On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 06:45 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > It causes problems for people who build things outside of chroots with
> > straight rpmbuild, though, if they need to ever build different things
> > with different buildreqs (even as test builds).
> >
> > Admitted
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> It causes problems for people who build things outside of chroots with
> straight rpmbuild, though, if they need to ever build different things
> with different buildreqs (even as test builds).
>
> Admittedly, we like to encourage people to use mock, but people will still
On Ter, 2012-09-18 at 16:31 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Seg, 2012-09-17 at 14:15 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > (3) I don't use it any more. I just gave up trying to get files off
> > Android tablets. WTF don't they support USB mass storage like every
> > other thing out there?
>
> A
Hi,
I've built libotr3 as a compat package in rawhide and f18/f17 to prepare
for the API change between libotr-3 and libotr-4.
Applications using libotr that have not been ported to the new libotr-4
should change their Requires: libotr to Requires: libotr3, so they won't
break when libotr, now
Hey, folks.
So the Big LVM Autopart Controversy has been kicked upstairs to FESCo:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/964
If they say 'go with LVM', we'll have to do that.
I have no idea what FESCo will decide, but we should cover our bets
either way, I think, so it will do no harm to do som
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:30:54 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> I sort of got the impression that Benjamin was looking for the
> *upstream* maintainers ...?
Actually I was looking for Jerry; I took the rest of the discussion
off-list.
-- Ben
--
Benjamin R Kreuter
UVA Computer Science
brk..
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 08:43:54AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Benjamin Kreuter
> wrote:
> > I have tried to contact the coq and emacs-common-proofgeneral package
> > maintainers directly, but have not had much luck. If any of those
> > maintainers can shoot me a
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 09:36 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 10/25/2012 10:46 AM, David Lehman wrote:
> > It is planned (but at risk) for the beta and a must-have for GA.
>
> If it's a must-have for GA, but it isn't in the beta, how does it get
> tested?
As part of Final validation testing.
--
Ada
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:51:24AM +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> > > setting up a custom partitioning scheme with LVM. It took me a bit to find
> > > where I could do that (I needed to check "I don't need help", I think),
> > > but
>
Hi Peter,
Would it be OK for me to add the following touchscreen input fixes to
xorg-x11-server in F18 + rawhide?
Sync TouchListener memory allocation with population in TouchSetupListeners()
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-October/034149.html
Xi: Don't check for TOUCH_END, it's neve
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 09:36 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 10/25/2012 10:46 AM, David Lehman wrote:
> > It is planned (but at risk) for the beta and a must-have for GA.
>
> If it's a must-have for GA, but it isn't in the beta, how does it get
> tested?
Before it goes in it will be discussed by th
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote:
> I have tried to contact the coq and emacs-common-proofgeneral package
> maintainers directly, but have not had much luck. If any of those
> maintainers can shoot me an email, that would be great.
Sorry. I have been (and still am) sick.
On 10/25/2012 10:46 AM, David Lehman wrote:
> It is planned (but at risk) for the beta and a must-have for GA.
If it's a must-have for GA, but it isn't in the beta, how does it get
tested?
--
Ian Pilcher
I have tried to contact the coq and emacs-common-proofgeneral package
maintainers directly, but have not had much luck. If any of those
maintainers can shoot me an email, that would be great.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Benjamin R Kreuter
UVA Computer Science
brk...@virginia.edu
KK4FJZ
--
"If large numb
On 10/26/2012 10:24 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
I'm proposing revert for F-18. Let's do the change in rawhide.
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/963
Freeze has happened...
..
Meeting summary
---
..
* AGREED: Freeze now for Beta, stick to current schedule. <--
JBG
--
de
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:51:24AM +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> > setting up a custom partitioning scheme with LVM. It took me a bit to find
> > where I could do that (I needed to check "I don't need help", I think), but
> > then when I tried anaconda crashed, and then the thing to autofile a
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 12:04 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> On 10/25/2012 09:55 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Matthew Miller
>[snip]
> >> It is often useful in enterprise settings to do non-kickstart installs
> >> while
> >> prototyping. *And*, people running Fedora i
On 10/25/2012 03:39 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Hi devels,
I'd like to ask for your opinion, especially those from anaconda,
system-config-* and localization. The last commit in systemd [1] changed
names of configuration files. Does someone else than systemd tools using
them? Fedora 18 is (or wi
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 15:39 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> Hi devels,
> I'd like to ask for your opinion, especially those from anaconda,
> system-config-* and localization. The last commit in systemd [1] changed
> names of configuration files. Does someone else than systemd tools using
> the
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 23:50 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Of course, in checking the code, anaconda for the moment is writing *both*
> files with identical data.
Exactly. And the reason is that there are still tools working with
the /etc/sysconfig/* files. Or aren't there? Believe me I'd be more
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 21:04 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I used to be annoyed by the long device names generated by LVM and didn't
> see myself as needing the complexity on a desktop. Over the years, I've
> found it to be more and more useful to be able to revisit partitioning
> choices without a
- 元のメッセージ -
| Hi devels,
| I'd like to ask for your opinion, especially those from anaconda,
| system-config-* and localization. The last commit in systemd [1]
| changed
| names of configuration files. Does someone else than systemd tools
| using
| them? Fedora 18 is (or will be soon) in fr
22 matches
Mail list logo
