Greetings,
I maintain package Skychart that requires Lazarus as Buildrequires.
Lazarus is currently broken in F17 and has broken functionality in
rawhide, see bug #799504 [1]. Short story is:
1. Lazarus must be updated to 0.9.30.4 to work with glib2 = 2.31 (F17
and higher)
2. Lazarus must be
Horst H. von Brand wrote:
keeping generated files in git is just dumb.
+1, but IMHO this is true even without the in git addition. Generated
files also have no business being in a source tarball, and IMHO the fact
that the autotools get that wrong entirely disqualifies them from being a
Mattia Verga wrote:
I cannot start the unresponsive package maintainer policy because the
package maintainer replied that he will do the upgrade, but when??
IMHO, give the maintainer some limited time (say, 2 weeks) to do the upgrade
and the rebuild for F17, and start unresponsive maintainer
Compose started at Sun Apr 15 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8
[aeolus-configserver]
aeolus-configserver-0.4.5-1.fc17.noarch
I waited for a month, I will wait another week... I don't want to kick
anyone and I'm not completely sure I can be the right person to fully
maintain Lazarus package. But I'm able to do the update this time.
Being co-maintainer would be better.
Il 15/04/2012 12:36, Kevin Kofler ha scritto:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:26:06AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Trying to fix all apps that could include confidential data from Programmer
Debugging tools which are a very small percentage of users use, is just crazy.
It isn't just debugging tools that would break, also things like wine, the
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:43:19 +0200, MV (Mattia) wrote:
I waited for a month, I will wait another week... I don't want to kick
anyone and I'm not completely sure I can be the right person to fully
maintain Lazarus package. But I'm able to do the update this time.
Being co-maintainer would be
Frank Ch. Eigler f...@redhat.com wrote:
Horst H. von Brand vonbr...@inf.utfsm.cl writes:
[...]
Please go with (3), keeping generated files in git is just dumb.
Please don't demean those who do it for well-considered reasons.
I'm sorry if it came through too abrasive, but I just can't see
14.04.2012 20:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.04.2012 18:39, schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:21:15PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm not arguing that's how yum works now, but it doesn't have to work
Review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812659
Sponsor needed. I'm a long-time open source contributor, notably to
ACEhttp://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html
and nmh http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/nmh/.
Some nmh developers and users would like to see a
Kevin
I am trying to get my account back in order how do i get it re-activated.
Mark Rader
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Just a friendly reminder: If you are a Fedora account system account
holder, and haven't changed your password and uploaded a new
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:16:58PM +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
As I look it for me for first glance.
Install or update one package scenario (yum install foo):
1) Client ask last foo package version.
2) Server calculate all dependencies by self algorithms and return in
requested form
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
You guys seem to be unable to comprehend the differences between
generated sources and generated intermediate files.
generated sources is an oxymoron.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:45:19 -0500
Mark Rader msra...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin
I am trying to get my account back in order how do i get it
re-activated.
Simply go to:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/resetpass
and reset your password and upload a new ssh public key (if you have
16.04.2012 00:51, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:16:58PM +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
As I look it for me for first glance.
Install or update one package scenario (yum install foo):
1) Client ask last foo package version.
2) Server calculate all dependencies by self algorithms
Before I generate a bug report, could I get a second opinion on whether
this is a bug or a feature?
Console logins through gdm are not getting recorded in lastlog.
(Fedora 16)
John
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #833 Clarify provenpackagers
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 02:02:31AM +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
16.04.2012 00:51, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:16:58PM +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
As I look it for me for first glance.
Install or update one package scenario (yum install foo):
1) Client ask last foo package
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML:
b2dd3c631ce17edd6b37a70872c9789c Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.18.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2d8ca496a7f1baeb1257da15c29c0be27fbf9fb5
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sun Apr 15 13:58:22 2012 +0100
Update to 0.18
- New upstream release 0.18
- CPAN RT#74317: Imported url validation from CPAN::Meta
- CPAN RT#66692: Updated license type
-
Summary of changes:
2d8ca49... Update to 0.18 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.18-1.fc17' was created pointing
to:
2d8ca49... Update to 0.18
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.18-1.fc18' was created pointing
to:
2d8ca49... Update to 0.18
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON:
a5056f68049d5aaae6d090ad53fcd21a Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3f3cc66829c789dc6b2122c20e90368016b3e439
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sun Apr 15 14:20:17 2012 +0100
Update to 0.11
- New upstream release 0.11
- CPAN RT#74317: imported url validation from CPAN::Meta
- CPAN RT#66692: updated license type
-
Summary of changes:
3f3cc66... Update to 0.11 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.11-1.fc17' was created pointing
to:
3f3cc66... Update to 0.11
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.11-1.fc18' was created pointing
to:
3f3cc66... Update to 0.11
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-RPM2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.x86_64 requires librpmio.so.2()(64bit)
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.x86_64 requires librpm.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.i686 requires librpmio.so.2
29 matches
Mail list logo
