https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855755
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On 11/02/2012 06:57 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?B?IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc29uIg==?=
johan...@gmail.com
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl:
0e57f2d01d96471d9effc3fb43175e84 perl-5.16.2.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/05/2012 09:22 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
You are using your use-case for everyone. If you insist on automatic
process, then the metric should work with more data.
It's good that we elected FESCO to find out and decide which appropriate
metric data should be used to determine that...
commit 37188919aedfa7b50f47974d52a91bed7aad241e
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 5 10:43:05 2012 +0100
Update to 5.16.2
.gitignore |1 +
perl.spec | 14 +++---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com a écrit:
Get a nice group of at least 10 or so folks who are active on this list
to agree to run it full time on their main machine.
Amen brother. Count me in that group if this ever happens.
I already run rawhide on a dedicated box for daily duties like
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-X11-Protocol-Other:
06c1a9df4ccad8c42b0123890063af96 X11-Protocol-Other-21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 24ae61d9bdaa1f7fe103e4e78252040f932c6a99
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 5 10:39:13 2012 +0100
21 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-X11-Protocol-Other.spec | 38 --
sources |2 +-
3
On 11/05/2012 09:39 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:59:54 -0700
Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net escribió:
On 10/31/2012 09:56 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
*
commit acd8b4dbbf9b77434cad7cfb4039e15e90c82d58
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 5 10:57:01 2012 +0100
Remove patch, update MODULE_COMPAT
...5.16.1-PATCH-perl-114220-h-not-equiv-to-h.patch | 83
perl.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855755
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872616
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-LibXML:
c95bbf6bdaef0b16bd7979f7e4f97ec8 XML-LibXML-2.0010.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 80235465a0323c8a5c7bfdda6d352b06cafa9636
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 5 11:16:09 2012 +0100
2.0010 bumpity
.gitignore |1 +
perl-XML-LibXML.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
Le Lun 5 novembre 2012 10:45, Dodji Seketeli a écrit :
Just having a dedicated Rawhide Swat Team of die hard volunteers who
could spot issues early, file more bugs, gently push for fixes in
Rawhide and last but not least build a kind of esprit de corps among
those who suffer Rawhide
On 11/02/2012 11:32 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Hi Miroslav,
It sounds like you are missing f18 branch while creating new build
I always push new Spacewalk packages to rawhide only. The reason is that
always some problem pops up - this time broken dependencies on
spacewalk-web. In rawhide I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872616
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
mike cloaked píše v Ne 04. 11. 2012 v 21:44 +:
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Jiri Eischmann jeisc...@redhat.com
wrote:
This is a very valid argument. I understand this is a devel
list, so we should stay on the technical level, but if we
- Original Message -
Le Lun 5 novembre 2012 10:45, Dodji Seketeli a écrit :
Just having a dedicated Rawhide Swat Team of die hard volunteers
who
could spot issues early, file more bugs, gently push for fixes in
Rawhide and last but not least build a kind of esprit de corps
On Monday, November 05, 2012 06:56 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
mike cloaked píše v Ne 04. 11. 2012 v 21:44 +:
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Jiri Eischmann jeisc...@redhat.com
wrote:
This is a very valid argument. I understand this is a devel
list, so we should stay on
On 11/05/2012 01:12 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
Le Lun 5 novembre 2012 10:45, Dodji Seketeli a écrit :
Just having a dedicated Rawhide Swat Team of die hard volunteers
who
could spot issues early, file more bugs, gently push for fixes in
Rawhide and last but not
commit 6557398aea0b97caf25820ebe8b80ac18bb6b3c0
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 5 12:53:58 2012 +0100
Add missing requirement - Exporter.
perl-Devel-Symdump.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686
Compose started at Mon Nov 5 09:15:26 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[dhcp-forwarder]
dhcp-forwarder-upstart-0.10-1801.fc18.noarch requires /sbin/initctl
[dnf]
dnf-0.2.14-2.git4831982.fc18.noarch requires python-hawkey =
On 11/05/2012 01:13 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Monday, November 05, 2012 06:56 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
mike cloaked píše v Ne 04. 11. 2012 v 21:44 +:
Does anyone have any reliable statistics about the number of users who
feel that release parties and codenames are important to them?
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Jiri Eischmann eischm...@redhat.comwrote:
Release parties and codenames were just examples. It's about the buzz
around releases. You can check Google Trends where you find peaks in
number of searches for Fedora after every release. Or fp.org monthly
stats.
On 11/05/2012 01:11 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 20:55:38 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
and one stable release ( valid for 2 maybe 3 years ) for those in the
community that want something they dont constantly having to upgrade to
and can deploy on their servers. ( ofcourse to
commit fcf8e1c0ebb953d67928a5231863efb05d3aaea5
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 5 14:01:30 2012 +0100
Specify all dependencies
perl-DBD-CSV.spec |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DBD-CSV.spec
commit 7461b80c41065e4a16ddb4afcbdff8b0f448dcc3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 5 14:00:47 2012 +0100
Improve description
perl-Sys-MemInfo.spec |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Sys-MemInfo.spec
commit 102f01ce793df330929f6ef7c10fb28358f5d28c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 5 14:02:28 2012 +0100
Specify all dependencies
perl-Sys-MemInfo.spec |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Sys-MemInfo.spec
commit 5d392a29e50c22982f5a7997ee49bd47bcb4837c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 5 14:02:57 2012 +0100
Modernize spec file
perl-Sys-MemInfo.spec |5 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Sys-MemInfo.spec b/perl-Sys-MemInfo.spec
commit ca549ffb9b51d9a871f29270d933d2762e66c48b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 5 14:04:33 2012 +0100
Teach rpmlint
.rpmlint |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.rpmlint b/.rpmlint
new file mode 100644
index 000..17fddf6
---
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:12:59 -0500,
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
This is a problem - when developers do not work first in Rawhide and
do not push back to branched (or push into branched from Rawhide if
it's on time). We talked about it in the last
Hi,
I'm a Fedora user and, occasionally, contributor.
I'm writing to you only to expose a simple proposal on Fedora future.
We are debating on how Fedora Development cycle could be improved, and, at
the same time, how to maintain its bleeding edge way.
So, this is my proposal:
We could
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:12:59 -0500,
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
This is a problem - when developers do not work first in Rawhide and
do not push back to branched (or push
You can find the same proposal scheme using this link (in order to avoid
mail formatting issues):
http://www.paololeoni.eu/fedora_proposal.jpg
bye,
Paolo
2012/11/5 Paolo Leoni ulixe...@yahoo.it
Hi,
I'm a Fedora user and, occasionally, contributor.
I'm writing to you only to expose a simple
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
The entire QA team (and the entire anaconda team, for that matter) is
currently spending virtually all its time trying to help bash the new
anaconda into something vaguely resembling shape for a fairly
arbitrary
release deadline, so we can ship something called 'the Fedora 18
stable
commit ff7a981be79fd7e937d4bccef3bb0c0a5dc19e2c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 5 14:44:34 2012 +0100
Change license
perl-Sys-MemInfo.spec | 11 +--
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Sys-MemInfo.spec b/perl-Sys-MemInfo.spec
Compose started at Mon Nov 5 08:15:12 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[LabPlot]
LabPlot-1.6.0.2-12.fc18.i686 requires libaudiofile.so.0
LabPlot-1.6.0.2-12.fc18.x86_64 requires libaudiofile.so.0()(64bit)
[PyKDE]
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 19:47 +0200, Alek Paunov wrote:
On 04.11.2012 19:25, Simo Sorce wrote:
note that this is also our strength in some respect because it allows
the system to evolve a lot more quickly, but it also means upgrades are
Indeed.
simply going to break stuff, and that's
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:35:53 -0500,
Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
My idea would be to have two releases:
== Fedora Stable ==
* A release for general users with low volume of security fixes and important
bug fixes.
** Bug fixes would be pushed monthly and QA would be performed on
On 10/31/2012 07:53 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
[perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser]
perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-9.fc17.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Really broken. Does not build with current perl. I suggest that it be
buried in a hole and covered up with a fire (or, if
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 10:45:00AM +0100, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com a écrit:
Additionally, if some number of these folks who pledge to run rawhide
full time were provenpackagers we could just go in and fix things as
they hit (or soon after) instead of waiting a
On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 10:45:00 +0100
Dodji Seketeli do...@seketeli.org wrote:
...snip...
Could we have a rawhide-list for this? I know fighting proliferation
of mailing list is a good thing, but practically speaking, being able
to quickly scan a mailing list before doing a yum update can help
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 11/01/2012 04:21 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:08:36 -0600
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
Some MPI updates:
- I built openmpi 1.6.3 in rawhide yesterday. This had an unexpected
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Jiri Eischmann eischm...@redhat.com wrote:
Release parties and codenames were just examples. It's about the buzz
around releases. You can check Google Trends where you find peaks in
number of searches for Fedora after every release. Or fp.org monthly
stats. You
I like this idea, it would also allow the introduction of things like newer
versions of Libreoffice, KDE, GNOME faster than potentially breaking
changes.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Paolo Leoni ulixe...@yahoo.it wrote:
You can find the same proposal scheme using this link (in order to
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 07:27:06AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I thought about that, but I don't think another list is something do so
lightly. How about rawhide folks add a [rawhide] to their email
subjects here to make them easy to filter out/see.
I'd personally love to see more signal here
Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
Simon Lukasik isim...@fedoraproject.org writes:
Currently, each Fedora release is kept alive for 13(+/-) months.
There
were dozens of threads about shortening or prolonging period -- but I
am
not sure if something like the following has been ever discussed:
Hi,
If/when the real work behind a feature has been done early enough,
getting from Fedora alpha to final consists of just a few bugfixes
Ah well.. only if everybody else did this so all the dependencies are stable.
In which case you just moved the development freeze to earlier date. No
commit cf2671f51e4283d7fc2f0608c3863315575d0d90
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 5 15:36:25 2012 +0100
Correct dependencies
perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec | 19 +--
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec
commit 38557497ba8b68b2e0c515d8409d2ab7fa222cb7
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 5 15:36:46 2012 +0100
Modernize spec file
perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec b/perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec
Le Lun 5 novembre 2012 12:12, Jaroslav Reznik a écrit :
- Original Message -
Le Lun 5 novembre 2012 10:45, Dodji Seketeli a écrit :
Someone wrote in this thread that Gnome updates were painful in
branched.
Well they are horrific in Rawhide. If there was some effort to make
them
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
So, I have been thinking about rawhide.
I agree identifying the problems/issues would be good, and I think
there's something we can do to help with that:
Get a nice group of at least 10 or so folks who are active on this list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For the most part I always run Rawhide. Except for a few weeks after branch.
I like to find the SELinux issues early...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
commit 63d3373030b7bdad93fce9a3b7ca0104bd29e68e
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 5 17:36:44 2012 +0100
Specify all dependencies. Use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT.
Signed-off-by: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
perl-AppConfig.spec | 15
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/01/2012 06:09 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
We were thinking with a few folks more about Self contained feature
but yeah, there's a lack of real definition.
Other thing is - these Self contained features could
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:09:21PM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
That sounds good. Maybe recast those ideas as three levels?
- Critical Path Feature
- Other Enhancement Feature
- New Leaf Feature
We were
On 11/02/2012 07:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Sure, like I said in another mail, we've got better at that than before.
But as I also said in the same mail, you still have to do a version
upgrade every twelve months. That alone is ridiculous for a 'stable'
operating system.
This is an
Summary of changes:
7461b80... Improve description (*)
102f01c... Specify all dependencies (*)
5d392a2... Modernize spec file (*)
ca549ff... Teach rpmlint (*)
ff7a981... Change license (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl
Summary of changes:
7461b80... Improve description (*)
102f01c... Specify all dependencies (*)
5d392a2... Modernize spec file (*)
ca549ff... Teach rpmlint (*)
ff7a981... Change license (*)
51b209e... Merge branch 'master' into el5
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no
commit 51b209efc779419a8b623accf1b28d8dc86369c9
Merge: 7b2c0b9 ff7a981
Author: Orion Poplawski or...@nwra.com
Date: Mon Nov 5 10:46:25 2012 -0700
Merge branch 'master' into el5
.rpmlint |2 ++
perl-Sys-MemInfo.spec | 29 +
2 files changed, 23
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 06:32:20PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, I have been thinking about rawhide.
I agree identifying the problems/issues would be good, and I think
there's something we can do to help with that:
Get a nice group of at least 10 or so folks who are active on this list
On 11/05/2012 09:21 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 10/31/2012 07:53 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
[perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser]
perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-9.fc17.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Really broken. Does not build with current perl. I suggest that it be
buried in a
Le Lun 5 novembre 2012 18:55, Till Maas a écrit :
Rawhide is not intended to be used for anything important and with any
security sensitive data because the used packages are not signed.
Alas
Whenever I asked to get Rawhide packages signed I was also told that it
is, because of Rawhide's
* A release for general users with low volume of security fixes and
important bug fixes.
** Bug fixes would be pushed monthly and QA would be performed on
this monthly batch of updates.
Some packages need more than bug fix updates (unless you are taking a
very
broad view of what a bug is).
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:21:42 +0100
Paolo Leoni ulixe...@yahoo.it wrote:
Hi,
I'm a Fedora user and, occasionally, contributor.
I'm writing to you only to expose a simple proposal on Fedora future.
We are debating on how Fedora Development cycle could be improved,
and, at the same time, how
This tool is still not going to be able to do magic and there will
be
config
things that still need to be redone. Third party repos will still
be
an issue.
It's a clean installation, I don't think it needs any magic. Also
third-party repos are not a problem, we just ignore them and
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:45:14PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
I think Leaf is better than Self contained, since it's unlikely for
the feature to have zero outside dependencies. I think it'd be fine for
such a feature to rely on small changes to existing packages (version
updates, say).
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 18:55:51 +0100
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Rawhide is not intended to be used for anything important and with any
security sensitive data because the used packages are not signed.
Whenever I asked to get Rawhide packages signed I was also told that
it is, because
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 13:23:59 -0500,
Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
This tool is still not going to be able to do magic and there will
be
config
things that still need to be redone. Third party repos will still
be
an issue.
It's a clean installation, I don't think it needs any
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 11:32:07AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Fedora is going to be the first distribution that abandons package
security more and more instead of trying to improve it. As far as I know
starting with preupgrade doing insecure updates were promoted and now
they are going to
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 11:32:07 -0700,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
I would personally love to see koji sign all official builds with a
This was built in koji key.
If the same key is used regardless of release that could allow for hard
links to builds inherited from another release.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:45:14PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
I think Leaf is better than Self contained, since it's unlikely for
the feature to have zero outside dependencies. I think it'd be fine for
such a
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Image-ExifTool:
7f62eae65b6ca1ac140268df98de192b Image-ExifTool-9.04.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit af02a0505ef86b324198076787f70a33bfd051c3
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Nov 5 14:03:47 2012 -0500
9.04
perl-Image-ExifTool.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
It's a clean installation, I don't think it needs any magic. Also
third-party repos are not a problem, we just ignore them and they
won't influence the new system. People will add them manually again
once in 18 months.
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
On 11/05/2012 05:28 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Sure, like I said in another mail, we've got better at that than
before.
But as I also said in the same mail, you still have to do a version
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 07:55:26PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Here, I think you're smooshing together two of the three levels I'd
suggested, putting both non-crit-path enhancements and new leaf
functionality into one category. Is that correct?
Yes, the self-contained wording covers both
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 07:55:26PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Here, I think you're smooshing together two of the three levels I'd
suggested, putting both non-crit-path enhancements and new leaf
functionality
On 5 November 2012 11:17, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/05/2012 09:21 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 10/31/2012 07:53 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
[perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser]
perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-9.fc17.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Really broken.
On 11/05/2012 07:52 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
A crit path update that affects, say, two packages and nothing else,
could be approved by default as well. Many of the crit path
features however affect a large or extremely large package set (e.g.
the sysv-systemd script migration), in which case
On 4 November 2012 23:57, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 12:18 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 00:36 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
2012/11/3 Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 17:04 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
You proposal may work *if* GNOME people take care to respect it. Otherwise
— yes the nuclear option is to only distribute GNOME releases that were
ready at branch time and could be stabilised during all the Fedora test
releases. It may
Hello guys and girls,
I need a review for owncloud:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841
the licences are good, note that there is not much time left if we want to
achieve this approved f18 feature [1]
I admit, this package is quite big. But in return I would be happy to review
On 11/04/2012 01:31 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Yeh, autoqa can't do a whole lot when its builds often intentionally
dependencies break (eg soname bumps). Unless such builds were required
to be done in a staging area - this is *possible* already but not much
used. It'd have to be reasonably
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 10:49:04PM +0100, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
Hello guys and girls,
I need a review for owncloud:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841
the licences are good, note that there is not much time left if we want to
achieve this approved f18 feature [1]
I admit,
On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:49:04 +0100
Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de wrote:
Hello guys and girls,
I need a review for owncloud:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841
the licences are good, note that there is not much time left if we
want to achieve this approved f18 feature
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 01:58:05PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
tongue_in_cheekThat might be because nobody can get past the
installer to test any of the GNOME bits./tongue_in_cheek
Heh. In seriousness, I've been running F18 GNOME on my laptop and, while I
have a number of annoyances with some
On 05.11.2012 15:57, Simo Sorce wrote:
A possibly viable alternative for the ABIs freezing (which we can not
ensure anyway) is the C/C++/etc tooling - If we arm upstreams, packagers
and 3rd parties with powerful source tools (API migration/checking),
just like Google does internally, unsing the
Le Lun 5 novembre 2012 22:33, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 17:04 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
You proposal may work *if* GNOME people take care to respect it.
Otherwise
— yes the nuclear option is to only distribute GNOME releases that were
ready at branch time and could
On 11/02/2012 05:10 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 11/01/2012 04:21 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:08:36 -0600
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
Some MPI updates:
- I built openmpi 1.6.3 in rawhide yesterday. This had an unexpected
bump in the libmpi_f90.so soname.
On Nov 5, 2012 1:21 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 November 2012 11:17, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/05/2012 09:21 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 10/31/2012 07:53 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
[perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser]
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 01:58:05PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
tongue_in_cheekThat might be because nobody can get past the
installer to test any of the GNOME bits./tongue_in_cheek
Heh. In seriousness, I've been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Mon, 5 Nov 2012 11:32:07 -0700
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com escribió:
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 18:55:51 +0100
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Rawhide is not intended to be used for anything important and with
any security sensitive data
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Mon, 5 Nov 2012 08:39:54 +0100
drago01 drag...@gmail.com escribió:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:59:54 -0700
Jesse Keating
On 2012-11-05 12:22, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/05/2012 07:52 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
A crit path update that affects, say, two packages and nothing else,
could be approved by default as well. Many of the crit path
features however affect a large or extremely large package set (e.g.
commit 48224afc13ab5c1f674107d5a9b5443d4664e0f4
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Nov 5 14:14:38 2012 -0500
9.04
perl-Image-ExifTool.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 77d15a19e176c47160d441b858c10ae6cab3b131
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Nov 5 14:15:37 2012 -0500
9.04
perl-Image-ExifTool.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
