Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

On 10/24/2011 08:05 PM, Chris Adams wrote: >> === >> #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-24) >> === >>* Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove >> (t8m, 17:26:45) > > This sounds interesting (speaking as a

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011/10/25 Matej Cepl : > Dne 24.10.2011 22:48, Michał Piotrowski napsal(a): >> For example - you can switch to different version of language >> interpreter with different configuration without modification of the >> script and without the hassle for server admin. > > So, because you haven't learne

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

W dniu 25 października 2011 08:32 użytkownik Matej Cepl napisał: > Dne 24.10.2011 22:27, Michał Piotrowski napsal(a): >> Yeah, this solution has its drawbacks, but it also has undoubted >> advantages. > > I am probably dumb, but could you tell me some *undoubted* advantage of > using > > #!/usr/bi

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

Dne 24.10.2011 22:48, Michał Piotrowski napsal(a): > For example - you can switch to different version of language > interpreter with different configuration without modification of the > script and without the hassle for server admin. So, because you haven't learned about ln(1) yet, we all have t

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

Dne 24.10.2011 22:27, Michał Piotrowski napsal(a): > Yeah, this solution has its drawbacks, but it also has undoubted > advantages. I am probably dumb, but could you tell me some *undoubted* advantage of using #!/usr/bin/env sh (note, that couple of years ago, we were removing /usr/bin/env pyth

Re: usb-modeswitch/usb-modeswitch-data must be updated (hardware related)

I will update both the components today. Thanks! - Original Message - From: "Xose Vazquez Perez" To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 10:00:58 PM Subject: usb-modeswitch/usb-modeswitch-data must be updated (hardware related) https://bugzilla.re

Re: Suggest 744217 blocker for F16

On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 10:57 +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote: > Hi, > > I realize this is last minute, but I just realized this wasn't marked as > a blocker already, and I am still pretty new to the Fedora package process. > > I would like to recommend this one being accepted as a blocker for F16: > >

[Test-Announce] F16 Final testing request: non-Intel BIOS RAID

Hey, folks. If anyone has a non-Intel BIOS RAID controller in a system they can blow away for testing, can you please take a look at the potential fix for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742226 you should be able to reproduce the bug just by trying to install F16 Final TC2 to a non-I

[Test-Announce] Karma needed for Final blockers

Hey, folks - here's a list of pending updates that ought to fix Final blockers, we need to get all these tested and up-karmaed to clear the blocker list: * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdm-3.2.1.1-3.fc16 (fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741431 and https://bugzilla.redh

Re: BEWARE: a problematic glibc made it to stable (F16)

Jim Meyering wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: >> ... The only breakage >> in one which was approved was to do with compiling things - which, sure, >> is a pain in the ass, but it's not the kind of problem critpath was >> introduced to deal with in the first place. > > The problem is bigger than it f

Re: BEWARE: a problematic glibc made it to stable (F16)

Adam Williamson wrote: > ... The only breakage > in one which was approved was to do with compiling things - which, sure, > is a pain in the ass, but it's not the kind of problem critpath was > introduced to deal with in the first place. The problem is bigger than it first seemed, and still not fi

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011/10/24 Tom Lane : > =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= writes: >> 2011/10/24 Chris Adams : >>> Using env has always been a hack (and overhead, especially on otherwise >>> short shell scripts). > >> Yeah, this solution has its drawbacks, but it also has undoubted >> advantages. Generally spea

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= writes: > 2011/10/24 Chris Adams : >> Using env has always been a hack (and overhead, especially on otherwise >> short shell scripts). > Yeah, this solution has its drawbacks, but it also has undoubted > advantages. Generally speaking it is better for end user

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011/10/24 Chris Adams : > Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said: >> In any case >> #!/usr/bin/env sh >> seems to be more portable solution. > > Using env has always been a hack (and overhead, especially on otherwise > short shell scripts). Yeah, this solution has its drawbacks, but it also ha

Re: how to block grub2 update?

2011/10/24 James Antill : > On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 18:56 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to know if it is possible to block grub2 update? I tried >> to use versionlock but unfortunately this does not work. Do anyone >> knows some other effective way to block this update? >

Upcoming elections for FAmSCo, FESCo, and the Fedora Board

One of the things I like most about Fedora is the orderly way in which people are able to move in and out of leadership positions within our community. Each development cycle, we have a set of elections for the steering committees and for the Fedora Board. The next election cycle is nearly upon u

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said: > In any case > #!/usr/bin/env sh > seems to be more portable solution. Using env has always been a hack (and overhead, especially on otherwise short shell scripts). As for "portable", /bin/sh is as portable as it gets. I doubt there has been a signific

Re: synergy-plu, synergy, and gnome3

Hi Laine, On 10/17/2011 08:01 PM, Laine Stump wrote: > The version of synergy-plus currently in Fedora doesn't work well with > gnome3; I had noticed this because I couldn't get the mouse past the > menubar to an alternate screen configured to be "north", but there are > other problems as well:

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011/10/24 Miloslav Trmač : > 2011/10/24 Michał Piotrowski : >> Hi, >> >> 2011/10/24 Chris Adams :   * Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove     (t8m, 17:26:45) >>> >> >> Cool idea. Next I suggest to stop using >> /bin >> /sbin >> /lib >> /lib64 >> in F19, and n

[perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule] Upstream is dead, and package no longer builds.

commit 2f4f56e1429c4c12ccc4dca89db542a264b85616 Author: Steven Pritchard Date: Mon Oct 24 15:10:56 2011 -0500 Upstream is dead, and package no longer builds. .gitignore|1 - Pugs-Compiler-Rule-filter-requires.sh |4 - dead.package

[perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule/f16] Upstream is dead, and package no longer builds.

commit db9acb06cb99d56922c9d7452ad551af236696bb Author: Steven Pritchard Date: Mon Oct 24 15:11:21 2011 -0500 Upstream is dead, and package no longer builds. .gitignore|1 - Pugs-Compiler-Rule-filter-requires.sh |4 - dead.package

Re: retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?

> My sentiments exactly. Better not to keep known broken packages > around; it's only going to cause grief for users if they find out they > can't even install the package. > > Once it's fixed upstream to not rely on libgnomeuimm, it can easily be > added back to Fedora. > > Alex, could you pleas

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

>> === >> #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-24) >> === >>* Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove >> (t8m, 17:26:45) which, among other things, proposes that "/usr/sbin can be moved also to /usr/bin."

Re: Trouble building for rawhide on F15

Jesse Keating wrote: > Hrm, there is a build target for dist-rawhide, so I'm not sure what is going > on there. Can you run with -v just to get a few more details? Problem solved. I was still pointed to my local koji. Doh! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedora

Re: how to block grub2 update?

On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 18:56 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know if it is possible to block grub2 update? I tried > to use versionlock but unfortunately this does not work. Do anyone > knows some other effective way to block this update? versionlock doesn't stop obsolet

Re: Trouble building for rawhide on F15

On Oct 24, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > It's been some time since I've had to build a Fedora package, but when I > tried today I'm having some trouble. > > $ rpm -q fedpkg > fedpkg-0.5.9.2-2.fc15.noarch > $ git branch > * master > $ fedpkg build > Could not initiate build: Unkno

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said: > Cool idea. Next I suggest to stop using > /bin > /sbin > /lib > /lib64 > in F19, and not to create these links on freshly installed systems in F20. That will (or at least should) never happen. You might could eliminate /sbin, but there are several thin

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011/10/24 Michał Piotrowski : > Hi, > > 2011/10/24 Chris Adams : >>>   * Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove >>>     (t8m, 17:26:45) >> > > Cool idea. Next I suggest to stop using > /bin > /sbin > /lib > /lib64 > in F19, and not to create these links on freshly install

Re: Heads up - firefox desktop file change

On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:58:05 +0200 Martin Stransky wrote: > Firefox desktop file name has been changed in rawhide, from > mozilla-firefox.desktop to firefox.desktop. See bug > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736558. Ok. Could you also please comment to packaging the firefox/mozilla

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

Hi, 2011/10/24 Chris Adams : >> === >> #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-24) >> === >>   * Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove >>     (t8m, 17:26:45) > Cool idea. Next I suggest to stop using /bin /sbin /li

UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

> === > #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-24) > === > * Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove > (t8m, 17:26:45) This sounds interesting (speaking as an admin that typically sets up servers with separate

Re: how to block grub2 update?

2011/10/24 Heiko Adams : > Am 24.10.2011 18:56, schrieb Michał Piotrowski: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to know if it is possible to block grub2 update? I tried >> to use versionlock but unfortunately this does not work. Do anyone >> knows some other effective way to block this update? >> > AFAIR yum.

Re: how to block grub2 update?

Am 24.10.2011 18:56, schrieb Michał Piotrowski: > Hi, > > I would like to know if it is possible to block grub2 update? I tried > to use versionlock but unfortunately this does not work. Do anyone > knows some other effective way to block this update? > AFAIR yum.conf has this ability. Regards,

Re: BEWARE: a problematic glibc made it to stable (F16)

On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 18:50 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > We have lots of suggestions. As I've said at least fifty times, it's > > pointless going too far with the slapping of band-aids on the current > > karma system, because it's fundamentally too simplistic: it's never

Re: Systemd conversion versus updates in back Fedora branches

Kevin Kofler writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> FWIW, I'm totally on board with the idea of not switching to systemd in >> F15 --- and even if I wanted to do that, it's pure luck that the problem >> doesn't apply to F14->F15 upgrades as well, where such an option is >> certainly not available. > F14 wi

FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-24) === Meeting started by t8m at 17:00:16 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-10-24/fesco.2011-10-24-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: Systemd conversion versus updates in back Fedora branches

Tom Lane wrote: > FWIW, I'm totally on board with the idea of not switching to systemd in > F15 --- and even if I wanted to do that, it's pure luck that the problem > doesn't apply to F14->F15 upgrades as well, where such an option is > certainly not available. F14 will be EOL in less than 2 month

Re: Systemd conversion versus updates in back Fedora branches

Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > Unless FESCO granted them exception this update might be pulled back It's too late, the update already went stable. (And FYI, the reason I didn't alert folks was that I also only noticed this when reading the notes for my stable updates.) Reverting things now will

Re: Systemd conversion versus updates in back Fedora branches

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 07:56:59AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > The current packaging guidelines require packages that update from sysv > > init scripts to systemd scripts to provide conversion triggers that are > > fired on the basis of an NVR

Re: Systemd conversion versus updates in back Fedora branches

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 06:49:04AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 10/24/2011 03:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > I'm really getting to the point where that's a completely unacceptable > > restriction. I've already blown off one mysql bug-fix release in F15 > > because of this restriction, an

Re: Systemd conversion versus updates in back Fedora branches

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:48:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > drago01 writes: > > 2011/10/24 "J�hann B. Gu�mundsson" : > >> On 10/24/2011 05:42 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >>> FWIW, what the tomcat6 maintainers did is that they just ignored the > >>> guideline which says that you cannot migrate to sys

Re: systemd - standard place to run stuff after the network is up?

On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 21:22 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le jeudi 20 octobre 2011 à 13:08 -0500, Dan Williams a écrit : > > > If you architect a system that accounts for networking changing states, > > then it works for *everyone*. If you depend on networking always being > > there, then it on

how to block grub2 update?

Hi, I would like to know if it is possible to block grub2 update? I tried to use versionlock but unfortunately this does not work. Do anyone knows some other effective way to block this update? -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: BEWARE: a problematic glibc made it to stable (F16)

Adam Williamson wrote: > We have lots of suggestions. As I've said at least fifty times, it's > pointless going too far with the slapping of band-aids on the current > karma system, because it's fundamentally too simplistic: it's never > going to be perfect and there is a definite point of diminish

usb-modeswitch/usb-modeswitch-data must be updated (hardware related)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728680 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625004 == usb-modeswitch-1.2.0 == Version 1.2.0, 2011/10/23 Added QisdaMode for Qisda H21 (thanks to Chi-Hang Long for the code); dispatcher can now be installed with an embedded interpreter,

Re: Systemd conversion versus updates in back Fedora branches

Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said: > FWIW, I'm totally on board with the idea of not switching to systemd in > F15 --- and even if I wanted to do that, it's pure luck that the problem > doesn't apply to F14->F15 upgrades as well, where such an option is > certainly not available. The reason F14 esc

Trouble building for rawhide on F15

It's been some time since I've had to build a Fedora package, but when I tried today I'm having some trouble. $ rpm -q fedpkg fedpkg-0.5.9.2-2.fc15.noarch $ git branch * master $ fedpkg build Could not initiate build: Unknown build target: dist-rawhide Any ideas? -- devel mailing list devel@lis

Re: Fwd: Zif and SOS projects on Fedora Upstream

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > On 10/24/2011 04:05 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote: >> There is a project named SOS in Fedora collection on Transifex. I'd >> like to know if there is anyone maintaining it, because it seems like >> it needs to be translated, but there is no main

Re: Systemd conversion versus updates in back Fedora branches

On 10/24/2011 05:26 PM, Remi Collet wrote: > Isn't epoch a solution ? Yes, but.. > .. > Yes, I know, epoch is evil... That's why everybody (including me) believes there is a better solution. Honza -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list

Re: Systemd conversion versus updates in back Fedora branches

Le 24/10/2011 05:52, Tom Lane a écrit : > The current packaging guidelines require packages that update from sysv > init scripts to systemd scripts to provide conversion triggers that are > fired on the basis of an NVR comparison: Isn't epoch a solution ? Epoch: 0 for sysv initscript Epoch: 1 for

Re: Systemd conversion versus updates in back Fedora branches

On 10/24/2011 04:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I'm not really seeing why this'd be a better approach than what I > suggested above. This isn't better in case we don't ship -sysvinit sub-package. This was meant as a general approach which should work even if a user has installed sysvinit scripts from

Re: BEWARE: a problematic glibc made it to stable (F16)

On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 09:51 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said: > > Oh - and remember, the goal of the critpath process is to ensure we > > don't send out updates that break people's systems. It worked fine in > > this case: no glibc update which breaks systems was

Re: BEWARE: a problematic glibc made it to stable (F16)

On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 11:06 +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote: > sön 2011-10-23 klockan 23:45 -0700 skrev Adam Williamson: > > > This would cause significant problems around crunch times. We would wind > > up having to have releng super-push far more updates because we simply > > don't always *have* t

Heads up - firefox desktop file change

Firefox desktop file name has been changed in rawhide, from mozilla-firefox.desktop to firefox.desktop. See bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736558. ma. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Systemd conversion versus updates in back Fedora branches

Honza Horak writes: > On 10/24/2011 05:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> The idea I have at the moment is to ignore the advice to check package >> version, and instead have the triggerun script check to see whether the >> mysql sysv initscript file is present. I wonder whether anyone else has >> dealt wi

Re: BEWARE: a problematic glibc made it to stable (F16)

Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said: > Oh - and remember, the goal of the critpath process is to ensure we > don't send out updates that break people's systems. It worked fine in > this case: no glibc update which breaks systems was approved. All the > ones which caused major runtime breakage g

Re: Systemd conversion versus updates in back Fedora branches

On 10/24/2011 05:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > The current packaging guidelines require packages that update from sysv > init scripts to systemd scripts to provide conversion triggers that are > fired on the basis of an NVR comparison: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Package

[Bug 743519] RFE: please update to 0.009

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743519 --- Comment #14 from Richard Shaw 2011-10-24 09:53:26 EDT --- Not being able to import perl modules seems pretty serious to me.

Re: Systemd conversion versus updates in back Fedora branches

drago01 writes: > 2011/10/24 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" : >> On 10/24/2011 05:42 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> FWIW, what the tomcat6 maintainers did is that they just ignored the >>> guideline which says that you cannot migrate to systemd in an update and >>> pushed this update: >> Unless FESCO grant

rawhide report: 20111024 changes

Compose started at Mon Oct 24 08:16:05 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46 389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46 389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 require

Re: yubikey

On Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Mario Ceresa wrote: > why is it failing? That's what I wanted to know. The FAS website just says "failed OTP" > did you reburn your yubikey with > fedora-burn-yubikey and activated it in your FAS profile? Yes, even using the latest rawhide versions of the yubikey related pa

Re: BTRFS on LVM causes long fedora-storage-init run?

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 07:52:04PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sat, 08.10.11 16:01, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: > > > What Tomasz said, and if that doesn't help use bootchart and upload > > > the chart somewhere so

Re: Fwd: Zif and SOS projects on Fedora Upstream

On 10/24/2011 04:05 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > There is a project named SOS in Fedora collection on Transifex. I'd > like to know if there is anyone maintaining it, because it seems like > it needs to be translated, but there is no maintainer assigned in Tx > and no translation team creation requ

[perl-ORLite-Migrate] 1.09 bump

commit feec307a94cd3ce010ebe0a015337fd413d06aed Author: Petr Sabata Date: Mon Oct 24 14:55:17 2011 +0200 1.09 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-ORLite-Migrate.spec | 44 sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 30 inser

File ORLite-Migrate-1.09.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ORLite-Migrate: 7f311c18c385e053ec8543c3f9c7761c ORLite-Migrate-1.09.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: Systemd conversion versus updates in back Fedora branches

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > The current packaging guidelines require packages that update from sysv > init scripts to systemd scripts to provide conversion triggers that are > fired on the basis of an NVR comparison: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnipp

F-16 Branched report: 20111024 changes

Compose started at Mon Oct 24 08:16:05 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- aeolus-all-0.4.0-1.fc16.noarch requires rubygem(aeolus-cli) aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-1.fc16.noarch requires rubygem(oauth) aeolus-conductor-devel-

Re: phoronix-test-suite stuck at review

Excerpts from Rahul Sundaram's message of Mon Oct 24 11:51:41 +0200 2011: > On 10/24/2011 03:17 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737263 > > > > FYI, this package looks like it has been stuck in review process for a > > few months. > > Do volunteer

Re: retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?

On 10/21/2011 09:37 PM, Alex Lancaster wrote: > There is a branch that was started back in February to port to gio > and away from libgnomemm: > > http://icculus.org/pipermail/referencer/2011-February/000534.html > > There was a commit to it in August, but looks the mm dep is still there > in the

FESCo meeting agenda for 2011 Oct 24

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting today at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic #667 Request to fix CRITPATH update proces

Re: Rwhide: Last Kernel not booting in vmware

On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > Linux rawhide.vmware.local 3.1.0-0.rc9.git0.0.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct 5 > 14:37:47 > > this is the last kernel booting in vmware for me > all following see screenshot Make sure your grub config file has an initrd line for that kernel. It

Re: unison formal review

Am Dienstag, 27. September 2011, 17:13:46 schrieb Gregor Tätzner: > Hi, > > Anyone want to review this one: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531 > > I'm sure a lot of Fedora users are awaiting this update. > > Regards, > Greg The leaves are falling and F16 is coming soon. Neithe

Re: phoronix-test-suite stuck at review

On 10/24/2011 03:17 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737263 > > FYI, this package looks like it has been stuck in review process for a > few months. Do volunteer and help out. You can use a helper tool like https://github.com/timlau/FedoraReview

phoronix-test-suite stuck at review

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737263 FYI, this package looks like it has been stuck in review process for a few months. Valent. -- follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt & http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave ICQ: 2

Re: yubikey

Hello Paul, why is it failing? did you reburn your yubikey with fedora-burn-yubikey and activated it in your FAS profile? Beware that this will destroy the yubiko configuration the key shipped with in slot 1 and there is no way to get it back. HTH, Mario On 21 October 2011 01:03, Paul Wouters

Re: Can't start httpd on FC16

On 2011-10-23, Sino wrote: > > I can't start apache httpd on Fedora 16 i386. My FC16 is installed on > guest of VirtualBox. > probably. -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin

Re: BEWARE: a problematic glibc made it to stable (F16)

sön 2011-10-23 klockan 23:45 -0700 skrev Adam Williamson: > This would cause significant problems around crunch times. We would wind > up having to have releng super-push far more updates because we simply > don't always *have* three days to wait to hit deadlines. note that I only proposed automa

Suggest 744217 blocker for F16

Hi, I realize this is last minute, but I just realized this wasn't marked as a blocker already, and I am still pretty new to the Fedora package process. I would like to recommend this one being accepted as a blocker for F16: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744217 The bug in question

Re: Systemd conversion versus updates in back Fedora branches

On 10/24/2011 04:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > The current packaging guidelines require packages that update from sysv > init scripts to systemd scripts to provide conversion triggers that are > fired on the basis of an NVR comparison: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Package

Re: BEWARE: a problematic glibc made it to stable (F16)

On 10/24/2011 02:47 AM, Henrik Nordström wrote: > sön 2011-10-23 klockan 17:04 -0500 skrev Rex Dieter: > >> The fail(*), imo, was with 12.999 going stable containing known-regressions. >> So, any suggestions, if any, to prevent any similar series of events? > > My suggestions: > > Disable automatic

Re: BEWARE: a problematic glibc made it to stable (F16)

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 05:04:48PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > So, any suggestions, if any, to prevent any similar series of events? Do the development in Rawhide and cherry pick only well-tested bug fix commits to the stable branch (F16 in this case). Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Grou

Re: BEWARE: a problematic glibc made it to stable (F16)

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> glibc-2.14.90-12.999, which has just made it to stable provokes a >> hard-to-diagnose (for me at least) problem. >> >> While most things work, and it fixed two problems that affected me, >> it caused me some frustration:

Re: Systemd conversion versus updates in back Fedora branches

2011/10/24 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" : > On 10/24/2011 05:42 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> FWIW, what the tomcat6 maintainers did is that they just ignored the >> guideline which says that you cannot migrate to systemd in an update and >> pushed this update: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FE