Is FAS (Fedora Account System) broken?

2011-11-11 Thread Adam Tkac
Hello, today I tried to upload new bind tarball via `fedpkg new-sources` command but it failed with pycurl.error: (60, 'Peer certificate cannot be authenticated with given CA certificates') error. I though there is problem with my ~/.fedora* certificates but after inspection all fedora* commands

Is FAS (Fedora Account System) broken?

2011-11-11 Thread Andre Robatino
Adam Tkac atkac at redhat.com writes: today I tried to upload new bind tarball via `fedpkg new-sources` command but it failed with pycurl.error: (60, 'Peer certificate cannot be authenticated with given CA certificates') error. I saw the same error trying to use fedora-easy-karma in F16.

Re: Is FAS (Fedora Account System) broken?

2011-11-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:17:20 + (UTC), AR (Andre) wrote: Adam Tkac atkac at redhat.com writes: today I tried to upload new bind tarball via `fedpkg new-sources` command but it failed with pycurl.error: (60, 'Peer certificate cannot be authenticated with given CA certificates')

Thanking Fedora developers for F16

2011-11-11 Thread mike cloaked
Having now used F16 in earnest on a freshly installed laptop I would like to add my thanks to developers for making Verne a superb release. I have had almost no issues during install apart from a couple of minor ones, and once the update from updates-testing is installed to bring KDE to version

Update packages available now for Fedora 16 Alpha on Power

2011-11-11 Thread Phil Knirsch
Hi everyone. As we're making quite good progress on fixing issues for the upcoming Fedora 16 Beta on Power we wanted to make sure everyone can get the updates on his system. We don't have a automated update syncing in place yet, but Dennis Gilmore is currently working on a solution that

Is FAS (Fedora Account System) broken?

2011-11-11 Thread Andre Robatino
Michael Schwendt mschwendt at gmail.com writes: Is this including updates from https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15056 python-gitdb-0.5.4-1.fc16.x86_64 python-smmap-0.8.1-3.fc16.noarch GitPython-0.2.0-0.6.beta1.fc16.noarch fedpkg-0.5.9.2-2.fc16.noarch package rpkg is not

Re: Is FAS (Fedora Account System) broken?

2011-11-11 Thread Adam Tkac
On 11/11/2011 12:11 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:17:20 + (UTC), AR (Andre) wrote: Adam Tkac atkac at redhat.com writes: today I tried to upload new bind tarball via `fedpkg new-sources` command but it failed with pycurl.error: (60, 'Peer certificate cannot be

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

2011-11-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 10.11.11 11:07, Ian Kent (ra...@themaw.net) wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 11:01 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 11/09/2011 05:49 AM, Ian Kent wrote: What other form of encouragement can you suggest? This email thread for a start. We have had email threads like this

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

2011-11-11 Thread Miloslav Trmač
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: Note that only double-forking will properly detach a process from the parent it is started from on Unix, and hence is not an option but mandatory to do In the traditional SysV, the process executing

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

2011-11-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 10.11.11 11:24, Ian Kent (ra...@themaw.net) wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 11:01 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: Now taking a quick look at the autofs service which I assume you are referring too I'm not seeing anykind of massive rewrite in order for the daemon ( which

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

2011-11-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 11.11.11 14:12, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: Note that only double-forking will properly detach a process from the parent it is started from on Unix, and hence is not an option but mandatory

FYI: yajl in rawhide updated to 2.0.1 with soname change

2011-11-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
FYI, the yajl RPM in rawhide has been updated to 2.0.1. This is an ABI and API *incompatible* release compared to 1.x series, due to the need to fix various API design flaws. Regards,, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org

Re: F17 heads up: X server git snapshots

2011-11-11 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 11/11/2011 02:42 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 15:01 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: So I put through a new xorg-x11-drv-evdev build which bumped it again to catch the fix from upstream. If you wind up with: xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.6.99-2.2009git745fca03a.fc17 and your

rawhide report: 20111111 changes

2011-11-11 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Nov 11 08:15:26 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 4ti2-1.3.2-7.fc17.1.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit) 1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.15

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

2011-11-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 11.11.11 14:36, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: On Fri, 11.11.11 14:12, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:

[Bug 753117] perl-Test-YAML-Meta-0.19 is available

2011-11-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753117 Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Differences between koji and mock rawhide environments?

2011-11-11 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:18:45 -0500 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com escribió: postgresql is currently failing to rebuild in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3499379 This seems quite repeatable, in koji, but the package builds

Re: Differences between koji and mock rawhide environments?

2011-11-11 Thread Tom Lane
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us writes: Tom Lane t...@redhat.com escribió: postgresql is currently failing to rebuild in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3499379 so the builders are all rhel6 and the buildroots all have dns resolution disabled. we are all running

Re: Is FAS (Fedora Account System) broken?

2011-11-11 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Am Freitag, 11. November 2011, 10:47:12 schrieb Adam Tkac: Hello, today I tried to upload new bind tarball via `fedpkg new-sources` command but it failed with pycurl.error: (60, 'Peer certificate cannot be authenticated with given CA certificates') error. I have a similar problem when

Re: Differences between koji and mock rawhide environments?

2011-11-11 Thread Jesse Keating
On Nov 11, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us writes: Tom Lane t...@redhat.com escribió: postgresql is currently failing to rebuild in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3499379 so the builders are all rhel6 and the buildroots all have

F16: dual monitor woes (nouveau)

2011-11-11 Thread Jerry James
I upgraded my home machine to F16 on Wednesday, and liked it so much that I decided to upgrade my work machine today. That didn't go quite as smoothly. I've got a dual monitor setup at work, with what lspci calls nVidia Corporation G94 [GeForce 9600 GT] (rev a1). I did a fresh install with a

Re: F16: dual monitor woes (nouveau)

2011-11-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 12:54 -0700, Jerry James wrote: I upgraded my home machine to F16 on Wednesday, and liked it so much that I decided to upgrade my work machine today. That didn't go quite as smoothly. I've got a dual monitor setup at work, with what lspci calls nVidia Corporation G94

Re: F16: dual monitor woes (nouveau)

2011-11-11 Thread Jerry James
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: That's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725219 . Ah, thanks. Another option is just to disconnect one of the monitors for installation and plug it back in when you're done. Well, the damage has been done

Re: Is FAS (Fedora Account System) broken?

2011-11-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 10:47 +0100, Adam Tkac wrote: Hello, today I tried to upload new bind tarball via `fedpkg new-sources` command but it failed with pycurl.error: (60, 'Peer certificate cannot be authenticated with given CA certificates') error. I though there is problem with my

Re: PolicyKit not working in Rawhide?

2011-11-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 23:48 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 08:25 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:22:55 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote: Anyone else noticed this? Anything which needs interactive auth via PK doesn't seem to work: when I run virt-manager

Re: PolicyKit not working in Rawhide?

2011-11-11 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/11/2011 04:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 23:48 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 08:25 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:22:55 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote: Anyone else noticed this?

Re: Cannot upload sources to git repository

2011-11-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 02:24:27 +0100 Casper casper.le.fan...@gmail.com wrote: ...snip... It's exactly the same output for openstego. Why fedpkg worked for xinput_calibrator and never worked for xnee and openstego ? I contacted my sponsor, we think it's maybe the different spelling of the

Re: Differences between koji and mock rawhide environments?

2011-11-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:43:28 -0500 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us writes: Tom Lane t...@redhat.com escribió: postgresql is currently failing to rebuild in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3499379 so the builders are all rhel6

[Bug 753116] New: perl-Net-DBus-1.0.0 is available

2011-11-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Net-DBus-1.0.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753116 Summary: perl-Net-DBus-1.0.0 is available Product: Fedora

[Bug 753118] New: perl-Wx-0.9903 is available

2011-11-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Wx-0.9903 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753118 Summary: perl-Wx-0.9903 is available Product: Fedora

[Bug 753117] New: perl-Test-YAML-Meta-0.19 is available

2011-11-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Test-YAML-Meta-0.19 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753117 Summary: perl-Test-YAML-Meta-0.19 is available Product:

[Bug 753116] perl-Net-DBus-1.0.0 is available

2011-11-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753116 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

File Net-DBus-1.0.0.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

2011-11-11 Thread Petr Šabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-DBus: b17e32976d1a3b56feb908ebd7fed7f1 Net-DBus-1.0.0.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Net-DBus] 1.0.0 bump

2011-11-11 Thread Petr Šabata
commit 7f2ec84e3a59b1bb30bf24cbe736305645111ca6 Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com Date: Fri Nov 11 15:11:30 2011 +0100 1.0.0 bump Removing now obsolete Buildroot and defattr License updated to GPLv2+ or Artistic (asked upstream for confirmation) .gitignore |

[Bug 753117] perl-Test-YAML-Meta-0.19 is available

2011-11-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753117 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[perl-Net-DBus] License change confirmed by upstream

2011-11-11 Thread Petr Šabata
commit dc775ad819f5afc1f5a19e8eff1939ca82837796 Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com Date: Fri Nov 11 15:19:57 2011 +0100 License change confirmed by upstream perl-Net-DBus.spec |3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Net-DBus.spec

[perl-Test-YAML-Meta] Update to 0.19 release

2011-11-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
commit 9961732917beb69d02d557e5d3ab1c5b2a80c92d Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com Date: Fri Nov 11 14:23:36 2011 + Update to 0.19 release .gitignore |3 ++- perl-Test-YAML-Meta.spec | 12 +++- sources |2 +- 3 files

[Bug 753116] perl-Net-DBus-1.0.0 is available

2011-11-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753116 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 753117] perl-Test-YAML-Meta-0.19 is available

2011-11-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753117 Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added