Main.hs:31:8:
Could not find module `System'
It is a member of the hidden package `haskell98-2.0.0.1'.
Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
It may be nice, if anyone can tell me in which package I
could find the missed System module.
I had a look and kaya needed
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:56:04PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com said:
* Simplifying the process for self-contained features (e.g. individual
package version upgrades)
I don't see why these are features at all. Surely it's better
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-GitHub:
1b8d5af787c870ce94dade88e322e9d1 Net-GitHub-0.50.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b308bdbf549200048ccf956ddfac287c6a5fc1cb
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 29 10:51:10 2012 +0100
0.50 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-GitHub.spec |8 ++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Paul Whalen pwha...@redhat.com wrote:
Good day all,
Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today.
For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
- Original Message -
From: Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, yum-ow...@fedoraproject.org,
yum-cron-ow...@fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:47:19 PM
Subject: Re: rawhide report:
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 12:32:35 AM
Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements
On 11/28/2012 08:08 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
this proposal was recently
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 1:21:01 AM
Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 09:08:59PM +0100,
- Original Message -
From: Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:50:48 AM
Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:56:04PM -0600,
On 28/11/2012 10:06 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
Hi Alex!
Do you have an srpm we can test with?
Dan
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Alexander Aristotle Davis
aadav...@learn.senecac.on.ca mailto:aadav...@learn.senecac.on.ca
wrote:
On 28/11/2012 5:27 PM, Alexander Aristotle Davis wrote:
Compose started at Thu Nov 29 09:15:25 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[gcc-python-plugin]
gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.9-6.fc18.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-3.fc18
gcc-python2-plugin-0.9-6.fc18.x86_64 requires gcc =
Hi,
I found an older post by KurtZeilenga:
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200501/msg00102.html
and I think RFC4517, 4.2.15. distinguishedNameMatch can be read that
the comparison has to be done by avas and so dn: cn=user
two,dc=example,dc=com to be compared to cn=user
I will get those packages signed.
Thanks
On , Rudolf Kastl
wrote:
Another comment: while you keep that repository up id really
welcome if you could sign the packages in your private repo.
2012/11/29 Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com
Actually the baseurl
provided in your paste does not
Hi,
On 11/29/2012 03:37 PM, John Dennis wrote:
On 11/29/2012 08:47 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
I found an older post by KurtZeilenga:
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200501/msg00102.html
and I think RFC4517, 4.2.15. distinguishedNameMatch can be read that
the comparison
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 16:03 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 15:01:21 -0700,
There are several mechanisms for a developer to get their work into the
release notes. The rel-notes BZ tag was wholly unused during this cycle, to
the best of my knowledge. There were no bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:31:25AM -0700, pete wrote:
It's actually 'fedora_requires_release_note' - you can find it with the
other, more familiar tags.
The response from Chris reminded me of the value of brevity, so I'll add
one comment
Hi,
I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want
upgrade to F18 Beta .
1 - Try Preupgrade but No preupgrade for F17-F18 ?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2012-August/109441.html
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-November/173805.html
Why
On 11/29/2012 04:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
4- use yum but I have bad memories from FC2 about use yum for upgrade
I had two machines updated using yum and although it is not a
recommended it worked without any problems.
Before going that route you should take a look into
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 16:47:16 +,
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
3 - Fedup , gives me a Traceback on transaction test. And don't let me
upgrade .
You probably should rebort this as a bug.
4- use yum but I have bad memories from FC2 about use yum for upgrade
So what you
On 11/29/2012 05:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want
upgrade to F18 Beta .
1 - Try Preupgrade but No preupgrade for F17-F18 ?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2012-August/109441.html
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:47:16 +
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want
upgrade to F18 Beta .
3 - Fedup , gives me a Traceback on transaction test. And don't let
me upgrade .
I used fedup earlier today, to
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:47:16 +
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want
upgrade to F18 Beta .
1 - Try Preupgrade but No preupgrade for F17-F18 ?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2012-August/109441.html
On Qui, 2012-11-29 at 17:21 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:47:16 +
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want
upgrade to F18 Beta .
3 - Fedup , gives me a Traceback on transaction test. And
Il 29/11/2012 17:47, Sérgio Basto ha scritto:
3 - Fedup , gives me a Traceback on transaction test. And don't let me
upgrade
Check if this bug could be related to your experience
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881764
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Qui, 2012-11-29 at 10:23 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:47:16 +
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want
upgrade to F18 Beta .
1 - Try Preupgrade but No preupgrade for F17-F18 ?
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:02:41 +
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Qui, 2012-11-29 at 10:23 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:47:16 +
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want
upgrade
I have signed the packages and updated my repo. I have also created
a rpm to install the repo config and the gpg pub key.
yum install
http://www.edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/17/x86_64/RPMS/enlightenment-repo-0.0.2-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
I also built a new 17 test machine to test out the
Hi everybody,
I would like to do whatever it takes to bring lsyncd, one of the packages
announced as abandoned in [1], up-to-date in EPEL.
The specs [2] build in my mock sandbox for CentOS 5, CentOS 6, and Fedora, and
the resultant packages have been working fine for me.
I work at a prominent
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Troy C wrote:
I've requested co-maintainer ship to bring this package up to speed
again. Thanks for the patches in the bugzilla.
Paul
I would like to do whatever it takes to bring lsyncd, one of the packages
announced as abandoned in [1], up-to-date in EPEL.
The specs
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 05:38 -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
Lacks clarification on what's considered an feature.
Arguably it should be mandatory for feature owners to provide or work
with the documentation and or marketing communities documenting and
publishing what benefits changes
On Qui, 2012-11-29 at 12:28 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
Sounds like a plan, hopefully it won't be too difficult to figure out.
I was just out of space in Hard Disk, correctly writes package
foo needs 100M etc
But should end with a nice message saying you need free space of your
disk before
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881625
Bug ID: 881625
Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.24 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible
Keywords:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881627
Bug ID: 881627
Summary: perl-File-pushd-1.003 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-File-pushd
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881629
Bug ID: 881629
Summary: perl-Net-GitHub-0.50 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-GitHub
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881630
Bug ID: 881630
Summary: perl-Net-IP-1.26 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-IP
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881627
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-pushd:
32c1c7d13e391f68fcd8ea63a5ad8fe7 File-pushd-1.003.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 54df7e2344d182fcd96084c23cfb38fcb60898d2
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 29 10:29:06 2012 +0100
1.003 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-File-pushd.spec | 14 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881630
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-IP:
3a98e3ac45d69ea38a63a7e678bd716d Net-IP-1.26.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 87f1f4dbdef81cebc7cdcb1f9823515156023cc8
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 29 10:52:24 2012 +0100
Enable tests
perl-Net-IP.spec | 14 +++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Net-IP.spec b/perl-Net-IP.spec
index
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881629
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881625
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Bug-fix release. Suitable for F≥17.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible:
70dad7f327a301bf58d0847b1943787c DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.24.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c336fbc8b769be002a33c694ec1546ac8d169fe6
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 29 11:11:33 2012 +0100
0.24 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible.spec | 12 +++-
sources|2 +-
3 files
commit 7528b82eeb5cbfc7afdbf2d2d9a554a3d1e44094
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 29 11:11:33 2012 +0100
0.24 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible.spec | 10 ++
sources|2 +-
3 files
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881625
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.24-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 18.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881625
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.24-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
commit dc1ea023fa870c6f042154189bf939319cb9a269
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca
Date: Thu Nov 29 10:55:57 2012 -0700
httpd 2.4 config fix
dspam-web.conf |7 +--
dspam.spec |5 -
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 508f9810d6822204a75bbdfcaf92a649eee99e24
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca
Date: Thu Nov 29 10:55:57 2012 -0700
httpd 2.4 config fix
dspam-web.conf |7 +--
dspam.spec |5 -
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
508f981... httpd 2.4 config fix (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875603
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-No-Worries-0.7-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875603
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-No-Worries-0.7-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881625
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.24-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your
On 11/29/2012 08:47 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
I found an older post by KurtZeilenga:
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200501/msg00102.html
and I think RFC4517, 4.2.15. distinguishedNameMatch can be read that
the comparison has to be done by avas and so dn: cn=user
Just made a schema update for winSync agreements
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/216
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/216/0001-Ticket-216-disable-replication-agreements.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
On 11/29/2012 06:49 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
On 11/29/2012 03:37 PM, John Dennis wrote:
On 11/29/2012 08:47 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
I found an older post by KurtZeilenga:
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200501/msg00102.html
and I think RFC4517, 4.2.15.
57 matches
Mail list logo
