I found that I have two java
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -qa 'java*'
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.1-2.0.3.fc16.x86_64
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-61.1.10.4.fc16.x86_64
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -e java-1.6.0-openjdk
error: Failed dependencies:
jre = 1.5.0 is needed by (installed)
On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 09:28 +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
hello,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
Would any one want to swap reviews please? This is a rather simple
package to review :)
Review Request: indimpc - A minimalist MPD
Compose started at Sun Dec 18 08:15:09 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
OpenGTL-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libLLVM-2.9.so()(64bit)
OpenGTL-devel-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.i686 requires libLLVM-2.9.so
http://lxer.com/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=159737
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
http://lxer.com/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=159737
So? They are removing the non free Sun JDK ... which we never shipped.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
http://lxer.com/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=159737
Actually that's not entirely correct. They're removing the Sun Java
closed source variant due to changes in licensing from Oracle
preventing them from shipping
drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
http://lxer.com/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=159737
So? They are removing the non free Sun JDK ... which we never shipped.
Sorry, I was confused - shouldn't post so early in the morning.
--
devel
Sorry, I saw it deprecated. Anyone known is there any drop-in alternative?
And why it was orphaned?
--
With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact
with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:05:42 +0400
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
Sorry, I saw it deprecated. Anyone known is there any drop-in
alternative?
And why it was orphaned?
gdk-pixbuf that it needed was being orphaned because it didn't build
anymore, so I thought
Hello, All.
I'm have two packages: xneur and gxneur. Second is just GUI fronted for
first. In major view it act only as GUI to write config for the xneur
daemon and just restart it to reload config.
As it do not interact via library and just through config file gxneur
package depends from
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
Now I have problem building two packages and pushes into stable branches -
to build gxneur I need waiting until xneur go through testing and will be
pushed to stable. Sometimes, when karma can't be
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:25:55 -0700,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:05:42 +0400
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
Sorry, I saw it deprecated. Anyone known is there any drop-in
alternative?
And why it was orphaned?
has anybody an idea why this spec-file not work?
somehow i have no plan how pack ruby-apps as rpm and
openvas would like the binary for sec-audits
[builduser@buildserver:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb arachni.spec
Ausführung(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8i1hwZ
+ umask 022
+ cd
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
install -d -m0755 %{buildroot}%{ruby_sitelib}
install -d -m0755 %{buildroot}%{ruby_sitearch}
It isn't installing anything! Just creating empty ruby library
directories. You need rake
does not help
do be honestly i have no plan what i do here
i simpy know that openvas would like to have arachni
and in the whole world seems to not exist any rpm
gem build arachni.gemspec
Successfully built RubyGem
Name: arachni
Version: 0.3
File: arachni-0.3.gem
gem install
Reindl Harald wrote:
+ install -d -m0755
'/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/arachni-0.3-7.fc15.20111218.rh.x86_64%{ruby_sitelib}'
+ install -d -m0755
'/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/arachni-0.3-7.fc15.20111218.rh.x86_64%{ruby_sitearch}'
+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh
Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
I found that I have two java
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -qa 'java*'
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.1-2.0.3.fc16.x86_64
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-61.1.10.4.fc16.x86_64
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -e java-1.6.0-openjdk
error: Failed dependencies:
jre = 1.5.0 is needed by
Am 19.12.2011 01:17, schrieb Björn Persson:
Reindl Harald wrote:
+ install -d -m0755
'/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/arachni-0.3-7.fc15.20111218.rh.x86_64%{ruby_sitelib}'
+ install -d -m0755
'/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/arachni-0.3-7.fc15.20111218.rh.x86_64%{ruby_sitearch}'
+
Thomas Spura wrote:
You can build xneur and then add a buildroot override at:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/override/list
After 20-40 minutes, it will be in the buildroot, so you can build gxneur.
After that you can push both new packages xneur and gxneur in one
update push (So
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 09:28 +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
hello,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
Would any one want to swap reviews please? This is a rather
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768615
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.024 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768726
Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.024 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Dancer-1.3091 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768725
Summary: perl-Dancer-1.3091 is available
Product: Fedora
commit 47c32022ab3eca0619a5d10c008901933e5295e4
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Mon Dec 19 08:03:26 2011 +0100
Update to 1.01
.gitignore |1 +
perl-JSON-RPC.spec | 58 +++-
sources|
25 matches
Mail list logo
