Re: Question mainline kernel on Fedora

2012-03-23 Thread Sergio Belkin
2012/3/23 Reindl Harald : > > Am 23.03.2012 19:00, schrieb Konstantin Ryabitsev: >> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: >>> http://kernel.org/faq/#stablekernels >> >> I'm pretty sure that FAQ entry is a bit outdated by now, too. Basically, >> if it came from linux-stable.git an

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
DJ Delorie wrote: > What a horrible thing to say about a company that's put a lot of > effort into supporting their products on Free Software platforms! I think the Nouveau developers have a different story to tell you there. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.

Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2012-03-23

2012-03-23 Thread Ben Boeckel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 17:50:22 GMT, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > Broken upgrade path report for tags dist-f15-updates -> f16-updates -> f17 -> > f18: I like this. Though webkitgtk3 is missing from the list (1.7.91 in f17, 1.7.5 in f18).

Re: Question mainline kernel on Fedora

2012-03-23 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 24.03.2012 01:18, schrieb Sergio Belkin: > 2012/3/23 Adam Williamson : >> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: >>> Dne 23.3.2012 17:23, Sergio Belkin napsal(a): Sorry I explained it bad, I'm talking about that latest release available of kernel for f16 is kernel-

Re: Question mainline kernel on Fedora

2012-03-23 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.03.2012 19:00, schrieb Konstantin Ryabitsev: > On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: >> http://kernel.org/faq/#stablekernels > > I'm pretty sure that FAQ entry is a bit outdated by now, too. Basically, > if it came from linux-stable.git and doesn't have an -rc in the tag,

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > DJ Delorie wrote: >> So buy a trimslice and use the internal SSD or sata disk.  The >> trimslice has everything the netwinder has (and more), and uses half >> the power. >> >> http://trimslice.com/web/ > > "Trim-Slice is the first desktop com

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 23 March 2012 18:24, Kevin Kofler wrote: > DJ Delorie wrote: >> So buy a trimslice and use the internal SSD or sata disk.  The >> trimslice has everything the netwinder has (and more), and uses half >> the power. >> >> http://trimslice.com/web/ > > "Trim-Slice is the first desktop computer powe

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread DJ Delorie
> i.e., by buying a Trimslice, you give money to The Enemy! What a horrible thing to say about a company that's put a lot of effort into supporting their products on Free Software platforms! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/deve

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
DJ Delorie wrote: > So buy a trimslice and use the internal SSD or sata disk. The > trimslice has everything the netwinder has (and more), and uses half > the power. > > http://trimslice.com/web/ "Trim-Slice is the first desktop computer powered by NVIDIA Tegra 2." i.e., by buying a Trimslice, y

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
DJ Delorie wrote: >> always with the caveat that you can't just use "make -j 288" on them. > > Why not? Multi-CPU machines is very old technology. Ask the people who designed those machines. (My guess: memory and bus bandwidth. There's a limit to how many cores you can put on a shared-memory,

Re: Question mainline kernel on Fedora

2012-03-23 Thread Sergio Belkin
2012/3/23 Adam Williamson : > On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: >> Dne 23.3.2012 17:23, Sergio Belkin napsal(a): >> > Sorry I explained it bad, I'm talking about that latest release >> > available of kernel  for f16 is kernel-3.3.0-4.fc16.x86_64 and stable >> > is 3.2.12 >> >

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Przemek Klosowski wrote: > Of course, but numbers are numbers; we just have to pay attention to > lighter, mobile formfactors. It is the same reasoning as in the desktop > vs. server dilemma 15 years ago: you could say that 'servers are > per-company devices', so Linux has been concentrating on the

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Eric Smith
DJ Delorie wrote: Buy a trimslice and run it with iSCSI. Pete Zaitcev wrote: This is not good enough for me to become involved with Fedora on ARM. Glad it works for you, but I need a real system, like a Netwinder. You did see that there's a "Trimslice H" model that can accomodate a 2.5"

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread DJ Delorie
> So I see, thanks. DJ's original suggestion was too forceful in insisting > on iSCSI. Sorry, I'm a big fan of iSCSI on trimslices. The SATA interface is on USB but the gigE isn't, so network (iscsi) is about 3x faster than a local disk, if you have a big raid server on the other end. I have tw

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:05:39 + > Peter Robinson wrote: > >> Trimslice has options of SSD or HDD as well so it would be no less of >> a real machine like a netwinder. >> >> http://trimslice.com/web/models > > So I see, thanks. DJ's origin

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:05:39 + Peter Robinson wrote: > Trimslice has options of SSD or HDD as well so it would be no less of > a real machine like a netwinder. > > http://trimslice.com/web/models So I see, thanks. DJ's original suggestion was too forceful in insisting on iSCSI. I also recei

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:02:37 + "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > It unfortunately shed no light on the ARM topic, because, well, > > there's ARM SoCs in all those form factors. > > Except the x86-64 high performance single threaded class :-) Rich, check this out - http://summit.openstack.org

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

2012-03-23 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17 techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17 autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1 ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 with tat build overrides but got error from bodhi what ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:01:27 -0400 > DJ Delorie wrote: > >> Buy a trimslice and run it with iSCSI. > > This is not good enough for me to become involved with Fedora on ARM. > Glad it works for you, but I need a real system, like a Netwinder.

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 04:50:38PM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > >> Buy a trimslice and run it with iSCSI. > > > > This is not good enough for me to become involved with Fedora on ARM. > > Glad it works for you, but I need a real system, lik

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

2012-03-23 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > 08.03.2012 20:24, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > > 08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > > 05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote: >> Buy a trimslice and run it with iSCSI. > > This is not good enough for me to become involved with Fedora on ARM. > Glad it works for you, but I need a real system, like a Netwinder. Whatever floats your boat! ARM SoCs are available in every

Re: Question mainline kernel on Fedora

2012-03-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: > Dne 23.3.2012 17:23, Sergio Belkin napsal(a): > > Sorry I explained it bad, I'm talking about that latest release > > available of kernel for f16 is kernel-3.3.0-4.fc16.x86_64 and stable > > is 3.2.12 > > That does not mean that 3.3 is so

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

2012-03-23 Thread Pavel Alexeev
08.03.2012 20:24, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio B

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread DJ Delorie
> Glad it works for you, but I need a real system, like a Netwinder. So buy a trimslice and use the internal SSD or sata disk. The trimslice has everything the netwinder has (and more), and uses half the power. http://trimslice.com/web/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

[Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Beta Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

2012-03-23 Thread Andre Robatino
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Beta Release Candidate 1 (RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5141 . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instr

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:01:27 -0400 DJ Delorie wrote: > Buy a trimslice and run it with iSCSI. This is not good enough for me to become involved with Fedora on ARM. Glad it works for you, but I need a real system, like a Netwinder. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org htt

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 04:46:23 +0100 Kevin Kofler wrote: > My desktop is actually older and slower than my notebook. Yet I use the > desktop whenever I'm at home. The form factor is just more convenient. That's just what you personally prefer. I quit using desktops back in 2001, because laptop fo

[Test-Announce] Fedora 17 QA Retrospective page is up

2012-03-23 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey, everyone. I'm sorry this is late, my bad for not getting it up earlier. :( The Retrospective page for Fedora 17 QA is now up: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_QA_Retrospective We use the retrospective page to track things that went well and things that didn't go so well during the F

Re: Depcheck failed?

2012-03-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: >>> >>> Darn... I was hoping that wouldn't bite me :) I'm assuming I can >>> ignore the error though? Or does it need to be fixed? >>

Re: Depcheck failed?

2012-03-23 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> >> Darn... I was hoping that wouldn't bite me :) I'm assuming I can >> ignore the error though? Or does it need to be fixed? > > Fix.  :( Which means I really need to bump the release in

Re: Depcheck failed?

2012-03-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> On 03/23/2012 11:57 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: >>> >>> It passed for -testing but after submitting for stable[1] I got the >>> following: >>> >>> FAIL] f18 >>>        Latest package: Fie

Re: Depcheck failed?

2012-03-23 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 03/23/2012 11:57 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> >> It passed for -testing but after submitting for stable[1] I got the >> following: >> >> FAIL] f18 >>        Latest package: Field3D-1.3.2-1.fc18 >>        Latest pending package: None >>    

Re: Depcheck failed?

2012-03-23 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 03/23/2012 11:57 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: It passed for -testing but after submitting for stable[1] I got the following: FAIL] f18 Latest package: Field3D-1.3.2-1.fc18 Latest pending package: None Error: Tested package must be less than or equal to the latest (pending)

Re: Question mainline kernel on Fedora

2012-03-23 Thread Konstantin Ryabitsev
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: > http://kernel.org/faq/#stablekernels I'm pretty sure that FAQ entry is a bit outdated by now, too. Basically, if it came from linux-stable.git and doesn't have an -rc in the tag, it's a stable kernel release. https://git.kernel.org/?p=li

Depcheck failed?

2012-03-23 Thread Richard Shaw
It passed for -testing but after submitting for stable[1] I got the following: FAIL] f18 Latest package: Field3D-1.3.2-1.fc18 Latest pending package: None Error: Tested package must be less than or equal to the latest (pending) package. How did a .fc18 package end up in F1

Package EVR problems in Fedora 2012-03-23

2012-03-23 Thread buildsys
Broken upgrade path report for tags dist-f15-updates -> f16-updates -> f17 -> f18: GConf2: f17 > f18 (GConf2-3.2.5-1.fc17 GConf2-3.2.4-1.fc18) Pound: dist-f15-updates > f16-updates (Pound-2.6-1.fc15 Pound-2.6-0.5.fc16) PyMca: dist-f15-updates > f17 (PyMca-4.4.1-4.p1.fc15 PyMca-4.4.1-

Re: Question mainline kernel on Fedora

2012-03-23 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.03.2012 17:23, schrieb Sergio Belkin: > 2012/3/23 Michal Schmidt : >> Dne 23.3.2012 16:24, Sergio Belkin napsal(a): >> >>> I've found that Fedora provides mainline kernel to download. Is >>> mainline a release candidate? I wonder if use that version is somewhat >>> risky... >> >> >> What ex

Re: httpd 2.4 is coming, RFC on module packaging draft

2012-03-23 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/3/23 Joe Orton : > httpd 2.4.1 packages are ready for dist-f18 and will be built early next > week.  Rebuilds will be required for all packages containing httpd > modules.  There are API changes in 2.4, so module packages may need > patches if upstream has not done that work already: > >

Re: F17 tree

2012-03-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:48:51 -0500 Mike Chambers wrote: > I mirror this locally from a mirror and now seeing most of the sub > dir's, such as image, efi, etc.. are now missing. (Checked other > mirrors too). > > Someone threw a grenade on the F17 tree and wiped it out? haha > There were no ins

Re: httpd 2.4 is coming, RFC on module packaging draft

2012-03-23 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > httpd 2.4.1 packages are ready for dist-f18 and will be built early next > week.  Rebuilds will be required for all packages containing httpd > modules.  There are API changes in 2.4, so module packages may need > patches if upstream has not done

httpd 2.4 is coming, RFC on module packaging draft

2012-03-23 Thread Joe Orton
httpd 2.4.1 packages are ready for dist-f18 and will be built early next week. Rebuilds will be required for all packages containing httpd modules. There are API changes in 2.4, so module packages may need patches if upstream has not done that work already: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/de

F17 tree

2012-03-23 Thread Mike Chambers
I mirror this locally from a mirror and now seeing most of the sub dir's, such as image, efi, etc.. are now missing. (Checked other mirrors too). Someone threw a grenade on the F17 tree and wiped it out? haha -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY "Best little town on Earth!" -- devel mailing list

Re: Pidgin 2.10.2 update missing

2012-03-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Heiko Adams > wrote: >> Am 23.03.2012 15:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla: >>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams >>> wrote: Hi, the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is >>

[Bug 806286] perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.26 is available

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806286 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added --

Re: Question mainline kernel on Fedora

2012-03-23 Thread Michal Schmidt
Dne 23.3.2012 17:23, Sergio Belkin napsal(a): Sorry I explained it bad, I'm talking about that latest release available of kernel for f16 is kernel-3.3.0-4.fc16.x86_64 and stable is 3.2.12 That does not mean that 3.3 is somehow unstable. It is supposed to be generally usable and not dangerous

Re: Question mainline kernel on Fedora

2012-03-23 Thread Sergio Belkin
2012/3/23 Michal Schmidt : > Dne 23.3.2012 16:24, Sergio Belkin napsal(a): > >> I've found that Fedora provides mainline kernel to download. Is >> mainline a release candidate? I wonder if use that version is somewhat >> risky... > > > What exactly are you talking about? Could you provide the URL y

Re: Booting Fedora from LVM with grub2

2012-03-23 Thread Gerry Reno
On 03/23/2012 11:26 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 23.03.2012 16:19, schrieb Michael Cronenworth: > >> David Lehman wrote: >> >>> I was able to complete an install of F17-Alpha just now with all lvm. I >>> had to force the use of MSDOS disklabel instead of GPT (used parted's >>> mklabel co

Re: Question mainline kernel on Fedora

2012-03-23 Thread Michal Schmidt
Dne 23.3.2012 16:24, Sergio Belkin napsal(a): I've found that Fedora provides mainline kernel to download. Is mainline a release candidate? I wonder if use that version is somewhat risky... What exactly are you talking about? Could you provide the URL you found? Michal -- devel mailing list de

[perl-Module-ExtractUse] Created tag perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.27-1.fc18

2012-03-23 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.27-1.fc18' was created pointing to: bd9b14e... Update to 0.27 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/per

[389-devel] please review ticket 319 - ldap-agent crashes on start with signal SIGSEGV

2012-03-23 Thread Mark Reynolds
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/319 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/319/0001-Ticket-319-ldap-agent-crashes-on-start-with-signal-S.patch The crash happens if you have two or more servers in the ldap-agent.conf file. We were not resetting the buffer length between files. Tha

Re: XFS rootfs required?

2012-03-23 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 3/20/12 1:02 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 23:52 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> It's not an option with Fedora-17-Beta-TC2-x86_64-DVD.iso. I don't see >> anything listed in alpha, beta, or final release criteria that >> requires it, but it's been a past option. Summary is tha

Question mainline kernel on Fedora

2012-03-23 Thread Sergio Belkin
Hi folks I've found that Fedora provides mainline kernel to download. Is mainline a release candidate? I wonder if use that version is somewhat risky... What do you think? Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blo

Re: Booting Fedora from LVM with grub2

2012-03-23 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.03.2012 16:19, schrieb Michael Cronenworth: > David Lehman wrote: >> I was able to complete an install of F17-Alpha just now with all lvm. I >> had to force the use of MSDOS disklabel instead of GPT (used parted's >> mklabel command on tty2 while the anaconda prerelease warning was on >> sc

Re: Booting Fedora from LVM with grub2

2012-03-23 Thread David Lehman
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 10:19 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > David Lehman wrote: > > I was able to complete an install of F17-Alpha just now with all lvm. I > > had to force the use of MSDOS disklabel instead of GPT (used parted's > > mklabel command on tty2 while the anaconda prerelease warning

Re: Booting Fedora from LVM with grub2

2012-03-23 Thread Michael Cronenworth
David Lehman wrote: I was able to complete an install of F17-Alpha just now with all lvm. I had to force the use of MSDOS disklabel instead of GPT (used parted's mklabel command on tty2 while the anaconda prerelease warning was on screen on tty6) Does the anaconda option "nogpt" no longer exist

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread DJ Delorie
> always with the caveat that you can't just use "make -j 288" on them. Why not? Multi-CPU machines is very old technology. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[perl-Module-ExtractUse] Update to 0.27

2012-03-23 Thread Paul Howarth
commit bd9b14e1ab13a1cc9c3950bbab82294aa7ad0521 Author: Paul Howarth Date: Fri Mar 23 15:16:56 2012 + Update to 0.27 - New upstream release 0.27 - Removed Test::NoWarnings from a t/23_universal_require.t because it upsets the (manual) plan if the tests are skippe

Re: Booting Fedora from LVM with grub2

2012-03-23 Thread David Lehman
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 19:41 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote: > Hallo, > > because I have read, that grub2 should be able to boot from LVM. I have > done the > following test in a VM > > 1.) Fresh install of Fedora 16. Unfortunately, I can't create a disk > which contains olny > a volume group, so I h

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 03/23/2012 05:59 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: And yes smartphones are booming, but they're not booming because they are a good desktop substitute, they're booming because they are a good dumbphone substitute (and before that digital cameras replaced chemical cameras, and mp3 readers replaced wa

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 03/22/2012 10:42 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Przemek Klosowski wrote: Fair enough, but the trends are well established, and the data are for shipments so the actual deployed numbers are compounded (flat shipments translate to steady growth, linear or faster shipment growth means quadratic or ma

File Module-ExtractUse-0.27.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2012-03-23 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-ExtractUse: 86c988672dd3f5b80c4b54f6caffcfb9 Module-ExtractUse-0.27.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproje

Re: Pidgin 2.10.2 update missing

2012-03-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Heiko Adams wrote: > Am 23.03.2012 15:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla: >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is >>> still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay? >>> --

Re: Pidgin 2.10.2 update missing

2012-03-23 Thread Heiko Adams
Am 23.03.2012 15:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams > wrote: >> Hi, >> the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is >> still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay? >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Heiko Adams >> -- >> devel mailing list >>

Re: Pidgin 2.10.2 update missing

2012-03-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams > wrote: >> Hi, >> the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is >> still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay? >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Heiko Adams >> -- >> devel mail

Re: Pidgin 2.10.2 update missing

2012-03-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams wrote: > Hi, > the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is > still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay? > -- > Regards, > > Heiko Adams > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedorapr

Pidgin 2.10.2 update missing

2012-03-23 Thread Heiko Adams
Hi, the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay? -- Regards, Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Bug 806296] New: perl-POE-1.352 is available

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-POE-1.352 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806296 Summary: perl-POE-1.352 is available Product: Fedora Versio

[Bug 806286] New: perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.26 is available

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.26 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806286 Summary: perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.26 is available Product

[Bug 806292] New: perl-Net-GitHub-0.42 is available

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Net-GitHub-0.42 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806292 Summary: perl-Net-GitHub-0.42 is available Product: Fedora

[Bug 746941] perl-Mojolicious-2.65 is available

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added --

F-17 Branched report: 20120323 changes

2012-03-23 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Fri Mar 23 08:15:06 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [HippoDraw] HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Jeu 22 mars 2012 21:13, Przemek Klosowski a écrit : > Fair enough, but the trends are well established, Like the netbook trends were well established? In the last years there has been a clear struggle between users that want cheaper computing and hardware manufacturers that want either to up

Re: PyXML package - deprecate it?

2012-03-23 Thread Marian Ganisin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:48:11PM +0100, Roman Rakus wrote: > Hi all, > looks like PyXML package is deprecated since python itself provides > xml mechanisms. > When you look deeper, > python's xml provides: > "dom", "parsers", "sax", "etree" > and PyXML provides: > 'dom', 'marshal', 'parsers', 'sa

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - > Define "do it " as MeeGo is dead and they had to cosy up to Microsoft > to survive, not sure I'd even wish that on canonical! In reality, Nokia never started working on MeeGo ;-) Once we're sooo off-topic (and tablets and cell phones) became the topic, I think ARM

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mar 23, 2012 3:22 AM, "Kevin Kofler" wrote: > > Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:28 PM, drago01 wrote: > >> The only ones where this is possible right now are actually x86 based > >> tablets. Even Windows 8 wont help here as MS mandates that the > >> devices are locked wit

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mar 22, 2012 8:47 PM, "Michael Cronenworth" wrote: > > Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> It doesn't seem like a huge over-reach to assume that any RH interest in >> ARM is more on the server side than a raging desire to take on Android >> and the iPad:) (Note: I don't have any sekrit inside info on

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

2012-03-23 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mar 22, 2012 8:32 PM, "Michael Cronenworth" wrote: > > Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> I would still like you to consider the question of whether this holds >> for the Fedora case, though. Is Fedora as a project in fact suitable - >> either in current implementation, or in terms of our self-defini

Re: Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h: 460: elf_machine_rela_relative: Assertion `((reloc->r_info) & 0xffffffff) == 8' failed!

2012-03-23 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/3/23 Kevin Kofler : > Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> I tried to build mod_spdy and I hit this >> Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h: 460: >> elf_machine_rela_relative: Assertion `((reloc->r_info) & 0x) >> == 8' failed! >> >> I get this when I try to build even

[Test-Announce] (CANCELLED) 2012-03-23 @ 17:00 UTC - F17 Beta Blocker Bug Review #4

2012-03-23 Thread Tim Flink
Since there is only one currently proposed blocker and F17 beta RC1 should land sometime Friday, there isn't much point in having a blocker meeting. Instead, please test beta RC1 once it lands. There are a lot of accepted blocker bugs - the fixes for them will need testing and verification. So, o

Re: Evolution + bogofilter

2012-03-23 Thread Milan Crha
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 10:12 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 10:40 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > > > Hi, > > just a little follow-up. I came across similar question with other user > > and even not for him, but for me, in my F17 install, I get an empty > > string when issuing:

Re: Darkserver in production

2012-03-23 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 03/23/2012 12:41 PM, Kushal Das wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 03/23/2012 12:22 PM, Kushal Das wrote: >>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Darkserver >>> [2] https://darkserver.fedoraproject.org/ >> >> Congrats Kushal. You should cross reference 1 and

Re: Darkserver in production

2012-03-23 Thread Kushal Das
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 03/23/2012 12:22 PM, Kushal Das wrote: >> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Darkserver >> [2] https://darkserver.fedoraproject.org/ > > Congrats Kushal.  You should cross reference 1 and 2 and maybe make 2 > not look like something peel

Re: Darkserver in production

2012-03-23 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 03/23/2012 12:22 PM, Kushal Das wrote: > Hi all, > > We have darkserver [1] in production. The URL is [2]. > > This service is providing the API(s) based on which other developers > can write tools to query details of build-ids. I am also writing a > command line client for the same, which wil