On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 21:22 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El Thu, 17 May 2012 21:51:40 -0400
> Braden McDaniel escribió:
> > On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 14:56 +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > >
> > > openvrml has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> > > On x86_64:
> > > openvrml-
TC6 won't put a boot loader in after installation.
--
Richard
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Richard Vickery <
richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh okay, I guess I'll try again.
>
> Perhaps my initial question about whether it is supposed to install makes
> more sense now?
>
> Thanks for t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Thu, 17 May 2012 21:51:40 -0400
Braden McDaniel escribió:
> On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 14:56 +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> >
> > openvrml has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> > On x86_64:
> > openvrml-java-0.18.9-2.fc18.x86_
Guys am looking for some one who wants to review this pkgs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822730
Spec URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/laptop-mode-tools.spec
SRPM URL:
http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/laptop-mode-tools-1.61-2.fc16.src.rpm
Regards, Adrian.-
--
devel mail
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 14:56 +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
> openvrml has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> On x86_64:
> openvrml-java-0.18.9-2.fc18.x86_64 requires java-1.6.0-openjdk(x86-64)
> On i386:
> openvrml-java-0.18.9-2.fc18.i686 requires java-1.6.0-openjd
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 01:53:45PM -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> When going to install the latest f17 release candidate, it won't
> install a boot-loader
Please don't top-post, and this list is for developers not users.
The correct list to use is the Fedora users list, but first I'd
suggest tha
At the Go/No-Go meeting today, it was decided to slip the GA of Fedora
17 by one week[1]. There are currently 4 remaining release blockers[2],
necessitating the creation of RC2. Minutes follow below.
GA for F17 is now scheduled for 2012-05-29. Adjustments to the
schedule[3] and wiki will be c
Hi.
On Thu, 17 May 2012 19:28:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote
> > I was under the impression that it was to make Android work better
> > on Intel. Scalable VMs are an interesting idea, but for a typical
> > session how much RAM are we talking about?
>
> ... and also how does it compare to oth
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:41:06PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:28:31PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Mhmm, so I was under the impression that x32 was mostly about increasing
> > the scalability of virtualized systems. i.e. run a higher number of
> > x32 container
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:28:31PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > Mhmm, so I was under the impression that x32 was mostly about increasing
> > the scalability of virtualized systems. i.e. run a higher number of
> > x32 cont
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Zdenek Pavlas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A new yum and urlgrabber packages have just hit Rawhide. These releases
> include some new features, including parallel downloading of packages and
> metadata, and a new mirror selection code. As we plan to include these
> features
Hi!
The mclazy.py script is doing a great job of building all the tarballs
that come from ftp.gnome.org that adhere to the official gnome
numbering scheme. This means we can build an entire gnome point update
automatically in about an afternoon whereas before it used to take
days of manual work. W
On 05/17/2012 04:37 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> Tomasz Torcz writes:
>
>> [...] Can we get some definite numbers?
>
> Yeah, not enough of those going around. A quick test with systemtap,
> a typical pointer/datastructure-heavy program, on same x86-64 machine,
> compiled with -m64 and -m32
On 17/05/12 09:33, Zdenek Pavlas wrote:
So disable fastestmirror plugin before testing this,
would be the way to go?
The fastestmirror plugin does some initial mirror sorting.
We mostly ignore this, so disabling fastestmirror makes sense
but is not strictly necessary.
--
Zdeněk Pavlas
Traceb
Tomasz Torcz writes:
> [...] Can we get some definite numbers?
Yeah, not enough of those going around. A quick test with systemtap,
a typical pointer/datastructure-heavy program, on same x86-64 machine,
compiled with -m64 and -m32, same workload. It parses /proc/self/statm.
64-bit
./stap -p
Compose started at Thu May 17 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.
Compose started at Thu May 17 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[LuxRender]
LuxRender-blender-0.8.0-13.fc17.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.61
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires rubyg
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:28:29AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>> Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>
>> > [...]
>> >So, overall, x32 is only really beneficial for embedded platforms rather
>> >than general purpose ones. As Josh says, if there's
Hi,
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 11:27 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
>> Currently, I have marked google-croscore-fonts as a optional package
>> in comps-f18. Considering it has got more orthography support compared
>> to Liberation font can we ins
> So disable fastestmirror plugin before testing this,
> would be the way to go?
The fastestmirror plugin does some initial mirror sorting.
We mostly ignore this, so disabling fastestmirror makes sense
but is not strictly necessary.
--
Zdeněk Pavlas
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproj
> > Both packages are compatible with older versions.
>
> Can we use them in Fedora 17 too ?
Yes, I've used it in F14 for some time.
--
Zdeněk Pavlas
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 09:53:12AM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> I don't think this is always the case. Obviously if you run a lot of
> both kinds of apps it matters, but if there are a few, small x86-64
> processes (say e.g. the xserver, or a database instance) the doubled mem
> use from some
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 11:27 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
> Currently, I have marked google-croscore-fonts as a optional package
> in comps-f18. Considering it has got more orthography support compared
> to Liberation font can we install it default?
> But, I would also say that we have active deve
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 02:28 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > So that make me wonder if we really need to built the whole collection
> > as x32 ? Or if we only wants a selection of components to be optimized
> > by x32. For example does it matter to move the whole Xorg server
24 matches
Mail list logo
