Re: Mate-Desktop

2012-08-28 Thread Adam Williamson

On 2012-08-27 22:08, Michael Scherer wrote:

Le lundi 27 août 2012 à 17:48 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :

On 2012-08-24 13:49, Rave it wrote:
 Rex Dieter wrote:

 I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had 
trouble

 communicating and working together.

 I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, 
and

 in
 your future endeavors.

 -- rex

 No mercy, no thanks.

 Why do you Mr. Rex Dieter as sponsor accept rude speaking,  and
 racist
 remarks from Dan Marchal?

 'Portuguese n00b'
 https://github.com/mate-desktop/mate-doc-utils/issues/3

That thread contains no instance of Dan calling you a Portuguese 
n00b.
It contains only an instance of you accusing Dan of having called 
you a

Portuguese n00b, 'if [you] recall correctly'.

(I draw no conclusions from this, I only state a fact.)


Just stating facts as well, that's slightly wrong.
Wolfgang aka raveit use the login niceandgently on github.


Ah, thanks. It seemed from the context that rave it was claiming to be 
the person in the thread, so I foolishly didn't check that was actually 
the case. Still, if he wasn't involved in that thread at all, I'm not 
sure why he'd quote it in support of an assertion that someone insulted 
him...



The one who accuse Dan mashal of calling him portuguese noob is
ketheriel, aka Nelson Marques, on 23-07-2012.

He also reuse the expression on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149#c5 on 14-07-2012

And he asked to have his account 1 month ago :
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3399 , on
25-07-2012.

The same day, he also posted that about the issue :

https://github.com/mate-desktop/mate-desktop/issues/18#issuecomment-7251595
So he didn't seemed to have got over it (yet) at this moment.


I hadn't looked at any other posts, just the one that was directly 
cited in the thread. Good job on the additional data.


--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: 3 day minimum in updates-testing for F18?

2012-08-28 Thread Vít Ondruch

Dne 28.8.2012 00:37, Jerry James napsal(a):

Bodhi seems to be enforcing 7 days in updates-testing for F18.  Are we
going to switch to the 3 day minimum described in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Pre_Beta?


We are in Alpha Freeze now [1, 2], so your update will spend in Bodhi 
even longer.



Vit


[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Alpha_Freeze_Policy
[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Mass changes to packaging

2012-08-28 Thread Miloslav Trmač
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
 On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:11:39 -0400
 Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
 This is the problem: In F18+, systemd now uses a system-wide policy
 (which can be overridden) to define what services are enabled, it is
 no longer hardcoded into each package's scriptlets. This is the
 feature that FESCo approved. You might not agree with it, but simply
 ignoring it is inappropriate.

 He's not ignoring it, he's saying that on F18+, the expansion of
 %systemd_post_enable should be exactly the same as the expansion of
 %systemd_post, i.e. not enabled by default and honoring whatever
 presets are set for the spin.

 This approach allows for spec files to be synced between all Fedora
 branches and generate the appropriate scriptlets for each release when
 built.

This optimizes the migration path at the cost of making the final
state ugly; I'm not sure that is a good bargain.

After all, the F17 and F18 spec files will do _different_ things.  I
don't think it's unreasonable that the spec files themselves will be
different - yes, that may be less convenient than having the same spec
file for all branches, but allowing for the possibility for
differences if why we have the branches in the first place.
Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Mass changes to packaging

2012-08-28 Thread Simone Caronni
On 28 August 2012 09:39, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:

 After all, the F17 and F18 spec files will do _different_ things.  I
 don't think it's unreasonable that the spec files themselves will be
 different - yes, that may be less convenient than having the same spec
 file for all branches, but allowing for the possibility for
 differences if why we have the branches in the first place.


I have the opposite feeling, having a single spec file for all the releases
would be a *huge* benefit (at least for me) for all the things that can be
updated in all releases.
All the packages I mantain have %ifs defined for RHEL/CentOS variants and
Fedora ones so they can be rebuilt everywhere and at least for the bacula
part the rebuilt packages are used a lot [1]. This also helps fixing stuff
once for all supported releases.

This has led to a super-long list of %post sections for a single spec file;
which is ok considering the SysV and systemd differences:

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bacula.git/tree/bacula.spec

Adding another variant for f18+ can be done, but I would prefer into
avoiding this.

Thanks,
--Simone

[1] http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/README.txt

-- 
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of
the shore (R. W. Emerson).
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Mass changes to packaging

2012-08-28 Thread Scott Schmit
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:39:32AM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
  He's not ignoring it, he's saying that on F18+, the expansion of
  %systemd_post_enable should be exactly the same as the expansion of
  %systemd_post, i.e. not enabled by default and honoring whatever
  presets are set for the spin.
 
  This approach allows for spec files to be synced between all Fedora
  branches and generate the appropriate scriptlets for each release when
  built.
 
 This optimizes the migration path at the cost of making the final
 state ugly; I'm not sure that is a good bargain.

Once F20 rolls out and F17 goes EOL, maintainers can simply
s/systemd_post_enable/systemd_post/ and then things won't be so ugly (or
final).

-- 
Scott Schmit


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Mate-Desktop

2012-08-28 Thread Matthias Runge
On 28/08/12 07:08, Michael Scherer wrote:

 
 Just stating facts as well, that's slightly wrong.
 Wolfgang aka raveit use the login niceandgently on github.
 
 The one who accuse Dan mashal of calling him portuguese noob is
 ketheriel, aka Nelson Marques, on 23-07-2012.
 
 He also reuse the expression on
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149#c5 on 14-07-2012
 
 And he asked to have his account 1 month ago :
 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3399 , on
 25-07-2012.
 
 The same day, he also posted that about the issue :
 https://github.com/mate-desktop/mate-desktop/issues/18#issuecomment-7251595
 So he didn't seemed to have got over it (yet) at this moment.
 
That's a good conclusion on this topic.

For enhancement:
Nelson Marques has been fedora contributor for about 2 weeks (and I have
been his sponsor). He felt assaulted and left frustrated, orphaning all
his packages, stopping further contributions.

Sadly, I have been on vacation then, so I had no chance to assist him in
any way.

I see an analogy between this case and Wolfgang aka raveit. Both of them
didn't want to take this into light to sort these issues out.

Since, Dan is the feature owner of
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MATE-Desktop

I think, he should take care not to scare every reviewer and contributor
away; many people left the reviews unfinished an unassigned them from
the tickets.
-- 
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
   mru...@fedoraproject.org
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Self Introduction

2012-08-28 Thread Sebastian Dyroff

Hey,

My name is Sebastian Dyroff. I am from Germany, Berlin. I've just 
finished my studies of computer science.


I am a Linux user for a decade  or so and tried a lot of different 
Distros. For a long time I used gentoo (don't know if it is a good idea 
to tell here:-) ), but switched to Fedora a while ago.


I really would like to see wiki2beamer (Bug 851891) included in fedora, 
an thought i should try to build a rpm for the package. It converts 
wiki-like syntax to latex beamer syntax and is written in python.
Currently I need to get some feedback, to get the spec-file meet the 
fedora standards.


I also built a rpm for lprof (Bug 851641), a colour management profiler, 
but upstream seems dead and there are some problems that might prevent 
that the package will be part of Fedora. But if someone wants that 
package included and is willing to help me fixing the issues or at least 
points me in the right direction I would continue to work on this.




Best regards

Sebastian Dyroff
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide report: 20120825 changes

2012-08-28 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 17:39 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
 On 8/27/12 5:38 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
  On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:27 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
 
  That said it's probably less work to grab a copy of pango-1.30.1 and
  just build compat-pangox from that.
 
  I would prefer if we could get a snapshot with the 2 1/2 year old
  gtkglext change built that removed the pangox dependency. We're talking
  about API that has been deprecated for three quarters of a decade...

Behdad was so nice to quickly put up a pangox-compat module here: 

http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/pangox-compat/0.0/

Do we have a volunteer for packaging that ?
I expect this to be a 'package and forget' operation...

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide report: 20120825 changes

2012-08-28 Thread पराग़
Hi,

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
 On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 17:39 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
 On 8/27/12 5:38 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
  On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:27 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
 
  That said it's probably less work to grab a copy of pango-1.30.1 and
  just build compat-pangox from that.
 
  I would prefer if we could get a snapshot with the 2 1/2 year old
  gtkglext change built that removed the pangox dependency. We're talking
  about API that has been deprecated for three quarters of a decade...

 Behdad was so nice to quickly put up a pangox-compat module here:

 http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/pangox-compat/0.0/

 Do we have a volunteer for packaging that ?
 I expect this to be a 'package and forget' operation...

Packaged this at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852416.
Can someone help with its review?

Thanks,
Parag.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Packaging software compatible with only one Fedora release

2012-08-28 Thread Nicolas Mailhot

Le Mar 28 août 2012 03:12, Adam Williamson a écrit :
 On 2012-08-25 22:52, M.M. wrote:

 Or is it better to add an explicit Requires (for e.g. GNOME Shell
 3.4.x) to the Spec files? In such case, is something like Requires:
 gnome-shell=3.4.* allowed to specify all sub-releases belonging to
 the 3.4 branch?

 You can't use wildcards like this, but I wonder if you could do this:

 Requires: gnome-shell = 3.3
 Requires: gnome-shell  3.5

 I've never actually tried that, but it might work. If it doesn't,
 someone tell me, cos I'd like to know =)

This only works as long as there is a single package providing gnome-shell
in the repo, as soon as someone releases a compat package this will fail
big time. The reqs are evaluated separately, so rpm thinks a system with
something providing gnome-shell 3.2 + something else providing gnome-shell
3.6 will work with your package.

In rpm, to restrict a version range on both ends, you need to combine
requires with conflicts (requires A = x, conflicts A = y). There is no
way to specify a range not open to infinity on one end as an atomic
requirement (it's an annoying limitation, but the positive side-effect is
that it forced people to give up on strict version locking and packages
upgrade by default).

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Could not execute scratch_build: database outage

2012-08-28 Thread Neal Becker
I assume this is a known (and temporary problem):

fedpkg scratch-build
Could not execute scratch_build: database outage

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Could not execute scratch_build: database outage

2012-08-28 Thread Seth Vidal




On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Neal Becker wrote:


I assume this is a known (and temporary problem):

fedpkg scratch-build
Could not execute scratch_build: database outage



yep - it is coming back in just a tick
-sv

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Could not execute scratch_build: database outage

2012-08-28 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:



 On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Neal Becker wrote:

 I assume this is a known (and temporary problem):

 fedpkg scratch-build
 Could not execute scratch_build: database outage


 yep - it is coming back in just a tick

It's back.

-J

 -sv

 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/

in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Mass changes to packaging

2012-08-28 Thread Tom Lane
Scott Schmit i.g...@comcast.net writes:
 On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:39:32AM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
 This optimizes the migration path at the cost of making the final
 state ugly; I'm not sure that is a good bargain.

 Once F20 rolls out and F17 goes EOL, maintainers can simply
 s/systemd_post_enable/systemd_post/ and then things won't be so ugly (or
 final).

I remain of the opinion that it's not a good idea to remove all trace
of the per-package enable decisions from the packages themselves.
*If* we get to F20 without realizing that we'd like the packages to
specify the defaults, then we can remove the redundant macro
definitions.  In the meantime, people who are arguing against this
seem to be entirely too confident that the current design is perfect.

regards, tom lane
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Bug 852190] Perl WWW::Curl fails to install - yaml_process_error

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852190

Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Last Closed||2012-08-28 10:32:12

--- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
I can't reproduce this.
By the way, do you have a reason not to use the Fedora package?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

self introduction

2012-08-28 Thread Olivier Bilodeau
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I'm a Perl developer / sys-admin working for the PacketFence[1] open
source project which has strong RHEL roots.

A few months ago I've switched to Fedora as my desktop and I'm trying
to upstream some of our own packages to improve their quality and so
that everyone can benefit from having easy access to them.

I have one package looking for a sponsor:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851721

Also I plan on updating the asciidoc package and do whatever is in my
way to ease PacketFence's integration into Fedora and RHEL with the
ultimate goal of `yum install packetfence`.

Finally I'm also a spare time FLOSS android developer working on
Tomdroid[2] and several other little perl projects[3] plus a father of
two.

Cheers!
[1]: http://www.packetfence.org
[2]: http://launchpad.net/tomdroid
[3]: https://github.com/obilodeau
- -- 
Olivier Bilodeau oliv...@bottomlesspit.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlA82cIACgkQV0xCmE0A0fBDmgCeO4fiOvYCIm7WpRyYEbOjVCug
aFsAoL0bCrYv8WpysMuKhaEnFf6mNurJ
=GALa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: SKS 1.1.0
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AAD/2wBDAAgGBgcGBQgHBwcJCQgKDBQNDAsLDBkSEw8UHRofHh0aHBwgJC4nICIsIxwcKDcp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Re: Re: Mate-Desktop

2012-08-28 Thread Stefano Karapetsas

Rex Dieter wrote:

I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
communicating and working together.

I don't accept it.  Dan reacting poorly is a given, and something he 
(and I

with him) are working on.

I personally don't feel it helps taking your greivances public, as 
now Dan's
perception of you (and now potentially others) will be colored as 
hostile.


Hi,
I'm one of MATE Desktop upstream developers. I'm sorry for my intrusion 
here, but I feel the need to write my opinion in this thread. We already 
worked with a lot of distros maintainers and always worked happily with 
them. We got problems with Dan only. He already insulted a lot of 
developers, maintainers and reviewers. He dont know how to work with 
other people, and specifically with free and open source projects 
upstream authors. If he has issues, he demands a solution from upstream 
devs without trying to help in any way, and if he dont receive answers, 
he start to insult.
I'm really worried if he can maintain MATE desktop packages with his 
way to cooperate with other people and upstream maintainers.


Cheers,
Stefano Karapetsas

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide report: 20120825 changes

2012-08-28 Thread पराग़
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Parag N(पराग़) panem...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
 On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 17:39 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
 On 8/27/12 5:38 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
  On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:27 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
 
  That said it's probably less work to grab a copy of pango-1.30.1 and
  just build compat-pangox from that.
 
  I would prefer if we could get a snapshot with the 2 1/2 year old
  gtkglext change built that removed the pangox dependency. We're talking
  about API that has been deprecated for three quarters of a decade...

 Behdad was so nice to quickly put up a pangox-compat module here:

 http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/pangox-compat/0.0/

 Do we have a volunteer for packaging that ?
 I expect this to be a 'package and forget' operation...

 Packaged this at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852416.
 Can someone help with its review?


pangox-compat package is now built in f19 and for f18, update
submitted to f18-testing.

Thanks,
Parag.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: F17: DirectFB

2012-08-28 Thread Gerry Reno
On 08/27/2012 10:59 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:

 Hi Gerry,

 Try contacting the main dev. mailing-list of DirectFB. I'm sure you'll get an 
 answer there.

 Btw, DirectFB-1.5.3 is rather old, DirectFB-1.6.1 is rather the latest stable 
 release.

 -Ilyes



Thanks Ilyes.

I'll try posting over on the directfb dev list.


Gerry

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [389-devel] Please review: various mem leaks and coverity errors

2012-08-28 Thread Nathan Kinder

ack.

On 08/27/2012 01:44 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:




--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel


--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: Re: Mate-Desktop: please moderate

2012-08-28 Thread Rex Dieter
Stefano Karapetsas wrote:

 Rex Dieter wrote:

 I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
 communicating and working together.

 I don't accept it.  Dan reacting poorly is a given, and something he
 (and I
 with him) are working on.

 I personally don't feel it helps taking your greivances public, as
 now Dan's
 perception of you (and now potentially others) will be colored as
 hostile.
 
 Hi,
 I'm one of MATE Desktop upstream developers. I'm sorry for my intrusion
 here, but I feel the need to write my opinion in this thread. We already
 worked with a lot of distros maintainers and always worked happily with
 them. We got problems with Dan only. He already insulted a lot of
 developers, maintainers and reviewers. He dont know how to work with
 other people, and specifically with free and open source projects
 upstream authors. If he has issues, he demands a solution from upstream
 devs without trying to help in any way, and if he dont receive answers,
 he start to insult.
 I'm really worried if he can maintain MATE desktop packages with his
 way to cooperate with other people and upstream maintainers.

Ok, thanks for your input, really.

However, I'm of the opinion firmly now that this has gone on long enough to 
be harmful and non-constructive for everyone involved.  Can this thread be 
moderated please?

I humbly ask anyone who wishes to take this further to contact the community 
working group
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Community_working_group#Contact
(or me, and I'd be happy to do it for you).
being mindful of:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

-- rex


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Test-Announce] 2012-08-29 @ 16:00 UTC - F18 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #5

2012-08-28 Thread Tim Flink
# F18 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #5
# Date: 2012-08-29
# Time: 16:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net

Note: This is the new time for regular blocker review meetings

We'll be running through the alpha blockers and nice-to-haves. The
current list of blocker bugs is available at:
  http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current

We'll be reviewing the bugs to determine ...

1. Whether they meet the Alpha release criteria [1] and should stay
 on the list
2. Whether they are getting the attention they need

[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Alpha_Release_Criteria

For guidance on Blocker and Nice-to-have (NTH) bugs, please refer to
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_nth_bug_process 

For the blocker review meeting protocol, see
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: 3 day minimum in updates-testing for F18?

2012-08-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:37:27 -0600
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:

 Bodhi seems to be enforcing 7 days in updates-testing for F18.  Are we
 going to switch to the 3 day minimum described in
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Pre_Beta?

It's set that way in it's config, but bodhi isn't honoring it for some
reason. :( Will investigate. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

guile-2.x: what is the way forward

2012-08-28 Thread Debarshi Ray
The update to guile-2.x has been blocked for almost 1.5 years now:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238

Long story short, existing programs are not ready to use guile-2.x, while newer
versions of aiselriot (part of GNOME) need it. Creating a compat-guile or a
guile2 package can be one way forward.

What do you think? Would be good to get this resolved finally.

Thanks,
Debarshi


-- 
If you break down the amazement with some simple rules it's only
disappointment which is underneath.  -- Vivek Shah


pgpHP2Jlp7XSE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: guile-2.x: what is the way forward

2012-08-28 Thread Rex Dieter
Debarshi Ray wrote:

 The update to guile-2.x has been blocked for almost 1.5 years now:
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238
 
 Long story short, existing programs are not ready to use guile-2.x, while
 newer versions of aiselriot (part of GNOME) need it. Creating a
 compat-guile or a guile2 package can be one way forward.

if these can be made parallel-installable, that's the way to go. 

As it appears the old one isn't going away any time soon, my opinion is to 
package the new one as guile2.  If that assumption about the expected 
lifetime of guile(1) is false, then compat-guile.

-- rex

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Rawhide boot problems

2012-08-28 Thread Jerry James
I've got two Rawhide VMs, one x86_64, one i686, both otherwise
identical.  I last booted them yesterday and did a yum repo-sync.
Today, neither of them will boot.

First, systemd complained about being unable to find
systemd-journal-flush.service.  Sure enough, it wasn't in the
initramfs.  So I added
$systemdsystemunitdir/systemd-journal-flush.service to
/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/98systemd/module-setup.sh, and regenerated
the initramfs.  Now the boot gets past that point, but starts doing
this over and over, apparently forever, even in emergency mode:

[  OK  ] Reached target Basic System.
[ 5.337054] systemd-journald[722]: Received SIGUSR1
[ 5.364465] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [817] did not accept message -1
(Connection refused), kill it
[ 5.372587] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [821] did not accept message -1
(Connection refused), kill it
[ 5.373956] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [823] did not accept message -1
(Connection refused), kill it
[ 5.375104] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [824] did not accept message -1
(Connection refused), kill it
[ 5.376358] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [826] did not accept message -1
(Connection refused), kill it
[ 5.377670] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [829] did not accept message -1
(Connection refused), kill it
[ 5.378890] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [831] did not accept message -1
(Connection refused), kill it
[ 5.380187] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [834] did not accept message -1
(Connection refused), kill it
[ 5.381802] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [837] did not accept message -1
(Connection refused), kill it
[ 5.383105] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [838] did not accept message -1
(Connection refused), kill it
[ 5.386671] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [786] did not accept message -1
(Connection refused), kill it
[ 35.340097] systemd-journald[722]: Received SIGTERM
[ 35.356677] systemd[1]: Running in intial RAM disk.

Welcome to Fedora 19 (Rawhide) dracut-023-2.fc18 (Initramfs)!

 Starting Journal Service...
 Starting Dracut cmdline hook...
[  OK  ] Reached target Sockets.
[  OK  ] Listening on udev Kernel Socket.
[  OK  ] Listening on udev Control Socket.
[  OK  ] Reached target Encrypted Volumes.
 Starting Setup Virtual Console...
[  OK  ] Reached target Swap.
[  OK  ] Reached target Local File Systems.
 Starting Tell Plymouth To Write Out Runtime Data...
[ 35.531873] systemd[1]: systemd-journald.service holdoff time over,
scheduling restart.
[  OK  ] Started Tell Plymouth To Write Out Runtime Data.
[  OK  ] Stopped Trigger Flushing of Journal to Persistent Storage.
 Stopping Journal Service...
[  OK  ] Stopped Journal Service.
 Starting Journal Service...
[  OK  ] Started Journal Service.
 Starting Trigger Flushing of Journal to Persistent Storage...
[ 35.884485] systemd-journald[881]: Fixed max_use=48.9M max_size=6.1M
min_size=64.0K keep_free=24.4M
[ 35.895630] systemd-journald[881]: Vacuuming...
[  OK  ] Started Trigger Flushing of Journal to Persistent Storage.
[ 35.945177] systemd-journald[881]: Received SIGUSR1
[  OK  ] Started Setup Virtual Console.
[  OK  ] Reached target System Initialization.
dracut-cmdline[885]: Warning: Option 'KEYTABLE' is deprecated, use
'KEYMAP' instead.
dracut-cmdline[885]: Warning: Option 'SYSFONT' is deprecated, use
'FONT' instead.
[  OK  ] Started Dracut cmdline hook.
 Starting Dracut pre-udev hook...
[  OK  ] Started Dracut pre-udev hook.
 Starting udev Kernel Device Manager...
[ 36.107496] system-udevd[948]: starting version 188
[  OK  ] Started udev Kernel Device Manager.
 Starting Dracut pre-trigger hook...
[  OK  ] Reached target Basic System.
[ 36.691716] systemd-journald[881]: Received SIGUSR1
...

Does anybody recognize the problem?
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Rawhide boot problems

2012-08-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:43:14 -0600
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:

 I've got two Rawhide VMs, one x86_64, one i686, both otherwise
 identical.  I last booted them yesterday and did a yum repo-sync.
 Today, neither of them will boot.

...snip...

 
 Does anybody recognize the problem?

Yes. 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847418

downgrade to: 

systemd-188-3.fc18 

(NOTE: NOT fc19)

then rebuild your initramfs with dracut

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Rawhide boot problems

2012-08-28 Thread Jerry James
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
 Yes.

 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847418

 downgrade to:

 systemd-188-3.fc18

 (NOTE: NOT fc19)

 then rebuild your initramfs with dracut

Thank you, Kevin!  I was hunting through dracut bugs looking for this,
instead of systemd bugs
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

anybody working on smuxi?

2012-08-28 Thread Adrian Alves
hello guy I want to build smuxi irc client for fedora but just wondering
first if anybody is working on it?

http://www.smuxi.org/page/About

Let me know asap

Regards, Adrian.-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

i18n translation contact

2012-08-28 Thread Dave Young
Hi,

I'm working on the Fedora/Rhel7 firstboot module, and I have some
changes to the firstboot module pot files. I wonder who I should cantact
for these translating things which are visible to end user.

Any help will be appreciated.

Thanks a lot
Dave
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: i18n translation contact

2012-08-28 Thread पराग़
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Dave Young dyo...@redhat.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I'm working on the Fedora/Rhel7 firstboot module, and I have some
 changes to the firstboot module pot files. I wonder who I should cantact
 for these translating things which are visible to end user.

 For translation related issues contact to l10n people on
tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org list. More can be read at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N

Thanks,
Parag.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: i18n translation contact

2012-08-28 Thread Dave Young
On 08/29/2012 10:54 AM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:

  For translation related issues contact to l10n people on
 tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org list. More can be read at
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N


Thanks very much, will contact i10n list

 
 Thanks,
 Parag.


-- 
Thanks
Dave
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: i18n translation contact

2012-08-28 Thread Domingo Becker
2012/8/28 Dave Young dyo...@redhat.com:
 On 08/29/2012 10:54 AM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:

  For translation related issues contact to l10n people on
 tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org list. More can be read at
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N


 Thanks very much, will contact i10n list


There is a firstboot project in Fedora's Transifex instance [1].

Would you please claim maintanership or comaintanership of that
project and upload the latest pot file?

I would be more than happy to translate it to Spanish and help you
with the pot upload.

[1] https://fedora.transifex.com/projects/p/firstboot/

thank you and kind regards

Domingo Becker
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: guile-2.x: what is the way forward

2012-08-28 Thread Jan Synacek
On 08/28/2012 08:17 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
 The update to guile-2.x has been blocked for almost 1.5 years now:
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238
 
 Long story short, existing programs are not ready to use guile-2.x, while 
 newer
 versions of aiselriot (part of GNOME) need it. Creating a compat-guile or a
 guile2 package can be one way forward.
 
 What do you think? Would be good to get this resolved finally.
 
 Thanks,
 Debarshi
 

I've been trying to patch some of the apps to compile with guile-2.x some time
ago. Some of them compile, some of them even run.. With my limited knowledge of
the guile API, I haven't finished all of them though. The good thing is that the
upstream is very active and very willing to help.

I think that installing both versions in parallel (if possible) is a good way to
go, but then the old programs won't ever get patched:) IMO the best way would be
some kind of a compatibility layer in guile itself, but I don't think that's
worth the trouble and the net gain for the upstream.

-- 
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[perl-WWW-RobotRules] Specify all dependencies

2012-08-28 Thread Jitka Plesnikova
commit 624bb76ca9590baac70a5c3f07ddb685575fdf8d
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date:   Mon Aug 27 17:05:43 2012 +0200

Specify all dependencies

 perl-WWW-RobotRules.spec |   10 +++---
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-WWW-RobotRules.spec b/perl-WWW-RobotRules.spec
index df81fcf..426a314 100644
--- a/perl-WWW-RobotRules.spec
+++ b/perl-WWW-RobotRules.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-WWW-RobotRules
 Version:6.02
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:4%{?dist}
 Summary:Database of robots.txt-derived permissions
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -8,12 +8,13 @@ URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/WWW-RobotRules/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/WWW-RobotRules-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildArch:  noarch
 BuildRequires:  perl(AnyDBM_File)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Fcntl)
+BuildRequires:  perl(LWP::RobotUA)
 BuildRequires:  perl(URI) = 1.10
+BuildRequires:  perl(URI::URL)
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
-Requires:   perl(AnyDBM_File)
-Requires:   perl(Fcntl)
 Requires:   perl(URI) = 1.10
 Conflicts:  perl-libwww-perl  6
 
@@ -50,6 +51,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Aug 27 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 6.02-4
+- Specify all dependencies.
+
 * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 6.02-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 851873] perl-Dancer-1.3100 is available

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851873

--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 847657] perl-Dancer-1.3099 is available

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847657

--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-version] Specify all dependencies

2012-08-28 Thread Jitka Plesnikova
commit 892a95bf1145ab1839b3603a3edd8ae21bc3b46b
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date:   Tue Aug 28 09:28:13 2012 +0200

Specify all dependencies

 perl-version.spec |8 ++--
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-version.spec b/perl-version.spec
index 52d596d..e9d0589 100644
--- a/perl-version.spec
+++ b/perl-version.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Name:   perl-version
 Epoch:  3
 Version:0.99
-Release:240%{?dist}
+Release:241%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl extension for Version Objects
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(File::Temp) = 0.13
 # IO::Handle is optional
 BuildRequires:  perl(lib)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) = 0.45
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Harness)
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
 
 %{?perl_default_filter}
@@ -48,7 +49,6 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} \; 
2/dev/null
 make test
 
 %files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
 %doc Changes README
 %doc %{perl_vendorarch}/version.pod
 %dir %{perl_vendorarch}/version/
@@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/version::Internals.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Aug 28 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 3:0.99-241
+- Add test BR perl(Test::Harness)
+- Remove %%defattr
+
 * Fri Aug 17 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 3:0.99-240
 - Increase release to replace perl sub-package (bug #848961)
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive:

381704c10802bbbf13e8e99d7ddccfbe  Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive] Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 12e02c51fed6c88e8ee2ce0f7f4241cd23ee98fe
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Tue Aug 28 08:57:43 2012 +0100

Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)

Sub::Exporter is an incredibly powerful module, but with that power comes
great responsibility, er- as well as some runtime penalties. This module is 
a
Sub::Exporter wrapper that will let your users just use Exporter if all they
are doing is picking exports, but use Sub::Exporter if your users try to use
Sub::Exporter's more advanced features features, like renaming exports, if
they try to use them.

Note that this module will export @EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK package variables 
for
Exporter to work. Additionally, if your package uses advanced Sub::Exporter
features like currying, this module will only ever use Sub::Exporter, so you
might as well use it directly.

 .gitignore |1 +
 ...orter-Progressive-0.001006-old-Test::More.patch |   94 +++
 perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive.spec |   99 
 sources|1 +
 4 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..d1af355 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/Sub-Exporter-Progressive-[0-9.]*.tar.gz
diff --git a/Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-old-Test::More.patch 
b/Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-old-Test::More.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..1b88196
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-old-Test::More.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+--- Makefile.PL
 Makefile.PL
+@@ -10,6 +10,6 @@ WriteMakefile(
+   NAME = 'Sub-Exporter-Progressive',
+   VERSION_FROM = 'lib/Sub/Exporter/Progressive.pm',
+   $key = {
+-  'Test::More' = 0.89,
++  'Test::More' = 0.47,
+   }
+ );
+--- t/all.t
 t/all.t
+@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
+ use strict;
+ use warnings;
+ 
+-use Test::More 0.89;
++use Test::More tests = 6;
+ use List::Util 'first';
+ use lib 't/lib';
+ use A::JunkAll;
+@@ -10,5 +10,3 @@ use A::JunkAll;
+ ok(main-can('junk1'), 'sub exported');
+ ok(main-can('junk2'), 'sub exported');
+ ok(! $INC{'Sub/Exporter.pm'}, 'Sub::Exporter not loaded');
+-
+-done_testing;
+--- t/basic.t
 t/basic.t
+@@ -2,12 +2,10 @@
+ use strict;
+ use warnings;
+ 
+-use Test::More 0.89;
++use Test::More tests = 2;
+ use List::Util 'first';
+ use lib 't/lib';
+ use A::Junk 'junk1';
+ 
+ ok(main-can('junk1'), 'requested sub exported');
+ ok(! $INC{'Sub/Exporter.pm'}, 'Sub::Exporter not loaded');
+-
+-done_testing;
+--- t/default.t
 t/default.t
+@@ -2,12 +2,10 @@
+ use strict;
+ use warnings;
+ 
+-use Test::More 0.89;
++use Test::More tests = 2;
+ use List::Util 'first';
+ use lib 't/lib';
+ use A::Junk;
+ 
+ ok(main-can('junk2'), 'sub exported');
+ ok(! $INC{'Sub/Exporter.pm'}, 'Sub::Exporter not loaded');
+-
+-done_testing;
+--- t/sex.t
 t/sex.t
+@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
+ use strict;
+ use warnings;
+ 
+-use Test::More 0.89;
++use Test::More tests = 2;
+ BEGIN {
+ plan skip_all = 'Sub::Exporter not installed'
+ unless eval { require Sub::Exporter };
+@@ -14,5 +14,3 @@ use A::Junk 'junk1' = { -as = 'junk' }
+ 
+ ok(main-can('junk'), 'sub renamed with Sub::Exporter');
+ ok($INC{'Sub/Exporter.pm'}, 'Sub::Exporter loaded');
+-
+-done_testing;
+--- t/tags.t
 t/tags.t
+@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
+ use strict;
+ use warnings;
+ 
+-use Test::More 0.89;
++use Test::More tests = 4;
+ use List::Util 'first';
+ use lib 't/lib';
+ use A::Junk ':other';
+@@ -10,6 +10,3 @@ ok(!main-can('junk1'), 'junk1 not expor
+ ok(!main-can('junk2'), 'junk2 not exported');
+ ok(main-can('junk3'), 'junk3 exported');
+ ok(! $INC{'Sub/Exporter.pm'}, 'Sub::Exporter not loaded');
+-
+-done_testing;
+-
diff --git a/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive.spec 
b/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive.spec
new file mode 100644
index 000..6ea2d03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive.spec
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+# We need to patch the test suite if we have old versions of Test::More
+%global old_test_more %(perl -MTest::More -e 'print (($Test::More::VERSION  
0.88) ? 1 : 0);' 2/dev/null || echo 0)
+
+Name:  perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive
+Version:   0.001006
+Release:   1%{?dist}
+Summary:   Only use Sub::Exporter if you need it
+Group: Development/Libraries
+License:   GPL+ or Artistic
+URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sub-Exporter-Progressive/
+Source0:   
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/L/LE/LEONT/Sub-Exporter-Progressive-%{version}.tar.gz
+Patch1:Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-old-Test::More.patch
+BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
+BuildArch: noarch
+# === Module Build ==
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+# === Module Runtime 
+BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
+BuildRequires: perl(List::Util)

[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive/f18] Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive/f17] Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive/f16] Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-URI] Specify all dependencies

2012-08-28 Thread Jitka Plesnikova
commit 9bf0afbc1aa61a8259b634fd327d719f38dd2478
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date:   Tue Aug 28 10:36:39 2012 +0200

Specify all dependencies

 perl-URI.spec |   15 ++-
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-URI.spec b/perl-URI.spec
index f26087e..1ed3dc4 100644
--- a/perl-URI.spec
+++ b/perl-URI.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-URI
 Version:1.60
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
 Summary:A Perl module implementing URI parsing and manipulation
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -9,15 +9,25 @@ Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/URI-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildArch:  noarch
 BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
 BuildRequires:  perl(constant)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Cwd)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Data::Dumper)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Encode)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Exporter)
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires:  perl(File::Spec::Functions)
 BuildRequires:  perl(MIME::Base64)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Net::Domain)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Storable)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
 # Business::ISBN - Test::Pod - Pod::Simple - HTML::Entities (HTML::Parser) 
- URI
 %if 0%{!?perl_bootstrap:1}
 BuildRequires:  perl(Business::ISBN)
 %endif
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
+Requires:   perl(Cwd)
+Requires:   perl(Data::Dumper)
+Requires:   perl(Net::Domain)
 
 %description
 This module implements the URI class. Objects of this class represent
@@ -57,6 +67,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/URI::ldap.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Aug 28 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.60-5
+- Specify all dependencies
+
 * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 1.60-4
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive/el6] Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive/el5] Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive] Created tag perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el5

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el5' was created 
pointing to:

 12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive] Created tag perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el6

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el6' was created 
pointing to:

 12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive] Created tag perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc16

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc16' was created 
pointing to:

 12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive] Created tag perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc18

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc18' was created 
pointing to:

 12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive] Created tag perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc19

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc19' was created 
pointing to:

 12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 845057] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive - Only use Sub::Exporter if you need it

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el6 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 845057] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive - Only use Sub::Exporter if you need it

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc16

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 845057] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive - Only use Sub::Exporter if you need it

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el5 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 845057] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive - Only use Sub::Exporter if you need it

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 845057] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive - Only use Sub::Exporter if you need it

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc17

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 852349] New: perl-CPAN-Mini-1.111009 is available

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852349

Bug ID: 852349
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
  Severity: unspecified
   Version: rawhide
  Priority: unspecified
CC: mmasl...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, psab...@redhat.com
  Assignee: mmasl...@redhat.com
   Summary: perl-CPAN-Mini-1.111009 is available
Regression: ---
  Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
  Type: ---
 Documentation: ---
  Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-CPAN-Mini
   Product: Fedora

Latest upstream release: 1.111009
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.111008
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Mini/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 746941] perl-Mojolicious-3.35 is available

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941

Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org 
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-Mojolicious-3.34 is|perl-Mojolicious-3.35 is
   |available   |available

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 746941] perl-Mojolicious-3.35 is available

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941

--- Comment #83 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Latest upstream release: 3.35
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 3.30
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mojolicious/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction] Update to 0.08

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 7df554d3f69ce00e03d5770742b9a1e2cf7eeb2a
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Wed Aug 1 16:44:38 2012 +0100

Update to 0.08

- New upstream release 0.08
  - Switch to Sub::Exporter::Progressive
- BR: perl(Sub::Exporter::Progressive) ≥ 0.001002 rather than plain
  perl(Sub::Exporter)

 perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec |   10 --
 sources   |2 +-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec 
b/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec
index 19b926c..8eeac2b 100644
--- a/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec
+++ b/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 %global noarch_package %(perl -e 'print (($] = 5.013007) ? 1 : 0);')
 
 Name:  perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction
-Version:   0.07
+Version:   0.08
 Release:   1%{?dist}
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Requires: perl(XSLoader)
 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec)
 BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
-BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Exporter)
+BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Exporter::Progressive) = 0.001002
 BuildRequires: perl(threads)
 Requires:  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
 Requires:  perl(Carp)
@@ -70,6 +70,12 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/Devel::GlobalDestruction.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Aug  1 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.08-1
+- Update to 0.08
+  - Switch to Sub::Exporter::Progressive
+- BR: perl(Sub::Exporter::Progressive) ≥ 0.001002 rather than plain
+  perl(Sub::Exporter)
+
 * Thu Jul 26 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.07-1
 - Update to 0.07
   - Actually detect errors in pure-perl test
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index fa4d145..e651f39 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-59667f28caa270f63b10f28d39e05797  Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.07.tar.gz
+2db1c816bb2a5e64fcb47d0bc1c577a7  Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction] Update to 0.09

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 2e8d642cd0b5d13ee5e83c7e1d1ec886a1bebbc0
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Thu Aug 9 10:14:06 2012 +0100

Update to 0.09

- New upstream release 0.09
  - Rewrite completely broken pure-perl GD detection under threads
  - Fix pure-perl implementation incorrectly reporting GD during END phase
- This release by RIBASUSHI - update source URL

 perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec |   10 --
 sources   |2 +-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec 
b/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec
index 8eeac2b..79b84b7 100644
--- a/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec
+++ b/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec
@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@
 %global noarch_package %(perl -e 'print (($] = 5.013007) ? 1 : 0);')
 
 Name:  perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction
-Version:   0.08
+Version:   0.09
 Release:   1%{?dist}
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 Group: Development/Libraries
 Summary:   Expose PL_dirty, the flag that marks global destruction
 Url:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-GlobalDestruction
-Source:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/Devel-GlobalDestruction-%{version}.tar.gz
+Source:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/R/RI/RIBASUSHI/Devel-GlobalDestruction-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
 %if %{noarch_package}
 BuildArch: noarch
@@ -70,6 +70,12 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/Devel::GlobalDestruction.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Aug  9 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.09-1
+- Update to 0.09
+  - Rewrite completely broken pure-perl GD detection under threads
+  - Fix pure-perl implementation incorrectly reporting GD during END phase
+- This release by RIBASUSHI - update source URL
+
 * Wed Aug  1 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.08-1
 - Update to 0.08
   - Switch to Sub::Exporter::Progressive
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e651f39..5800265 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-2db1c816bb2a5e64fcb47d0bc1c577a7  Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.08.tar.gz
+97e52fdf2de2df1843a5d3d9fce725df  Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction/f18] (2 commits) ...Update to 0.09

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  7df554d... Update to 0.08 (*)
  2e8d642... Update to 0.09 (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction] Created tag perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18' was created 
pointing to:

 2e8d642... Update to 0.09
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 844965] perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09 is available

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844965

--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Try-Tiny] Specify all dependencies

2012-08-28 Thread Jitka Plesnikova
commit fc0d4f28497dc996ef20a27e6ae75d12993a4b59
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date:   Tue Aug 28 12:03:38 2012 +0200

Specify all dependencies

 perl-Try-Tiny.spec |7 ++-
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Try-Tiny.spec b/perl-Try-Tiny.spec
index 4301c03..2057564 100644
--- a/perl-Try-Tiny.spec
+++ b/perl-Try-Tiny.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Name:  perl-Try-Tiny
 Summary:   Minimal try/catch with proper localization of $@
 Version:   0.11
-Release:   6%{?dist}
+Release:   7%{?dist}
 License:   MIT
 Group: Development/Libraries
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Try-Tiny
@@ -9,9 +9,11 @@ Source0:   
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DO/DOY/Try-Tiny-%{version}.tar
 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
 BuildArch: noarch
 BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
+BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
 Requires:  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
+Requires:  perl(Exporter)
 
 # obsolete/provide old tests subpackage
 # can be removed during F19 development cycle
@@ -54,6 +56,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/Try::Tiny.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Aug 28 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.11-7
+- Add BR/R perl(Exporter).
+
 * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 0.11-6
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-PDL

2012-08-28 Thread buildsys


perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO

2012-08-28 Thread buildsys


perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires libsal_textenc.so
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-JSON-PP] Spec clean-up

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 5b0705dd3c1a048c3b3b7db1976957ec109204c5
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Tue Aug 28 12:26:36 2012 +0100

Spec clean-up

- BR: perl(base), perl(constant) and perl(lib)
- Install to vendor directories
- Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot

 perl-JSON-PP.spec |   18 --
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-JSON-PP.spec b/perl-JSON-PP.spec
index 9e40c6d..496f052 100644
--- a/perl-JSON-PP.spec
+++ b/perl-JSON-PP.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-JSON-PP
 Version:   2.27200
-Release:   240%{?dist}
+Release:   241%{?dist}
 Summary:   JSON::XS compatible pure-Perl module
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -8,12 +8,14 @@ URL:  http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Meta-YAML/
 Source0:   
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/MA/MAKAMAKA/JSON-PP-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
 BuildArch: noarch
-BuildRequires: perl(B)
+BuildRequires: perl(base)
 BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
+BuildRequires: perl(constant)
 BuildRequires: perl(Data::Dumper)
 BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 BuildRequires: perl(Getopt::Long)
+BuildRequires: perl(lib)
 BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
 BuildRequires: perl(Tie::IxHash)
 Requires:  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
@@ -30,14 +32,13 @@ JSON::PP is a pure-Perl module and is compatible with 
JSON::XS.
 %setup -q -n JSON-PP-%{version}
 
 %build
-perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=perl
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
 make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
 rm -rf %{buildroot}
 make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
 find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} \; 2/dev/null
 %{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
 
 %check
@@ -47,15 +48,20 @@ make test
 rm -rf %{buildroot}
 
 %files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
 %doc Changes README
 %{_bindir}/json_pp
-%{perl_privlib}/JSON/
+%{perl_vendorlib}/JSON/
 %{_mandir}/man1/json_pp.1*
 %{_mandir}/man3/JSON::PP.3pm*
 %{_mandir}/man3/JSON::PP::Boolean.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Aug 28 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 2.27200-241
+- BR: perl(base), perl(constant) and perl(lib)
+- Install to vendor directories
+- Drop %%defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
+- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot
+
 * Fri Aug 17 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.27200-240
 - Increase release to replace perl sub-package (bug #848961)
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Tie-ToObject] Specify all dependencies

2012-08-28 Thread Jitka Plesnikova
commit 1a2c1d6348dd23f38951d3566880dc0b753dd5b8
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date:   Tue Aug 28 13:59:08 2012 +0200

Specify all dependencies

 perl-Tie-ToObject.spec |8 ++--
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Tie-ToObject.spec b/perl-Tie-ToObject.spec
index bf65c65..8eb7dbf 100644
--- a/perl-Tie-ToObject.spec
+++ b/perl-Tie-ToObject.spec
@@ -1,16 +1,17 @@
 
 Name:   perl-Tie-ToObject 
 Version:0.03 
-Release:13%{?dist}
+Release:14%{?dist}
 License:GPL+ or Artistic 
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 Summary:Tie to an existing object 
 Source: 
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/N/NU/NUFFIN/Tie-ToObject-%{version}.tar.gz
 
 Url:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Tie-ToObject
 BuildRoot:  %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) 
-Requires:  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version))
+Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
 BuildArch:  noarch
 
+BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util)
 # tests
@@ -58,6 +59,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Aug 28 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.03-14
+- Add BR perl(Carp).
+
 * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 0.03-13
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-JSON-PP] Created tag perl-JSON-PP-2.27200-241.fc19

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-JSON-PP-2.27200-241.fc19' was created pointing to:

 5b0705d... Spec clean-up
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Perl-OSType] Spec clean-up

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 4a545199abfc3d7ea9906d22392a1bd0817565d9
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Tue Aug 28 13:37:19 2012 +0100

Spec clean-up

- Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot
- Don't delete the extra tests when bootstrapping, but don't run them either

 perl-Perl-OSType.spec |   21 -
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Perl-OSType.spec b/perl-Perl-OSType.spec
index dfee0bc..d2058f5 100644
--- a/perl-Perl-OSType.spec
+++ b/perl-Perl-OSType.spec
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 # We don't really need ExtUtils::MakeMaker ≥ 6.31
-%global old_eumm %(perl -MExtUtils::MakeMaker -e 'printf %d\\n, 
$ExtUtils::MakeMaker::VERSION  6.31 ? 1 : 0;' 2/dev/null || echo 0)
+%global old_eumm %(perl -MExtUtils::MakeMaker -e 'print 
(($ExtUtils::MakeMaker::VERSION  6.31) ? 1 : 0);' 2/dev/null || echo 0)
 
 # Test suite needs patching if we have Test::More  0.88
-%global old_test_more %(perl -MTest::More -e 'printf %d\\n, 
$Test::More::VERSION  0.88 ? 1 : 0;' 2/dev/null || echo 0)
+%global old_test_more %(perl -MTest::More -e 'print (($Test::More::VERSION  
0.88) ? 1 : 0);' 2/dev/null || echo 0)
 
 Name:  perl-Perl-OSType
 Version:   1.002
-Release:   240%{?dist}
+Release:   241%{?dist}
 Summary:   Map Perl operating system names to generic types
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ BuildRequires:perl(Exporter)
 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
 BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
-# Optional tests
+# Optional tests, not run for this dual-lived module when bootstrapping
 %if !%{defined perl_bootstrap}
 BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Coverage::TrustPod)
 BuildRequires: perl(Test::CPAN::Meta)
@@ -62,25 +62,28 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
 rm -rf %{buildroot}
 make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
 find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} \; 2/dev/null
 %{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
 
 %check
-%if %{defined perl_bootstrap}
-rm -rf xt
+make test
+%if !%{defined perl_bootstrap}
+make test TEST_FILES=$(echo $(find xt/ -name '*.t'))
 %endif
-make test TEST_FILES=t/*.t xt/*/*.t
 
 %clean
 rm -rf %{buildroot}
 
 %files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
 %doc Changes LICENSE README
 %{perl_vendorlib}/Perl/
 %{_mandir}/man3/Perl::OSType.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Aug 28 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.002-241
+- Drop %%defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
+- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot
+- Don't delete the extra tests when bootstrapping, but don't run them either
+
 * Fri Aug 17 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.002-240
 - Increase release to replace perl sub-package (bug #848961)
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Test-use-ok] Specify all dependencies

2012-08-28 Thread Jitka Plesnikova
commit 8a24292816a01b7841f0d086755fc8e76b819ca4
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date:   Tue Aug 28 14:37:28 2012 +0200

Specify all dependencies

 perl-Test-use-ok.spec |8 +++-
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-use-ok.spec b/perl-Test-use-ok.spec
index 86472c5..02e07df 100644
--- a/perl-Test-use-ok.spec
+++ b/perl-Test-use-ok.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-Test-use-ok
 Version:   0.02
-Release:   15%{?dist}
+Release:   16%{?dist}
 Summary:   Alternative to Test::More::use_ok
 License:   MIT 
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
 BuildArch: noarch
 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
+# Requires of bundled library inc::Module::Install
+BuildRequires: perl(Cwd)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Path)
 Requires:  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
 
 %description
@@ -52,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/ok.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Aug 28 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.02-16
+- Specify all dependencies.
+
 * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 0.02-15
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-PDL

2012-08-28 Thread buildsys


perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO

2012-08-28 Thread buildsys


perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires libsal_textenc.so
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Perl-OSType] Created tag perl-Perl-OSType-1.002-241.fc19

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl-OSType-1.002-241.fc19' was created pointing to:

 4a54519... Spec clean-up
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 783740] perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 not available in RHEL 6 PPC64

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783740

--- Comment #1 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt ---
perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5-1.3-6 requirements:


$ rpm -qpR perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5-1.3-6.el6.src.rpm
--
perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)  
/usr/bin/iconv  
rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
--


$ rpm -qR perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5
--
perl = 0:5.000
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)  
perl(Digest::MD5)  
perl(Exporter)  
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1
--

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker] Do not build-require itself

2012-08-28 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 7ca116b9ff30be66a819e5da2d88a307b897ce2d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Tue Aug 28 16:35:51 2012 +0200

Do not build-require itself

 perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec |   29 +
 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec b/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec
index a69cfdc..c10e196 100644
--- a/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec
+++ b/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec
@@ -1,40 +1,41 @@
-%global real_version 6.63_02
+%global cpan_version 6.63_02
 
 Name:   perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker
-Version:6.63.02
-Release:240%{?dist}
+Version:%(echo '%{cpan_version}' | tr _ .)
+Release:241%{?dist}
 Summary:Create a module Makefile
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/ExtUtils-MakeMaker/
-Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MS/MSCHWERN/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-%{real_version}.tar.gz
+Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MS/MSCHWERN/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-%{cpan_version}.tar.gz
 # Do not set RPATH to perl shared-library modules by default. Bug #773622.
 # This is copy from `perl' package. This is distributor extension.
 Patch0: %{name}-6.62-USE_MM_LD_RUN_PATH.patch
 BuildArch:  noarch
-BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+# Makefile.Pl uses ExtUtils::MakeMaker from ./lib
+BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Cwd)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Exporter)
+BuildRequires:  perl(File::Path)
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Spec) = 0.8
+BuildRequires:  perl(lib)
 # Unbundled
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Copy::Recursive)
 # Tests:
 BuildRequires:  perl(AutoSplit)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
 BuildRequires:  perl(CPAN::Meta)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Cwd)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Data::Dumper)
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::Command)
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::Install)
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::Installed)
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::Manifest)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Exporter)
+BuildRequires:  perl(File::Find)
+BuildRequires:  perl(File::Temp)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Getopt::Long)
 BuildRequires:  perl(IO::File)
 BuildRequires:  perl(lib)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Parse::CPAN::Meta)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Pod::Man)
-BuildRequires:  perl(File::Find)
-BuildRequires:  perl(File::Path)
-BuildRequires:  perl(File::Temp)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Harness)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
 # Optional tests
@@ -59,7 +60,7 @@ Makefile.PL. It is based on the Makefile.SH model provided by 
Andy
 Dougherty and the perl5-porters.
 
 %prep
-%setup -q -n ExtUtils-MakeMaker-%{real_version}
+%setup -q -n ExtUtils-MakeMaker-%{cpan_version}
 %patch0 -p1
 # Remove bundled modules
 rm -rf bundled/* ||:
@@ -86,6 +87,10 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Aug 28 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 6.63.02-241
+- Compute RPM version
+- Do not build-require itself, the build script runs from ./lib
+
 * Mon Aug 13 2012 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 6.63.02-240
 - update version to the same as in perl.srpm
 - Bump release to override sub-package from perl.spec
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-YAML] Specify all dependencies

2012-08-28 Thread Petr Pisar
commit f5219056eb51e7a7512e1ed6dc9aa5506dde8a60
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date:   Tue Aug 28 16:20:40 2012 +0200

Specify all dependencies

 perl-YAML.spec |7 ++-
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-YAML.spec b/perl-YAML.spec
index ccb55c5..13a95d2 100644
--- a/perl-YAML.spec
+++ b/perl-YAML.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-YAML
 Version:0.84
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:4%{?dist}
 Summary:YAML Ain't Markup Language (tm)
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -9,9 +9,11 @@ Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/MS/MSTROUT/YAML-%{versi
 BuildArch:  noarch
 BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
 BuildRequires:  perl(constant)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Cwd)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Data::Dumper)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Exporter)
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires:  perl(File::Path)
 BuildRequires:  perl(lib)
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
 Requires:   perl(Carp)
@@ -57,6 +59,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/YAML*.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Aug 28 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.84-4
+- Specify all dependencies.
+
 * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 0.84-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 851721] Review Request: perl-Net-Nessus-XMLRPC - Communicate with Nessus scanner(v4.2+) via XMLRPC

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851721

Olivier Bilodeau oliv...@bottomlesspit.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||perl-devel@lists.fedoraproj
   ||ect.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 852503] Review Request: perl-Net-Radius - Object-oriented Perl interface to RADIUS

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852503

Olivier Bilodeau oliv...@bottomlesspit.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||perl-devel@lists.fedoraproj
   ||ect.org
 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 844965] perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09 is available

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844965

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing
perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-12840/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 851873] perl-Dancer-1.3100 is available

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851873

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-12848/perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File MailTools-2.10.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MailTools:

bb1ee1b02913b94104209acda0163933  MailTools-2.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MailTools] Update to 2.10

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 54eef31f5e3368b8aa2359458f5670a992401878
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Tue Aug 28 22:07:07 2012 +0100

Update to 2.10

- New upstream release 2.10:
  - Mail::Mailer::smtp set from address twice (CPAN RT#77161)
  - Mail::Mailer::smtps did not support the From option (CPAN RT#77161)
  - Mail::Util::mailaddress has now an optional parameter to set the 
returned
value explicitly (CPAN #75975)
- BR: perl(base)
- Drop BR: perl(Config) and perl(POSIX), not dual-lived
- Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot

 perl-MailTools.spec |   20 ++--
 sources |2 +-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-MailTools.spec b/perl-MailTools.spec
index 9fe11e4..9cecf2f 100644
--- a/perl-MailTools.spec
+++ b/perl-MailTools.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary:   Various mail-related perl modules
 Name:  perl-MailTools
-Version:   2.09
-Release:   3%{?dist}
+Version:   2.10
+Release:   1%{?dist}
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 Group: Development/Libraries
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/MailTools/
@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ Patch0:   MailTools-2.08-UTF8.patch
 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
 BuildArch: noarch
 BuildRequires: perl = 3:5.8.1
+BuildRequires: perl(base)
 BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
-BuildRequires: perl(Config)
 BuildRequires: perl(Date::Format)
 BuildRequires: perl(Date::Parse)
 BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ BuildRequires:perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 BuildRequires: perl(IO::Handle)
 BuildRequires: perl(Net::Domain) = 1.05
 BuildRequires: perl(Net::SMTP) = 1.03
-BuildRequires: perl(POSIX)
 BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
 BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod)
 Requires:  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
@@ -52,7 +51,6 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
 rm -rf %{buildroot}
 make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
 find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
-find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} ';' 2/dev/null
 %{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
 
 %check
@@ -63,7 +61,6 @@ make test TEST_FILES=xt/*.t
 rm -rf %{buildroot}
 
 %files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
 %doc ChangeLog README* examples/
 %dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Mail/
 %dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Mail/Field/
@@ -112,6 +109,17 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/Mail::Util.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Aug 28 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2.10-1
+- Update to 2.10
+  - Mail::Mailer::smtp set from address twice (CPAN RT#77161)
+  - Mail::Mailer::smtps did not support the From option (CPAN RT#77161)
+  - Mail::Util::mailaddress has now an optional parameter to set the returned
+value explicitly (CPAN #75975)
+- BR: perl(base)
+- Drop BR: perl(Config) and perl(POSIX), not dual-lived
+- Drop %%defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
+- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot
+
 * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 2.09-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 2705db2..a325997 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-2ab874c4202d647e0fc58dd7cffb59f6  MailTools-2.09.tar.gz
+bb1ee1b02913b94104209acda0163933  MailTools-2.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MailTools/f18] Update to 2.10

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  54eef31... Update to 2.10 (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MailTools] Created tag perl-MailTools-2.10-1.fc18

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-MailTools-2.10-1.fc18' was created pointing to:

 54eef31... Update to 2.10
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MailTools] Created tag perl-MailTools-2.10-1.fc19

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-MailTools-2.10-1.fc19' was created pointing to:

 54eef31... Update to 2.10
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 849609] perl-homedir.csh causes login error for users with CSH as default shell

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849609

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-08-28 19:26:55

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-local-lib-1.008004-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 849609] perl-homedir.csh causes login error for users with CSH as default shell

2012-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849609

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-local-lib-1.008004-5.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel