On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 02:52:58AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
seth vidal wrote:
That you've implemented a depsolver for use with PK that does not match
yum nor anaconda is pretty bad. You've chosen intentional
incompatibility. That's neither helpful nor really embodying the goals I
like
On 17 September 2011 02:36, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
So you came up with this really complex heuristic in a vain attempt to
always do the right thing without requiring changes to the packages, and now
it does a completely wrong thing which would be straightforward to avoid,
I've just upgrade libmemcached to 0.52
which provides libmemcached.so.8
I don't plan to push this update to fedora = 16.
(except if expressly asked to)
Remi
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hey, everyone.
I'm starting to get a bit concerned about one aspect of the SysV to
systemd conversion process. I've come across three separate bugs where
the default and/or post-upgrade state of services was incorrect: in two
cases, the service changed from being disabled by default in F15 to
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 08:08:24AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 17 September 2011 07:21, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
... and no way to access yum information from anything other than
Python, which makes it harder to use more professional programming
languages and yum data
I meant to add this link to the current Python-subprocess code:
http://git.annexia.org/?p=febootstrap.git;a=blob;f=src/febootstrap_yum_rpm.ml;h=028492a0d3c894e7cb2c85b446f6bff272217147;hb=HEAD#l35
Note the extra backslashes and double %%'s are because the Python code
is contained in a
On 17 September 2011 10:38, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Yeah, it looks possible.
The very fact that you're exposing a C API and a library is a
promising start, even if it didn't yet do specifically what I needed.
Would it be easier if I provided a GIR file so you can just use
Richard Hughes wrote:
Anyway, if anyone wants to know the fesco ticket, it's here:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/669
Thanks for actually posting the link!
To Seth: What a bunch of nonsense!
This is a more serious proposal:
Hi,
After having installed both GNOME and Xfce since F15, I noticed that the
GNOME terminal (package gnome-terminal) and Xfce terminal (package Terminal)
use the same Name and Icon in their desktop files. So when using the
System menu, you have to try (and remember) which one is the one you
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:54:35AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 17 September 2011 10:38, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Yeah, it looks possible.
The very fact that you're exposing a C API and a library is a
promising start, even if it didn't yet do specifically what I
On 17 September 2011 11:05, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't mind as long as it's callable from other languages (either
using generated bindings like GIR or using hand written bindings).
I've just pushed:
commit 4132eb5a40e1a6a85358e96f7adfd3cf56e8ef3f
Author: Richard Hughes
On 09/17/2011 06:22 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
It's quite funny that you're accusing Richard of being incompatible with yum
when the incompatibilities that matter most to our users have been required
by yum developers, in particular:
* no writing to the yum database by default,
* no parsing
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Adding a conflicts to yum against zif was a inappropriate use of
conflicts and must have been resolved in a better way. The animosity
between people working on competing solutions is leading to a proposal
which really wouldn't fly. Having said that, I think zif needs
On 09/17/2011 04:50 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
While I think Fedora would benefit from using zif throughout (mainly because
it's in a compiled language, not in Python), I don't agree that this should
be a requirement for using zif in PackageKit. PackageKit should use what is
best suited for
On 17 September 2011 11:59, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
I think zif needs to be command line compatible and support delta RPMs
The former should work pretty well. If I've missed any obvious aliases
yell and I'll add them. The latter is 80% implemented, but I don't use
delta-rpms
Richard Hughes wrote:
On 17 September 2011 11:59, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
...I think the problem PackageKit is facing is also true for other tools.
I agree. I've just merged the GIR generation into master, so hopefully
it would be possible to do things like use Zif from PHP
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 03:38:55AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
If you have decided you are going to do something different with Zif
anyway, you might as well as work with the zypper team and see whether
you can make something out of it. So much of what we do in Fedora
On 09/17/2011 01:08 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
I've just upgrade libmemcached to 0.52
which provides libmemcached.so.8
Are you planning to rebuild the dependencies?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 17 September 2011 13:56, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Richard Hughes wrote:
And Python too, I suppose?
Sure. I'd welcome any python dudes to write a small program in
examples/ just to test if the GIR annotations are complete enough.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
Le 17/09/2011 15:36, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
On 09/17/2011 01:08 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
I've just upgrade libmemcached to 0.52
which provides libmemcached.so.8
Are you planning to rebuild the dependencies?
Yes, build are already running.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
On 09/17/2011 06:44 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
libzypp is actually a library on top of libsatsolver (now renamed to
libsolv). If you want a lightweight package dependency solver you
should probably use libsolv directly. (It also contains python
bindings and a simple python demo program which
Kevin Kofler wrote:
The yum default provider picking logic has become so complex (and dependent
on what the user happens to have already installed!)
[...]
And while making a decision based on what
the user has already installed may make sense from a user's perspective,
from a developer's
On 09/16/2011 11:53 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:49:36 -0400, SV (seth) wrote:
There are still a largish number of packages out there that have things
like:
Requires: foo
where they really want:
Requires: foo(64bit)
Fixing this in some packages is not entirely
On 09/17/2011 07:53 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
The near-flamefest on this thread over whose depsolver is the best is
largely besides the point: in a perfect world there would be just one
Grand Unified Depsolver (library) that everything including rpm itself
would use. And in order for rpm to
On 09/17/2011 01:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 23:22 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
Oh, I must have misunderstood - Gene's Mailist comment:
.
Temptinh as it might be, just please keep session management away from
the init daemon and let it do its one important job
Hi developers of NM and Fedora,
We are trying to get DNSSEC validation on the end nodes. One way of doing
that is to run a caching resolver on every host, but that strains the
DNS infrastructure because all DNS caches would be circumvented. Since
DNSSEC data is signed, you can obtain it via
On 09/17/2011 05:58 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 09/17/2011 07:53 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
The near-flamefest on this thread over whose depsolver is the best is
largely besides the point: in a perfect world there would be just one
Grand Unified Depsolver (library) that everything including
Hi,
I finally had the time to package the updated and renamed version of the
Finnish spell-checking extension for LibreOffice and OpenOffice.org,
libreoffice-voikko.
The review request is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739331 . I also CC'd
libreoffice-owner, maybe the
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.comwrote:
On 16 September 2011 20:46, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you sure you didn't cut it down so much that you are hiding problems
that your depsolving rules don't solve well? Did you throw out
someone's
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
But putting that aside for a minute. I'm interested in asking zif a series
of more complicated real world Fedora repository questions to get a better
understanding how your chosen scoring rules currently work in practise.
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:04:36 +0200
Jos Vos j...@xos.nl wrote:
Hi,
After having installed both GNOME and Xfce since F15, I noticed that
the GNOME terminal (package gnome-terminal) and Xfce terminal
(package Terminal) use the same Name and Icon in their desktop
files. So when using the
Hello. My name is Russell Golden. I am currently an Ambassador, and I would
like to branch into packaging.
I already have a review request up: the EFF's HTTPS Everywhere browser
plugin. I would greatly appreciate any and all feedback that a reviewer
might have.
Hello. My name is Russell Golden. I am currently an Ambassador, and I would
like to branch into packaging.
I already have a review request up: the EFF's HTTPS Everywhere browser
plugin. I would greatly appreciate any and all feedback that a reviewer
might have.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 14:00 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
You can find source and package pre-releases at:
ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnssec-trigger/
At least for Fedora 15:
BuildRequires: glib-devel, gtk2-devel, ldns-devel
and in %install
mkdir -p
Package perl-String-CRC32 in Fedora devel is now owned by pghmcfc
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-String-CRC32
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-String-CRC32 in Fedora 16 is now owned by pghmcfc
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-String-CRC32
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-String-CRC32 in Fedora 15 is now owned by pghmcfc
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-String-CRC32
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-String-CRC32 in Fedora 14 is now owned by pghmcfc
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-String-CRC32
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-65 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739293
Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-65 is available
Product:
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables has broken dependencies in the F-16
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables-0.01-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables-0.01-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8 has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc15.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-Test-Version has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Package perl-SVN-Simple in Fedora 15 is now owned by lbazan
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-SVN-Simple
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-SVN-Simple in Fedora 16 is now owned by lbazan
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-SVN-Simple
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 09e26992dd0bdc8b20b59d87d128d2f28a58fbcb
Author: Luis Bazan lbazan@BAKER-FEDORA.(none)
Date: Sat Sep 17 08:07:37 2011 -0500
changes
perl-SVN-Simple.spec |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-SVN-Simple.spec b/perl-SVN-Simple.spec
index
commit fa70f170fdff8376e44e23cde3671f418bd9cb89
Author: Luis Bazan lbazan@BAKER-FEDORA.(none)
Date: Sat Sep 17 08:24:15 2011 -0500
new tar
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index
commit 05a108ae9d1054b6bac80cbd7e78ca79a1d55a4e
Author: Luis Bazan lbazan@BAKER-FEDORA.(none)
Date: Sat Sep 17 08:23:29 2011 -0500
new release
perl-SVN-Simple.spec |8 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-SVN-Simple.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715745
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738383
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738599
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734469
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2011-09-17 18:01:28 EDT ---
perl-Directory-Queue-1.2-1.el4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734469
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-17
17:59:44 EDT ---
perl-Directory-Queue-1.2-1.el6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734469
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2011-09-17 18:00:25 EDT ---
perl-Directory-Queue-1.2-1.el5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734469
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734469
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734469
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Your following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
package:
59 matches
Mail list logo
