: 9c79f05... update to 0.002 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-MooseX-OneArgNew/f14] update to 0.002
Summary of changes: 9c79f05... update to 0.002 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Dist-Zilla-4.200008.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Dist-Zilla: 45ee9e267c1dc2a8a20efac99ae20195 Dist-Zilla-4.28.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Dist-Zilla] update to 4.200008
commit f734b23f707de567c208958bf7b2c08963f1ebcb
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Jun 25 12:57:37 2011 +0200
update to 4.28
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Dist-Zilla.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 1d8a96e..ad69a44 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ Dist-Zilla-4.101900.tar.gz
/Dist-Zilla-4.24.tar.gz
/Dist-Zilla-4.26.tar.gz
/Dist-Zilla-4.27.tar.gz
+/Dist-Zilla-4.28.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Dist-Zilla.spec b/perl-Dist-Zilla.spec
index 8da6a7e..6a22424 100644
--- a/perl-Dist-Zilla.spec
+++ b/perl-Dist-Zilla.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Dist-Zilla
-Version:4.27
+Version:4.28
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Distribution builder; installer not included!
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -128,6 +128,9 @@ make test
%{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d
%changelog
+* Sat Jun 25 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 4.28-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
* Sun Jun 05 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 4.27-1
- update to latest upstream version
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index d293ff7..8111046 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-891594cce8759f1aa58e3eb577fbf6fc Dist-Zilla-4.27.tar.gz
+45ee9e267c1dc2a8a20efac99ae20195 Dist-Zilla-4.28.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 715559] perl-Mojolicious-1.48 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715559 Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Mojolicious-1.47 is|perl-Mojolicious-1.48 is |available |available --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-25 07:11:36 EDT --- Latest upstream release: 1.48 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.46 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mojolicious/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Dist-Zilla/f15] (2 commits) ...update to 4.200008
Summary of changes: 72097d7... update to 4.27 (*) f734b23... update to 4.28 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Dist-Zilla/f14] (10 commits) ...update to 4.200008
Summary of changes: 24382d9... update to 4.102341 (*) 77dcca6... update to 4.102344 (*) 67c04fd... update to 4.20 (*) 4fc328e... install bash_completion script (*) 537f9d7... update to 4.21 (*) 64d02f3... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*) 4fa4c87... update to 4.24 (*) 8d47807... update to 4.26 (*) 72097d7... update to 4.27 (*) f734b23... update to 4.28 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch
perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch-3.00-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(HTTP::Exception) On i386: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch-3.00-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(HTTP::Exception) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Text-SpellChecker-0.11.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Text-SpellChecker: 60282ec427819944c75d155d3fcf8ead Text-SpellChecker-0.11.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Text-SpellChecker] Update to 0.11
commit fa32eb46fab2b71d0b8cf407bb2f8e5d524ced2b
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sat Jun 25 13:27:21 2011 +0100
Update to 0.11
- New upstream release 0.11
- POD fixes and POD test
- Re-diff dictionary path patch
- BR: perl(Test::Pod)
patch = Text-SpellChecker-0.11-dictpath.patch |8
perl-Text-SpellChecker.spec| 17 +
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/Text-SpellChecker-0.09-dictpath.patch
b/Text-SpellChecker-0.11-dictpath.patch
similarity index 64%
rename from Text-SpellChecker-0.09-dictpath.patch
rename to Text-SpellChecker-0.11-dictpath.patch
index 17469af..4b9cfa5 100644
--- a/Text-SpellChecker-0.09-dictpath.patch
+++ b/Text-SpellChecker-0.11-dictpath.patch
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Text-SpellChecker-0.09/lib/Text/SpellChecker.pm2011-06-23
21:21:15.0 +0100
-+++ Text-SpellChecker-0.09/lib/Text/SpellChecker.pm2011-06-24
09:37:13.236197703 +0100
-@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@
+--- Text-SpellChecker-0.11/lib/Text/SpellChecker.pm2011-06-24
18:33:16.0 +0100
Text-SpellChecker-0.11/lib/Text/SpellChecker.pm2011-06-25
13:08:24.612108338 +0100
+@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
=item $Text::SpellCheckerDictionaryPath{Hunspell}
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
This directory should have $lang.dic and $lang.aff files.
-@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@
+@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@
};
}
our %DictionaryPath = (
diff --git a/perl-Text-SpellChecker.spec b/perl-Text-SpellChecker.spec
index 790de0e..918fd85 100644
--- a/perl-Text-SpellChecker.spec
+++ b/perl-Text-SpellChecker.spec
@@ -1,14 +1,17 @@
Summary: OO interface for spell-checking a block of text
Name: perl-Text-SpellChecker
-Version: 0.09
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Version: 0.11
+Release: 1%{?dist}
License: GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
Url: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-SpellChecker/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/B/BD/BDUGGAN/Text-SpellChecker-%{version}.tar.gz
-Patch0:Text-SpellChecker-0.09-dictpath.patch
+Patch0:Text-SpellChecker-0.11-dictpath.patch
BuildArch: noarch
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker), perl(Text::Hunspell),
perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(Text::Hunspell)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod)
BuildRequires: hunspell-en
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
Requires: perl(Text::Hunspell)
@@ -47,6 +50,12 @@ make test TEST_VERBOSE=1
%{_mandir}/man3/Text::SpellChecker.3pm*
%changelog
+* Sat Jun 25 2011 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.11-1
+- Update to 0.11
+ - POD fixes and POD test
+- Re-diff dictionary path patch
+- BR: perl(Test::Pod)
+
* Fri Jun 24 2011 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.09-2
- Perl mass rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 1f59814..3f8c500 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-0dd3f672547f356bc6eab1836da66b31 Text-SpellChecker-0.09.tar.gz
+60282ec427819944c75d155d3fcf8ead Text-SpellChecker-0.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Text-SpellChecker] Perl mass rebuild
commit 7373dd45f32f02b1e0b4cd7abce6ff939bf19b06
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sat Jun 25 13:34:56 2011 +0100
Perl mass rebuild
perl-Text-SpellChecker.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Text-SpellChecker.spec b/perl-Text-SpellChecker.spec
index 918fd85..afcfdab 100644
--- a/perl-Text-SpellChecker.spec
+++ b/perl-Text-SpellChecker.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Summary: OO interface for spell-checking a block of text
Name: perl-Text-SpellChecker
Version: 0.11
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
License: GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
Url: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-SpellChecker/
@@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ make test TEST_VERBOSE=1
%{_mandir}/man3/Text::SpellChecker.3pm*
%changelog
+* Sat Jun 25 2011 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.11-2
+- Perl mass rebuild
+
* Sat Jun 25 2011 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.11-1
- Update to 0.11
- POD fixes and POD test
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Text-SpellChecker] Created tag perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.09-1.fc16
The lightweight tag 'perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.09-1.fc16' was created pointing to: 5239ecc... Spec clean-up -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Text-SpellChecker] Created tag perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.11-1.fc16
The lightweight tag 'perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.11-1.fc16' was created pointing to: fa32eb4... Update to 0.11 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Text-SpellChecker] Created tag perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.11-2.fc16
The lightweight tag 'perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.11-2.fc16' was created pointing to: 7373dd4... Perl mass rebuild -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Text-SpellChecker] Created tag perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.09-2.fc16
The lightweight tag 'perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.09-2.fc16' was created pointing to: e323fb0... Perl mass rebuild -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Moose-2.0010.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Moose: c0b5c0ab72c9f80ab789cb20908e2deb Moose-2.0010.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Moose] update to 2.0010
commit 26d3777e3ed93cd47165cfd2bf6a0df3fdf53249
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Jun 25 15:29:13 2011 +0200
update to 2.0010
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Moose.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 3682c81..2294fa5 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ Moose-1.08.tar.gz
/Moose-2.0001.tar.gz
/Moose-2.0002.tar.gz
/Moose-2.0007.tar.gz
+/Moose-2.0010.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Moose.spec b/perl-Moose.spec
index 8f7554c..670371c 100644
--- a/perl-Moose.spec
+++ b/perl-Moose.spec
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
Name: perl-Moose
Summary:Complete modern object system for Perl 5
-Version:2.0007
+Version:2.0010
Release:1%{?dist}
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
-Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/Moose-%{version}.tar.gz
+Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DO/DOY/Moose-%{version}.tar.gz
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
@@ -164,6 +164,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/Test::Moose*
%changelog
+* Sat Jun 25 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2.0010-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
* Fri May 20 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2.0007-1
- update to latest upstream version
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index c1d219f..8e47468 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-cdce8ba1f6dbc321280cdb4d3108de8b Moose-2.0007.tar.gz
+c0b5c0ab72c9f80ab789cb20908e2deb Moose-2.0010.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File App-perlbrew-0.25.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perlbrew: 12ba896bcb0eac264f3544e4803053ed App-perlbrew-0.25.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 716411] perlbrew-0.25 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716411 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-06-25 10:12:14 --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2011-06-25 10:12:14 EDT --- perlbrew 0.25 fails its test-suite (see http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=App-perlbrew+0.25). Will wait for 0.26. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 713711] perl-Bio-SamTools-1.29 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713711 Adam Huffman bl...@verdurin.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-06-25 12:46:41 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2011-06-26
Your following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == package: dspam-web-3.9.0-8.el4.i386 from fedora-epel-4-i386 unresolved deps: perl(GD::Graph::lines) perl(GD::Graph::bars) perl(GD::Graph::lines3d) package: dspam-web-3.9.0-8.el4.ppc from fedora-epel-4-ppc unresolved deps: perl(GD::Graph::lines) perl(GD::Graph::bars) perl(GD::Graph::lines3d) package: dspam-web-3.9.0-8.el4.x86_64 from fedora-epel-4-x86_64 unresolved deps: perl(GD::Graph::lines) perl(GD::Graph::bars) perl(GD::Graph::lines3d) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
