Hi,
I currently maintains fusioninventory stack in Fedora / EPEL
fusioninventory-agent
perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-Deploy
perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-ESX
perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-NetDiscovery (to be EOL)
perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-NetInventory (new in F18, to be EOL)
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com a écrit:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847418
downgrade to:
systemd-188-3.fc18
(NOTE: NOT fc19)
Just so that I understand. What version of systemd and kernel should
Rawhide users *not* use to avoid the issue?
I couldn't figure this out by
Jerry James wrote:
I've got two Rawhide VMs, one x86_64, one i686, both otherwise
identical. I last booted them yesterday and did a yum repo-sync.
Today, neither of them will boot.
First, systemd complained about being unable to find
systemd-journal-flush.service. Sure enough, it wasn't in
On 08/29/2012 12:31 PM, Domingo Becker wrote:
2012/8/28 Dave Young dyo...@redhat.com:
On 08/29/2012 10:54 AM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
For translation related issues contact to l10n people on
tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org list. More can be read at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N
Thanks
Hi,
CC tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org and Neil Horman
What's tell the normal process of translating po file?
Neil, do you remember how to update the po files in kexec-tools before?
On 08/29/2012 04:00 PM, Dave Young wrote:
On 08/29/2012 12:31 PM, Domingo Becker wrote:
2012/8/28 Dave Young
Are any Fedora developers going to be going to the talk by Arjan on
system updates (https://plus.google.com/114657443111661859546/posts/MGuHZdw2L9R)
at the Linux Plumbers Conference?
It should be interesting?
--
mike c
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
M. M. wrote:
I'm packaging some themes for GNOME Shell, which are compatible with only
GNOME 3.4 (i.e. can be installed with success only on Fedora 17).
What do you think is the best way to act?
Fix the themes to work with the current version? If upstream doesn't do it
(in time), it's your
Hi
I'm orphaning privoxy as I'm not using anymore and need to focus on secondary
archs.
AFAIK it isn't required by any other packages, but needs to be updated to the latest
version if someone decides to pick it up.
Karsten
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Excuse me
I want to take it...
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi all,
I would like to revive a proposal that I have made a while ago, regarding
a framework for managing network interfaces. I called it wicked at that time,
and it's still called that way, but because of potential confusion with WICD
I'll probably change the name soonishly.
This project has
On 08/29/2012 01:58 PM, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Your feedback is very much welcome!
Regards,
Olaf
Why Did You Do This?!
Do we really need yet another network management thing?
===
No, not really. We already have the good old
On 08/28/2012 11:57 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
On 08/27/2012 10:59 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Hi Gerry,
Try contacting the main dev. mailing-list of DirectFB. I'm sure you'll get
an answer there.
Btw, DirectFB-1.5.3 is rather old, DirectFB-1.6.1 is rather the latest
stable release.
-Ilyes
2012/8/29 Dave Young dyo...@redhat.com:
Hi,
CC tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org and Neil Horman
What's tell the normal process of translating po file?
It can be translated online in Transifex [1] or a translator may
download the po file for working offline with it using a po file
editor like
On 08/29/2012 03:17 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On 08/29/2012 01:58 PM, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Why Did You Do This?!
Do we really need yet another network management thing?
===
...
We've got Network Manager, which is also doing
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Dodji Seketeli do...@seketeli.org wrote:
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com a écrit:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847418
downgrade to:
systemd-188-3.fc18
(NOTE: NOT fc19)
Just so that I understand. What version of systemd and kernel should
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:30:34 +0200
Dodji Seketeli do...@seketeli.org wrote:
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com a écrit:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847418
downgrade to:
systemd-188-3.fc18
(NOTE: NOT fc19)
Just so that I understand. What version of systemd and
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
Excuse me
I want to take it...
You're not sponsored yet. How about I take it, and you work on an
update to the latest. Once we work that out to my satisfaction, I'll
sponsor you and you can be comaintainer.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Debarshi Ray rishi...@lostca.se wrote:
The update to guile-2.x has been blocked for almost 1.5 years now:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238
Long story short, existing programs are not ready to use guile-2.x, while
newer
versions of aiselriot
Hi,
I wonder if one way to deal with the network configuration issue is to
try and help different configuration systems work with each other,
rather than to try and create one system which does everything. Last
time I looked into this there were various things which could be done to
allow
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-Catalog:
7a69f3cdf0a3ed32f37f8681ea85d08e XML-Catalog-0.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3101b091b48045ec78842fbecf9ebce06ee1ed0c
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Aug 29 17:55:38 2012 +0200
Initial import
.gitignore|1 +
perl-XML-Catalog.spec | 50 +
sources |1 +
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Olaf Kirch o...@suse.de wrote:
While I my original motivation in working on this is from a SUSE perspective,
I believe other Linux distributions can benefit from this as well, and I'd
be happy to work on this cross-distribution.
Your feedback is very
Good day all,
This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Aug 29th)
in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work):
PDT: 1pm
MDT: 2pm
CDT: 3pm
EDT: 4pm
UTC: 8pm
BST: 9pm
CST: 10pm
Current items on the agenda:
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 13:58 +0200, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to revive a proposal that I have made a while ago, regarding
a framework for managing network interfaces. I called it wicked at that time,
and it's still called that way, but because of potential confusion with WICD
On 08/29/2012 09:25 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
DirectFB says that there are Fedora packaging errors which are causing the
undefined symbol on XUnlockDisplay and
inability to run as normal user.
Upstream is wrong, btw.
The dlopen problem is caused by the fact that they don't pass the
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
The core issue behind why dfbinfo doesn't run as a normal user is due
to the fact that the Linux kernel requires CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG to do any
TTY ioctl() calls. UID 0 (root) has that, but normal users do not. It is
On 8/29/12 3:06 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
I made an updated package (1.6.1) that has these fixes applied and sets
the CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG capability to the dfbinfo binary. (Other DirectFB
binaries probably need the same
On 08/29/2012 03:16 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 8/29/12 3:06 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
wrote:
I made an updated package (1.6.1) that has these fixes applied and sets
the CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG capability to the dfbinfo binary.
On 08/29/2012 02:33 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 08/29/2012 09:25 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
DirectFB says that there are Fedora packaging errors which are causing the
undefined symbol on XUnlockDisplay and
inability to run as normal user.
Upstream is wrong, btw.
The dlopen problem is caused by
On 08/29/2012 11:58 AM, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Your feedback is very much welcome!
The network management/solution of the future most likely ( at least
will need to ) be something that is integrated into ( or with )
systemd/Core OS
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Good day all,
Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today.
For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-08-29/fedora-meeting-1.2012-08-29-19.59.html
Minutes (text):
Hi,
I have rebuilt this package and requested it to be pushed to stable.
Is there anything else I need to do to get it through and stop the nag
emails?
Am I missing some update procedure?
thanks,
-Zach
On 08/29/2012 04:36 AM, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
[schroot]
Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) said:
On 08/28/2012 08:17 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
The update to guile-2.x has been blocked for almost 1.5 years now:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238
Long story short, existing programs are not ready to use guile-2.x, while
newer
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:01:52 -0700
Zach Carter z.car...@f5.com wrote:
Hi,
I have rebuilt this package and requested it to be pushed to stable.
Is there anything else I need to do to get it through and stop the
nag emails?
Am I missing some update procedure?
We are currently in Alpha
Gerry,
You could also use DirectFB's X11 system module, so that you can run
DirectFB-based applications in a usual X11 window. You can tell
DirectFB so by using the DFBARGS environment variable:
$ export DFBARGS=system=x11,mode=1280x800
(probably also w/ disable-module=gl)
Tom,
Ok, I tried testing with the following settings:
$ ls -l /dev/tty{,0,1} /dev/fb{,0}
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 3 Aug 21 21:52 /dev/fb - fb0
crw-rw-rw-. 1 root video 29, 0 Aug 21 21:52 /dev/fb0
crw-rw-rw-. 1 root tty5, 0 Aug 21 21:52 /dev/tty
crw--w. 1 root
On 08/29/2012 06:43 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Gerry,
You could also use DirectFB's X11 system module, so that you can run
DirectFB-based applications in a usual X11 window. You can tell
DirectFB so by using the DFBARGS environment variable:
$ export DFBARGS=system=x11,mode=1280x800
(probably
Ok, thanks Kevin,
Good to know, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't dropping the ball on
anything
-Zach
On 08/29/2012 03:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:01:52 -0700
Zach Carter z.car...@f5.com wrote:
Hi,
I have rebuilt this package and requested it to be pushed to
Okay...
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 2012-08-29 6:17, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
We've got Network Manager, which is also doing it's job nicely and
won't
give you any headaches if you prevent it from stepping on anybody
else's
toes. Or try to make it manage a thousand devices, like on System z.
*** Network Manager is just another
On Wednesday 29 August 2012 21:56:45 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 08/29/2012 11:58 AM, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Your feedback is very much welcome!
The network management/solution of the future most likely ( at least
will need to ) be something that is integrated into ( or with )
systemd/Core
Hi Adam,
On Thursday 30 August 2012 04:16:23 Adam Williamson wrote:
*** Network Manager is just another daemon created for a task
which historically often did not need any daemons. It's almost as if
the new generation of Unix hackers wants to redo everything -
in x10 or x100 times
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852653
Bug ID: 852653
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MailTools:
081af6119a7f231a2c24d2e18bb7dfbd MailTools-2.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 24b0613f2b4b29cee2d82f8bfc665284fa049d3f
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Aug 29 09:31:52 2012 +0100
Update to 2.11
- New upstream release 2.11:
- Fix typo in Mail::Mailer::smtp, which only shows up in Perl 5.14
perl-MailTools.spec |6 +-
Summary of changes:
24b0613... Update to 2.11 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-MailTools-2.11-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
24b0613... Update to 2.11
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-MailTools-2.11-1.fc19' was created pointing to:
24b0613... Update to 2.11
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Font-TTF:
c12a7b6ee866ffedc44d7d18d41eff82 Font-TTF-1.00.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 76e56900de54906d3babb8be366be30b33885edf
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Aug 29 11:52:49 2012 +0200
1.00 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Font-TTF.spec | 60
sources|2 +-
3 files changed,
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686
Summary of changes:
76e5690... 1.00 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-GD-SecurityImage:
679aae59342fb88389eda8647bf4974c GD-SecurityImage-1.72.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852653
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Font-TTF-1.00-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Font-TTF-1.00-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Tk:
13275e85f99ee467a86d9598a437abff Tk-804.030.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 381e835550ed2f797fc6bb48fa9a3b63ecda683b
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Aug 29 16:08:38 2012 +0200
804.030 bump, update source link
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Tk.spec | 12 +++-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6
commit f1596c140ca504855c6eea46d6bcb69a34069f63
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Wed Aug 29 18:16:23 2012 +0200
Update to 1.72
.gitignore |1 +
perl-GD-SecurityImage.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852653
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
59 matches
Mail list logo
