Re: Broken dependencies: openvrml

2012-05-17 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 21:22 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El Thu, 17 May 2012 21:51:40 -0400 > Braden McDaniel escribió: > > On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 14:56 +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > > > > > openvrml has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > > > On x86_64: > > > openvrml-

Re: Another heads up for F17 upgrades from F16 (via yum)

2012-05-17 Thread Richard Vickery
TC6 won't put a boot loader in after installation. -- Richard On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Richard Vickery < richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh okay, I guess I'll try again. > > Perhaps my initial question about whether it is supposed to install makes > more sense now? > > Thanks for t

Re: Broken dependencies: openvrml

2012-05-17 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Thu, 17 May 2012 21:51:40 -0400 Braden McDaniel escribió: > On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 14:56 +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > > > openvrml has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > > On x86_64: > > openvrml-java-0.18.9-2.fc18.x86_

Laptop-mode-tools for Review Bugzilla #822730

2012-05-17 Thread Adrian Alves
Guys am looking for some one who wants to review this pkgs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822730 Spec URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/laptop-mode-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/laptop-mode-tools-1.61-2.fc16.src.rpm Regards, Adrian.- -- devel mail

Re: Broken dependencies: openvrml

2012-05-17 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 14:56 +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > openvrml has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > On x86_64: > openvrml-java-0.18.9-2.fc18.x86_64 requires java-1.6.0-openjdk(x86-64) > On i386: > openvrml-java-0.18.9-2.fc18.i686 requires java-1.6.0-openjd

Re: rawhide report: 20120517 changes

2012-05-17 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 01:53:45PM -0700, Richard Vickery wrote: > When going to install the latest f17 release candidate, it won't > install a boot-loader Please don't top-post, and this list is for developers not users. The correct list to use is the Fedora users list, but first I'd suggest tha

F17 GA to slip by one week.

2012-05-17 Thread Robyn Bergeron
At the Go/No-Go meeting today, it was decided to slip the GA of Fedora 17 by one week[1]. There are currently 4 remaining release blockers[2], necessitating the creation of RC2. Minutes follow below. GA for F17 is now scheduled for 2012-05-29. Adjustments to the schedule[3] and wiki will be c

Re: x32 abi support?

2012-05-17 Thread Ralf Ertzinger
Hi. On Thu, 17 May 2012 19:28:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote > > I was under the impression that it was to make Android work better > > on Intel. Scalable VMs are an interesting idea, but for a typical > > session how much RAM are we talking about? > > ... and also how does it compare to oth

Re: x32 abi support?

2012-05-17 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:41:06PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:28:31PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > Mhmm, so I was under the impression that x32 was mostly about increasing > > the scalability of virtualized systems. i.e. run a higher number of > > x32 container

Re: x32 abi support?

2012-05-17 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:28:31PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > Mhmm, so I was under the impression that x32 was mostly about increasing > > the scalability of virtualized systems. i.e. run a higher number of > > x32 cont

Re: [announce] yum: parallel downloading

2012-05-17 Thread elison.ni...@gmail.com
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Zdenek Pavlas wrote: > Hi, > > A new yum and urlgrabber packages have just hit Rawhide.  These releases > include some new features, including parallel downloading of packages and > metadata, and a new mirror selection code.  As we plan to include these > features

Non-GNOME version numbers -- maintainer help required!!

2012-05-17 Thread Richard Hughes
Hi! The mclazy.py script is doing a great job of building all the tarballs that come from ftp.gnome.org that adhere to the official gnome numbering scheme. This means we can build an entire gnome point update automatically in about an afternoon whereas before it used to take days of manual work. W

Re: x32 abi support?

2012-05-17 Thread Andrew Haley
On 05/17/2012 04:37 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > Tomasz Torcz writes: > >> [...] Can we get some definite numbers? > > Yeah, not enough of those going around. A quick test with systemtap, > a typical pointer/datastructure-heavy program, on same x86-64 machine, > compiled with -m64 and -m32

Re: [announce] yum: parallel downloading

2012-05-17 Thread Frank Murphy
On 17/05/12 09:33, Zdenek Pavlas wrote: So disable fastestmirror plugin before testing this, would be the way to go? The fastestmirror plugin does some initial mirror sorting. We mostly ignore this, so disabling fastestmirror makes sense but is not strictly necessary. -- Zdeněk Pavlas Traceb

Re: x32 abi support?

2012-05-17 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Tomasz Torcz writes: > [...] Can we get some definite numbers? Yeah, not enough of those going around. A quick test with systemtap, a typical pointer/datastructure-heavy program, on same x86-64 machine, compiled with -m64 and -m32, same workload. It parses /proc/self/statm. 64-bit ./stap -p

rawhide report: 20120517 changes

2012-05-17 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu May 17 08:15:03 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [389-admin] 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.

F-17 Branched report: 20120517 changes

2012-05-17 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Thu May 17 08:15:04 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [LuxRender] LuxRender-blender-0.8.0-13.fc17.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.61 [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires rubyg

Re: x32 abi support?

2012-05-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:28:29AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >> Matthew Garrett wrote: >> >> > [...] >> >So, overall, x32 is only really beneficial for embedded platforms rather >> >than general purpose ones. As Josh says, if there's

Re: Fwd: should we install google croscore font as a default font in fedora 18?

2012-05-17 Thread पराग़
Hi, On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 11:27 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: >>   Currently, I have marked google-croscore-fonts as a optional package >> in comps-f18. Considering it has got more orthography support compared >> to Liberation font can we ins

Re: [announce] yum: parallel downloading

2012-05-17 Thread Zdenek Pavlas
> So disable fastestmirror plugin before testing this, > would be the way to go? The fastestmirror plugin does some initial mirror sorting. We mostly ignore this, so disabling fastestmirror makes sense but is not strictly necessary. -- Zdeněk Pavlas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproj

Re: [announce] yum: parallel downloading

2012-05-17 Thread Zdenek Pavlas
> > Both packages are compatible with older versions. > > Can we use them in Fedora 17 too ? Yes, I've used it in F14 for some time. -- Zdeněk Pavlas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: x32 abi support?

2012-05-17 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 09:53:12AM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > I don't think this is always the case. Obviously if you run a lot of > both kinds of apps it matters, but if there are a few, small x86-64 > processes (say e.g. the xserver, or a database instance) the doubled mem > use from some

Re: Fwd: should we install google croscore font as a default font in fedora 18?

2012-05-17 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 11:27 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: > Currently, I have marked google-croscore-fonts as a optional package > in comps-f18. Considering it has got more orthography support compared > to Liberation font can we install it default? > But, I would also say that we have active deve

Re: x32 abi support?

2012-05-17 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 02:28 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > So that make me wonder if we really need to built the whole collection > > as x32 ? Or if we only wants a selection of components to be optimized > > by x32. For example does it matter to move the whole Xorg server