Re: Mate-Desktop
On 2012-08-27 22:08, Michael Scherer wrote: Le lundi 27 août 2012 à 17:48 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit : On 2012-08-24 13:49, Rave it wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in your future endeavors. -- rex No mercy, no thanks. Why do you Mr. Rex Dieter as sponsor accept rude speaking, and racist remarks from Dan Marchal? 'Portuguese n00b' https://github.com/mate-desktop/mate-doc-utils/issues/3 That thread contains no instance of Dan calling you a Portuguese n00b. It contains only an instance of you accusing Dan of having called you a Portuguese n00b, 'if [you] recall correctly'. (I draw no conclusions from this, I only state a fact.) Just stating facts as well, that's slightly wrong. Wolfgang aka raveit use the login niceandgently on github. Ah, thanks. It seemed from the context that rave it was claiming to be the person in the thread, so I foolishly didn't check that was actually the case. Still, if he wasn't involved in that thread at all, I'm not sure why he'd quote it in support of an assertion that someone insulted him... The one who accuse Dan mashal of calling him portuguese noob is ketheriel, aka Nelson Marques, on 23-07-2012. He also reuse the expression on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149#c5 on 14-07-2012 And he asked to have his account 1 month ago : https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3399 , on 25-07-2012. The same day, he also posted that about the issue : https://github.com/mate-desktop/mate-desktop/issues/18#issuecomment-7251595 So he didn't seemed to have got over it (yet) at this moment. I hadn't looked at any other posts, just the one that was directly cited in the thread. Good job on the additional data. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: 3 day minimum in updates-testing for F18?
Dne 28.8.2012 00:37, Jerry James napsal(a): Bodhi seems to be enforcing 7 days in updates-testing for F18. Are we going to switch to the 3 day minimum described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Pre_Beta? We are in Alpha Freeze now [1, 2], so your update will spend in Bodhi even longer. Vit [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Alpha_Freeze_Policy [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass changes to packaging
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote: On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:11:39 -0400 Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: This is the problem: In F18+, systemd now uses a system-wide policy (which can be overridden) to define what services are enabled, it is no longer hardcoded into each package's scriptlets. This is the feature that FESCo approved. You might not agree with it, but simply ignoring it is inappropriate. He's not ignoring it, he's saying that on F18+, the expansion of %systemd_post_enable should be exactly the same as the expansion of %systemd_post, i.e. not enabled by default and honoring whatever presets are set for the spin. This approach allows for spec files to be synced between all Fedora branches and generate the appropriate scriptlets for each release when built. This optimizes the migration path at the cost of making the final state ugly; I'm not sure that is a good bargain. After all, the F17 and F18 spec files will do _different_ things. I don't think it's unreasonable that the spec files themselves will be different - yes, that may be less convenient than having the same spec file for all branches, but allowing for the possibility for differences if why we have the branches in the first place. Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass changes to packaging
On 28 August 2012 09:39, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote: After all, the F17 and F18 spec files will do _different_ things. I don't think it's unreasonable that the spec files themselves will be different - yes, that may be less convenient than having the same spec file for all branches, but allowing for the possibility for differences if why we have the branches in the first place. I have the opposite feeling, having a single spec file for all the releases would be a *huge* benefit (at least for me) for all the things that can be updated in all releases. All the packages I mantain have %ifs defined for RHEL/CentOS variants and Fedora ones so they can be rebuilt everywhere and at least for the bacula part the rebuilt packages are used a lot [1]. This also helps fixing stuff once for all supported releases. This has led to a super-long list of %post sections for a single spec file; which is ok considering the SysV and systemd differences: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bacula.git/tree/bacula.spec Adding another variant for f18+ can be done, but I would prefer into avoiding this. Thanks, --Simone [1] http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/README.txt -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass changes to packaging
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:39:32AM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: He's not ignoring it, he's saying that on F18+, the expansion of %systemd_post_enable should be exactly the same as the expansion of %systemd_post, i.e. not enabled by default and honoring whatever presets are set for the spin. This approach allows for spec files to be synced between all Fedora branches and generate the appropriate scriptlets for each release when built. This optimizes the migration path at the cost of making the final state ugly; I'm not sure that is a good bargain. Once F20 rolls out and F17 goes EOL, maintainers can simply s/systemd_post_enable/systemd_post/ and then things won't be so ugly (or final). -- Scott Schmit smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mate-Desktop
On 28/08/12 07:08, Michael Scherer wrote: Just stating facts as well, that's slightly wrong. Wolfgang aka raveit use the login niceandgently on github. The one who accuse Dan mashal of calling him portuguese noob is ketheriel, aka Nelson Marques, on 23-07-2012. He also reuse the expression on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149#c5 on 14-07-2012 And he asked to have his account 1 month ago : https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3399 , on 25-07-2012. The same day, he also posted that about the issue : https://github.com/mate-desktop/mate-desktop/issues/18#issuecomment-7251595 So he didn't seemed to have got over it (yet) at this moment. That's a good conclusion on this topic. For enhancement: Nelson Marques has been fedora contributor for about 2 weeks (and I have been his sponsor). He felt assaulted and left frustrated, orphaning all his packages, stopping further contributions. Sadly, I have been on vacation then, so I had no chance to assist him in any way. I see an analogy between this case and Wolfgang aka raveit. Both of them didn't want to take this into light to sort these issues out. Since, Dan is the feature owner of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MATE-Desktop I think, he should take care not to scare every reviewer and contributor away; many people left the reviews unfinished an unassigned them from the tickets. -- Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de mru...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Self Introduction
Hey, My name is Sebastian Dyroff. I am from Germany, Berlin. I've just finished my studies of computer science. I am a Linux user for a decade or so and tried a lot of different Distros. For a long time I used gentoo (don't know if it is a good idea to tell here:-) ), but switched to Fedora a while ago. I really would like to see wiki2beamer (Bug 851891) included in fedora, an thought i should try to build a rpm for the package. It converts wiki-like syntax to latex beamer syntax and is written in python. Currently I need to get some feedback, to get the spec-file meet the fedora standards. I also built a rpm for lprof (Bug 851641), a colour management profiler, but upstream seems dead and there are some problems that might prevent that the package will be part of Fedora. But if someone wants that package included and is willing to help me fixing the issues or at least points me in the right direction I would continue to work on this. Best regards Sebastian Dyroff -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide report: 20120825 changes
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 17:39 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: On 8/27/12 5:38 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:27 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: That said it's probably less work to grab a copy of pango-1.30.1 and just build compat-pangox from that. I would prefer if we could get a snapshot with the 2 1/2 year old gtkglext change built that removed the pangox dependency. We're talking about API that has been deprecated for three quarters of a decade... Behdad was so nice to quickly put up a pangox-compat module here: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/pangox-compat/0.0/ Do we have a volunteer for packaging that ? I expect this to be a 'package and forget' operation... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide report: 20120825 changes
Hi, On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 17:39 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: On 8/27/12 5:38 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:27 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: That said it's probably less work to grab a copy of pango-1.30.1 and just build compat-pangox from that. I would prefer if we could get a snapshot with the 2 1/2 year old gtkglext change built that removed the pangox dependency. We're talking about API that has been deprecated for three quarters of a decade... Behdad was so nice to quickly put up a pangox-compat module here: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/pangox-compat/0.0/ Do we have a volunteer for packaging that ? I expect this to be a 'package and forget' operation... Packaged this at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852416. Can someone help with its review? Thanks, Parag. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packaging software compatible with only one Fedora release
Le Mar 28 août 2012 03:12, Adam Williamson a écrit : On 2012-08-25 22:52, M.M. wrote: Or is it better to add an explicit Requires (for e.g. GNOME Shell 3.4.x) to the Spec files? In such case, is something like Requires: gnome-shell=3.4.* allowed to specify all sub-releases belonging to the 3.4 branch? You can't use wildcards like this, but I wonder if you could do this: Requires: gnome-shell = 3.3 Requires: gnome-shell 3.5 I've never actually tried that, but it might work. If it doesn't, someone tell me, cos I'd like to know =) This only works as long as there is a single package providing gnome-shell in the repo, as soon as someone releases a compat package this will fail big time. The reqs are evaluated separately, so rpm thinks a system with something providing gnome-shell 3.2 + something else providing gnome-shell 3.6 will work with your package. In rpm, to restrict a version range on both ends, you need to combine requires with conflicts (requires A = x, conflicts A = y). There is no way to specify a range not open to infinity on one end as an atomic requirement (it's an annoying limitation, but the positive side-effect is that it forced people to give up on strict version locking and packages upgrade by default). -- Nicolas Mailhot -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Could not execute scratch_build: database outage
I assume this is a known (and temporary problem): fedpkg scratch-build Could not execute scratch_build: database outage -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Could not execute scratch_build: database outage
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Neal Becker wrote: I assume this is a known (and temporary problem): fedpkg scratch-build Could not execute scratch_build: database outage yep - it is coming back in just a tick -sv -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Could not execute scratch_build: database outage
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Neal Becker wrote: I assume this is a known (and temporary problem): fedpkg scratch-build Could not execute scratch_build: database outage yep - it is coming back in just a tick It's back. -J -sv -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass changes to packaging
Scott Schmit i.g...@comcast.net writes: On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:39:32AM +0200, Miloslav TrmaÄ wrote: This optimizes the migration path at the cost of making the final state ugly; I'm not sure that is a good bargain. Once F20 rolls out and F17 goes EOL, maintainers can simply s/systemd_post_enable/systemd_post/ and then things won't be so ugly (or final). I remain of the opinion that it's not a good idea to remove all trace of the per-package enable decisions from the packages themselves. *If* we get to F20 without realizing that we'd like the packages to specify the defaults, then we can remove the redundant macro definitions. In the meantime, people who are arguing against this seem to be entirely too confident that the current design is perfect. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 852190] Perl WWW::Curl fails to install - yaml_process_error
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852190 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Last Closed||2012-08-28 10:32:12 --- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- I can't reproduce this. By the way, do you have a reason not to use the Fedora package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
self introduction
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm a Perl developer / sys-admin working for the PacketFence[1] open source project which has strong RHEL roots. A few months ago I've switched to Fedora as my desktop and I'm trying to upstream some of our own packages to improve their quality and so that everyone can benefit from having easy access to them. I have one package looking for a sponsor: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851721 Also I plan on updating the asciidoc package and do whatever is in my way to ease PacketFence's integration into Fedora and RHEL with the ultimate goal of `yum install packetfence`. Finally I'm also a spare time FLOSS android developer working on Tomdroid[2] and several other little perl projects[3] plus a father of two. Cheers! [1]: http://www.packetfence.org [2]: http://launchpad.net/tomdroid [3]: https://github.com/obilodeau - -- Olivier Bilodeau oliv...@bottomlesspit.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlA82cIACgkQV0xCmE0A0fBDmgCeO4fiOvYCIm7WpRyYEbOjVCug aFsAoL0bCrYv8WpysMuKhaEnFf6mNurJ =GALa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: SKS 1.1.0 mQGiBEpGWwoRBACQoy2t+UTC2w8Oi2s78pX3HtrUItSa1HrM+lcBCX9K9UQtKr0wPENgysZm oVpN6DALf5qYdgYNbAtaWiUqyacX/Ocm8vpG9cTHSW9zdLJDRz37AZP5XQbAmnLmuSt1v4gp YOmrrSgigdQPNLqiMV0HGkI8NtOaJVwX1dOxiDF1fwCg0eLySV3izsatr0hiq1T0qOObItUD /2mS5N/1ni5n2mhOZXXypBRm2wjJwS1M5HehMhk5aA002bywjKKqvwtbnOUU+6DCXQTPTp3O xqaY3Ah0Kre0gxhAauVL0Ia0gvgl5puMNJhrGUnvj3a6iZOy1hmUovDFI0mIygk6pUTZJ2P+ U+5mj0k3p5tzBXeFPlJZ9aztcTslA/4hItlv61u90glnVvkdAO3EaxAYGYK6oA9pL3qFp65c PcmaUGmQq/eST5wmy4sjv4ge/8GSXUOvt+eEtkAthCAwUjsqiKPKJKxcpkBiI8jp+kc1WNoN JDxsBGWq4mYp0QrO/31+umWYzqQKkfzYi+7rqmYdJpRjvj1Ly6JlJl+r+rQsT2xpdmllciBC aWxvZGVhdSA8b2xpdmllckBib3R0b21sZXNzcGl0Lm9yZz6IRgQQEQIABgUCSskYJAAKCRAs uneP6zS13ENaAKDk3EuPyqSar4xqegyUYxs25qHwIgCfWVWmejwoUi66i2Oxarqal6FiIa2I RgQQEQIABgUCSskdMQAKCRBicnz0MgkNSolwAKDRyInKHDp8taxuJYgUoEMcdwG1XACfb4Ld Yboc74qugVMWyhbHEsMeHGaIRgQQEQIABgUCSslP2gAKCRAPMQW+2OB6+ms7AJkBzzSranFv Da2qgrPLGfNPVFx45ACgj/Wto6IL9FMc113dVOo26zoYS5+IRgQQEQIABgUCStddTAAKCRCY 1P0845D3sjBMAKCnEO4anuqxXOfCxyVEHDnf3OPlBQCfV3PYZubXUTA0nK+66m/hf0FVGVaI ZgQTEQIAJgUCSkZbCgIbIwUJCWaRNgYLCQgHAwIEFQIIAwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEFdMQphN ANHwBCYAnAnRDiwZnQhvQmPeaM/NNpE+iQCXAJ0Z66Ypgmj7YpkBBsFiq0ykrbgHfohpBBMR AgApAhsjBQkJZpE2BgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYCAwECHgECF4AFAkrKjrwCGQEACgkQV0xCmE0A 0fCFkACffWhRrFrjAqKOd+G2vlPs3mL3DrcAoMrMnSDcTjsB5wVJVNX0hzgQw4zHtC5PbGl2 aWVyIEJpbG9kZWF1IChXb3JrKSA8b2JpbG9kZWF1QGludmVyc2UuY2E+iEYEEBECAAYFAkrX bJMACgkQmNT9POOQ97LB0wCgoBhut4smJpEIXGg2tTbxUvFhD2sAoMDOxWGtqQl1OJtD065Y ZOjXC5jriGYEExECACYFAkrKjw0CGyMFCQlmkTYGCwkIBwMCBBUCCAMEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAK CRBXTEKYTQDR8BmKAJ4mtVyTxjubqeADmUxj/YGOC46LYwCeOChYnikfwZdHl2ETrkI24p1c 5uy0L09saXZpZXIgQmlsb2RlYXUgPG9saXZpZXIuYmlsb2RlYXUuMUBnbWFpbC5jb20+iEYE EBECAAYFAkrXbJMACgkQmNT9POOQ97LrIwCgrwOjOWDmMmkJMDWq5bzDYlKNhDAAn3TE0X9l G7iSyU6P9exhVSEDkxxniGYEExECACYFAkrKjrACGyMFCQlmkTYGCwkIBwMCBBUCCAMEFgID AQIeAQIXgAAKCRBXTEKYTQDR8DqRAKCuStH0B+t4581IsOKeBg+ky2RmgQCgxO38ERCe1ydv kErqRjEeMKMZIpvR/wAADOfMJQEQAAEB/9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQAAAQAB AAD/2wBDAAgGBgcGBQgHBwcJCQgKDBQNDAsLDBkSEw8UHRofHh0aHBwgJC4nICIsIxwcKDcp LDAxNDQ0Hyc5PTgyPC4zNDL/2wBDAQkJCQwLDBgNDRgyIRwhMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIy MjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjL/wAARCABzAJoDASIAAhEBAxEB/8QA HwAAAQUBAQEBAQEAAAECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtRAAAgEDAwIEAwUFBAQAAAF9AQID AAQRBRIhMUEGE1FhByJxFDKBkaEII0KxwRVS0fAkM2JyggkKFhcYGRolJicoKSo0NTY3ODk6 Q0RFRkdISUpTVFVWV1hZWmNkZWZnaGlqc3R1dnd4eXqDhIWGh4iJipKTlJWWl5iZmqKjpKWm p6ipqrKztLW2t7i5usLDxMXGx8jJytLT1NXW19jZ2uHi4+Tl5ufo6erx8vP09fb3+Pn6/8QA HwEAAwEBAQEBAQEBAQECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtREAAgECBAQDBAcFBAQAAQJ3AAEC AxEEBSExBhJBUQdhcRMiMoEIFEKRobHBCSMzUvAVYnLRChYkNOEl8RcYGRomJygpKjU2Nzg5 OkNERUZHSElKU1RVVldYWVpjZGVmZ2hpanN0dXZ3eHl6goOEhYaHiImKkpOUlZaXmJmaoqOk paanqKmqsrO0tba3uLm6wsPExcbHyMnK0tPU1dbX2Nna4uPk5ebn6Onq8vP09fb3+Pn6/9oA DAMBAAIRAxEAPwDyv7O3XctW7ZCFbPc1TFwnXypP0q/aOssW5VIwcYIrjlex1RtcQLgXJ/2F /magQ4k+oNWz9y5/3V/maqI6ltoYFh1Geaa2H1JdwUPnupFVWA55qy2COelN8lD2P500wauV uKQD51A9amkjjRdx4z09zVU3i7lAwMnk+1Wo3M3JInn+4o9zVOe2dBvAyvtVya4gmg+6YR2Z uSfwqKyaRnPl5ESH5mk71cYWJdTW6Ko8w4DlsKOAT0pP4j9KvXKo07Hd8x7CqbRgEkE0itXq QyH5j9KiJqcoMklv0pjIv94/lTRDTISaVT8rGlZF/vH8qaeEbvTEQdqBQKWqJExzmj8KRm54 puWoEdMUHFWrLIWRf9oEVAen41asxkyD6Vyz2OmG48j93cevy/1qjGimZnIGRnBq8/3J/wDg P9aqxdZPp/WiOxb3GzEmMqM/UVBHMsLYkZyD33d6sf8ALN/p/Wsi7cead27HYDitKaM6jsS3 twRldxaItkg9jVe8URXO5TuVzuU0W9yxcLLlgDwDXTaR4aa+t8yHOOQDW2xiouRya3Nw0v7v JbGAepp8V1cwXJMoYhuGVu9a+peGbywmJVNy9R1qD+zb6ZEV0IHpg0XBxaILxlmZWhJXcM49 6jjZzuUjp3rcPh6VVt88nIyM9OarX9l9mkcNwzHgjof880NAtGYzySZOCuPpUTSSe1SPwTUR pA2IZX7gUu7MZzTTQeENMVyM57UKMnrS96VetAhCPmNJinHqaKAOoPQ49asWXWT8KpCVCDhg R9asWkqIZCzgAkYzXLJaHTF6k7kATj3X+tVov+Wn0p8kyFpiHBBIxz1qGJuXoS0Kb1FY/u3P sP51lahGSocD64rSZ1ELA+2KqTjdHxWkdCJ6mbaAtOijselex+CZbFwkEt1D5oXpuGa8p0+x
Re: Re: Mate-Desktop
Rex Dieter wrote: I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I don't accept it. Dan reacting poorly is a given, and something he (and I with him) are working on. I personally don't feel it helps taking your greivances public, as now Dan's perception of you (and now potentially others) will be colored as hostile. Hi, I'm one of MATE Desktop upstream developers. I'm sorry for my intrusion here, but I feel the need to write my opinion in this thread. We already worked with a lot of distros maintainers and always worked happily with them. We got problems with Dan only. He already insulted a lot of developers, maintainers and reviewers. He dont know how to work with other people, and specifically with free and open source projects upstream authors. If he has issues, he demands a solution from upstream devs without trying to help in any way, and if he dont receive answers, he start to insult. I'm really worried if he can maintain MATE desktop packages with his way to cooperate with other people and upstream maintainers. Cheers, Stefano Karapetsas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide report: 20120825 changes
Hi, On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Parag N(पराग़) panem...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 17:39 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: On 8/27/12 5:38 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:27 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: That said it's probably less work to grab a copy of pango-1.30.1 and just build compat-pangox from that. I would prefer if we could get a snapshot with the 2 1/2 year old gtkglext change built that removed the pangox dependency. We're talking about API that has been deprecated for three quarters of a decade... Behdad was so nice to quickly put up a pangox-compat module here: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/pangox-compat/0.0/ Do we have a volunteer for packaging that ? I expect this to be a 'package and forget' operation... Packaged this at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852416. Can someone help with its review? pangox-compat package is now built in f19 and for f18, update submitted to f18-testing. Thanks, Parag. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: F17: DirectFB
On 08/27/2012 10:59 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi Gerry, Try contacting the main dev. mailing-list of DirectFB. I'm sure you'll get an answer there. Btw, DirectFB-1.5.3 is rather old, DirectFB-1.6.1 is rather the latest stable release. -Ilyes Thanks Ilyes. I'll try posting over on the directfb dev list. Gerry -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [389-devel] Please review: various mem leaks and coverity errors
ack. On 08/27/2012 01:44 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Re: Re: Mate-Desktop: please moderate
Stefano Karapetsas wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I don't accept it. Dan reacting poorly is a given, and something he (and I with him) are working on. I personally don't feel it helps taking your greivances public, as now Dan's perception of you (and now potentially others) will be colored as hostile. Hi, I'm one of MATE Desktop upstream developers. I'm sorry for my intrusion here, but I feel the need to write my opinion in this thread. We already worked with a lot of distros maintainers and always worked happily with them. We got problems with Dan only. He already insulted a lot of developers, maintainers and reviewers. He dont know how to work with other people, and specifically with free and open source projects upstream authors. If he has issues, he demands a solution from upstream devs without trying to help in any way, and if he dont receive answers, he start to insult. I'm really worried if he can maintain MATE desktop packages with his way to cooperate with other people and upstream maintainers. Ok, thanks for your input, really. However, I'm of the opinion firmly now that this has gone on long enough to be harmful and non-constructive for everyone involved. Can this thread be moderated please? I humbly ask anyone who wishes to take this further to contact the community working group https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Community_working_group#Contact (or me, and I'd be happy to do it for you). being mindful of: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Test-Announce] 2012-08-29 @ 16:00 UTC - F18 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #5
# F18 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #5 # Date: 2012-08-29 # Time: 16:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net Note: This is the new time for regular blocker review meetings We'll be running through the alpha blockers and nice-to-haves. The current list of blocker bugs is available at: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current We'll be reviewing the bugs to determine ... 1. Whether they meet the Alpha release criteria [1] and should stay on the list 2. Whether they are getting the attention they need [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Alpha_Release_Criteria For guidance on Blocker and Nice-to-have (NTH) bugs, please refer to - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_nth_bug_process For the blocker review meeting protocol, see - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: 3 day minimum in updates-testing for F18?
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:37:27 -0600 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote: Bodhi seems to be enforcing 7 days in updates-testing for F18. Are we going to switch to the 3 day minimum described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Pre_Beta? It's set that way in it's config, but bodhi isn't honoring it for some reason. :( Will investigate. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
guile-2.x: what is the way forward
The update to guile-2.x has been blocked for almost 1.5 years now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238 Long story short, existing programs are not ready to use guile-2.x, while newer versions of aiselriot (part of GNOME) need it. Creating a compat-guile or a guile2 package can be one way forward. What do you think? Would be good to get this resolved finally. Thanks, Debarshi -- If you break down the amazement with some simple rules it's only disappointment which is underneath. -- Vivek Shah pgpHP2Jlp7XSE.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: guile-2.x: what is the way forward
Debarshi Ray wrote: The update to guile-2.x has been blocked for almost 1.5 years now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238 Long story short, existing programs are not ready to use guile-2.x, while newer versions of aiselriot (part of GNOME) need it. Creating a compat-guile or a guile2 package can be one way forward. if these can be made parallel-installable, that's the way to go. As it appears the old one isn't going away any time soon, my opinion is to package the new one as guile2. If that assumption about the expected lifetime of guile(1) is false, then compat-guile. -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Rawhide boot problems
I've got two Rawhide VMs, one x86_64, one i686, both otherwise identical. I last booted them yesterday and did a yum repo-sync. Today, neither of them will boot. First, systemd complained about being unable to find systemd-journal-flush.service. Sure enough, it wasn't in the initramfs. So I added $systemdsystemunitdir/systemd-journal-flush.service to /usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/98systemd/module-setup.sh, and regenerated the initramfs. Now the boot gets past that point, but starts doing this over and over, apparently forever, even in emergency mode: [ OK ] Reached target Basic System. [ 5.337054] systemd-journald[722]: Received SIGUSR1 [ 5.364465] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [817] did not accept message -1 (Connection refused), kill it [ 5.372587] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [821] did not accept message -1 (Connection refused), kill it [ 5.373956] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [823] did not accept message -1 (Connection refused), kill it [ 5.375104] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [824] did not accept message -1 (Connection refused), kill it [ 5.376358] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [826] did not accept message -1 (Connection refused), kill it [ 5.377670] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [829] did not accept message -1 (Connection refused), kill it [ 5.378890] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [831] did not accept message -1 (Connection refused), kill it [ 5.380187] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [834] did not accept message -1 (Connection refused), kill it [ 5.381802] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [837] did not accept message -1 (Connection refused), kill it [ 5.383105] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [838] did not accept message -1 (Connection refused), kill it [ 5.386671] systemd-udevd[763]: worker [786] did not accept message -1 (Connection refused), kill it [ 35.340097] systemd-journald[722]: Received SIGTERM [ 35.356677] systemd[1]: Running in intial RAM disk. Welcome to Fedora 19 (Rawhide) dracut-023-2.fc18 (Initramfs)! Starting Journal Service... Starting Dracut cmdline hook... [ OK ] Reached target Sockets. [ OK ] Listening on udev Kernel Socket. [ OK ] Listening on udev Control Socket. [ OK ] Reached target Encrypted Volumes. Starting Setup Virtual Console... [ OK ] Reached target Swap. [ OK ] Reached target Local File Systems. Starting Tell Plymouth To Write Out Runtime Data... [ 35.531873] systemd[1]: systemd-journald.service holdoff time over, scheduling restart. [ OK ] Started Tell Plymouth To Write Out Runtime Data. [ OK ] Stopped Trigger Flushing of Journal to Persistent Storage. Stopping Journal Service... [ OK ] Stopped Journal Service. Starting Journal Service... [ OK ] Started Journal Service. Starting Trigger Flushing of Journal to Persistent Storage... [ 35.884485] systemd-journald[881]: Fixed max_use=48.9M max_size=6.1M min_size=64.0K keep_free=24.4M [ 35.895630] systemd-journald[881]: Vacuuming... [ OK ] Started Trigger Flushing of Journal to Persistent Storage. [ 35.945177] systemd-journald[881]: Received SIGUSR1 [ OK ] Started Setup Virtual Console. [ OK ] Reached target System Initialization. dracut-cmdline[885]: Warning: Option 'KEYTABLE' is deprecated, use 'KEYMAP' instead. dracut-cmdline[885]: Warning: Option 'SYSFONT' is deprecated, use 'FONT' instead. [ OK ] Started Dracut cmdline hook. Starting Dracut pre-udev hook... [ OK ] Started Dracut pre-udev hook. Starting udev Kernel Device Manager... [ 36.107496] system-udevd[948]: starting version 188 [ OK ] Started udev Kernel Device Manager. Starting Dracut pre-trigger hook... [ OK ] Reached target Basic System. [ 36.691716] systemd-journald[881]: Received SIGUSR1 ... Does anybody recognize the problem? -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Rawhide boot problems
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:43:14 -0600 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote: I've got two Rawhide VMs, one x86_64, one i686, both otherwise identical. I last booted them yesterday and did a yum repo-sync. Today, neither of them will boot. ...snip... Does anybody recognize the problem? Yes. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847418 downgrade to: systemd-188-3.fc18 (NOTE: NOT fc19) then rebuild your initramfs with dracut kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Rawhide boot problems
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: Yes. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847418 downgrade to: systemd-188-3.fc18 (NOTE: NOT fc19) then rebuild your initramfs with dracut Thank you, Kevin! I was hunting through dracut bugs looking for this, instead of systemd bugs -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
anybody working on smuxi?
hello guy I want to build smuxi irc client for fedora but just wondering first if anybody is working on it? http://www.smuxi.org/page/About Let me know asap Regards, Adrian.- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
i18n translation contact
Hi, I'm working on the Fedora/Rhel7 firstboot module, and I have some changes to the firstboot module pot files. I wonder who I should cantact for these translating things which are visible to end user. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks a lot Dave -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: i18n translation contact
Hi, On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Dave Young dyo...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I'm working on the Fedora/Rhel7 firstboot module, and I have some changes to the firstboot module pot files. I wonder who I should cantact for these translating things which are visible to end user. For translation related issues contact to l10n people on tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org list. More can be read at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N Thanks, Parag. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: i18n translation contact
On 08/29/2012 10:54 AM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: For translation related issues contact to l10n people on tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org list. More can be read at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N Thanks very much, will contact i10n list Thanks, Parag. -- Thanks Dave -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: i18n translation contact
2012/8/28 Dave Young dyo...@redhat.com: On 08/29/2012 10:54 AM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: For translation related issues contact to l10n people on tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org list. More can be read at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N Thanks very much, will contact i10n list There is a firstboot project in Fedora's Transifex instance [1]. Would you please claim maintanership or comaintanership of that project and upload the latest pot file? I would be more than happy to translate it to Spanish and help you with the pot upload. [1] https://fedora.transifex.com/projects/p/firstboot/ thank you and kind regards Domingo Becker -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: guile-2.x: what is the way forward
On 08/28/2012 08:17 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote: The update to guile-2.x has been blocked for almost 1.5 years now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238 Long story short, existing programs are not ready to use guile-2.x, while newer versions of aiselriot (part of GNOME) need it. Creating a compat-guile or a guile2 package can be one way forward. What do you think? Would be good to get this resolved finally. Thanks, Debarshi I've been trying to patch some of the apps to compile with guile-2.x some time ago. Some of them compile, some of them even run.. With my limited knowledge of the guile API, I haven't finished all of them though. The good thing is that the upstream is very active and very willing to help. I think that installing both versions in parallel (if possible) is a good way to go, but then the old programs won't ever get patched:) IMO the best way would be some kind of a compatibility layer in guile itself, but I don't think that's worth the trouble and the net gain for the upstream. -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[perl-WWW-RobotRules] Specify all dependencies
commit 624bb76ca9590baac70a5c3f07ddb685575fdf8d Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com Date: Mon Aug 27 17:05:43 2012 +0200 Specify all dependencies perl-WWW-RobotRules.spec | 10 +++--- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-WWW-RobotRules.spec b/perl-WWW-RobotRules.spec index df81fcf..426a314 100644 --- a/perl-WWW-RobotRules.spec +++ b/perl-WWW-RobotRules.spec @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: perl-WWW-RobotRules Version:6.02 -Release:3%{?dist} +Release:4%{?dist} Summary:Database of robots.txt-derived permissions License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries @@ -8,12 +8,13 @@ URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/WWW-RobotRules/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/WWW-RobotRules-%{version}.tar.gz BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: perl(AnyDBM_File) +BuildRequires: perl(Carp) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Fcntl) +BuildRequires: perl(LWP::RobotUA) BuildRequires: perl(URI) = 1.10 +BuildRequires: perl(URI::URL) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) -Requires: perl(AnyDBM_File) -Requires: perl(Fcntl) Requires: perl(URI) = 1.10 Conflicts: perl-libwww-perl 6 @@ -50,6 +51,9 @@ make test %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Mon Aug 27 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 6.02-4 +- Specify all dependencies. + * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 6.02-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 851873] perl-Dancer-1.3100 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851873 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 847657] perl-Dancer-1.3099 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847657 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-version] Specify all dependencies
commit 892a95bf1145ab1839b3603a3edd8ae21bc3b46b Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com Date: Tue Aug 28 09:28:13 2012 +0200 Specify all dependencies perl-version.spec |8 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-version.spec b/perl-version.spec index 52d596d..e9d0589 100644 --- a/perl-version.spec +++ b/perl-version.spec @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Name: perl-version Epoch: 3 Version:0.99 -Release:240%{?dist} +Release:241%{?dist} Summary:Perl extension for Version Objects License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp) = 0.13 # IO::Handle is optional BuildRequires: perl(lib) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.45 +BuildRequires: perl(Test::Harness) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) %{?perl_default_filter} @@ -48,7 +49,6 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} \; 2/dev/null make test %files -%defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes README %doc %{perl_vendorarch}/version.pod %dir %{perl_vendorarch}/version/ @@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ make test %{_mandir}/man3/version::Internals.3pm* %changelog +* Tue Aug 28 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 3:0.99-241 +- Add test BR perl(Test::Harness) +- Remove %%defattr + * Fri Aug 17 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 3:0.99-240 - Increase release to replace perl sub-package (bug #848961) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive: 381704c10802bbbf13e8e99d7ddccfbe Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive] Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
commit 12e02c51fed6c88e8ee2ce0f7f4241cd23ee98fe Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Tue Aug 28 08:57:43 2012 +0100 Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) Sub::Exporter is an incredibly powerful module, but with that power comes great responsibility, er- as well as some runtime penalties. This module is a Sub::Exporter wrapper that will let your users just use Exporter if all they are doing is picking exports, but use Sub::Exporter if your users try to use Sub::Exporter's more advanced features features, like renaming exports, if they try to use them. Note that this module will export @EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK package variables for Exporter to work. Additionally, if your package uses advanced Sub::Exporter features like currying, this module will only ever use Sub::Exporter, so you might as well use it directly. .gitignore |1 + ...orter-Progressive-0.001006-old-Test::More.patch | 94 +++ perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive.spec | 99 sources|1 + 4 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index e69de29..d1af355 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +/Sub-Exporter-Progressive-[0-9.]*.tar.gz diff --git a/Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-old-Test::More.patch b/Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-old-Test::More.patch new file mode 100644 index 000..1b88196 --- /dev/null +++ b/Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-old-Test::More.patch @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +--- Makefile.PL Makefile.PL +@@ -10,6 +10,6 @@ WriteMakefile( + NAME = 'Sub-Exporter-Progressive', + VERSION_FROM = 'lib/Sub/Exporter/Progressive.pm', + $key = { +- 'Test::More' = 0.89, ++ 'Test::More' = 0.47, + } + ); +--- t/all.t t/all.t +@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ + use strict; + use warnings; + +-use Test::More 0.89; ++use Test::More tests = 6; + use List::Util 'first'; + use lib 't/lib'; + use A::JunkAll; +@@ -10,5 +10,3 @@ use A::JunkAll; + ok(main-can('junk1'), 'sub exported'); + ok(main-can('junk2'), 'sub exported'); + ok(! $INC{'Sub/Exporter.pm'}, 'Sub::Exporter not loaded'); +- +-done_testing; +--- t/basic.t t/basic.t +@@ -2,12 +2,10 @@ + use strict; + use warnings; + +-use Test::More 0.89; ++use Test::More tests = 2; + use List::Util 'first'; + use lib 't/lib'; + use A::Junk 'junk1'; + + ok(main-can('junk1'), 'requested sub exported'); + ok(! $INC{'Sub/Exporter.pm'}, 'Sub::Exporter not loaded'); +- +-done_testing; +--- t/default.t t/default.t +@@ -2,12 +2,10 @@ + use strict; + use warnings; + +-use Test::More 0.89; ++use Test::More tests = 2; + use List::Util 'first'; + use lib 't/lib'; + use A::Junk; + + ok(main-can('junk2'), 'sub exported'); + ok(! $INC{'Sub/Exporter.pm'}, 'Sub::Exporter not loaded'); +- +-done_testing; +--- t/sex.t t/sex.t +@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ + use strict; + use warnings; + +-use Test::More 0.89; ++use Test::More tests = 2; + BEGIN { + plan skip_all = 'Sub::Exporter not installed' + unless eval { require Sub::Exporter }; +@@ -14,5 +14,3 @@ use A::Junk 'junk1' = { -as = 'junk' } + + ok(main-can('junk'), 'sub renamed with Sub::Exporter'); + ok($INC{'Sub/Exporter.pm'}, 'Sub::Exporter loaded'); +- +-done_testing; +--- t/tags.t t/tags.t +@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ + use strict; + use warnings; + +-use Test::More 0.89; ++use Test::More tests = 4; + use List::Util 'first'; + use lib 't/lib'; + use A::Junk ':other'; +@@ -10,6 +10,3 @@ ok(!main-can('junk1'), 'junk1 not expor + ok(!main-can('junk2'), 'junk2 not exported'); + ok(main-can('junk3'), 'junk3 exported'); + ok(! $INC{'Sub/Exporter.pm'}, 'Sub::Exporter not loaded'); +- +-done_testing; +- diff --git a/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive.spec b/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive.spec new file mode 100644 index 000..6ea2d03 --- /dev/null +++ b/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive.spec @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +# We need to patch the test suite if we have old versions of Test::More +%global old_test_more %(perl -MTest::More -e 'print (($Test::More::VERSION 0.88) ? 1 : 0);' 2/dev/null || echo 0) + +Name: perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive +Version: 0.001006 +Release: 1%{?dist} +Summary: Only use Sub::Exporter if you need it +Group: Development/Libraries +License: GPL+ or Artistic +URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sub-Exporter-Progressive/ +Source0: http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/L/LE/LEONT/Sub-Exporter-Progressive-%{version}.tar.gz +Patch1:Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-old-Test::More.patch +BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu) +BuildArch: noarch +# === Module Build == +BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) +# === Module Runtime +BuildRequires: perl(Exporter) +BuildRequires: perl(List::Util)
[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive/f18] Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
Summary of changes: 12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive/f17] Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
Summary of changes: 12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive/f16] Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
Summary of changes: 12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-URI] Specify all dependencies
commit 9bf0afbc1aa61a8259b634fd327d719f38dd2478 Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com Date: Tue Aug 28 10:36:39 2012 +0200 Specify all dependencies perl-URI.spec | 15 ++- 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-URI.spec b/perl-URI.spec index f26087e..1ed3dc4 100644 --- a/perl-URI.spec +++ b/perl-URI.spec @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: perl-URI Version:1.60 -Release:4%{?dist} +Release:5%{?dist} Summary:A Perl module implementing URI parsing and manipulation Group: Development/Libraries License:GPL+ or Artistic @@ -9,15 +9,25 @@ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/URI-%{version}.tar.gz BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: perl(Carp) BuildRequires: perl(constant) +BuildRequires: perl(Cwd) +BuildRequires: perl(Data::Dumper) +BuildRequires: perl(Encode) BuildRequires: perl(Exporter) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) +BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec::Functions) BuildRequires: perl(MIME::Base64) +BuildRequires: perl(Net::Domain) +BuildRequires: perl(Storable) +BuildRequires: perl(Test) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) # Business::ISBN - Test::Pod - Pod::Simple - HTML::Entities (HTML::Parser) - URI %if 0%{!?perl_bootstrap:1} BuildRequires: perl(Business::ISBN) %endif Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version)) +Requires: perl(Cwd) +Requires: perl(Data::Dumper) +Requires: perl(Net::Domain) %description This module implements the URI class. Objects of this class represent @@ -57,6 +67,9 @@ make test %{_mandir}/man3/URI::ldap.3pm* %changelog +* Tue Aug 28 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.60-5 +- Specify all dependencies + * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 1.60-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive/el6] Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
Summary of changes: 12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive/el5] Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1)
Summary of changes: 12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive] Created tag perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el5
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el5' was created pointing to: 12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive] Created tag perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el6
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el6' was created pointing to: 12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive] Created tag perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc16
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc16' was created pointing to: 12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive] Created tag perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc18
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc18' was created pointing to: 12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive] Created tag perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc19
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc19' was created pointing to: 12e02c5... Initial import (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 845057] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive - Only use Sub::Exporter if you need it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 845057] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive - Only use Sub::Exporter if you need it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 845057] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive - Only use Sub::Exporter if you need it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.el5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 845057] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive - Only use Sub::Exporter if you need it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 845057] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive - Only use Sub::Exporter if you need it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 852349] New: perl-CPAN-Mini-1.111009 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852349 Bug ID: 852349 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, psab...@redhat.com Assignee: mmasl...@redhat.com Summary: perl-CPAN-Mini-1.111009 is available Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: perl-CPAN-Mini Product: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.111009 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.111008 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Mini/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 746941] perl-Mojolicious-3.35 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941 Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Mojolicious-3.34 is|perl-Mojolicious-3.35 is |available |available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 746941] perl-Mojolicious-3.35 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941 --- Comment #83 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Latest upstream release: 3.35 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 3.30 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mojolicious/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction] Update to 0.08
commit 7df554d3f69ce00e03d5770742b9a1e2cf7eeb2a Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Wed Aug 1 16:44:38 2012 +0100 Update to 0.08 - New upstream release 0.08 - Switch to Sub::Exporter::Progressive - BR: perl(Sub::Exporter::Progressive) ≥ 0.001002 rather than plain perl(Sub::Exporter) perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec | 10 -- sources |2 +- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec b/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec index 19b926c..8eeac2b 100644 --- a/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec +++ b/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ %global noarch_package %(perl -e 'print (($] = 5.013007) ? 1 : 0);') Name: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction -Version: 0.07 +Version: 0.08 Release: 1%{?dist} License: GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Requires: perl(XSLoader) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec) BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp) -BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Exporter) +BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Exporter::Progressive) = 0.001002 BuildRequires: perl(threads) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version)) Requires: perl(Carp) @@ -70,6 +70,12 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %{_mandir}/man3/Devel::GlobalDestruction.3pm* %changelog +* Wed Aug 1 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.08-1 +- Update to 0.08 + - Switch to Sub::Exporter::Progressive +- BR: perl(Sub::Exporter::Progressive) ≥ 0.001002 rather than plain + perl(Sub::Exporter) + * Thu Jul 26 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.07-1 - Update to 0.07 - Actually detect errors in pure-perl test diff --git a/sources b/sources index fa4d145..e651f39 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -59667f28caa270f63b10f28d39e05797 Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.07.tar.gz +2db1c816bb2a5e64fcb47d0bc1c577a7 Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.08.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction] Update to 0.09
commit 2e8d642cd0b5d13ee5e83c7e1d1ec886a1bebbc0 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Thu Aug 9 10:14:06 2012 +0100 Update to 0.09 - New upstream release 0.09 - Rewrite completely broken pure-perl GD detection under threads - Fix pure-perl implementation incorrectly reporting GD during END phase - This release by RIBASUSHI - update source URL perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec | 10 -- sources |2 +- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec b/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec index 8eeac2b..79b84b7 100644 --- a/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec +++ b/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec @@ -2,13 +2,13 @@ %global noarch_package %(perl -e 'print (($] = 5.013007) ? 1 : 0);') Name: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction -Version: 0.08 +Version: 0.09 Release: 1%{?dist} License: GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries Summary: Expose PL_dirty, the flag that marks global destruction Url: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-GlobalDestruction -Source: http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/Devel-GlobalDestruction-%{version}.tar.gz +Source: http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/R/RI/RIBASUSHI/Devel-GlobalDestruction-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu) %if %{noarch_package} BuildArch: noarch @@ -70,6 +70,12 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %{_mandir}/man3/Devel::GlobalDestruction.3pm* %changelog +* Thu Aug 9 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.09-1 +- Update to 0.09 + - Rewrite completely broken pure-perl GD detection under threads + - Fix pure-perl implementation incorrectly reporting GD during END phase +- This release by RIBASUSHI - update source URL + * Wed Aug 1 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.08-1 - Update to 0.08 - Switch to Sub::Exporter::Progressive diff --git a/sources b/sources index e651f39..5800265 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -2db1c816bb2a5e64fcb47d0bc1c577a7 Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.08.tar.gz +97e52fdf2de2df1843a5d3d9fce725df Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction/f18] (2 commits) ...Update to 0.09
Summary of changes: 7df554d... Update to 0.08 (*) 2e8d642... Update to 0.09 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction] Created tag perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18
The lightweight tag 'perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18' was created pointing to: 2e8d642... Update to 0.09 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 844965] perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844965 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Try-Tiny] Specify all dependencies
commit fc0d4f28497dc996ef20a27e6ae75d12993a4b59 Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com Date: Tue Aug 28 12:03:38 2012 +0200 Specify all dependencies perl-Try-Tiny.spec |7 ++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Try-Tiny.spec b/perl-Try-Tiny.spec index 4301c03..2057564 100644 --- a/perl-Try-Tiny.spec +++ b/perl-Try-Tiny.spec @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Name: perl-Try-Tiny Summary: Minimal try/catch with proper localization of $@ Version: 0.11 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} License: MIT Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Try-Tiny @@ -9,9 +9,11 @@ Source0: http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DO/DOY/Try-Tiny-%{version}.tar BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: perl(Carp) +BuildRequires: perl(Exporter) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version)) +Requires: perl(Exporter) # obsolete/provide old tests subpackage # can be removed during F19 development cycle @@ -54,6 +56,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %{_mandir}/man3/Try::Tiny.3pm* %changelog +* Tue Aug 28 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.11-7 +- Add BR/R perl(Exporter). + * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 0.11-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-PDL
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree: On x86_64: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires libsal_textenc.so Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-JSON-PP] Spec clean-up
commit 5b0705dd3c1a048c3b3b7db1976957ec109204c5 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Tue Aug 28 12:26:36 2012 +0100 Spec clean-up - BR: perl(base), perl(constant) and perl(lib) - Install to vendor directories - Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4 - Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot perl-JSON-PP.spec | 18 -- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-JSON-PP.spec b/perl-JSON-PP.spec index 9e40c6d..496f052 100644 --- a/perl-JSON-PP.spec +++ b/perl-JSON-PP.spec @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: perl-JSON-PP Version: 2.27200 -Release: 240%{?dist} +Release: 241%{?dist} Summary: JSON::XS compatible pure-Perl module License: GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries @@ -8,12 +8,14 @@ URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Meta-YAML/ Source0: http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/MA/MAKAMAKA/JSON-PP-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu) BuildArch: noarch -BuildRequires: perl(B) +BuildRequires: perl(base) BuildRequires: perl(Carp) +BuildRequires: perl(constant) BuildRequires: perl(Data::Dumper) BuildRequires: perl(Exporter) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Getopt::Long) +BuildRequires: perl(lib) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) BuildRequires: perl(Tie::IxHash) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version)) @@ -30,14 +32,13 @@ JSON::PP is a pure-Perl module and is compatible with JSON::XS. %setup -q -n JSON-PP-%{version} %build -perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=perl +perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf %{buildroot} make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; -find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} \; 2/dev/null %{_fixperms} %{buildroot} %check @@ -47,15 +48,20 @@ make test rm -rf %{buildroot} %files -%defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes README %{_bindir}/json_pp -%{perl_privlib}/JSON/ +%{perl_vendorlib}/JSON/ %{_mandir}/man1/json_pp.1* %{_mandir}/man3/JSON::PP.3pm* %{_mandir}/man3/JSON::PP::Boolean.3pm* %changelog +* Tue Aug 28 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 2.27200-241 +- BR: perl(base), perl(constant) and perl(lib) +- Install to vendor directories +- Drop %%defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4 +- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot + * Fri Aug 17 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.27200-240 - Increase release to replace perl sub-package (bug #848961) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Tie-ToObject] Specify all dependencies
commit 1a2c1d6348dd23f38951d3566880dc0b753dd5b8 Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com Date: Tue Aug 28 13:59:08 2012 +0200 Specify all dependencies perl-Tie-ToObject.spec |8 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Tie-ToObject.spec b/perl-Tie-ToObject.spec index bf65c65..8eb7dbf 100644 --- a/perl-Tie-ToObject.spec +++ b/perl-Tie-ToObject.spec @@ -1,16 +1,17 @@ Name: perl-Tie-ToObject Version:0.03 -Release:13%{?dist} +Release:14%{?dist} License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries Summary:Tie to an existing object Source: http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/N/NU/NUFFIN/Tie-ToObject-%{version}.tar.gz Url:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Tie-ToObject BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) +Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: perl(Carp) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util) # tests @@ -58,6 +59,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %{_mandir}/man3/*.3* %changelog +* Tue Aug 28 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.03-14 +- Add BR perl(Carp). + * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 0.03-13 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-JSON-PP] Created tag perl-JSON-PP-2.27200-241.fc19
The lightweight tag 'perl-JSON-PP-2.27200-241.fc19' was created pointing to: 5b0705d... Spec clean-up -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Perl-OSType] Spec clean-up
commit 4a545199abfc3d7ea9906d22392a1bd0817565d9 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Tue Aug 28 13:37:19 2012 +0100 Spec clean-up - Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4 - Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot - Don't delete the extra tests when bootstrapping, but don't run them either perl-Perl-OSType.spec | 21 - 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Perl-OSType.spec b/perl-Perl-OSType.spec index dfee0bc..d2058f5 100644 --- a/perl-Perl-OSType.spec +++ b/perl-Perl-OSType.spec @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ # We don't really need ExtUtils::MakeMaker ≥ 6.31 -%global old_eumm %(perl -MExtUtils::MakeMaker -e 'printf %d\\n, $ExtUtils::MakeMaker::VERSION 6.31 ? 1 : 0;' 2/dev/null || echo 0) +%global old_eumm %(perl -MExtUtils::MakeMaker -e 'print (($ExtUtils::MakeMaker::VERSION 6.31) ? 1 : 0);' 2/dev/null || echo 0) # Test suite needs patching if we have Test::More 0.88 -%global old_test_more %(perl -MTest::More -e 'printf %d\\n, $Test::More::VERSION 0.88 ? 1 : 0;' 2/dev/null || echo 0) +%global old_test_more %(perl -MTest::More -e 'print (($Test::More::VERSION 0.88) ? 1 : 0);' 2/dev/null || echo 0) Name: perl-Perl-OSType Version: 1.002 -Release: 240%{?dist} +Release: 241%{?dist} Summary: Map Perl operating system names to generic types License: GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ BuildRequires:perl(Exporter) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) -# Optional tests +# Optional tests, not run for this dual-lived module when bootstrapping %if !%{defined perl_bootstrap} BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Coverage::TrustPod) BuildRequires: perl(Test::CPAN::Meta) @@ -62,25 +62,28 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags} rm -rf %{buildroot} make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; -find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} \; 2/dev/null %{_fixperms} %{buildroot} %check -%if %{defined perl_bootstrap} -rm -rf xt +make test +%if !%{defined perl_bootstrap} +make test TEST_FILES=$(echo $(find xt/ -name '*.t')) %endif -make test TEST_FILES=t/*.t xt/*/*.t %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} %files -%defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes LICENSE README %{perl_vendorlib}/Perl/ %{_mandir}/man3/Perl::OSType.3pm* %changelog +* Tue Aug 28 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.002-241 +- Drop %%defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4 +- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot +- Don't delete the extra tests when bootstrapping, but don't run them either + * Fri Aug 17 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.002-240 - Increase release to replace perl sub-package (bug #848961) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Test-use-ok] Specify all dependencies
commit 8a24292816a01b7841f0d086755fc8e76b819ca4 Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com Date: Tue Aug 28 14:37:28 2012 +0200 Specify all dependencies perl-Test-use-ok.spec |8 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Test-use-ok.spec b/perl-Test-use-ok.spec index 86472c5..02e07df 100644 --- a/perl-Test-use-ok.spec +++ b/perl-Test-use-ok.spec @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: perl-Test-use-ok Version: 0.02 -Release: 15%{?dist} +Release: 16%{?dist} Summary: Alternative to Test::More::use_ok License: MIT Group: Development/Libraries @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) +# Requires of bundled library inc::Module::Install +BuildRequires: perl(Cwd) +BuildRequires: perl(File::Path) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version)) %description @@ -52,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %{_mandir}/man3/ok.3pm* %changelog +* Tue Aug 28 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.02-16 +- Specify all dependencies. + * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 0.02-15 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-PDL
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires libsal_textenc.so Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Perl-OSType] Created tag perl-Perl-OSType-1.002-241.fc19
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl-OSType-1.002-241.fc19' was created pointing to: 4a54519... Spec clean-up -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 783740] perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 not available in RHEL 6 PPC64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783740 --- Comment #1 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt --- perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5-1.3-6 requirements: $ rpm -qpR perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5-1.3-6.el6.src.rpm -- perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) /usr/bin/iconv rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 -- $ rpm -qR perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 -- perl = 0:5.000 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) perl(Digest::MD5) perl(Exporter) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 -- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker] Do not build-require itself
commit 7ca116b9ff30be66a819e5da2d88a307b897ce2d Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Tue Aug 28 16:35:51 2012 +0200 Do not build-require itself perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec | 29 + 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec b/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec index a69cfdc..c10e196 100644 --- a/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec +++ b/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec @@ -1,40 +1,41 @@ -%global real_version 6.63_02 +%global cpan_version 6.63_02 Name: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker -Version:6.63.02 -Release:240%{?dist} +Version:%(echo '%{cpan_version}' | tr _ .) +Release:241%{?dist} Summary:Create a module Makefile License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/ExtUtils-MakeMaker/ -Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MS/MSCHWERN/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-%{real_version}.tar.gz +Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MS/MSCHWERN/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-%{cpan_version}.tar.gz # Do not set RPATH to perl shared-library modules by default. Bug #773622. # This is copy from `perl' package. This is distributor extension. Patch0: %{name}-6.62-USE_MM_LD_RUN_PATH.patch BuildArch: noarch -BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) +# Makefile.Pl uses ExtUtils::MakeMaker from ./lib +BuildRequires: perl(Carp) +BuildRequires: perl(Cwd) +BuildRequires: perl(Exporter) +BuildRequires: perl(File::Path) BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec) = 0.8 +BuildRequires: perl(lib) # Unbundled BuildRequires: perl(File::Copy::Recursive) # Tests: BuildRequires: perl(AutoSplit) -BuildRequires: perl(Carp) BuildRequires: perl(CPAN::Meta) -BuildRequires: perl(Cwd) BuildRequires: perl(Data::Dumper) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Command) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Install) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Installed) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Manifest) -BuildRequires: perl(Exporter) +BuildRequires: perl(File::Find) +BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp) BuildRequires: perl(Getopt::Long) BuildRequires: perl(IO::File) BuildRequires: perl(lib) BuildRequires: perl(Parse::CPAN::Meta) BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Man) -BuildRequires: perl(File::Find) -BuildRequires: perl(File::Path) -BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp) BuildRequires: perl(Test::Harness) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) # Optional tests @@ -59,7 +60,7 @@ Makefile.PL. It is based on the Makefile.SH model provided by Andy Dougherty and the perl5-porters. %prep -%setup -q -n ExtUtils-MakeMaker-%{real_version} +%setup -q -n ExtUtils-MakeMaker-%{cpan_version} %patch0 -p1 # Remove bundled modules rm -rf bundled/* ||: @@ -86,6 +87,10 @@ make test %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue Aug 28 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 6.63.02-241 +- Compute RPM version +- Do not build-require itself, the build script runs from ./lib + * Mon Aug 13 2012 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 6.63.02-240 - update version to the same as in perl.srpm - Bump release to override sub-package from perl.spec -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-YAML] Specify all dependencies
commit f5219056eb51e7a7512e1ed6dc9aa5506dde8a60 Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com Date: Tue Aug 28 16:20:40 2012 +0200 Specify all dependencies perl-YAML.spec |7 ++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-YAML.spec b/perl-YAML.spec index ccb55c5..13a95d2 100644 --- a/perl-YAML.spec +++ b/perl-YAML.spec @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: perl-YAML Version:0.84 -Release:3%{?dist} +Release:4%{?dist} Summary:YAML Ain't Markup Language (tm) License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries @@ -9,9 +9,11 @@ Source0: http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/MS/MSTROUT/YAML-%{versi BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: perl(Carp) BuildRequires: perl(constant) +BuildRequires: perl(Cwd) BuildRequires: perl(Data::Dumper) BuildRequires: perl(Exporter) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) +BuildRequires: perl(File::Path) BuildRequires: perl(lib) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version)) Requires: perl(Carp) @@ -57,6 +59,9 @@ make test %{_mandir}/man3/YAML*.3* %changelog +* Tue Aug 28 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.84-4 +- Specify all dependencies. + * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 0.84-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 851721] Review Request: perl-Net-Nessus-XMLRPC - Communicate with Nessus scanner(v4.2+) via XMLRPC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851721 Olivier Bilodeau oliv...@bottomlesspit.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||perl-devel@lists.fedoraproj ||ect.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 852503] Review Request: perl-Net-Radius - Object-oriented Perl interface to RADIUS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852503 Olivier Bilodeau oliv...@bottomlesspit.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||perl-devel@lists.fedoraproj ||ect.org Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 844965] perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844965 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-12840/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.09-1.fc18 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 851873] perl-Dancer-1.3100 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851873 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-12848/perl-Dancer-1.3100-1.fc18 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File MailTools-2.10.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MailTools: bb1ee1b02913b94104209acda0163933 MailTools-2.10.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-MailTools] Update to 2.10
commit 54eef31f5e3368b8aa2359458f5670a992401878 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Tue Aug 28 22:07:07 2012 +0100 Update to 2.10 - New upstream release 2.10: - Mail::Mailer::smtp set from address twice (CPAN RT#77161) - Mail::Mailer::smtps did not support the From option (CPAN RT#77161) - Mail::Util::mailaddress has now an optional parameter to set the returned value explicitly (CPAN #75975) - BR: perl(base) - Drop BR: perl(Config) and perl(POSIX), not dual-lived - Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4 - Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot perl-MailTools.spec | 20 ++-- sources |2 +- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-MailTools.spec b/perl-MailTools.spec index 9fe11e4..9cecf2f 100644 --- a/perl-MailTools.spec +++ b/perl-MailTools.spec @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Summary: Various mail-related perl modules Name: perl-MailTools -Version: 2.09 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Version: 2.10 +Release: 1%{?dist} License: GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MailTools/ @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ Patch0: MailTools-2.08-UTF8.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: perl = 3:5.8.1 +BuildRequires: perl(base) BuildRequires: perl(Carp) -BuildRequires: perl(Config) BuildRequires: perl(Date::Format) BuildRequires: perl(Date::Parse) BuildRequires: perl(Exporter) @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ BuildRequires:perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(IO::Handle) BuildRequires: perl(Net::Domain) = 1.05 BuildRequires: perl(Net::SMTP) = 1.03 -BuildRequires: perl(POSIX) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version)) @@ -52,7 +51,6 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags} rm -rf %{buildroot} make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';' -find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} ';' 2/dev/null %{_fixperms} %{buildroot} %check @@ -63,7 +61,6 @@ make test TEST_FILES=xt/*.t rm -rf %{buildroot} %files -%defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc ChangeLog README* examples/ %dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Mail/ %dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Mail/Field/ @@ -112,6 +109,17 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %{_mandir}/man3/Mail::Util.3pm* %changelog +* Tue Aug 28 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2.10-1 +- Update to 2.10 + - Mail::Mailer::smtp set from address twice (CPAN RT#77161) + - Mail::Mailer::smtps did not support the From option (CPAN RT#77161) + - Mail::Util::mailaddress has now an optional parameter to set the returned +value explicitly (CPAN #75975) +- BR: perl(base) +- Drop BR: perl(Config) and perl(POSIX), not dual-lived +- Drop %%defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4 +- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot + * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 2.09-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild diff --git a/sources b/sources index 2705db2..a325997 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -2ab874c4202d647e0fc58dd7cffb59f6 MailTools-2.09.tar.gz +bb1ee1b02913b94104209acda0163933 MailTools-2.10.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-MailTools/f18] Update to 2.10
Summary of changes: 54eef31... Update to 2.10 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-MailTools] Created tag perl-MailTools-2.10-1.fc18
The lightweight tag 'perl-MailTools-2.10-1.fc18' was created pointing to: 54eef31... Update to 2.10 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-MailTools] Created tag perl-MailTools-2.10-1.fc19
The lightweight tag 'perl-MailTools-2.10-1.fc19' was created pointing to: 54eef31... Update to 2.10 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 849609] perl-homedir.csh causes login error for users with CSH as default shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849609 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-08-28 19:26:55 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-local-lib-1.008004-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 849609] perl-homedir.csh causes login error for users with CSH as default shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849609 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-local-lib-1.008004-5.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel