Hi,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
which (right now) has precisely one other hit on Google.
If you search for the demangled symbol, there are more references:
v8::internal::I18NExtension::get()
-Cam
--
devel mailing list
On Mar 20, 2012, at 11:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The yum update didn't update grub, but it did update the kernel. This is
the first time you have done a kernel update via yum with the new grub2.
grubby updates the grub.cfg file.
It seems reasonable to consider this a grubby bug, yes?
On Mar 21, 2012, at 12:08 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
It seems reasonable to consider this a grubby bug, yes?
Considering grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg produces the exact correct
result, guess I'm not understanding the purpose of grubby. Are we in transition?
Chris Murphy
--
devel
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 00:12 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mar 21, 2012, at 12:08 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
It seems reasonable to consider this a grubby bug, yes?
Considering grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg produces the exact
correct result, guess I'm not understanding the purpose
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
[...]
In the US instead patents have their root in a specific constitutional
provision that says that this kind of monopoly can only be granted if it
promotes innovation, this means there is no specific ban on software
patents
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:52:58PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 03/20/2012 12:44 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Now the ultra ridiculous: How about secondary architecture requirements
demoted as-is to tertiary. And create substantially more aggressive
requirements for secondary architecture (in
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:44 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
Now the ultra ridiculous: How about secondary architecture
requirements demoted as-is to tertiary. And create substantially more
aggressive requirements for secondary architecture (in which ARM would
be placed), yet are not identical
Meanwhile, my Fedora post-installation instructions are quite popular on the
Internet:
http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/06/fedora-post-installation-configurations.html
It is link #3 on a fedora h.264 Google search and I use to keep it updated.
On 20/03/2012, at 23:11, Rahul Sundaram
- Original Message -
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 22:29 -0400, Fedora Video wrote:
In any case. This argument is moot. Fedora will distribute H.264
because it will be part of Firefox.
No, it won't. You persist in misunderstanding this, though it has
been
explained to you. Firefox will
On 20.3.2012 23:27, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Even YouTube has adopted WebM.
What the original author ignored to include was link to
http://brendaneich.com/2012/03/video-mobile-and-the-open-web/ which
explains the position of MoFo. What he completely missed is bug
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 10:17 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
Yes I understand it has to relearn. But it doesn't is the problem. I
had to keep marking them as junk.
Example, just reinstalled F16+updates on this very box. Started evo +
the backup file as a restore, just as with F17. Soon as I
On 21.3.2012 03:41, Adam Williamson wrote:
Firefox will take advantage of a system h264 codec where one is
available. In the Fedora system, one will not be available.
Fedora as shipped from get.fedoraproject.org won't contain H.264 codec.
Which doesn't mean that my computer won't be able to
On 03/20/2012 05:44 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jon Masters wrote:
On 03/20/2012 11:52 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
7) it can't be a serious maintenance burdon due to build related issues.
We need a couple of groups to sign off that builds are fast enough, not
just on a full distro rebuild
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
I think you're looking at this in slightly the wrong way. Being a
primary architecture isn't meant to be a benefit to the port - it's
meant to be a benefit to Fedora. Adding arm to the PA list means you'll
have to
Dne 21.3.2012 03:56, Adam Williamson napsal:
Properly, it ought to be versioned grub2-2.00-0.1.beta2.fc17. (Or possibly
grub2-2.00-0.1.~beta2.fc17, I really dunno what that tilde is for).
The tilde is a debianism to mark a pre-release.
dpkg understands version 42~foo as lower than 42.
Michal
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/19/2012 02:32 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.comwrote:
On 03/19/2012 12:50 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build a package. It's an
commit fc4da8936ee6341a05420a021b5488d960df0417
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Mar 21 10:59:45 2012 +
Drop tests subpackage and clean up
- Drop -tests subpackage (general lack of interest in this), but include
them as documentation for the main package
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:41:33AM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
I think you're looking at this in slightly the wrong way. Being a
primary architecture isn't meant to be a benefit to the port - it's
meant to be a
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
Maybe it's worth to ask them (or look at for example Mer builds)
what's
the difference in build times.
A few statistics from build.meego.com - using the OBS and building in
qemu. These
The yum update didn't update grub, but it did update the kernel. This is
the first time you have done a kernel update via yum with the new grub2.
grubby updates the grub.cfg file.
seems reproducible. My grub config is pretty empty, too.
During update, I get something an error:
grubby fatal
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 05:04 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
just a side note - I was told by an OpenSUSE on ARM person that they
use
x86 boxes with the user-space qemu virtual machine. It works quite
fast,
but still needs some hacking eg. in test-suites
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Peter Jones wrote:
In yesterday's FESCo meeting I told you I'd make a list of specific issues
I have with the current proposal for ARM as a primary archictecture. There
are some places where I think the current
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Peter Jones wrote:
In yesterday's FESCo meeting I told you I'd make a list of specific issues
I have with the current proposal for ARM as a
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:12:25PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
How was this handled in the case of PPC? My understanding is that due
to legal reasons the Fedora Project never officially provided access
to PPC machines. There were a number of machines that users could get
access to that were
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 08:58:36PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Here's another suspicious action:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/714364#3
Is anybody from the ABRT team watching these actions?
The bot closed bug 714364 (gtk2) as duplicate of bug 701926
(rhythmbox) and did the same for
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:56:40PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
If you find a suspicious action, please let us know at
crash-catc...@lists.fedorahosted.org or file a ticket at
https://fedorahosted.org/abrt.
What about bugs that your script did not catch?
Bug
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
1) mechanisms need to be in place to get package maintainers access to
fix
arm-specific bugs in their packages
So we have a tracker bug at the moment. Is that sufficient? If so, we
obviously should make sure
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:12:25PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
How was this handled in the case of PPC? My understanding is that due
to legal reasons the Fedora Project never officially provided access
to PPC
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
We don't try to deduplicate python bugs yet. (only by the abrt_hash
field in bugzilla)
Every dupe bug has the same abrt_hash in the Whiteboard:
abrt_hash:01acb9e5787833cdbc03832f71e787ef531f1cd
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:41:33AM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org
wrote:
I think you're looking at this in slightly the wrong way. Being a
primary
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 12:08 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
2) Updates. Submitting updates requires the entire build to be complete
which means you have to wait for the slowest thing to finish. Having to
wait for 12 hours
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:41:33AM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org
wrote:
I think you're looking at this in slightly the wrong way. Being a
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
Maybe it's worth to ask them (or look at for example Mer builds)
what's
the difference in build times.
A few statistics from build.meego.com - using the OBS and building in
qemu. These
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:13 AM, David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:52:58PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 03/20/2012 12:44 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Now the ultra ridiculous: How about secondary architecture requirements
demoted as-is to tertiary. And create
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 08:08:13AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
We don't try to deduplicate python bugs yet. (only by the abrt_hash
field in bugzilla)
Every dupe bug has the same abrt_hash in the Whiteboard:
abrt_hash:01acb9e5787833cdbc03832f71e787ef531f1cd
Hm,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:26:58PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
The expectation would be that the architecture maintainers have fixed
everything before moving to being a primary architecture, so this should
only be
On 03/21/2012 02:32 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 08:08:13AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
We don't try to deduplicate python bugs yet. (only by the abrt_hash
field in bugzilla)
Every dupe bug has the same abrt_hash in the Whiteboard:
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com writes:
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
We don't try to deduplicate python bugs yet. (only by the abrt_hash
field in bugzilla)
Every dupe bug has the same abrt_hash in the Whiteboard:
abrt_hash:01acb9e5787833cdbc03832f71e787ef531f1cd
which is very, very odd.
W dniu 13 marca 2012 21:59 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com:
2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
?
This is
On 03/21/2012 09:21 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Except when people are forced to look at it, their solution was often
ExcludeArch for PPC. As I said in the other thread, you cannot force
people to care about an architecture they don't know or want to learn.
That suggests we need a FTBFS-like
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
1) mechanisms need to be in place to get package maintainers access to
fix
arm-specific bugs in their packages
So we have a tracker bug at the
commit 0a5b90bb2f3179fb463d66e196a77fce930ed142
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Mar 21 13:59:13 2012 +
Remove unused patch
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-Test-Perl-Critic-1.01-fixtest.patch | 21 -
2 files changed, 1
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/21/2012 09:21 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Except when people are forced to look at it, their solution was often
ExcludeArch for PPC. As I said in the other thread, you cannot force
people to care about an architecture they
2012/3/13 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com:
2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
?
This is the first major release from a few
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/21/2012 09:21 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Except when people are forced to look at it, their solution was often
ExcludeArch for PPC. As I said in the other thread, you cannot force
people to care about an architecture they
2012/3/21 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
2012/3/13 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com:
2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 12:26 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
No, we've never said that ever! But then there are a lot of desktops
that run just fine without OpenGL. 3D really wasn't in a great state
even in x86 until Fedora 15 with a lot of drivers only doing it
partially or not at all, even now
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 13:32 +0100, drago01 wrote:
Even though I disagree with Kevin that we should block on does not
have 3D drivers .. OpenGL is imo
even more important on ARM (non server systems) then on x86.
A tablet or smartphone without hardware accelerated rendering is just
useless
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 12:26 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
No, we've never said that ever! But then there are a lot of desktops
that run just fine without OpenGL. 3D really wasn't in a great state
even in x86 until Fedora 15
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:28:10PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
What about all the other xorg-x11-drv* video cards, admittedly they're
generally considered legacy but there are a lot that don't do 3D at
all there.
Of the hardware still produced, they're either things Adam listed as
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 13:32 +0100, drago01 wrote:
Even though I disagree with Kevin that we should block on does not
have 3D drivers .. OpenGL is imo
even more important on ARM (non server systems) then on x86.
A tablet or
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 13:32 +0100, drago01 wrote:
Even though I disagree with Kevin that we should block on does not
have 3D drivers .. OpenGL is imo
even more important on ARM (non server systems) then on x86.
A tablet or
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:28:10PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
What about all the other xorg-x11-drv* video cards, admittedly they're
generally considered legacy but there are a lot that don't do 3D at
all there.
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
That's my point, I don't believe that working 3D should be a blocker
to primary arch because like mainline it will likely come with both
time and demand.
Is llvmpipe not 'working'? (Admittedly, on low-power CPUs like ARM, it might
be more of a
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
That's my point, I don't believe that working 3D should be a blocker
to primary arch because like mainline it will likely come with both
time and demand.
Is llvmpipe not
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 14:31 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:28:10PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
What about all the other xorg-x11-drv* video cards, admittedly they're
generally considered legacy but there are a lot that don't do 3D at
all there.
Of the
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 10:38 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
That's my point, I don't believe that working 3D should be a blocker
to primary arch because like mainline it will likely come with both
time and demand.
Is llvmpipe not 'working'?
From the docs@ list, FYI, in case someone has some time in which they
can contribute to release notes for desktop, system daemons, web
servers, or for that matter any other existing beats:
- Forwarded message from John J. McDonough wb8...@arrl.net -
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 23:27 -0400,
Peter Jones (pjo...@redhat.com) said:
In yesterday's FESCo meeting I told you I'd make a list of specific issues
I have with the current proposal for ARM as a primary archictecture. There
are some places where I think the current proposal fails to deal with some
necessary aspects of becoming
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:27:04PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
All sorts of things can speed it up, most of the Fedora builders are
currently loopback ext4 over NFS over 100Mb ethernet over USB. Not
optimal.
Just switching them to ext2 would save a ton of IO. The buildroots
get regenerated
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 20:30 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
On 03/20/2012 06:24 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
After a yum update a few minutes ago, GRUB's kinda messed up. Anyone else?
Yes, it happened to me, too, after booting an up-to-the-minute anaconda
install DVD
for _update_ (not fresh
On 03/21/2012 02:27 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 00:12 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mar 21, 2012, at 12:08 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
It seems reasonable to consider this a grubby bug, yes?
Considering grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg produces the exact
correct
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:27:04PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
All sorts of things can speed it up, most of the Fedora builders are
currently loopback ext4 over NFS over 100Mb ethernet over USB. Not
optimal.
Just
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 14:31 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:28:10PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
What about all the other xorg-x11-drv* video cards, admittedly they're
generally considered legacy
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 10:38 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
That's my point, I don't believe that working 3D should be a blocker
to primary arch because like mainline it will likely
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Wx:
757f337a14869a3fdfa8ebd3444159b1 Wx-0.9905.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit d69eb2b96252d3a54d531a551b37ecbb91a9d94e
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Mar 21 11:29:39 2012 -0400
0.9905
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Wx.spec |7 ++-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore
So probably using Qemu could speed it up quite a lot. Also OBS
offers
quite a lot of flexibility to decouple arch builds, disable
selected
archs etc. But I'm not sure about the processes for chain builds,
updates, how they make the builds consistent (if one arch fails)...
All sorts
On 03/21/2012 10:58 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:27:04PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
All sorts of things can speed it up, most of the Fedora builders are
currently loopback ext4 over NFS over 100Mb ethernet over USB. Not
optimal.
Just switching them to ext2
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 09:55 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 21.3.2012 03:41, Adam Williamson wrote:
Firefox will take advantage of a system h264 codec where one is
available. In the Fedora system, one will not be available.
Fedora as shipped from get.fedoraproject.org won't contain H.264
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Peter Jones (pjo...@redhat.com) said:
In yesterday's FESCo meeting I told you I'd make a list of specific issues
I have with the current proposal for ARM as a primary archictecture. There
are some places where I think
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 11:20 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Dne 21.3.2012 03:56, Adam Williamson napsal:
Properly, it ought to be versioned grub2-2.00-0.1.beta2.fc17. (Or possibly
grub2-2.00-0.1.~beta2.fc17, I really dunno what that tilde is for).
The tilde is a debianism to mark a
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 19:10 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
The usual way to make this selectable is with a parameter for the
package's configure script, something like --disable-desktop-update .
These days, it seems like very few packages need this any more. I don't
know if upstreams have
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 14:28 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
So it's a little like saying we only support x86 chips from Intel, AMD,
and VIA. Okay, yeah, maybe that's fair, but those are actually all
there is to care about.
What about all the other xorg-x11-drv* video cards, admittedly
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:32:04AM -0400, Zach Brown wrote:
On 03/21/2012 10:58 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:27:04PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
All sorts of things can speed it up, most of the Fedora builders are
currently loopback ext4 over NFS over 100Mb
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 11:17 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
On 03/21/2012 02:27 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 00:12 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mar 21, 2012, at 12:08 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
It seems reasonable to consider this a grubby bug, yes?
Considering
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 12:51 +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote:
I wrote a small patch to comment out this line and it worked just
fine. I'll file a bug upstream.
A patch to simply remove the update-desktop-database call is unlikely to
be accepted upstream, as people building for themselves want the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804420
--- Comment #1 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2012-03-21
12:13:23 EDT ---
0.9905 is in rawhide.
--
Configure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804420
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Compose started at Wed Mar 21 08:15:05 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
On Mar 20, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Proposed as blocker, F17 Final.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805272
Does anyone know how GRUB2 (bootloader+core, grub2-install, grub2-mkconfig)
will behave in a case where there is a valid legacy MBR and a stale GPT remains
On 03/21/2012 04:33 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hello All.
As was announced before ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 now in build
overrides. Please build your package against it (and answer there if it
not so hard).
23 march I'll push one update for Fedora 17.
--
With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka
Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 12:52 + schrieb
build...@fedoraproject.org:
parcellite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On i386:
parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Christoph Wickert
christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 12:52 + schrieb
build...@fedoraproject.org:
parcellite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On i386:
parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires
On 03/21/2012 05:25 AM, Chris Tyler wrote:
Fully-emulated actually fits into the Native Builds guideline, but it
hasn't been economical to use this approach because there's no hardware
support for ARM emulation on x86 (the way that there is hardware
acceleration for x86 virtualization on x86)
21.03.2012 20:31, Marcela Mašláňová написал:
On 03/21/2012 04:33 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hello All.
As was announced before ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 now in build
overrides. Please build your package against it (and answer there if it
not so hard).
23 march I'll push one update for Fedora
On 3/21/12 6:52 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
On 03/21/2012 09:21 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Except when people are forced to look at it, their solution was often
ExcludeArch for PPC. As I said in the other thread, you cannot force
people to care about an architecture they don't know or want to learn.
On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:17 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
We definitely want to keep using grubby instead of running grub2-mkconfig and
clobbering whatever's in your config file every time.
*shrug* I think grubby makes for an increasingly cluttered grub.cfg. With the
latest behavior I'm seeing with
Summary of changes:
42abd26... Initial import (#605674). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 3/21/12 10:36 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
The main place I see ARM emulation being useful is in allowing any
packager with an x86 host to boot a simulated ARM host to resolve build
failures in their package. That's not ideal- ideal is every package
owner has an ARM system they can use, but
On 03/21/2012 06:26 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Thanks Adam, this is the first real use case where speed of builds is
important for something other than keeping the developer happy.
Other points raised on the list are:
1. The nature of chainbuilds would feel slowed build times particularly.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:07:57 -0400 (EDT)
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
Maybe it's worth to ask them (or look at for example Mer builds)
what's
the difference in build times.
A few statistics from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:12:58 -0400
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 03/21/2012 09:21 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Except when people are forced to look at it, their solution
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:07:57 -0400 (EDT)
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
Maybe it's worth to ask them (or look at for example Mer
On 03/21/2012 11:42 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
21.03.2012 20:31, Marcela Mašláňová написал:
On 03/21/2012 04:33 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hello All.
As was announced before ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 now in build
overrides. Please build your package against it (and answer there if it
not so
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-InSitu:
69e55eda0c3d0e5597b88a9ccf9fbfc3 IO-InSitu-0.0.2.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 42abd2609be3ccfdd50e0907237849fa163624fd
Author: Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu
Date: Wed Mar 21 13:05:24 2012 -0400
Initial import (#605674).
.gitignore |1 +
perl-IO-InSitu.spec | 83 +++
sources |1
On 03/21/2012 02:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/21/2012 11:42 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
21.03.2012 20:31, Marcela Mašláňová написал:
On 03/21/2012 04:33 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hello All.
As was announced before ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 now in build
overrides. Please build your
On 03/21/2012 12:34 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 03/21/2012 02:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/21/2012 11:42 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
21.03.2012 20:31, Marcela Mašláňová написал:
On 03/21/2012 04:33 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hello All.
As was announced before ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 now
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 12:02 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:17 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
We definitely want to keep using grubby instead of running grub2-mkconfig
and
clobbering whatever's in your config file every time.
*shrug* I think grubby makes for an increasingly
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo