Web old version?
Firefox launch new releases all time. I do no see a web programmers change
your code page all time. While follow w3 standards never mind. So, Firefox
ESR has got a lot stability and standby updates each some time.
So, developers I guess are feel bad with new Firefox way to new rel
On 09/22/2012 01:02 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2012 15:33, Martin Stransky pisze:
Hi guys,
as the subject says there are test packages available for your beloved
Fedora's. Especially Thunderbird 17 (Earlybird now) needs some love from
you (the 17ESR line is going to be a background
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 01:10:45PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> you can not have BOTH in the repos in a way that
> the installation doses not conflict and you are
Sure we can. It's not pretty, but definitely possible.
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁
--
devel mailing lis
On 23.09.2012 13:10, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 23.09.2012 13:06, schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
>> Has anybody considered to package the ESR releases for Fedora or is the
>> general consensus "that doesn't make much sense, just leads to confusion
>> and is not worth the trouble". I now and then could n
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Sounds nice...
>
> Could you file a bodhi ticket on this?
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/newticket
Filed: https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/695
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:33:56 +0200
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I wrote:
> > 3. If the user did not have some of the packages in the group
> > installed, explicitly listing them installs them, which is usually
> > not what the user wants.
>
> Oops, sorry, I just tested this, I was wrong about that one.
Am 23.09.2012 13:06, schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
> Has anybody considered to package the ESR releases for Fedora or is the
> general consensus "that doesn't make much sense, just leads to confusion
> and is not worth the trouble". I now and then could need a parallel
> installed Firefox ESR for a
I wrote:
> 3. If the user did not have some of the packages in the group installed,
> explicitly listing them installs them, which is usually not what the user
> wants.
Oops, sorry, I just tested this, I was wrong about that one. But that in
turn means that if the user had only subpackages instal
Il 23/09/2012 17:06, Kevin Kofler ha scritto:
> yum --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2012-14137 update
I strongly agree with Kevin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> No surprises that the build system of libtool is as crazy as the
> program itself. I can't even find how the 'libtool' script
> is created ...
Sigh, libtool is probably the most braindead of the autocrap. Good luck with
it, you'll need it! ;-)
Kevin Kofler
-
Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> How is that going to work? The current release will become the previous
> version at some time, and you cannot just downgrade to the ESR at that
> time.
How about upgrading until the next ESR-supported branch and then switching
to the ESR releases? (Just floating the idea.
Hi,
in its Bugzilla comments for the bugs related to:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-14137
Bodhi suggested to upgrade using the following monster command:
su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing kde-workspace-4.9.1-5.fc17
akonadi-1.8.0-1.fc17 analitza-4.9.1-1.fc17 ar
Chris Murphy wrote:
> I would use the word "RELEASE" instead of TC1, TC2, RC1, RC2. So "Fedora
> 18 Alpha RC3" became "Fedora 18 Alpha Release". It was after all a
> "release candidate" and once no longer a candidate, it is a release.
I think "release" is even more confusing to the average user th
Álvaro Castillo wrote:
> If you do not like touchpad. Can disable on your laptop with Fn keys.
1. not all laptops have this and 2. what if I want to use the touchpad, just
not with tapping?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
drago01 wrote:
> Because some people that can actually use it (i.e I never accidentally
> click when trying to move the mouse; maybe you just have a crappy
> touchpad?).
On my notebook, touchpad tapping is off of course. I have this problem each
time I try to use somebody else's touchpad which ha
Hi,
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> We set up a page about this (The link was sent to the list too iirc)
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_enable_touchpad_click#KDE
>
> It still misses the KDE method. Could someone please add it? Please add
> info about gdm etc also if you think it should be presen
On 09/19/2012 12:34 AM, Brendan Jones wrote:
> 1.9.1 pushed to rawhide,f18,f17
Excellent. However, the broken deps still remain. From latest rawhide
report:
> [pytrainer]
> pytrainer-1.9.1-1.fc19.noarch requires gnome-python2-gtkmozembed
Can you also fix it up to not depend on a package th
On 09/23/2012 02:58 PM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> Compose started at Sun Sep 23 08:15:10 UTC 2012
>
> Broken deps for i386
> --
> [gnome-contacts]
> gnome-contacts-3.5.92-2.fc18.i686 requires libcheese.so.7
> gnome-contacts-3
Compose started at Sun Sep 23 08:15:10 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[almanah]
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.16()(64bit)
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 01:06:53PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Has anybody considered to package the ESR releases for Fedora or is the
> general consensus "that doesn't make much sense, just leads to confusion
> and is not worth the trouble". I now and then could need a parallel
It's too bad
On 22.09.2012 13:02, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 21.09.2012 15:33, Martin Stransky pisze:
>> as the subject says there are test packages available for your beloved
>> Fedora's. Especially Thunderbird 17 (Earlybird now) needs some love from
>> you (the 17ESR line is going to be a background for
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:25:25AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 23/09/12 10:20, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> >$ grep /usr/lib/gcc /usr/bin/libtool
> >sys_lib_search_path_spec="/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.1 /usr/lib64
> >/lib64 "
> >compiler_lib_search_dirs="/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-l
On 23/09/12 10:20, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
$ grep /usr/lib/gcc /usr/bin/libtool
sys_lib_search_path_spec="/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.1 /usr/lib64 /lib64
"
compiler_lib_search_dirs="/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.1
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.1/../../../../lib64 /lib/
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:17:10AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:12:51AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > This doesn't look right ...
> >
> > DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: libtool-2.4.2-6.fc18.x86_64 (build)
> > DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: gc
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:12:51AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> This doesn't look right ...
>
> DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: libtool-2.4.2-6.fc18.x86_64 (build)
> DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: gcc = 4.7.1
> DEBUG util.py:257: Installed: gcc-4.7.2-2.fc18.x86_64
This doesn't look right ...
DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: libtool-2.4.2-6.fc18.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: gcc = 4.7.1
DEBUG util.py:257: Installed: gcc-4.7.2-2.fc18.x86_64
(@build/$releasever)
DEBUG util.py:257: gcc = 4.7.2-2.fc18
DEB
Hi,
My name is Erwin Waterlander. I intend to maintain the package wcd for
Fedora, of which I am also the upstream maintainer. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675
Wcd is a mature package, already part of Debian, Ubuntu and Cygwin
(packaged by others).
I provided wcd RPM
On 09/22/2012 09:03 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 07:37:13PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>>> Does it mean Fedora will stop shipping the latest FF/TB and stick to ESR
>>> instead? Or is it for parallel-installation purposes?
>> Assuming RHEL will have ESR (which is reasonable)
28 matches
Mail list logo
