On 09/03/12 08:13, Chris Murphy wrote:
> OK well if I'm going to use real files, and I don't want disk read
> performance to be a factor in this, I kinda need to put the source
> files into a ramdisk. So if it's 3x of cache, out of 7.4G free, a 6G
> ramdisk would be at least 3x that of what remains
On Mar 9, 2012, at 12:10 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 09/03/12 07:43, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Don't file transfers get cached and return to a console as 'complete'
>> long before the data is ever written, sometimes?
>
> I've learned a long time ago, if you want to get near real numbers, you
On 09/03/12 07:43, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Don't file transfers get cached and return to a console as 'complete'
> long before the data is ever written, sometimes?
I've learned a long time ago, if you want to get near real numbers, you
have
to write data at least three times larger than memory si
On Mar 8, 2012, at 11:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 22:19 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> I'm not sure how useful 'time' is as a benchmark for file copies.
>
> Don't file transfers get cached and return to a console as 'complete'
> long before the data is ever written, somet
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 22:19 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> I'm not sure how useful 'time' is as a benchmark for file copies.
Don't file transfers get cached and return to a console as 'complete'
long before the data is ever written, sometimes?
I'm pretty sure you sometimes hit the case where you co
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 17:50 +0100, Alan Pevec wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Thursday is OpenStack Test Day[2].
>
> > [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-08_OpenStack_Test_Day
>
> You can also join Openstack testing today on your current trusty
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 15:37 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> >>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Privilege_escalation_policy
> >
> > ...except that the primary author of that document told me this month
> > that it is only a draft and can be ignore
# F17 Beta Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2012-03-09
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
It's that time again! The second F17 beta blocker bug review meeting
will be this Friday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll be
running thro
I'm not sure how useful 'time' is as a benchmark for file copies. But that's
what I used getting copy time for a folder containing 325 ~7.2MB files (DNGs)
totaling 2.3G. First I copied the files to tmpfs, and made all copies from that
to the destination. Destination device and partition is alway
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 23:46 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like that someone sponsor me, to reinsert smb4k in Fedora.
> I have follow upstream and update the package to last stable version.
> The .spec is just an update of previous version, so should be easy to
> review , or is already r
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Anuj More wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was thinking of porting something like AUR (Arch User Repository) to Fedora.
> I have blogged about it, and any feedback about the feasibility,
> technical issues, is appreciated.
>
> Link to blog post:
> http://execat.blogspot.com/
On Mar 3, 2012, at 1:27 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> FYI, I released parted-3.1 yesterday,
>
>http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.parted.bugs/10790
>
> In addition to pretty many bug fixes,
>
>This is to announce parted-3.1, a bug fix release that also reintroduces
>a minimal subset
I wrote:
Is there a way to query the package database to find out what packages
depend on a particular package (in this case, muParser)? I didn't see
anything obvious.
Vít Ondruch wrote:
$ repoquery --whatrequires muParser
Cool! I didn't even know of the existence of the repoquery tool, I
On Mar 7, 2012 7:54 AM, "Stanislav Ochotnicky"
wrote:
> - Remove mention of maven2 in guidelines since all supported versions
>have maven-3.x. Some other small cleanups as well perhaps
Is there already a separate set of java guidelines for EPEL? If there isn't
does this mean we should create
2012/3/8 Miloslav Trmač :
> Right... I just wanted to make sure that any potential work on user
> session printing is not discouraged by adding requirements that are
> not currently satisfied with the system daemon.
Of course. That wasn't meant as stop energy. If those situations have
a _least sur
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> 2012/3/8 Miloslav Trmač :
>> The lazy answer to both is "fail, or not, the same way as cups
>> currently fails, or not" (in fact, could the session printing service
>> simply be cups that treats the system instance as another remote
>> server?).
Aleksandar Kurtakov (akurt...@redhat.com) said:
> I'm pretty sure that Bill ment dropping it from the various packages so gcj
> is not brought on regular user machine, make packages noarch and etc. not to
> drop gcj itself. If this was the question - gcj_support has been removed from
> most of
2012/3/8 Miloslav Trmač :
> The lazy answer to both is "fail, or not, the same way as cups
> currently fails, or not" (in fact, could the session printing service
> simply be cups that treats the system instance as another remote
> server?).
If we were looking for the lazy answer, we'd just not bo
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> 1) What if I've hopped networks since then and the print job that was
> que'd was on a printer that was only visible on the original network?
>
> 2) What if I've hopped networks and the old network and the new
> network have a printer at the sam
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Tim Waugh (twa...@redhat.com) said:
>> For a plain network printer, where the printer might not be able to
>> accept the job while it's busy processing others, you might have to
>> queue the job and retry it later. So if you are doing that
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 12:02 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Tim Waugh (twa...@redhat.com) said:
> > For things like cloud printing, where the print server is a hosted
> > service somewhere out in the Internet, I think the applications should
> > be talking directly to it (via the print dialog).
>
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.10.3. No new features were added after alpha 8, just
many bug fixes. There are also 389-adminutil, 389-admin, and 389-dsgw
packages in Testing.
NEW: EL6 support
Beginning with RHEL 6.2, the 389-ds-base package is inc
On 02/23/2012 05:32 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 05:26:25PM +0100, Roman Rakus wrote:
On 02/22/2012 09:08 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:46:19AM +0100, Roman Rakus wrote:
On 02/16/2012 05:33 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
For just -O3 or -O2 -ftree-vectorize
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Thursday is OpenStack Test Day[2].
> [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-08_OpenStack_Test_Day
You can also join Openstack testing today on your current trusty
Fedora 16 installation by using fresh Openstack Preview reposito
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:35:09AM +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
>>
>> I would like for a review swap for the following packages. They are
>> sugar activities.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795069
>> https://bugzil
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/308
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/308/0001-Ticket-308-Automembership-plugin-fails-if-data-and-c.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio Basto пишет:
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 17:21, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be
>> honest - it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user
>> POV.
>>
> Just disable SELinux in /etc/selinux/config.
Which is exactly the use model of /etc we recommen
On 03/08/2012 02:42 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 22:56 -0500, Peter A wrote:
The issue effects only Evolution it seems - all other software I tried
works fine (that's anything from firefox to libreoffice to gimp to
ancient stuff like xv from an rpm built in 99). My desktop is KDE
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Privilege_escalation_policy
>
> ...except that the primary author of that document told me this month
> that it is only a draft and can be ignored¹.
It was actually approved by FESCo about two years ago:
Given
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Haley"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 1:38:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Roadmap for Java things in Fedora
>
> On 03/07/2012 04:34 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Any plans for sunsetting GCJ?
>
> That's an interesting que
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:35:09AM +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
>
> I would like for a review swap for the following packages. They are
> sugar activities.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795069
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700
>
I'll have a go :-)
Could
On 03/07/2012 04:09 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
We're a bit late to our own party this year but rpm 4.10 pre-release
version should be headed for rawhide in not too far future. In the
meanwhile, in what is starting to become a tradition at this point,
Fedora compatible [*] SRPM(s) are available a
commit 83530ec10d61ead4b4837147bebc6e47b675ec0c
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Thu Mar 8 12:42:09 2012 +0100
Upstream update.
- BR: perl(Carp).
- Remove filter.
.gitignore|2 +-
perl-Log-Any-Adapter.spec | 13 -
sources |2
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Log-Any-Adapter:
7851f73eb007b4f08750aff42b14c03c Log-Any-Adapter-0.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
On 03/07/2012 04:34 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Any plans for sunsetting GCJ?
That's an interesting question. It's still useful in a number
of niche roles: for example, it's used in PDFTK. Also, it would
have been very hard to bootstrap OpenJDK onto ARM without it.
For that reason, it's on my
Hey,
I've build a big round of GNOME 3.3.91 updates, which include the gtk
3.3.18. This one is a bit more interesting than your average gtk
release, since it includes touch and smooth scrolling support. If you
experience breakage wrt to scrolling or more general input handling, I'd
be interested
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 22:56 -0500, Peter A wrote:
> The issue effects only Evolution it seems - all other software I tried
> works fine (that's anything from firefox to libreoffice to gimp to
> ancient stuff like xv from an rpm built in 99). My desktop is KDE with
> OpenGL rendering but most ef
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 11:05 -0800, Scott Doty wrote:
> /etc/polkit-1/localauthority.conf.d/60-desktop-policy.conf
>
> Regarding this situation: turns out that if system-config-printer
> doesn't establish proper contact with cups-pk-helper, it will fall back
> to a mode that pops up the root passwo
Dne 8.3.2012 06:07, Eric Smith napsal(a):
Fabian Deutsch wrote:
because I no longer use them I am orpahning
dbh
muParser
scidavis
I wrote:
I use muParser in Meshlab. I'm not a C++ whiz (as witnessed by my not
yet having figured out how to make Meshlab build properly with GCC
4.7, so I'm wa
40 matches
Mail list logo
