On 27.06.2011 11:28, Karel Zak wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:15:52PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
I did a find_bind_mount() function as part of:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commitdiff;h=ddf6fb86
Note, be careful with st_dev, because:
* after
mount
On 06/29/2011 06:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 13:11 +0200, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 06/29/2011 12:18 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/29/2011 03:20 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
Hi!
I'm going to replace the report library with the new libreport. Today I
plan to replace it
hi
as far as i can see fedora is built with -fstack-protector and not
-fstack-protector-all - is there a specific reason for not using
the all variant or is it safe to rebuild server-packages with it?
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/ssp.txt
The GCC options for SSP are
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 03:19:10PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
as far as i can see fedora is built with -fstack-protector and not
-fstack-protector-all - is there a specific reason for not using
the all variant
Sure, it is expensive to set up the canary even when it is obvious
it isn't needed.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 03:31:24PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 03:19:10PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
as far as i can see fedora is built with -fstack-protector and not
-fstack-protector-all - is there a specific reason for not using
the all variant
Sure, it is
On 06/29/2011 02:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 10:01 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 09:59 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 27 juin 2011 15:12, Miloslav Trmač a écrit :
Placing trust in the manufacturer of the hardware puts the user in no
worse
Am 30.06.2011 15:36, schrieb Jakub Jelinek:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 03:31:24PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 03:19:10PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
as far as i can see fedora is built with -fstack-protector and not
-fstack-protector-all - is there a specific reason for
Hi,
as far as I remember the versions of firefox and thunderbird have
allways been sinchronuos at their latest stable version. So I'd like to
know for personal interest if there are reasons that would deny updating
thunderbird packages to version 5.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Regards
Heiko Adams
On 06/24/2011 01:00 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
DEBUG: ERROR: The file '/usr/lib/monodevelop/AddIns/NUnit/nunit.core.dll'
referenced in the manifest could not be found.
You'll probably need to patch the manifest to tell it where the
nunit.core.dll lives. Grep the source code for
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com wrote:
- I was afraid, that it would be against some Fedora policy ;) Then just
the rawhide..
Okay if this isn't coming to F15, can you provide the sufficient
instructions on how to revert the libreport packages from F15
On 06/30/2011 12:16 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com wrote:
- I was afraid, that it would be against some Fedora policy ;) Then just
the rawhide..
Okay if this isn't coming to F15, can you provide the sufficient
instructions on
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
Actually I'd prefer to know how to move forward to the new way ...
run rawhide!
-jef
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com wrote:
- I was afraid, that it would be against some Fedora policy ;) Then just
the rawhide..
Okay if this isn't coming to F15, can you provide the
On 06/30/2011 12:16 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com wrote:
- I was afraid, that it would be against some Fedora policy ;) Then just
the rawhide..
Okay if this isn't coming to F15, can you provide the sufficient
instructions on
On 06/30/2011 07:37 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 06/30/2011 12:16 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Jiri Moskovcakjmosk...@redhat.com wrote:
- I was afraid, that it would be against some Fedora policy ;) Then just
the rawhide..
Okay if this isn't coming to F15, can
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:06:17 +0200, JM (Jiri) wrote:
Whats the way forward from here in F15?
gene/
1. bumping the version of the report-gtk package should do the trick - I
already contacted the maintainer and ask him to do - as this seems to
work for rawhide:
On 06/30/2011 08:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, updates-testing is 'you get to keep both halves' territory.
wasn't it stable that broke things (sealert stopped working for example
after a stable update) - and then something from updates testing was
supposed to fix it? But it never made
I have been having problems with my Lenovo T61 and Rawhide. Currently
the system will do all kinds of watchdog resets when I am booting the
3.0 kernels but not with the 2.6.38 kernel. I am trying to figure out
how to best capture and debug them as they tend to scroll off the
screen faster than I
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 22:04 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 06/30/2011 08:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, updates-testing is 'you get to keep both halves' territory.
wasn't it stable that broke things (sealert stopped working for example
after a stable update) - and then something
I have been having problems with my Lenovo T61 and Rawhide. Currently
the system will do all kinds of watchdog resets when I am booting the
3.0 kernels but not with the 2.6.38 kernel. I am trying to figure out
how to best capture and debug them as they tend to scroll off the
screen faster
On 06/30/2011 10:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 22:04 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 06/30/2011 08:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, updates-testing is 'you get to keep both halves' territory.
wasn't it stable that broke things (sealert stopped working for example
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 06:34:35PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:27:47PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
Portreserve is also useful to reserve (not let the OS make use of)
ports that are needed by an embedded management controller that
intercepts delivery of packets
commit 2f30b0a700fd6653a9e796d3ab457250991b378b
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Jun 30 12:46:23 2011 +0200
Fix up bogus Tue Jun 28 2011 changelog entry.
Fix License (Artistic2.0).
Add BR: perl(Test::CPAN:Changes).
perl-Params-Validate.spec | 12
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Params-Validate:
e8989f5686de4cd916cd973ccf097625 Params-Validate-1.00.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4d569faffe21253dd91d20eb867ae7b19de36eaf
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Jun 30 12:48:13 2011 +0200
Upstream update.
Deactivate t/release-pod-coverage.t
(Add Params-Validate-1.00-no-pod-coverage.patch).
.gitignore
On 06/28/2011 12:57 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:58:58AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:28:58PM -0400, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
If you like imagine how bad it is, see:
http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl_rebuild/5.14/notbuilt.svg ;-)
It doesn't
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 01:12:13PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 06/28/2011 12:57 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:58:58AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:28:58PM -0400, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
If you like imagine how bad it is, see:
On 06/30/2011 01:35 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 01:12:13PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 06/28/2011 12:57 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:58:58AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:28:58PM -0400, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
If you like imagine
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 01:44:15PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 06/30/2011 01:35 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 01:12:13PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 06/28/2011 12:57 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:58:58AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:29:28PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 06/30/2011 02:05 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 01:44:15PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 06/30/2011 01:35 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 01:12:13PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 06/28/2011 12:57
commit 88b33edee2f2520f6dc679468fbba760d80c8d49
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Jun 30 10:45:20 2011 +0100
Comment clean-up
perl-Test-EOL.spec |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-EOL.spec b/perl-Test-EOL.spec
index
commit c446e409fde2c70ea563d1f568764ac48b3f1473
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Jun 30 10:53:12 2011 +0100
Nobody else likes macros for commands
perl-Test-EOL.spec |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-EOL.spec
commit f405d34b3fc0e08f87cec881667541f9dedb26dd
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Jun 30 10:57:58 2011 +0100
%{?perl_default_filter} isn't needed for this tiny package
perl-Test-EOL.spec |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 5948a41e0cc0e2175ee3cb7f406a810dc791ce04
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Jun 30 11:03:18 2011 +0100
perl(Pod::Coverage::TrustPod) is available everywhere now
perl-Test-EOL.spec |4 +---
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit f8de5a255346df92544a4db4e76ed09bf5a90afc
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Jun 30 11:06:46 2011 +0100
Restore EPEL-4 compatibility
perl-Test-EOL.spec |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-EOL.spec b/perl-Test-EOL.spec
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-EOL-0.9-5.fc16' was created pointing to:
f8de5a2... Restore EPEL-4 compatibility
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660847
--- Comment #10 from Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com 2011-07-01 00:59:01 EDT
---
No, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 is still
37 matches
Mail list logo
