Re: Sourcing one spec from another permissible?

2011-10-18 Thread Kevin Kofler
Richard Shaw wrote: Yeah, it's a hack, but it works pretty well. Now the kernel module SRPM will be available as part of the build results. Anyone have a better idea? Instead of trying to come up with clever hacks, please look at how existing kernel modules are packaged in RPM Fusion. They

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Petr Sabata
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:54:53PM +0300, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, The purpose of this bug was to provide native systemd script for cpuspeed in Fedora 16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713572 But instead of adding systemd script which should load cpufreq modules

Re: How to update GMP-using packages

2011-10-18 Thread Peter Schiffer
Hello, it will be better, if you could wait until the f17-gmp tag will be merged into rawhide. In general, it's not a problem, when you make build _between_ our two builds, but it's problem, when you make build after our second build and before merging f17-gmp into rawhide. In that case, we

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Vratislav Podzimek
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 22:40 +0300, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: Frequency scaling have negative effects for me so I need to have it disabled in BIOS. What negative effects does frequency scaling have for you when using governor performance? -- Vratislav Podzimek I think that this is not

F-16 Branched report: 20111018 changes

2011-10-18 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Tue Oct 18 08:15:25 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- assogiate-0.2.1-5.fc15.x86_64 requires libgnomevfsmm-2.6.so.1()(64bit) bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit)

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 12:49 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 22:40 +0300, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: Frequency scaling have negative effects for me so I need to have it disabled in BIOS. What negative effects does frequency scaling have for you when using governor

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 07:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 12:49 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 22:40 +0300, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: Frequency scaling have negative effects for me so I need to have it disabled in BIOS. What negative effects

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread alekcejk
Vratislav Podzimek wrote: On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 22:40 +0300, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: Frequency scaling have negative effects for me so I need to have it disabled in BIOS. What negative effects does frequency scaling have for you when using governor performance? -- Vratislav

Re: Sourcing one spec from another permissible?

2011-10-18 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Instead of trying to come up with clever hacks, please look at how existing kernel modules are packaged in RPM Fusion. They always have 2 SRPMs, by design, a -common package with the userspace parts (if there's no

rawhide report: 20111018 changes

2011-10-18 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Oct 18 08:15:13 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46 389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46 389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Marcos Mello
alekcejk at googlemail.com writes: Kernel don't have parameter which can disable using cpufreq built-in modules. This is the main problem because it makes using frequency scaling unconditional. Here's what I use. I hope it can help you. - Install kernel-tools package - Start/enable

File App-cpanminus-1.5002.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

2011-10-18 Thread Petr Sabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-App-cpanminus: 8382fd84fceaf151f9b05bd10724815e App-cpanminus-1.5002.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-App-cpanminus] 1.5002 bump

2011-10-18 Thread Petr Sabata
commit d46dc012399666ea1aa215ebdfb75b09f51051ae Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com Date: Tue Oct 18 17:05:02 2011 +0200 1.5002 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-App-cpanminus.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2

[Bug 746940] perl-App-cpanminus-1.5002 is available

2011-10-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746940 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 746940] perl-App-cpanminus-1.5002 is available

2011-10-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746940 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread alekcejk
Marcos Mello wrote: alekcejk at googlemail.com writes: Kernel don't have parameter which can disable using cpufreq built-in modules. This is the main problem because it makes using frequency scaling unconditional. Here's what I use. I hope it can help you. - Install kernel-tools

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello
2011/10/18 alekc...@googlemail.com: Changing governor can't help me, I need frequency scaling completely disabled. cpupower.service starts cpupower which can't set frequency which I set in BIOS (slightly overclocked). This is cpufreq modules problem because frequency which I set is not in

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread alekcejk
Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello wrote: Let's hope the CPU modaliases stuff get done some day. Marcos As workaround now I can use in F16 kernel from F15. But when F15 will be EOL no more kernel updates will be available and using old kernels forever is not good idea. Is there any chance that

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 18:57 +0300, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: Changing governor can't help me, I need frequency scaling completely disabled. Have you filed a bug for the problem which frequency scaling causes for you (system time going out of whack)? Have you tried alternative workarounds

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread alekcejk
Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 18:57 +0300, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: Changing governor can't help me, I need frequency scaling completely disabled. Have you filed a bug for the problem which frequency scaling causes for you (system time going out of whack)?

[dspam] removed sysconfig/dspam file

2011-10-18 Thread Nathanael Noblet
Summary of changes: 9f63873... removed sysconfig/dspam file (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:52 PM, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: Thanks, I will try makestep directive with F16 kernel. This is workaround may work or may not because chrony not always available. For example chrony can be not installed on Live images (not from Fedora) or other systems which

Re: Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

2011-10-18 Thread alekcejk
Josh Boyer wrote: Chrony is in Fedora, so I'm not entirely sure what you mean there. I mean other systems (even not Linux-based) that may run in virtual machines. The real solution can be adding kernel parameter like cpufreq=disable that can disable using built-in cpufreq modules.

transmission-remote-cli package

2011-10-18 Thread Ben Thompson
I've taken an interest in the development of this project and would like to help maintain it. Therefore I'm looking for someone involved to sponsor/mentor me. Regards, -Ben -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Test-Announce] Note on live installs of F16 TC1

2011-10-18 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey, folks. So we pinned down that mysterious 'F16 Desktop live x86_64 install boots to a black screen' bug. Turns out that liveinst will always corrupt a small amount of data on install with anaconda 16.21; it's actually also happening in all the other live images that 'aren't affected', it's

[Test-Announce] Proventesters meetup tomorrow at 18UTC (2011-10-19)

2011-10-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
We are going to be having another proventesters meetup tomorrow on IRC in #fedora-meeting at 18:00UTC. Purpose of meetup: Brainstorm ideas on improving testing and processes for testing updates. * Intro/gather more agenda items * Recruiting more proventesters/testers. * One stop page for

Re: [HEADS UP] rename cryptsetup-luks to cryptsetup and libcrypsetup version bump

2011-10-18 Thread Milan Broz
On 10/18/2011 06:40 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:40:33PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote: So I did discover a weird problem with this update. When running the libguestfs test suite, cryptsetup sometimes hangs on this command: cryptsetup -q -d /tmp/luksFbnt2j --key-slot

[Bug 743519] RFE: please update to 0.009

2011-10-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743519 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 744166] perl-Module-Runtime-0.010 is available

2011-10-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744166 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 746941] New: perl-Mojolicious-2.0 is available

2011-10-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Mojolicious-2.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-2.0 is available Product: Fedora

[Bug 746940] New: perl-App-cpanminus-1.5002 is available

2011-10-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-App-cpanminus-1.5002 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746940 Summary: perl-App-cpanminus-1.5002 is available Product:

[perl-IO-Socket-SSL] Created tag perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.46-1.fc17

2011-10-18 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.46-1.fc17' was created pointing to: a5d7b7b... Update to 1.46 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

File IO-Socket-SSL-1.46.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2011-10-18 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL: 3007fd52f0ef28bdcc311943a57f5cc8 IO-Socket-SSL-1.46.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-IO-Socket-SSL] Update to 1.46

2011-10-18 Thread Paul Howarth
commit a5d7b7bddb85e51ae58ea972578b0c5e4783b617 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Tue Oct 18 12:02:55 2011 +0100 Update to 1.46 - New upstream release 1.46: - Skip signals test on Windows perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec |6 +- sources |2 +- 2

Broken dependencies: perl-Text-Aspell

2011-10-18 Thread buildsys
perl-Text-Aspell has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree: On x86_64: perl-Text-Aspell-0.09-9.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) On i386: perl-Text-Aspell-0.09-9.fc15.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora

Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule

2011-10-18 Thread buildsys
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) Please resolve this as soon as

Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule

2011-10-18 Thread buildsys
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) Please resolve this as soon

[dspam/f16] fix for bug #745194

2011-10-18 Thread Nathanael Noblet
commit aa7c8a962214c0c4656d8740cda4554097c41c84 Author: Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca Date: Tue Oct 18 14:13:24 2011 -0600 fix for bug #745194 dspam-init.d| 93 --- dspam-sysconfig |3 -- dspam-systemd |9 ++---

[dspam] (7 commits) ...fix for bug #745194

2011-10-18 Thread Nathanael Noblet
Summary of changes: 80d3de4... new upstream release (*) 44dc59b... bump version (*) ce34179... update sources (*) 02954b9... update sources (*) 46c64c1... fixed conflicted spec (*) 09c9f57... Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into f16 (*) aa7c8a9... fix for bug #745194

[dspam/f16] forgot to bump release

2011-10-18 Thread Nathanael Noblet
commit 62acb6a8c32451c0e4254fc5a2e059e5ffbc0cb9 Author: Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca Date: Tue Oct 18 18:57:23 2011 -0600 forgot to bump release dspam.spec |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec index b23cdbc..5f605f1

[dspam] forgot to bump release

2011-10-18 Thread Nathanael Noblet
Summary of changes: 62acb6a... forgot to bump release (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org