I've added the fedora-16-prerelease repo to three ppc systems on which
I'm experimenting, two p720's and a Mac G5. Updates went smoothly
except that the installation of the updated kernel
(kernel-3.1.0-7.fc16.ppc64) failed with the message
grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:22:53PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
>> I just had to setup a new machine, and new ssh keys.
>>
>> I visited
>>
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/edit/
>>
>> I chose my new id_rsa.pub to upload.
>>
>> But I get:
>>
>> git push --
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754159
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:22:53PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> I just had to setup a new machine, and new ssh keys.
>
> I visited
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/edit/
>
> I chose my new id_rsa.pub to upload.
>
> But I get:
>
> git push --verbose
> Pushing to ssh://nbec.
Neal Becker wrote:
> I just had to setup a new machine, and new ssh keys.
>
> I visited
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/edit/
>
> I chose my new id_rsa.pub to upload.
>
> But I get:
>
> git push --verbose
> Pushing to ssh://nbec...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/mercurial
> Perm
I just had to setup a new machine, and new ssh keys.
I visited
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/edit/
I chose my new id_rsa.pub to upload.
But I get:
git push --verbose
Pushing to ssh://nbec...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/mercurial
Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: The remote
David Howells writes:
It took a long time to load from grub1 for me too - several minutes. Loading
it by hand from grub2 was much quicker. I had the joy of doing the latter as
two of the three machines I upgraded to F-16 failed to boot thereafter.
I waited 10-15 minutes, no go.
On one I ha
Really?
So is no one interested in a abi compliance checker or it is no one is
interested in reviewing it?
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:21:52PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:57:20PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
> >
> > A qui
On 11/14/2011 09:31 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would be willing to swap a review of gmtk [1] in rpmfusion for another
> review, be it RPM Fusion or Fedora, preferably not something overly
> complex. Feel free to contact me if you are interested.
>
> Cheers,
> Julian
>
> [1] https://bugz
From c9cfb1de26f76263c56e03e2465cc22446a68dbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:25:56 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] csn_as_string - use slapi_uN_to_hex instead of sprintf
This introduces the following new slapi functions
slapi_u8_to_hex slapi_u16_to_hex slapi_u32_
Its easy enough to build an iso using mock/pungi which will take
advantage of all your local packages ... I really don't know that jigdo
added anything to that - in fact using pungi you always get a fully
updated build without waiting for a jigdo list.
gene
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> For developers like me which have a F16 repo for mock builds anyway it
> is quite useful though. A large fraction of the stuff in Packages/ is
> on my disk already, and with a jigdo I could save quite a bit on
> bandwidth and download time over my not-exactly-fast internet
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 11/08/2011 10:18 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Fedora 16 is not science fiction. It is here right now:
>>> http://get.fedoraproject.org
>>
>> Hmm, no jigdo downloads any more?
>
> Yes. Would be nice to have this back. It is not a big burden. Is it?
I have u
On 11/15/2011 03:28 PM, Ola Thoresen wrote:
>>
>> Everything here looks correct. Seems like SSSD is authenticating the
>> user just fine. I'd say the bug is with pure-ftpd, then. File a BZ.
>>
> I'd have thought so as well, if at least one of pure-ftpd, proftpd or
> vsftpd had worked.
> But they al
>
>
> Everything here looks correct. Seems like SSSD is authenticating the
> user just fine. I'd say the bug is with pure-ftpd, then. File a BZ.
>
I'd have thought so as well, if at least one of pure-ftpd, proftpd or
vsftpd had worked.
But they all show the same symptoms.
But I filed a report ag
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 15:19 +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
> On 15. nov. 2011 14:44, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> >
> > It should be working with *just* PAMAuthentication. Can you check to see
> > if /var/log/secure is showing any errors during login?
> >
> > Also, please attach your /etc/pam.d/pure-f
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Up until F14 this worked fine. F15's pxeboot/vmlinuz made me stare at a blank
> screen, and the only available option, apparently, was the three-
> fingered salute. I wrote it off as an F15 glitch.
>
> Now, same story with F16. Looks like I have to do a real PXE boot. No
On 11/08/2011 10:18 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Fedora 16 is not science fiction. It is here right now:
>> http://get.fedoraproject.org
>
> Hmm, no jigdo downloads any more?
Yes. Would be nice to have this back. It is not a big burden. Is it?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
On 11/15/11 00:38, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 17:48 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Fedora 16 is not science fiction. It is here right now:
>>> http://get.fedoraproject.org
>>
>> Hmm, no jigdo downloads any more?
>
> Releng say they dropped jigdo due to overwhelming i
You can try people on sssd-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Jan
- Original Message -
> > I have successfully set up pure-ftpd with LDAP-auth directly,
> > instead of
> > relying og sssd, and that works fine.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On 15. nov. 2011 14:44, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> It should be working with *just* PAMAuthentication. Can you check to see
> if /var/log/secure is showing any errors during login?
>
> Also, please attach your /etc/pam.d/pure-ftpd
> and /etc/pam.d/password-auth files so we can see if they're
> m
Summary of changes:
016a08a... Initial import from review (rhbz #752836) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
On 11/15/2011 03:52 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
> I will soon update libcdio to 0.83 in rawhide which requires a rebuild
> of following the packages:
>
> audacious-plugins
> cdw
> gvfs
> kover
> libcddb
> oxine
> pragha
> pycdio
> qmmp
> xmms2
>
> I will rebuild these packages if the corresponding ma
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 13:58 +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
> On 15. nov. 2011 13:03, Ola Thoresen wrote:
>
> > I have successfully set up pure-ftpd with LDAP-auth directly, instead of
> > relying og sssd, and that works fine.
> > Except users do not have access to folders woth "rwx"-permissions for a
Compose started at Tue Nov 15 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
4ti2-1.3.2-7.fc17.1.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit)
OpenGTL-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libLLVM-2.9.so()(64bit)
OpenGTL-devel-0.9.15.1-
On 15. nov. 2011 13:03, Ola Thoresen wrote:
> I have successfully set up pure-ftpd with LDAP-auth directly, instead of
> relying og sssd, and that works fine.
> Except users do not have access to folders woth "rwx"-permissions for a
> secondary-group the are member of.
> The same user has access t
Not sure the -devel list is the correct place, but I believe this is not
a -user-related question.
Has anyone tested (and successfully set up) an F16 based FTP-server with
LDAP as auth-backend for sssd?
(And please, I do not need any "you should use sftp and ssh"-replies.
This is a server supp
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 13:19 -0500, Chris Tyler wrote:
> The ARM Secondary Arch project[0] is working on an F15 release for the
> existing armv5tel architecture as well as the new armv7hl architecture
> (with hardfp ABI). This effort has been previously announced and is
> ongoing. A number of minor
I see the same issue with "clone" on F16:
[goldmann@nightmare fedora]$ fedpkg clone appliance-tools
Could not execute clone: must be type, not classobj
[goldmann@nightmare fedora]$ rpm -q fedpkg
fedpkg-1.5-1.fc16.noarch
Downgrading to fedpkg-1.1-1.fc16.noarch helped.
--Marek
On 9 lis 2011, at 2
I will soon update libcdio to 0.83 in rawhide which requires a rebuild
of following the packages:
audacious-plugins
cdw
gvfs
kover
libcddb
oxine
pragha
pycdio
qmmp
xmms2
I will rebuild these packages if the corresponding maintainers do not
object.
Adrian
--
devel mailing list
de
On 11/14/2011 06:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
>
> A quick scan says this affects:
>
> avahi-ui-tools (LGPLv2)
> gnu-smalltalk (GPLv2+ with exceptions)
> jpilot-
32 matches
Mail list logo
