On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 21:18 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Paul Whalen pwha...@redhat.com
wrote:
Good day all,
Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status
meeting today. For those that were unable, the
On 19 July 2012 06:15, Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.comwrote:
On 07/18/2012 04:15 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Did the netkit upstream finally give up the ghost entirely? If so, it
likely
affects more packages than just ftp.
Bill
[1] seems to be dead. And I haven't found any other
On 07/19/2012 09:42 AM, Paul Black wrote:
On 19 July 2012 06:15, Jan Synacek mailto:jsyna...@redhat.comwrote:
On 07/18/2012 04:15 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Did the netkit upstream finally give up the ghost entirely? If so, it
likely
affects more packages than just ftp.
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 22:09:27 +0400, Fl@sh wrote:
The bug report is almost completely incomprehensible. I'm not
surprised the maintainer is ignoring it.
Rich.
Not too difficult for maintainer to see these lines and see
the difference in exactly four brackets ;)
This maintainer
That's still no excuse for not submitting a more comprehensible bug report
and a more readable unified diff (man diff -- diff -u …).
OK, I will correct it.
--
Fl@sh
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/18/2012 05:29 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:12:42PM +0400, Fl@sh wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831743
Maybe anyone knows how to contact the maintainer? (His mail
is not answer.)
To save everyone the trouble of opening this bug, the summary
Dear list,
The old Fedora, heavily patched OpenBSD nc package was just
obsoleted by the nmap ncat implementation, available as the
nmap-ncat subpackage. Those are mostly compatible and this
change shouldn't cause much headache but please check your
netcat dependant scripts or apps.
Related bug:
On 07/18/2012 11:37 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Andrew Haley writes:
On 07/18/2012 12:06 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
But that's not a use case. There's no way to know why you want to do
this: why you care that another process is running the exact same
executable.
Because that's the only
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:12:16PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
Dear list,
The old Fedora, heavily patched OpenBSD nc package was just
obsoleted by the nmap ncat implementation, available as the
nmap-ncat subpackage. Those are mostly compatible and this
change shouldn't cause much headache
Andrew Haley writes:
On 07/18/2012 11:37 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
How do you know that the server that gave you a seemingly verified SSL
certificate, that checks out, isn't an impostor that managed to crack the
right prime.
Because we know that to do that is at the present, time
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 07:10:18AM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
What's a special-case band-aid about it? It looks perfectly
reasonable to me. Why wouldn't you restart init?
Why would you?If there's nothing wrong with with overwriting an
executable, and, after all, that's how UNIX worked
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 07:10 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Andrew Haley writes:
On 07/18/2012 11:37 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
How do you know that the server that gave you a seemingly verified SSL
certificate, that checks out, isn't an impostor that managed to crack the
right
Hello,
This morning, I woke up to the news that a group of developers have managed
to successfully make Ubuntu's Unity Desktop work on Fedora 17[1]. What kind
of work would be needed to get these people to be able to bring their work
into the Fedora repository so that everyone can easily choose
2012/7/19 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com:
Libvirt needs to be able to run the following command
# nc -U /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock
It could use socat:
# socat stdio /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock
- Thomas
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/19/2012 12:10 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Andrew Haley writes:
On 07/18/2012 11:37 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
How do you know that the server that gave you a seemingly verified SSL
certificate, that checks out, isn't an impostor that managed to crack the
right prime.
Because we know
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:27:14PM +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote:
2012/7/19 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com:
Libvirt needs to be able to run the following command
# nc -U /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock
It could use socat:
This isn't something that can simply be fixed in libvirt in
2012/7/19 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) ngomp...@gmail.com
Hello,
This morning, I woke up to the news that a group of developers have
managed to successfully make Ubuntu's Unity Desktop work on Fedora 17[1].
What kind of work would be needed to get these people to be able to bring
their work into
commit 082f2016f5f33dfaed58ba1cc103093b7151d780
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jul 19 13:19:42 2012 +0200
Update to 2.19.2, Fixed #841133
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DBD-Pg.spec | 12
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+),
On 07/19/2012 12:29 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 07/19/2012 12:10 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Andrew Haley writes:
On 07/18/2012 11:37 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
How do you know that the server that gave you a seemingly verified SSL
certificate, that checks out, isn't an impostor that managed
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:30:35PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:27:14PM +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote:
2012/7/19 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com:
Libvirt needs to be able to run the following command
# nc -U /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock
It
Andrew Haley writes:
On 07/19/2012 12:10 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Andrew Haley writes:
On 07/18/2012 11:37 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
How do you know that the server that gave you a seemingly verified SSL
certificate, that checks out, isn't an impostor that managed to crack the
right
Tomas Mraz writes:
Actually if you normally open the /proc/pid/exe and read it, it will
give you the exact executable that was used to start the process with
the pid. That readlink will not give you path to the executable, but the
old path with '(deleted)' is very reasonable too. So what's the
Dangerous road you follow. Best of luck.
On Jul 19, 2012 11:23 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) ngomp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This morning, I woke up to the news that a group of developers have
managed to successfully make Ubuntu's Unity Desktop work on Fedora 17[1].
What kind of work would be
Hi all,
this package is required for the forthcoming Fedora audio spin. Would be
great to get this reviewed before the Spin review.
rtirq - realtime IRQ threading
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839527
regards,
Brendan
bsjones
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/19/2012 01:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
These days I think init reexecs itself during shutdown sequence
anyway,
Yes, there's a reexec or two during shutdown. After stopping the units
the usual way, systemd re-execs into a helper program
(/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-shutdown), which does
perl-Unix-Statgrab has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-13.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-13.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-Class-InsideOut has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Class-InsideOut-1.10-6.fc17.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-Class-InsideOut-1.10-6.fc17.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-eperl has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-eperl-2.2.14-19.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-eperl-2.2.14-19.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl
Hey,
I will take this.
Could you take devtodo2 or prey?
Greetings,
Patrick
Op 19 jul. 2012 14:42 schreef Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com
het volgende:
Hi all,
this package is required for the forthcoming Fedora audio spin. Would be
great to get this reviewed before the Spin review.
Hello!
2012/7/19 Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com:
Hey,
I will take this.
I'm faster than you! :)
Could you take devtodo2 or prey?
I'll take a look.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/19/2012 02:50 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello!
2012/7/19 Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com:
Hey,
I will take this.
I'm faster than you! :)
Could you take devtodo2 or prey?
I'll take a look.
Thanks Peter!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 08:14 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I'm already handling updates. Updates are a no-brainer. It's a controlled,
orderly process, and I can handle my housekeeping using the hook scripts.
There is nothing comparable that can be used with prelink.
The API for that would
On 07/19/2012 11:23 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
What kind of work would be needed to get these people to be able to
bring their work into the Fedora repository so that everyone can
easily choose to use it without breaking stuff?
From the looks of it I'm pretty sure they will need to patch
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 06:56 +0200, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 07/17/2012 10:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
gtick -- A graphical metronome software
I have added myself to this package.
ditto (as co-maint)
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 13:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Package gpsdrive (orphan)
Taken.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
n...@redhat.com nor Safety. --
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Michael J Gruber
michaeljgruber+gm...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Package qtparted (fails to build)
That one is at 0.4.5 in the repo and at 0.6.0 upstream. Maybe getting
the 0.6.0 to build is more promising?
I'm taking a shot at it. It looks like 0.5.0 is the current
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Michael J Gruber
michaeljgruber+gm...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Package qtparted (fails to build)
That one is at 0.4.5 in the repo and at 0.6.0 upstream. Maybe getting
the 0.6.0 to build is
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com said:
If what prelink is doing is perfectly fine, then there's no reason to have
the /sbin/telinit hack in /etc/cron.daily, is it? That statement, of
course, would be either true or false irrespective of what I'm doing,
which is
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Michael J Gruber
michaeljgruber+gm...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Package qtparted (fails to build)
That one is at 0.4.5 in the repo and at 0.6.0 upstream. Maybe getting
the 0.6.0 to build is more promising?
Even a svn checkout failed to build. It looks like it
Hi,
When running pungi on a F17 system with all updates applied, it seems
to work fine when I only use the F17 release repo in the config file, but
it creates uninstallable media when I also include the F17 updates repo.
Then, when booting the DVD, it times out after a long time when spawning
I see no reason to keep cmucl in the distro given where sbcl is these days.
Any objections to dropping it completely?
AG
- Original Message -
From: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: tr...@df.lth.se, radoslaw lisowski radoslaw.lisow...@gmail.com,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:49:15 +0200
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/7/19 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) ngomp...@gmail.com
This morning, I woke up to the news that a group of developers have
managed to successfully make Ubuntu's Unity Desktop work on Fedora
17[1]. What kind of work
The following three have been orphaned in pkgdb today, which makes it
possible to grab ownership:
archmage -- Extensible reader/decompiler of files in CHM format
gtick -- A graphical metronome software
python-chm -- Python package for CHM files handling
--
devel mailing list
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Jussi Lehtola
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:49:15 +0200
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/7/19 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) ngomp...@gmail.com
This morning, I woke up to the news that a group of developers have
managed
On 07/19/2012 07:01 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Lol, as if that isn't enough, looks like they ship their own version of
GCC 4.6 as well in the repo...
I don't know what Ubuntu has been doing so far, but to be fair, probably
all major Linux distros and, on a more general scope probably all OSes
2012/7/19 Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Jussi Lehtola
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:49:15 +0200
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/7/19 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) ngomp...@gmail.com
This morning, I woke up to the
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:29:13 +0200
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 07/19/2012 07:01 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Lol, as if that isn't enough, looks like they ship their own
version of GCC 4.6 as well in the repo...
I don't know what Ubuntu has been doing so far, but to be fair,
It would be better to think of this as a starting point for porting
and to work out the packaging issue instead of an enduser consumable.
Porting Unity outside of Ubuntu is not going to be easy for anyone.
There's a reason why its not in Debian yet at all.
Jeff,
The GNOME:Ayatana repo was
Hello,
No rush on this I *just* posted it and sadly I don't have a lot of
time to swap reviews. I thought I would point out that I had posted a
review for php-pecl-cairo if anyone is interested in having it in fedora
so they could review it.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel
Hello,
I tried to use fedora-review and it seems to attempt building the
package using Fedora 14?
from root.log
rootdir = /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/root/
Is that intentional? A mis-configuration on my part?
On 07/11/2012 11:23 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Dear all,
A new
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:14 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello,
I tried to use fedora-review and it seems to attempt building the
package using Fedora 14?
from root.log
rootdir = /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/root/
Is that intentional? A mis-configuration on my part?
You
Thanks Pierre,
Unfortunately there is no such file .config/fedora-review there is
however a .config/fedora-create-review.
On 07/19/2012 01:12 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:14 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello,
I tried to use fedora-review and it seems to
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:20 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Thanks Pierre,
Unfortunately there is no such file .config/fedora-review there is
however a .config/fedora-create-review.
I went a little bit too fast, the file is
~/.config/fedora-review/settings
Pierre
On 07/19/2012 01:12
On 07/19/2012 09:56 AM, Jos Vos wrote:
When running pungi on a F17 system with all updates applied, it seems
to work fine when I only use the F17 release repo in the config file, but
it creates uninstallable media when I also include the F17 updates repo.
Then, when booting the DVD, it times
On Wednesday, July 18 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Please try again now.
I did some tweaking on things and I think it should be much faster
now.
Indeed, it is faster now. As fast as gitweb, apparently.
Thanks,
--
Sergio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you ready to accept patches on GTK+ and potentially on Xorg that
were declined from upstream? This should be your initial thoughts!
Can you point me to the relevant discussion for any critical
functionality
On 07/19/2012 09:22 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:20 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Thanks Pierre,
Unfortunately there is no such file .config/fedora-review there is
however a .config/fedora-create-review.
I went a little bit too fast, the file is
2012/7/19 Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com
wrote:
Are you ready to accept patches on GTK+ and potentially on Xorg that
were declined from upstream? This should be your initial thoughts!
Can you point me to the relevant
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
I've asked Ken to provide me some additional info on this; I will mail
tomorrow or during the weekend the links to this list.
Let's get an accurate picture of what is actually left for vendor
patches before we decide
2012/7/19 Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've asked Ken to provide me some additional info on this; I will mail
tomorrow or during the weekend the links to this list.
Let's get an accurate picture of what is
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not involved in this project anyway;
If you can put me into direct contact with someone who is actively
involved I'd be more than happy to discuss a potential roadmap towards
a submittable set of packages, either
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:30:35PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:27:14PM +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote:
2012/7/19 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com:
Libvirt needs to be able to run the following command
# nc -U /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock
It
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:20:59PM +0100, Nelson Marques wrote:
+ 043_ubuntu_menu_proxy.patch ( to export menus through DBus, this
one is still used, and if I understood correctly, this is currently
the only remnant of non-upstreamed patches and I believe it was
declined by GTK+ upstream,
Chris Adams writes:
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com said:
If what prelink is doing is perfectly fine, then there's no reason to have
the /sbin/telinit hack in /etc/cron.daily, is it? That statement, of
course, would be either true or false irrespective of what I'm
On 07/20/2012 12:57 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Chris Adams writes:
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com said:
If what prelink is doing is perfectly fine, then there's no reason
to have
the /sbin/telinit hack in /etc/cron.daily, is it? That statement, of
course, would be
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com said:
No, it's not because init is not a standard daemon. prelink did not
single out init for special treatment just because of its special status.
prelink does this to every binary, not just init. It's just that the
results of
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 21:58 +0100, Nelson Marques wrote:
2012/7/19 Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've asked Ken to provide me some additional info on this; I will mail
tomorrow or during the weekend the links
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 20:29 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/19/2012 07:01 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Lol, as if that isn't enough, looks like they ship their own version of
GCC 4.6 as well in the repo...
I don't know what Ubuntu has been doing so far, but to be fair, probably
all major
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Note for the record - I'm perfectly willing to give up my maintainership
of the few packages I own from my old abortive effort to package Unity.
I have bamf, libindicator and probably one or two others I forgot about.
On 2012-07-19 15:57, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
The fact that the same consequences can occur from
upgrades, or some other unspecified events, is irrelevant, because
appropriate measures /can/ be easily put in place, to take the
appropriate action when upgrading, and most likely for whatever those
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 01:04 +0200, Brendan Jones wrote:
Can someone please kill this thread.
It's easy enough to filter it out.
Reading -devel without filtering out at least one thread per month can
cause serious damage to your mental wellbeing. Just sayin'.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839706
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837756
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840523
--- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com ---
perl-Moo-0.091014-1.fc18 is in rawhide now. Building for f16/f17 soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839742
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Rose-Object:
f29945067ab64453be3f50c70e4daf85 Rose-Object-0.859.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 82d4ea3af97095b6f58e9bb94037741f192ae0ef
Author: Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu
Date: Thu Jul 19 09:07:22 2012 -0400
Initial import (#839742).
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Rose-Object.spec | 72 +
sources |
Summary of changes:
82d4ea3... Initial import (#839742). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
82d4ea3... Initial import (#839742). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839742
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Rose-Object-0.859-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-Object-0.859-5.fc17
--
You are receiving this
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SNMP-Simple:
d5725a7279c7d3e50d6b5fe6e49d9a7a SNMP-Simple-0.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4dc8c0801f4b9d1b5e14696c1d4fd3efd00d1a3b
Author: Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com
Date: Thu Jul 19 16:26:11 2012 +0300
Initial import
.gitignore|1 +
perl-SNMP-Simple.spec | 57 +
sources |1 +
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841133
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DBD-Pg-2.19.2-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DBD-Pg-2.19.2-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841133
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DBD-Pg-2.19.2-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DBD-Pg-2.19.2-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841372
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Summary of changes:
82d4ea3... Initial import (#839742). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841133
--- Comment #3 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com ---
Fedora 18 has already contained the version 2.19.2 of DBD-Pg which contains the
fix for CVE-2012-1151.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839742
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Rose-Object-0.859-5.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-Object-0.859-5.el6
--
You are receiving
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SOAP-Lite:
a44c41291aa19c02a72cd554327b SOAP-Lite-0.715.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 867f8d5d278710c91cb972f18af721ecefeebb8d
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jul 19 17:22:49 2012 +0200
0.715 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-SOAP-Lite.spec | 14 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839742
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Rose-Object-0.859-5.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-Object-0.859-5.fc16
--
You are receiving this
Summary of changes:
ac24715... Perl 5.16 rebuild (*)
867f8d5... 0.715 bump (*)
f981a8f... Post-merge cleanup
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit f981a8fe0fd11c4b3dad89a007b4e5581507537c
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jul 19 18:00:57 2012 +0200
Post-merge cleanup
perl-SOAP-Lite.spec |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-SOAP-Lite.spec b/perl-SOAP-Lite.spec
index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832644
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832644
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Latest upstream release: 1.98.3
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.98.2
URL:
Summary of changes:
4dc8c08... Initial import (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
--- Comment #70 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Latest upstream release: 3.11
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 3.10
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mojolicious/
Please consult the package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839742
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841133
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
