I have a package that supplies translated man pages (only in Ukrainian
strangely enough). They are installed by the upstream under:
%{_mandir}/uk/man1/
%{_mandir}/uk/man3/
Maybe my Google-fu is failing me, but I can't find any guidelines on
how to package these for Fedora. Should I create
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721337
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-07-18 04:00:50 EDT ---
*** Bug 722660 has been marked as a duplicate of
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722660
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 08:57 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I have a package that supplies translated man pages (only in Ukrainian
strangely enough). They are installed by the upstream under:
%{_mandir}/uk/man1/
%{_mandir}/uk/man3/
I would use
%lang(uk) %{_mandir}/uk/man1/foo.1*
in
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:09:21AM +0200, Andreas Bierfert wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 08:57 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I have a package that supplies translated man pages (only in Ukrainian
strangely enough). They are installed by the upstream under:
%{_mandir}/uk/man1/
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:45:33 +0100, RWMJ (Richard) wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:09:21AM +0200, Andreas Bierfert wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 08:57 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I have a package that supplies translated man pages (only in Ukrainian
strangely enough). They are
Hello,
I have updated sg3_utils in rawhide to 1.31. The API/ABI of the
libsgutils2 library is not considered stable and there is no soname
change, so all consumers of the library need to be rebuild. Affected
packages are
podsleuth (FTBFS due missing hal-devel)
libgpod
lsvpd (will be built only
Do any of you use _. to match e.g. the h extension?
Right now _[a-z] does not match the special h extension but does match
someone explicitly dialling h. Would it make sense to extend this
behaviour to the . and ! patterns, so they never match h?
/Benny
--
devel mailing list
Hi List
Referring to sections of Packaging Guidelines:
No longer necessary to explicitly include %defattr at the beginning of %
files.
and the fact that the BuildRoot tag, eve if defined, is ignored.
After reviewing packages I have suggested %defattr is not strictly
necessary. I have also
Compose started at Mon Jul 18 08:15:54 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.0()(64bit)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #608 F16Feature: Trusted Boot -
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Benny Amorsen benny+use...@amorsen.dk wrote:
Do any of you use _. to match e.g. the h extension?
Right now _[a-z] does not match the special h extension but does match
someone explicitly dialling h. Would it make sense to extend this
behaviour to the . and !
Benny Amorsen benny+use...@amorsen.dk writes:
Do any of you use _. to match e.g. the h extension?
Right now _[a-z] does not match the special h extension but does match
someone explicitly dialling h. Would it make sense to extend this
behaviour to the . and ! patterns, so they never match h?
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 01:20:30PM +0100, Damian L Brasher wrote:
Hi List
Referring to sections of Packaging Guidelines:
No longer necessary to explicitly include %defattr at the beginning of %
files.
and the fact that the BuildRoot tag, eve if defined, is ignored.
After reviewing
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 06:27:50PM -0700, Travis Davies wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Fellow Linux enthusiast here.
I am working on developing the netperf rpm package for Fedora. I use
this software
daily at work and thought why not be the package maintainer, right?
Will of course need your
2011/7/18 Denys Vlasenko dvlas...@redhat.com:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 18:15 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
The TPM allows verifying that this kernel (and only this kernel) is
actually running. An attacker with access to the hard drive (evil
maid) can modify the code to disable any signature check
Hi to all,
anybody would review my new package disper?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712579
Thank you in advance!
--
Mario Santagiuliana
www.marionline.it
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-07-18)
===
Meeting started by mjg59 at 17:01:22 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-07-18/fesco.2011-07-18-17.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
The upstream website says that right now it's only tested and working
with the binary nvidia drivers. Does this actually work with xrandr?
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
This article recommends ending /etc/sysconfig
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/on-etc-sysinit.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
2011/7/18 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com:
This article recommends ending /etc/sysconfig
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/on-etc-sysinit.html
Generally speaking I like the idea of dropping /etc/sysconfig. I think
the right way it keeping minimal, standardized configuration in
On Mon, 18.07.11 20:54, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
2011/7/18 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com:
This article recommends ending /etc/sysconfig
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/on-etc-sysinit.html
Generally speaking I like the idea of dropping /etc/sysconfig. I
Summary of changes:
b90cd1d... - Upstream update. (*)
c3a3b87... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
75065f0... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*)
03fa3db... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
be75a3c... dist-git conversion (*)
03e5901... - Upstream update.
commit f308d83740ca9e3274ed93882a452250463af647
Merge: 353f86d 2d1eb60
Author: Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org
Date: Mon Jul 18 20:58:50 2011 +0200
Merge branch 'master' into el6
Conflicts:
.gitignore
perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Mason.spec
sources
On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 12:48 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:36:10 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
...snip...
We wanted to check that this was okay with FESCo and the feature
wrangler and the project in general before going ahead, so here we are
=)
On 07/18/2011 06:57 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.07.11 20:54, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
2011/7/18 Neal Beckerndbeck...@gmail.com:
This article recommends ending /etc/sysconfig
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/on-etc-sysinit.html
Generally speaking I
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.07.11 20:54, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
2011/7/18 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com:
This article recommends ending /etc/sysconfig
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/on-etc-sysinit.html
TK == Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com writes:
TK They are now optional but there's no need to force people to be rid
TK of them. In particular, some people like to build a package for both
TK Fedora and EPEL-5. In this case, a lot of the things that are
TK optional in Fedora have to remain
On Mon, 18.07.11 15:13, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.07.11 20:54, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
2011/7/18 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com:
This article recommends ending
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:14:48PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
TK == Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com writes:
TK They are now optional but there's no need to force people to be rid
TK of them. In particular, some people like to build a package for both
TK Fedora and EPEL-5. In
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
Some daemons cannot be fixed, get over with this mantra that daemons
need be fixed Lennart.
If I were a betting man I'd wager that all the daemons we ship are
easier to fix than the US deficit (in both the technical sense
Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com writes:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/on-etc-sysinit.html
No. There is no need for a directory that replaces /etc/sysconfig. It's
borked. If a daemon has not configuration file but should have one, then
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:16:13PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
SNIP
Hmm? Which ones in fedora can't? Are you suggesting we are shipping
software that cannot be modified? If so, please explain which one that
is, since we need to remove it from the distro then. Fedora only
includess Free
On Mon, 18.07.11 15:34, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote:
Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com writes:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/on-etc-sysinit.html
No. There is no need for a directory that replaces /etc/sysconfig. It's
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de writes:
On Mon, 18.07.11 15:34, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote:
Well, if they didn't need fixed before, they'll certainly need fixed
when you make them start keeping their configuration info someplace else
than /etc/sysconfig. This proposal sounds
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 21:45, Adam Miller
maxamill...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:16:13PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
SNIP
Hmm? Which ones in fedora can't? Are you suggesting we are shipping
software that cannot be modified? If so, please explain which one that
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 21:59, Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de writes:
On Mon, 18.07.11 15:34, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote:
Well, if they didn't need fixed before, they'll certainly need fixed
when you make them start keeping their configuration
Hi there,
in accordance with the announced Fedora feature[1][2], we (the Boost
maintainers) plan to rebase Boost to 1.47.0 really soon now. Boost
1.47.0 has been released recently and Denis Arnaud kindly did the
packaging, so it is ready for scratch builds, smoke testing, and related
fun.
I'll
In data 18/7/2011 20:34:17, Matthew Garrett ha scritto:
The upstream website says that right now it's only tested and working
with the binary nvidia drivers. Does this actually work with xrandr?
The developer tell me that disper use libxrandr, if some users had problems
with the ctypes-based
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
Some daemons cannot be fixed, get over with this mantra that daemons
need be fixed Lennart.
If I were a betting man I'd wager that all the daemons we
On 07/18/2011 11:09 AM, Andreas Bierfert wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 08:57 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I have a package that supplies translated man pages (only in Ukrainian
strangely enough). They are installed by the upstream under:
%{_mandir}/uk/man1/
%{_mandir}/uk/man3/
I
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:46:30PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
This article recommends ending /etc/sysconfig
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/on-etc-sysinit.html
I'm sympathetic to Lennart's arguments, but really this should be
discussed and decided in the context of a real, open forum, drawing
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 21:16 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.07.11 15:13, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.07.11 20:54, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
2011/7/18
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 21:16 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.07.11 15:13, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.07.11 20:54, Michał
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:42 PM, mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess the process can be started - but by the time it is ready for
prime time then any daemons that need to work should have been tested
to work without the need for any /etc/sysconfig/... files - just by
the way
On Mon, 18.07.11 21:57, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:46:30PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
This article recommends ending /etc/sysconfig
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/on-etc-sysinit.html
I'm sympathetic to Lennart's arguments, but really
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:42 PM, mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote:
what then out of interest is the replacement for a
/etc/sysconfig/desktop file that defines which login manager should be
the default (and which is not there by default)? Can KDM then be
started when X starts and
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Mon, 18.07.11 21:57, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:46:30PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
This article recommends ending /etc/sysconfig
David Michael (fedora@gmail.com) said:
what then out of interest is the replacement for a
/etc/sysconfig/desktop file that defines which login manager should be
the default (and which is not there by default)? Can KDM then be
started when X starts and not GDM without the use of the
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.07.11 15:13, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.07.11 20:54, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
2011/7/18 Neal Becker
On Mon, 18.07.11 17:00, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
Generally speaking I like the idea of dropping /etc/sysconfig. I think
the right way it keeping minimal, standardized configuration in
/etc/services.conf/ or something like that.
No. There is no need for a
On Mon, 18.07.11 23:17, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
These interfaces introduced by systemd are actually discussed in quite
some detail on the systemd irc channel and mailing list. It's a very
open forum, you are welcome to join.
So Fedora is the right place to discuss removal
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm sympathetic to Lennart's arguments, but really this should be
discussed and decided in the context of a real, open forum, drawing
interested people from all of the Linux distros (possibly BSD etc
too). Perhaps
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Right, but that then causes 'last one wins' behavior among multiple DMs.
I suppose we could use alternatives for this, as much as I dislike it.
I meant creating that symlink was the replacement for
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 23:20, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm? Which ones in fedora can't? Are you suggesting we are shipping
software that cannot be modified? If so, please explain which one that
is, since we need to remove it from
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 23:27, David Michael fedora@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Right, but that then causes 'last one wins' behavior among multiple DMs.
I suppose we could use alternatives for this, as much as I dislike it.
On Mon, 18.07.11 23:26, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
I'm sympathetic to Lennart's arguments, but really this should be
discussed and decided in the context of a real, open forum, drawing
interested
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 15:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de writes:
On Mon, 18.07.11 15:34, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote:
Well, if they didn't need fixed before, they'll certainly need fixed
when you make them start keeping their configuration info
Hi,
I'm using the gmane gateway to read the list and I'm getting Posting
not allowed errors across all the lists I've tried. Is it just me or
are others seeing this?
--Ben
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 23:14 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.07.11 21:57, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:46:30PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
This article recommends ending /etc/sysconfig
On 07/19/2011 12:38 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the gmane gateway to read the list and I'm getting Posting
not allowed errors across all the lists I've tried. Is it just me or
are others seeing this?
--Ben
If you're reading this, posting through the gmane newsgroup works.
--
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org wrote:
We should not let packages create config files in lib, lib is more for
static content from rpms, not really for configuration. For the same
reason, 'systemctl enable/disable' acts on /etc only.
I had imagined using
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 17:38:30 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
I'm using the gmane gateway to read the list and I'm getting Posting
not allowed errors across all the lists I've tried. Is it just me or
are others seeing this?
Hrm...seems tin isn't getting a FQDN when starting up and then refusing
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.07.11 15:13, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.07.11 20:54, MichaÅ Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com)
wrote:
Hi,
2011/7/18 Neal Becker
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
Well, if they didn't need fixed before, they'll certainly need fixed
when you make them start keeping their configuration info someplace else
Yeah -- daemons that can be configured with commandline options or
envvars are Just
commit 4cf01501b7dc0622faff1a7c16df3ec42e0d5b2c
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jul 18 13:20:16 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-Inline-Files.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Inline-Files.spec
commit fcef96e8f8750107f97c50085b2d8ea0b22df34a
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jul 18 13:20:18 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-List-MoreUtils.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-List-MoreUtils.spec
commit 2572ae068bf5075989671594b4f6872d38deeb33
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jul 18 13:20:35 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-Test-Inter.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-Inter.spec b/perl-Test-Inter.spec
commit de42297e9810f07ad9bf244c15d3a30266f6d757
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jul 18 13:25:57 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-Test-Refcount.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-Refcount.spec
commit 32807ff5efccf44304eae873220f41f1b1c5fe95
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jul 18 13:26:39 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-Pod-Eventual.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Pod-Eventual.spec
commit 8df02f0e8c4086cbb52e77e96a2613681f1d8b7c
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jul 18 13:30:39 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-Time-modules.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Time-modules.spec
commit fcf3b98e166e51e1df3274f6673b1ac62fc91666
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jul 18 13:32:44 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec
commit c598892c55daf03a780170b04c014b90a0500013
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jul 18 13:31:17 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-Config-Properties.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Config-Properties.spec
commit 09530da674af3c1ed683878e40c0dc7c6356d2bf
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jul 18 13:36:52 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-SDL.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-SDL.spec b/perl-SDL.spec
index 3b3a226..fb5b50c
commit 3069f454861e5e106433773e4580d6e7eac4a502
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jul 18 13:37:05 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-File-Remove.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-Remove.spec b/perl-File-Remove.spec
commit 34c721f78e58c9649fe43ba81920dfe92fe7d532
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jul 18 13:38:42 2011 +0200
Perl mass rebuild
perl-HTML-Template.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-HTML-Template.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Fedora-Rebuild:
892a7940f43286f279d076c59dae11d8 Fedora-Rebuild-v0.7.0.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit e4526ff362f8041e93053afd3621a14263b4696e
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jul 18 16:36:54 2011 +0200
0.7.0 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2
Summary of changes:
e4526ff... 0.7.0 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
e4526ff... 0.7.0 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721337
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-18
11:04:41 EDT ---
perl-Fedora-Rebuild-0.7.0-1.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721337
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-18
11:04:01 EDT ---
perl-Fedora-Rebuild-0.7.0-1.fc15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715240
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-18
11:04:12 EDT ---
perl-Fedora-Rebuild-0.7.0-1.fc15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716407
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-18
11:04:17 EDT ---
perl-Fedora-Rebuild-0.7.0-1.fc15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716407
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-18
11:04:56 EDT ---
perl-Fedora-Rebuild-0.7.0-1.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722604
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit fa045894e2470cbb279a89ca877287d433c16c1d
Author: Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org
Date: Tue May 3 01:21:17 2011 +0200
BR: perl(Digest::SHA)
rt3.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/rt3.spec b/rt3.spec
index 2714374..00bfeb8 100644
commit 3b0b77697fc2245288f03470871af2fa9f80d540
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Jul 19 06:28:10 2011 +0200
fix filtering; clean up requires
perl-Object-InsideOut.spec | 23 +--
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
88 matches
Mail list logo
