Re: prefered way of configuring X11 keyboard layouts in F18
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 09:20 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 12/02/2012 10:57 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: system-config-keyboard should do this: 1. Get the old settings: cat /etc/sysconfig/keyboard 2. Set the new settings: su -c 'localectl set-x11-keymap layout [model] [variant] [options]' 3. Remove the old configuration file: su -c 'rm /etc/sysconfig/keyboard' or at least warning that we should do something new like this . http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/systemd.git/commit/?h=f18id=0969ad24898347919865e9298fa01e19cec98649 already attempts to do some kind of automatic conversion. If that is insufficient, please file bugs against systemd. It seems that the virtual console layout is migrated ok, but the x11 part is not. This is what I get on my two upgraded F18 boxes: [root@turre ~]# localectl System Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 VC Keymap: fi X11 Layout: n/a [root@turre ~]# The n/a part is the problem as it falls back to US keyboard. localectl manual says both set-keymap and set-x11-keymap apply to both the keymaps unless --no-convert is specified, but that doesn't seem to happen in practise: [root@turre ~]# localectl set-keymap fi [root@turre ~]# localectl System Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 VC Keymap: fi X11 Layout: n/a [root@turre ~]# localectl set-x11-keymap fi [root@turre ~]# localectl System Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 VC Keymap: fi-latin1 X11 Layout: fi [root@turre ~]# localectl set-keymap fi [root@turre ~]# localectl System Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 VC Keymap: fi X11 Layout: fi X11 Model: pc105 X11 Options: terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp It's a bit bizarre: set-keymap doesn't seem to find fi as the closest matching keyboard for x11 (it probably should), set-x11-keymap considers fi-latin1 to be the closest matching keymap for fi, but in this specific order its possible to get both set to fi. Only it now adds additional model + options there, whatever the reason. - Panu - The conversion (as systemd-localed calls it) works really poorly also for the Czech keymaps/layouts. 'cz' X11 layout is converted to 'cz-lat2' which works like 'us' until you hit the Pause Break key. This is really unfortunate especially when people set their LUKS password in Anaconda with the 'cz' X11 layout activated and then they are supposed to enter it again with the 'cz-lat2' keymap during boot. -- Vratislav Podzimek Anaconda Rider | Red Hat, Inc. | Brno - Czech Republic -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: RFC: Feature process improvements
Dne 30.11.2012 18:16, Matthew Miller napsal(a): On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 03:28:52PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: I'd love to see the feature process to be turned opposite, i.e. make the feature auto-approved as default. It could look like: In general, features _have_ been approved by default, so in practice, this isn't a major change. It particularly makes sense for leaf features. I missed to point out that another advantage of this proposal is that you don't need to specify what is leaf/self contained feature ;) Although everybody understands what the leaf feature is, it is not always so clear in reality. 3) There might be some period, let say one week, for community review and discussion (of course this period might get extended for some controversial features) Having a devel-announce message for each feature seems good, ideally with some standard subject tag for filtering. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rawhide report: 20121203 changes
Compose started at Mon Dec 3 08:15:06 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [ansible] ansible-fireball-0.9-1.fc19.noarch requires python-keyczar ansible-node-fireball-0.9-1.fc19.noarch requires python-keyczar [cp2k] cp2k-mpich2-2.3-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libmpichf90.so.3()(64bit) cp2k-mpich2-2.3-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libmpich.so.3()(64bit) [dogtag-pki] dogtag-pki-10.0.0-0.16.b3.fc19.noarch requires dogtag-pki-server-theme = 0:10.0.0 [epiphany-extensions] epiphany-extensions-3.6.0-1.fc19.x86_64 requires epiphany(abi) = 0:3.6 [ghc-wai-extra] ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSzlib-conduit-0.4.0.2-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSzlib-bindings-0.1.0.1-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSzlib-0.5.3.3-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSwai-1.2.0.3-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSvoid-0.5.6-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSvault-0.2.0.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSunordered-containers-0.2.1.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSunix-2.5.1.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHStransformers-base-0.4.1-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHStransformers-0.3.0.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHStime-1.4-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHStext-0.11.2.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSsemigroups-0.8.3.2-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSresourcet-0.3.2.2-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSparsec-3.1.2-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSold-time-1.1.0.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSold-locale-1.0.0.4-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSnetwork-2.3.0.13-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSmtl-2.1.1-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSmonad-control-0.3.1.3-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSlifted-base-0.1.1-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSinteger-gmp-0.4.0.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHShttp-types-0.6.11-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHShashable-1.1.2.3-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSghc-prim-0.2.0.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSfilepath-1.3.0.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSfast-logger-0.0.2-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSdlist-0.5-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSdirectory-1.1.0.2-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSdeepseq-1.3.0.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSdata-default-0.4.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHScontainers-0.4.2.1-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSconduit-0.4.2-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHScase-insensitive-0.4.0.1-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSbytestring-0.9.2.1-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSblaze-builder-conduit-0.4.0.2-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSblaze-builder-0.3.1.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSbase-unicode-symbols-0.2.2.3-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSbase-4.5.0.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSarray-0.4.0.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires libHSansi-terminal-0.5.5-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires ghc(zlib-conduit-0.4.0.2-149e1851b93bbe144b083a1f99148d21) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires ghc(wai-1.2.0.3-4466c294feb7ca5c2dfc91b47a3dad71) ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires ghc(transformers-0.3.0.0-b55e1ba0a2f0da13c35eec50d1253059)
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Beta Test Compose 8 (TC8) Available Now!
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:56:24 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: On 11/13/2012 10:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Kevin Fenzi wrote: Sometimes things aren't ideal for one group in favor of another. WHAT group is actually in favor of MiniDebugInfo? It has one single person as the feature owner. ABRT developers consider it useless. Who actually wants it? And are you sure those who think they want it realize what it really means? Let's take a simple example: $ gdb --args sleep 10 (gdb) r (press Ctrl-C) (gdb) bt #0 0xb7fdc424 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7eb94f0 in __nanosleep_nocancel () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x0804b232 in ?? () #3 0x08048f99 in ?? () #4 0xb7e166b3 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 #5 0x08049085 in ?? () What MiniDebugInfo will give you (not tested): #0 0xb7fdc424 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7eb94f0 in __nanosleep_nocancel () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x0804b232 in xnanosleep () from /usr/bin/sleep #3 0x08048f99 in main () from /usr/bin/sleep #4 0xb7e166b3 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 #5 0x08049085 in ?? () With coreutils-debuginfo, glibc-debuginfo and glibc-debuginfo-common installed: #0 0xb7fdc424 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7eb94f0 in __nanosleep_nocancel () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:82 #2 0x0804b232 in xnanosleep (seconds=10) at xnanosleep.c:111 #3 0x08048f99 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbfffef24) at sleep.c:147 Spot the difference… I just did. You seem to have proved the point of mini-debuginfo. You seem to have proved different people consider it useless vs. useful. Jan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: F18 ARM Beta VFAD - 2012-12-03
Okey that's also something. Because last am I check rpi-update didn't work on F17 image. If It's works now. , That's nice at least we get a little more performance from new Rs-pi but yet we need new arch for this. On 3 December 2012 03:24, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote: Le lundi 03 décembre 2012 à 02:41 +0200, Onuralp SEZER a écrit : Yes I have question too I got my new 512 MB Rs-pi especially I wonder do we have 512 MB support at least for F17 image or Are we have to wait for F18 image with ( I really hope ) Hard Float support. 512 work on mine with the F17 image, after having updated the boot loaader with a script ( https://github.com/Hexxeh/rpi-update/ ) -- Michael Scherer -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- -- Onuralp SEZER Fedora Ambassadors http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors EMEAhttp://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/EMEAMember / Turkey Fedora Translations Turkish Team Memberhttps://fedora.transifex.net/projects/p/fedora/team/tr/ Fedora Design Member http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Design Monster.inc Notebook Fedora 18 Gnome Beta MONSTER Notebook Nvidia GeForce GTX 680M with Optimus and Intel Ivy Bridge Intel® Core™ i7-3720QM CPU @ 2.60GHz × 8 4x4 GB Kingston HyperX KIT CL11 1866 MHZ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F-18 Branched report: 20121203 changes
Compose started at Mon Dec 3 09:15:26 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [ugene] ugene-1.11.3-1.fc18.x86_64 requires qtwebkit = 0:4.7.0 Broken deps for i386 -- [ugene] ugene-1.11.3-1.fc18.i686 requires qtwebkit = 0:4.7.0 New package: ghc-hs-bibutils-4.15-2.fc18 Haskell bindings to bibutils New package: maradns-2.0.06-3.fc18 Authoritative and recursive DNS server made with security in mind New package: maven-plugins-pom-23-2.fc18 Maven Plugins POM New package: php-pear-XML-SVG-1.1.0-2.fc18 API for building SVG documents New package: php-pecl-uuid-1.0.3-3.fc18 Universally Unique Identifier extension for PHP New package: php-xcache-3.0.0-1.fc18.1 Fast, stable PHP opcode cacher New package: sigil-0.6.0-3.fc18 WYSIWYG ebook editor Updated Packages: dcap-2.47.7-1.fc18 -- * Tue Nov 27 2012 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se - 2.47.7-1 - New upstream release gcc-python-plugin-0.9-7.fc18 * Tue Nov 27 2012 Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org - 0.9-7 - another round of rebuilds for broken deps girara-0.1.4-2.fc18 --- * Tue Nov 27 2012 François Cami fc...@fedoraproject.org - 0.1.4-2 - remove static library [863049] google-guice-3.1.2-6.fc18 - * Fri Nov 09 2012 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com - 3.1.2-6 - Don't try to build extension modules unless they are needed * Fri Nov 09 2012 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com - 3.1.2-5 - Conditionalize %install section too * Fri Nov 09 2012 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com - 3.1.2-4 - Conditionally disable extensions * Thu Nov 01 2012 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com - 3.1.2-3 - Update to new add_maven_depmap macro * Wed Oct 31 2012 Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com - 3.1.2-2 - Use new generated maven filelist feature from javapackages-tools * Fri Oct 05 2012 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com - 3.1.2-1 - Complete rewrite of the spec file - New upstream, to ease future maintenance - Build with maven instead of ant - Split into multiple subpackages ibus-chewing-1.4.3-1.fc18 - * Mon Nov 26 2012 Ding-Yi Chen dchen at redhat.com - 1.4.3-1 - Fixed GitHub issue #30: Rework decorate_preedit by merging pull request #30 from buganini - Fixed GitHub issue #31: Properly refresh property by merging pull request #31 from buganini ibus-libpinyin-1.4.93-4.fc18 * Tue Nov 27 2012 Peng Wu p...@redhat.com - 1.4.93-4 - Fixes symbol icons * Tue Nov 20 2012 Peng Wu p...@redhat.com - 1.4.93-3 - Fixes spec file koji-1.7.1-1.fc18 - * Wed Nov 21 2012 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us - 1.7.1-1 - update to upstream 1.7.1 release * Sat Sep 01 2012 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us - 1.7.0-7 - add patch to mount all of /dev on appliances and lives * Fri Aug 31 2012 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us - 1.7.0-4 - add patch to only make /dev/urandom if it doesnt exist - add upstream patch for taginfo fixes with older servers libchewing-0.3.3-5.fc18 --- * Thu Nov 22 2012 Ding-Yi Chen dchen at redhat dot com - 0.3.3-5 - RPM Macro: define is replaced by global. * Tue Nov 20 2012 Ding-Yi Chen dchen at redhat dot com - 0.3.3-4 - BuildRequires for libchewing-python changed from python-devel to python2-devel - RPM_BUILD_ROOT changed to buildroot * Thu Jul 19 2012 Ding-Yi Chen dchen at redhat dot com - 0.3.3-3 - Fixed Bug 477690 - libchewing multilib conflict php-5.4.9-1.fc18 * Thu Nov 22 2012 Remi Collet rcol...@redhat.com 5.4.9-1 - update to 5.4.9 * Thu Nov 15 2012 Remi Collet rcol...@redhat.com 5.4.9-0.5.RC1 - switch back to upstream generated scanner/parser * Thu Nov 15 2012 Remi Collet rcol...@redhat.com 5.4.9-0.4.RC1 - use _httpd_contentdir macro and fix php.gif path * Wed Nov 14 2012 Remi Collet rcol...@redhat.com 5.4.9-0.3.RC1 - improve system libzip patch to use pkg-config * Wed Nov 14 2012 Remi Collet rcol...@redhat.com 5.4.9-0.2.RC1 - use _httpd_moddir macro * Wed Nov 14 2012 Remi Collet rcol...@redhat.com 5.4.9-0.1.RC1 - update to 5.4.9RC1 - improves php.conf (use FilesMatch + SetHandler) - improves filter (httpd module) - apply ldap_r patch on fedora = 18 only php-pear-Date-Holidays-0.21.7-1.fc18 * Sun Nov 25 2012 Remi Collet r...@fedoraproject.org - 0.21.7-1 - Version 0.21.7 (alpha) - API 0.17.2 (alpha) - add all phpci detected dependencies powertop-2.2-2.fc18 --- * Wed Nov 28 2012 Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com - 2.2-2 - Fixed crash when writing report on readonly filesystem (fix-crash-on-readonly-fs patch) soundconverter-2.0.4-7.fc18 --- * Sat Dec 01 2012 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@fedoraproject.org - 2.0.4-7 - Patch further to also
Re: F-18 Branched report: 20121203 changes
2012/12/3 Fedora Branched Report rawh...@fedoraproject.org: Compose started at Mon Dec 3 09:15:26 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [ugene] ugene-1.11.3-1.fc18.x86_64 requires qtwebkit = 0:4.7.0 Broken deps for i386 -- [ugene] ugene-1.11.3-1.fc18.i686 requires qtwebkit = 0:4.7.0 That was my fault. Fortunately Rex Dieter had fixed that and I submitted a new builds to updates-testing. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [Bug 872826] f18 anaconda - no option to install bootloader to a partition
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:12:09PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: This sounds like a different bug than the one thats in the report above. I'd advise the commenter to open a new one on mkfs or anaconda to change the boot sector padding. It's part of the filesystem format, there's no way to change it. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Self Introduction
On 12/01/2012 01:02 PM, Edward Mann wrote: I was just informed that trying to install enlightenment when you have libeio installed won't work. eio that i have and libeio are two different projects. I am not sure how to work around or fix this. If anyone has suggestions i'm all ears. I'll try to take a look at this later this week (I'd do it now, but I'm in all day meetings). ~tom == Fedora Project -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [Bug 872826] f18 anaconda - no option to install bootloader to a partition
On 12/03/2012 05:44 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:12:09PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: This sounds like a different bug than the one thats in the report above. I'd advise the commenter to open a new one on mkfs or anaconda to change the boot sector padding. It's part of the filesystem format, there's no way to change it. This may be true, but not a priori. extN has feature flags which can be used to enable leaving more space, or other larger space at a constant offset. For example, the first otherwise-allocatable filesystem block might be permanently allocated for use by booting. There may be other ways, too. If not, then there is ext5. Deprecate ext4 for its mistake in not allowing a maximal-sized filesystem block [8KiB] for the boot block. And oh by the way, several years ago ext3 was fixed in a non-backwards compatible way involving symbolic links. The fix changed the interpretation of on-disk file system data! -- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [Bug 872826] f18 anaconda - no option to install bootloader to a partition
Am 03.12.2012 14:44, schrieb Matthew Garrett: On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:12:09PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: This sounds like a different bug than the one thats in the report above. I'd advise the commenter to open a new one on mkfs or anaconda to change the boot sector padding. It's part of the filesystem format, there's no way to change it in other words - grub2 is way to bloated for a boot-loader and looks more like a operating system with it's own scripting language as a bootloader that is also the reason why /boot has to start on 2048 while over decades it was not needed signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora ARM F18 Beta VFAD - Test Images posted
Please join us today (December 3rd, 2012) in #fedora-arm on Freenode for another Fedora ARM VFAD. There are a number of pre-created F18 ARM Beta TC1 images available for testing, including: Pandaboard, Trimslice, vexpress (QEMU) and Kirkwood. Images can be downloaded from: http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/arm-nightlies/vault/f18-beta-tc1/ Please help us track the results by adding your findings to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Quality_Assurance/2012-12-03-VFAD-Fedora_18_Beta All help is appreciated and we look forward to your participation. Thanks, Paul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: selinux-policy-3.11.1-57 and 3.11.1-58 breaking access to 'storage' drives
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/01/2012 12:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Just a heads-up - several reporters (including me) have noticed that they can't access 'storage' drives in their systems (disks mounted at non-system locations - mine's at /media/Sea500 - to contain miscellaneous data) after updating to selinux-policy-3.11.1-57. -58 does not fix this problem. If you find you suddenly can't access a drive on your system, this bug may be the culprit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882416 just setting SELinux to 'permissive' will work around the issue, or you can downgrade to an earlier version (-50 was the last submitted as an update, we don't know where between -50 and -57 it broke). Adam have you tried -59? Does this fix the problem? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlC86D8ACgkQrlYvE4MpobPC5wCgoFApOzgheOsxrhNyFfUN4dT1 zxYAoOhrVmXq1f3sqyvrzm8lioz6vE5a =ti4Y -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [Bug 872826] f18 anaconda - no option to install bootloader to a partition
On Monday 03 December 2012 14:58:05 Reindl Harald wrote: that is also the reason why /boot has to start on 2048 while over decades it was not needed You really want your partitions to be nicely aligned when using SSDs or similar. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: selinux-policy-3.11.1-57 and 3.11.1-58 breaking access to 'storage' drives
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 12:58:23 -0500, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/01/2012 12:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Just a heads-up - several reporters (including me) have noticed that they can't access 'storage' drives in their systems (disks mounted at non-system locations - mine's at /media/Sea500 - to contain miscellaneous data) after updating to selinux-policy-3.11.1-57. -58 does not fix this problem. If you find you suddenly can't access a drive on your system, this bug may be the culprit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882416 just setting SELinux to 'permissive' will work around the issue, or you can downgrade to an earlier version (-50 was the last submitted as an update, we don't know where between -50 and -57 it broke). Adam have you tried -59? Does this fix the problem? In bohdi, people have reported that -59 fixed the problem going forward. But people already affected need to relabel. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [Bug 872826] f18 anaconda - no option to install bootloader to a partition
Am 03.12.2012 19:37, schrieb Lars Seipel: On Monday 03 December 2012 14:58:05 Reindl Harald wrote: that is also the reason why /boot has to start on 2048 while over decades it was not needed You really want your partitions to be nicely aligned when using SSDs or similar. maybe, but as example i do not want to resize /boot of more than 20 perfect working fedora-VM's which are living on a vSphere environment with a SAN storage as backend as forced with F16 because they are not interested in which physical media is behind the SAN happily i decided 2008 to make own virtual disks for boot, sysroot, /var/cache, /var/log, /tmp and data so i had only to resize/move /boot without downtime and blow the dd-image from the goldenmaster to all other VMs signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: hdf5 1.8.10 being pushed to rawhide
On 11/14/2012 09:02 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: I'll be building hdf5 1.8.10 for rawhide shortly. This will require a rebuild of all hdf5 using packages. I'll try to get to most of them today. Finally happening today. I'm starting builds of dependent packages... -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [Bug 872826] f18 anaconda - no option to install bootloader to a partition
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 07:25:16AM -0800, John Reiser wrote: On 12/03/2012 05:44 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: It's part of the filesystem format, there's no way to change it. This may be true, but not a priori. extN has feature flags which can be used to enable leaving more space, or other larger space at a constant offset. For example, the first otherwise-allocatable filesystem block might be permanently allocated for use by booting. There may be other ways, too. Sure, this is a problem that could be solved. But nobody's working on solving it, and it's not going to be solved in time for F18. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Blocker Bug Voting and Conversation
I don't think that anyone is a huge fan of the current blocker bug process. I realize that the people most affected by the process are really busy right now but I also think that it wouldn't be a bad thing to start a conversation while the process is active and at its most painful. I don't really want this to devolve into a long flamewar about how bad the process is (I probably spend more time with the process than most people, I know it has issues) but I would like to start a conversation about some of it. This conversation affects both test@ and devel@, so please try to send replies to both lists. I'm trying to think through methods to improve the process but I ended up with some questions that need more than just my input: How useful is it to have the blocker votes and conversation in the bug? I think that it needs to be public, archived and easily accessible from affected bugs but I'm questioning the value of having conversations about blocker status within bugzilla comments. Affected Devs: - Do you find the blocker related conversations in bugzilla comments helpful? Annoying? Don't really care? - Do you want to be more involved in the blocker process? Less involved and just notified about status changes? Affected Voters: - Do you vote on blocker status in bug comments? - Would you vote on blocker status more often if you could easily vote outside of meetings? - Do you want to receive status updates on the bugs you vote on, even if those status updates don't deal directly with blocker status? Anyhow, helpful thoughts would be appreciated. Hopefully we can improve the process so that it's less painful for everyone and maybe even more useful (at the very least, less difficult to understand). Tim signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Yum Package Remove Order
Besides a call to /sbin/chkconfig perhaps I see no reason for anything to be done in %post, %preun etc. in a setup like the on you describe. These scripts are supposed to be used for very simple and very unlikely commands like adding a user or a service to boot, they should not install or remove files (directly) of any kind, there are other sections that have the appropriate mechanisms to do that and detect problems at rpmbuild time instead of when you are installing/uninstalling. Regards, Fernando - Original Message - From: Mark Bidewell mbide...@gmail.com To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Saturday, December 1, 2012 8:46:52 PM Subject: Re: Yum Package Remove Order On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 17:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Ven 30 novembre 2012 15:11, Mark Bidewell a écrit : I have been working on packaging software into RPMs for my company. These RPMs create directories in %post into which dependent RPMs install components. You need to create those directories in %install and have your package own them in %files, and have dependant rpms depend on your package then everything will work fine Or for bonus points, the app itself ought to create the directories in the first place, if they're associated with the app. Packages should only create directories for stuff that's added as part of the package, not part of the software per se - say, you're including a convenience script which is not upstream, or moving the icons around, or something. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca : adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Here is the setup we have. 1) An RPM which creates a raw JBoss install 2) An RPM which sets up a specialized server config (based on the default config from 1) with common configuration 3) RPMs containing WARs (and configuration). The reason we encounter the CentOS 5 bug is that the when the RPM in 2 uninstalls, it removes the server config and with it the WARs from 3. Is there a better way? Thanks -- Mark Bidewell http://www.linkedin.com/in/markbidewell -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Heads up: rpm 4.11 alpha coming soon to rawhide near you
Looks like some packages make use of: %doc --parents Copyright.txt README.html vtkLogo.jpg vtkBanner.gif Wrapping/*/README* To pass --parents to the cp command. This appears to no longer work: Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SeYbFF + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd VTK5.10.1 + DOCDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/vtk-5.10.1-2.fc19.x86_64/usr/share/doc/vtk-5.10.1 + export DOCDIR + /usr/bin/mkdir -p /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/vtk-5.10.1-2.fc19.x86_64/usr/share/doc/vtk-5.10.1 + cp -pr --parents /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/vtk-5.10.1-2.fc19.x86_64/usr/share/doc/vtk-5.10.1 cp: missing destination file operand after '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/vtk-5.10.1-2.fc19.x86_64/usr/share/doc/vtk-5.10.1' Try 'cp --help' for more information. Now, this seems like very much a hack that only accidentally worked. That said, can this functionality be restored somehow? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rawhide buildroot broken: octave packages?
Hi folks, I recently packaged octave-odepkg[1] reviewed and approved for fedora. I've been able to build it for both f18 and f17, but the rawhide builds keep failing because of what looks like a broken dep chain: INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result ERROR: Command failed: # ['/usr/bin/yum-builddep', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/', '/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root///builddir/build/SRPMS/octave-odepkg-0.8.2-2.fc19.src.rpm'] Getting requirements for octave-odepkg-0.8.2-2.fc19.src -- 6:octave-devel-3.6.3-2.fc19.x86_64 Error: Package: 6:octave-3.6.3-2.fc19.x86_64 (fedora) Requires: libcxsparse.so.2()(64bit) Error: Package: 6:octave-3.6.3-2.fc19.x86_64 (fedora) Requires: libcholmod.so.1()(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest How should I proceed? File a bug against octave for broken deps? -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur: FranciscoD Please only print if necessary. Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: prefered way of configuring X11 keyboard layouts in F18
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 09:20:05AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 12/02/2012 10:57 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: system-config-keyboard should do this: 1. Get the old settings: cat /etc/sysconfig/keyboard 2. Set the new settings: su -c 'localectl set-x11-keymap layout [model] [variant] [options]' 3. Remove the old configuration file: su -c 'rm /etc/sysconfig/keyboard' or at least warning that we should do something new like this . http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/systemd.git/commit/?h=f18id=0969ad24898347919865e9298fa01e19cec98649 already attempts to do some kind of automatic conversion. If that is insufficient, please file bugs against systemd. It seems that the virtual console layout is migrated ok, but the x11 part is not. This is what I get on my two upgraded F18 boxes: [root@turre ~]# localectl System Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 VC Keymap: fi X11 Layout: n/a [root@turre ~]# The n/a part is the problem as it falls back to US keyboard. localectl manual says both set-keymap and set-x11-keymap apply to both the keymaps unless --no-convert is specified, but that doesn't seem to happen in practise: [root@turre ~]# localectl set-keymap fi [root@turre ~]# localectl System Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 VC Keymap: fi X11 Layout: n/a [root@turre ~]# localectl set-x11-keymap fi [root@turre ~]# localectl System Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 VC Keymap: fi-latin1 X11 Layout: fi [root@turre ~]# localectl set-keymap fi [root@turre ~]# localectl System Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 VC Keymap: fi X11 Layout: fi X11 Model: pc105 X11 Options: terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp It's a bit bizarre: set-keymap doesn't seem to find fi as the closest matching keyboard for x11 (it probably should), set-x11-keymap considers fi-latin1 to be the closest matching keymap for fi, but in this specific order its possible to get both set to fi. Only it now adds additional model + options there, whatever the reason. pc105 is just the standard model that XKB uses. and the option is there to get zapping behaviour when the server is started (until that option is overwritten by a desktop environment or other client) Cheers, Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Blocker Bug Voting and Conversation
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 15:19 -0700, Tim Flink wrote: I don't think that anyone is a huge fan of the current blocker bug process. I realize that the people most affected by the process are really busy right now but I also think that it wouldn't be a bad thing to start a conversation while the process is active and at its most painful. I don't really want this to devolve into a long flamewar about how bad the process is (I probably spend more time with the process than most people, I know it has issues) but I would like to start a conversation about some of it. This conversation affects both test@ and devel@, so please try to send replies to both lists. I'm trying to think through methods to improve the process but I ended up with some questions that need more than just my input: How useful is it to have the blocker votes and conversation in the bug? I think that it needs to be public, archived and easily accessible from affected bugs but I'm questioning the value of having conversations about blocker status within bugzilla comments. My take on this is that 'public, archived and easily accessible' are precisely the important criteria. The existing process was thrown together on the back of a napkin, more or less, and tracking it in the report itself was the obvious, easy way to do it in such a way that we wouldn't lose the data later. I don't see any problem with doing it somewhere else, so long as that 'somewhere else' meets the criteria. Affected Devs: - Do you find the blocker related conversations in bugzilla comments helpful? Annoying? Don't really care? - Do you want to be more involved in the blocker process? Less involved and just notified about status changes? Affected Voters: - Do you vote on blocker status in bug comments? Yes. - Would you vote on blocker status more often if you could easily vote outside of meetings? I do my best, but probably. - Do you want to receive status updates on the bugs you vote on, even if those status updates don't deal directly with blocker status? Not terribly applicable to me, as I want to know everything about just about every bug =) Anyhow, helpful thoughts would be appreciated. Hopefully we can improve the process so that it's less painful for everyone and maybe even more useful (at the very least, less difficult to understand). I don't want to overplay how bad the current system is, to be honest. It's a duct tape job, sure, but it's survived as long as it has because it actually achieves its goals fairly efficiently. I think we can definitely build something more solid, but let's not throw out any babies... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide buildroot broken: octave packages?
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 13:08:13 +1100, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, I recently packaged octave-odepkg[1] reviewed and approved for fedora. I've been able to build it for both f18 and f17, but the rawhide builds keep failing because of what looks like a broken dep chain: Probably you want to try rebuilding octave first. INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result ERROR: Command failed: # ['/usr/bin/yum-builddep', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/', '/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root///builddir/build/SRPMS/octave-odepkg-0.8.2-2.fc19.src.rpm'] Getting requirements for octave-odepkg-0.8.2-2.fc19.src -- 6:octave-devel-3.6.3-2.fc19.x86_64 Error: Package: 6:octave-3.6.3-2.fc19.x86_64 (fedora) Requires: libcxsparse.so.2()(64bit) Error: Package: 6:octave-3.6.3-2.fc19.x86_64 (fedora) Requires: libcholmod.so.1()(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest How should I proceed? File a bug against octave for broken deps? Yes. There is a chance that a simple rebuild will be good enough. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide buildroot broken: octave packages?
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 21:52 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 13:08:13 +1100, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, I recently packaged octave-odepkg[1] reviewed and approved for fedora. I've been able to build it for both f18 and f17, but the rawhide builds keep failing because of what looks like a broken dep chain: Probably you want to try rebuilding octave first. INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result ERROR: Command failed: # ['/usr/bin/yum-builddep', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/', '/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root///builddir/build/SRPMS/octave-odepkg-0.8.2-2.fc19.src.rpm'] Getting requirements for octave-odepkg-0.8.2-2.fc19.src -- 6:octave-devel-3.6.3-2.fc19.x86_64 Error: Package: 6:octave-3.6.3-2.fc19.x86_64 (fedora) Requires: libcxsparse.so.2()(64bit) Error: Package: 6:octave-3.6.3-2.fc19.x86_64 (fedora) Requires: libcholmod.so.1()(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest How should I proceed? File a bug against octave for broken deps? Yes. There is a chance that a simple rebuild will be good enough. Ah. I'm not the maintainer. I'll go file a bug. -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur: FranciscoD Please only print if necessary. Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [Bug 872826] f18 anaconda - no option to install bootloader to a partition
On Dec 2, 2012, at 7:57 PM, John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote: Fourteen years ago in 1998 I published a boot loader for i386 that loaded linux kernel and initrd using filesystem lookup by name from ext2, occupying 446 bytes of MBR plus 2*510 bytes of bootblock from ext2. The space also allowed some tens of bytes of kernel command line. So must use block lists was not true then. Yeah obviously I asked the wrong question, again. I will digress instead of asking a new (bad) question: 1. Another possible work around. In addition to the do nothing and install to MBR + MBR gap options, is the make a core.img and grub.cfg, but do not install anything to MBR, the MBR gap, or use block lists option. This core.img could be called by another boot manager, presumably already installed and in use by the user, the one they don't want stepped on in the first place. If they load the /boot/grub2/core.img, it will in turn load the grub.cfg and they get a GRUB menu as expected. To do this anaconda would use grub2-mkimage instead of grub2-install; it would use grub2-mkconfig as it currently does to generate the grub.cfg. I think that work around satisfies most concerns, albeit without automatically linking the existing boot manager to the core.img file. The user wouldh have to do that themselves (rather than relying merely on a change in the MBR active flag). 2. Incidentally, Btrfs has a 64KB offset before the start of the file system, which I confirmed on the btrfs list is intended for a boot mananager/loader. Because of how btrfs works, block lists are not merely not recommended but proscribed, the --force option fails, but as it turns out you don't need to use block lists with Btrfs because core.img and then some will happily fit in the rather enormous boot loader region completely contiguously intact. And I've confirmed that it does work, both installation of GRUB2 into this region, as well as it being loaded and functioning (ergo 100% Btrfs boot, even with boot and root in subvols). So the solution to the problem maybe for F19/F20 is actually Btrfs by default, and then grub2-install to a partition can be employed once again and simply just work without extra effort on the part of the user as is the case with work around 1. Chris Murphy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 882835] New: abi-compliance-checker-1.98.5 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882835 Bug ID: 882835 Summary: abi-compliance-checker-1.98.5 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: abi-compliance-checker Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 1.98.5 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.98.4 URL: http://ispras.linuxbase.org/index.php/ABI_compliance_checker_Downloads Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882872] New: perl-Date-Manip-6.37 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882872 Bug ID: 882872 Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.37 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Date-Manip Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 6.37 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 6.36 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Date-Manip/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882873] New: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.56 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882873 Bug ID: 882873 Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.56 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 1.56 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.54 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-TimeZone/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882876] New: perl-File-chdir-0.1008 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882876 Bug ID: 882876 Summary: perl-File-chdir-0.1008 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-File-chdir Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.1008 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.1007 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-chdir/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882877] New: perl-LDAP-0.51 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882877 Bug ID: 882877 Summary: perl-LDAP-0.51 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-LDAP Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.51 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.50 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/perl-ldap/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882878] New: perl-Log-Log4perl-1.40 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882878 Bug ID: 882878 Summary: perl-Log-Log4perl-1.40 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Log-Log4perl Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 1.40 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.39 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Log-Log4perl/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882879] New: perl-podlinkcheck-11 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882879 Bug ID: 882879 Summary: perl-podlinkcheck-11 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-podlinkcheck Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 11 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 10 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/podlinkcheck/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882880] New: perl-Tk-Pod-0.9941 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882880 Bug ID: 882880 Summary: perl-Tk-Pod-0.9941 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Tk-Pod Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.9941 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.9940 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Tk-Pod/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882878] perl-Log-Log4perl-1.40 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882878 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|mmasl...@redhat.com |jples...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File podlinkcheck-11.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-podlinkcheck: 3fbc8d52068e411c0aee9576099650eb podlinkcheck-11.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-podlinkcheck] 11 bump
commit 8aa150d8d74f98effb0fcd4219c627c8dc53ed7d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 3 10:48:27 2012 +0100
11 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-podlinkcheck.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 8052bbd..1120e4a 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
/podlinkcheck-8.tar.gz
/podlinkcheck-9.tar.gz
/podlinkcheck-10.tar.gz
+/podlinkcheck-11.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-podlinkcheck.spec b/perl-podlinkcheck.spec
index 1847f8b..3a18731 100644
--- a/perl-podlinkcheck.spec
+++ b/perl-podlinkcheck.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-podlinkcheck
-Version:10
+Version:11
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Check Perl POD L link references
License:GPLv3+
@@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Dec 03 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 11-1
+- 11 bump
+
* Mon Nov 26 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 10-1
- 10 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 8a2471e..f791117 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-58af5557a3d6e5ba3684fe16b0309737 podlinkcheck-10.tar.gz
+3fbc8d52068e411c0aee9576099650eb podlinkcheck-11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Tk-Pod-0.9941.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Tk-Pod: bd94b892746e23b1c0626cf82dc18473 Tk-Pod-0.9941.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882879] perl-podlinkcheck-11 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882879 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-podlinkcheck-11-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-12-03 05:07:17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Tk-Pod] 0.9941 bump
commit 838e3a35fd00374f0ecd1bc3e9418cec2cd0542d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 3 11:04:09 2012 +0100
0.9941 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Tk-Pod.spec |9 +++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 52ff318..27790f7 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
/Tk-Pod-0.9939.tar.gz
/Tk-Pod-0.9940.tar.gz
+/Tk-Pod-0.9941.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Tk-Pod.spec b/perl-Tk-Pod.spec
index 428de02..792fb99 100644
--- a/perl-Tk-Pod.spec
+++ b/perl-Tk-Pod.spec
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
%endif
Name: perl-Tk-Pod
-Version:0.9940
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:0.9941
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Pod browser top-level widget
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl}
-V:version`; echo $versi
Requires: perl(File::Temp)
Requires: perl(Pod::Simple) = 2.05
Requires: perl(Tk) = 800.004
+# URI::Escape is optional but usefull to escape URIs properly
+Requires: perl(URI::Escape)
# Remove under-specified dependencies
%global __requires_exclude
%{?__requires_exclude:%__requires_exclude|}^perl\\(Tk(::Pod)?\\)\\s*$
@@ -84,6 +86,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {}
2/dev/null \;
%{_mandir}/man1/*
%changelog
+* Mon Dec 03 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.9941-1
+- 0.9941 bump
+
* Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.9940-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 6ff22d5..d82fb8a 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-82b6b10c6e65d504a6ca08c663cb6638 Tk-Pod-0.9940.tar.gz
+bd94b892746e23b1c0626cf82dc18473 Tk-Pod-0.9941.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882872] perl-Date-Manip-6.37 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882872 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|mmasl...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|mmasl...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882880] perl-Tk-Pod-0.9941 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882880 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Tk-Pod-0.9941-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-12-03 05:29:30 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Log-Log4perl-1.40.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Log-Log4perl: e05ab4508863116bad03ef26dd9f98fd Log-Log4perl-1.40.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Log-Log4perl] 1.40 bump
commit bb43004a2e06fd0e887f60b135d30cf5fc924696
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 3 11:48:06 2012 +0100
1.40 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Log-Log4perl.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index bce260a..a55a482 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@ Log-Log4perl-1.24.tar.gz
/Log-Log4perl-1.37.tar.gz
/Log-Log4perl-1.38.tar.gz
/Log-Log4perl-1.39.tar.gz
+/Log-Log4perl-1.40.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Log-Log4perl.spec b/perl-Log-Log4perl.spec
index c6233c7..bc55efd 100644
--- a/perl-Log-Log4perl.spec
+++ b/perl-Log-Log4perl.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Log-Log4perl
-Version:1.39
+Version:1.40
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Log4j implementation for Perl
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ make test L4P_ALL_TESTS=1
%{_bindir}/*
%changelog
+* Mon Dec 03 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.40-1
+- 1.40 bump
+
* Tue Oct 30 2012 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 1.39-1
- 1.39 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 5f5b131..5cbab70 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-541d7ac477590b8ccbd04993b0f23120 Log-Log4perl-1.39.tar.gz
+e05ab4508863116bad03ef26dd9f98fd Log-Log4perl-1.40.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882878] perl-Log-Log4perl-1.40 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882878 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Log-Log4perl-1.40-1.fc ||19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-12-03 05:58:21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882877] perl-LDAP-0.51 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882877 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|mmasl...@redhat.com |jples...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Date-Manip] 6.37 bump
commit dd6baf2e7aeb774f9b6f49abff960670b51d4941
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 3 12:22:29 2012 +0100
6.37 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Date-Manip.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 1493704..99b034d 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -14,3 +14,4 @@ Date-Manip-6.07.tar.gz
/Date-Manip-6.32.tar.gz
/Date-Manip-6.34.tar.gz
/Date-Manip-6.36.tar.gz
+/Date-Manip-6.37.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Date-Manip.spec b/perl-Date-Manip.spec
index d6bc073..a2fe21d 100644
--- a/perl-Date-Manip.spec
+++ b/perl-Date-Manip.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Date-Manip
-Version:6.36
+Version:6.37
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Date manipulation routines
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@ find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
%{_bindir}/dm_*
%changelog
+* Mon Dec 03 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 6.37-1
+- 6.37 bump
+
* Thu Nov 01 2012 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 6.36-1
- 6.36 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 743d1f0..2cb73f9 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-e060c47350c7b7c1ed25e7a52ecac4a9 Date-Manip-6.36.tar.gz
+71601cb8c03f9f6716a3835eeb071219 Date-Manip-6.37.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882872] perl-Date-Manip-6.37 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882872 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Date-Manip-6.37-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-12-03 06:31:55 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File perl-ldap-0.51.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-LDAP: 81a9ae2bb0b28e905b5c139ea1a5cb0a perl-ldap-0.51.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-LDAP] 0.51 bump
commit 29b4187e6742eb82ddf536e395818a2ecdc61a75
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 3 12:37:41 2012 +0100
0.51 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-LDAP.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 40025a0..296ccb4 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ perl-ldap-0.40.tar.gz
/perl-ldap-0.47.tar.gz
/perl-ldap-0.49.tar.gz
/perl-ldap-0.50.tar.gz
+/perl-ldap-0.51.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-LDAP.spec b/perl-LDAP.spec
index 015d359..c3ee0fc 100644
--- a/perl-LDAP.spec
+++ b/perl-LDAP.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-LDAP
-Version:0.50
+Version:0.51
Release:1%{?dist}
Epoch: 1
Summary:LDAP Perl module
@@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm*
%changelog
+* Mon Dec 03 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1:0.50-1
+- 0.51 bump
+
* Mon Nov 26 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1:0.50-1
- 0.50 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index eba04da..a338b83 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-2ec4b97ea8c054a45c647990e00de81b perl-ldap-0.50.tar.gz
+81a9ae2bb0b28e905b5c139ea1a5cb0a perl-ldap-0.51.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882877] perl-LDAP-0.51 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882877 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-LDAP-0.51-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-12-03 06:48:10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File DateTime-TimeZone-1.56.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-TimeZone: cb1b51137568520f6b4f248ab2b7b818 DateTime-TimeZone-1.56.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-DateTime-TimeZone] update to 1.56
commit 56f9dcf699c4f97601138950d6ec7ee7026a64af
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Dec 3 04:57:22 2012 -0700
update to 1.56
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 260f434..0fc1545 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -14,3 +14,4 @@
/DateTime-TimeZone-1.51.tar.gz
/DateTime-TimeZone-1.52.tar.gz
/DateTime-TimeZone-1.54.tar.gz
+/DateTime-TimeZone-1.56.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec b/perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec
index cd8e2fa..8d66d5d 100644
--- a/perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec
+++ b/perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-DateTime-TimeZone
-Version:1.54
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:1.56
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Time zone object base class and factory
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Dec 03 2012 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 1.56-1
+- update to latest upstream version - still Olson 2012j
+
* Thu Nov 15 2012 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 1.54-2
- add BR, filter duplicated requires
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 078904d..2aed267 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-4372e25aeeb2fcdf056831825135443e DateTime-TimeZone-1.54.tar.gz
+cb1b51137568520f6b4f248ab2b7b818 DateTime-TimeZone-1.56.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882873] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.56 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882873 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-12-03 07:08:41 --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com --- There's no interesting changes here - built for rawhide only -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File File-chdir-0.1008.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-chdir: 4b0bfb8135554ef1e4e1440b89befe09 File-chdir-0.1008.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-File-chdir] 0.1008 bump
commit 4531d0f3525fb796ac1607820a227c9ce757acc3
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 3 13:29:07 2012 +0100
0.1008 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-File-chdir.spec | 17 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index c8c071e..8f299ae 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ File-chdir-0.09.tar.gz
/File-chdir-0.1003.tar.gz
/File-chdir-0.1006.tar.gz
/File-chdir-0.1007.tar.gz
+/File-chdir-0.1008.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-File-chdir.spec b/perl-File-chdir.spec
index 11c4368..916d07f 100644
--- a/perl-File-chdir.spec
+++ b/perl-File-chdir.spec
@@ -1,21 +1,22 @@
Name: perl-File-chdir
-Version:0.1007
+Version:0.1008
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:A more sensible way to change directories
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-chdir/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/File/File-chdir-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildRequires: perl(Cwd) = 3.16
BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
+BuildRequires: perl(Cwd) = 3.16
BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
-BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec) = 3.27
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec::Functions) = 3.27
BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildArch: noarch
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
+Requires: perl(File::Spec)
%description
Perl's chdir() has the unfortunate problem of being very, very, very
@@ -27,13 +28,12 @@ whole program.
%setup -q -n File-chdir-%{version}
%build
-%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
+make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-find %{buildroot} -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
chmod -R u+rwX,go+rX,go-w %{buildroot}/*
%check
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Dec 03 2012 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.1008-1
+- 0.1008 bump
+
* Wed Sep 19 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.1007-1
- 0.1007 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 38c025a..e4d1296 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-23cfff71a01412249b3c2202307750a5 File-chdir-0.1007.tar.gz
+4b0bfb8135554ef1e4e1440b89befe09 File-chdir-0.1008.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 882876] perl-File-chdir-0.1008 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882876 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-File-chdir-0.1008-1.fc ||19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-12-03 07:42:01 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 872993] perl-Class-XSAccessor-1.16 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872993 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|mmasl...@redhat.com |jples...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Class-XSAccessor-1.16.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-XSAccessor: 990ec14dda99ff01a32f64708b1ce15f Class-XSAccessor-1.16.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Class-XSAccessor] 1.16 bump. Replace PERL_INSTALL_ROOT with DESTDIR
commit beaa991eb855e663166a141344e189282dc1642c
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 3 15:13:50 2012 +0100
1.16 bump. Replace PERL_INSTALL_ROOT with DESTDIR
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec | 11 ---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 5a6b76b..9000802 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ Class-XSAccessor-1.05.tar.gz
/Class-XSAccessor-1.11.tar.gz
/Class-XSAccessor-1.13.tar.gz
/Class-XSAccessor-1.14.tar.gz
+/Class-XSAccessor-1.16.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec b/perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec
index 054c696..59b458e 100644
--- a/perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec
+++ b/perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Class-XSAccessor
-Version:1.14
+Version:1.16
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Generate fast XS accessors without run-time compilation
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-XSAccessor/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/S/SM/SMUELLER/Class-XSAccessor-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRequires: perl(AutoXS::Header)
+BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
Requires: perl(AutoXS::Header)
@@ -34,10 +35,9 @@ perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE=%{optflags}
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
+make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f {} \;
-find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}/*
%check
@@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/Class::*
%changelog
+* Mon Dec 03 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.16-1
+- 1.16 bump
+- Replace PERL_INSTALL_ROOT with DESTDIR
+- Add BR perl(Carp)
+
* Fri Aug 31 2012 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 1.14-1
- 1.14 bump (no changes for Fedora)
- Drop command macros
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 061ef03..e86805e 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-035e54873c66d5bafc6240ff58f5a795 Class-XSAccessor-1.14.tar.gz
+990ec14dda99ff01a32f64708b1ce15f Class-XSAccessor-1.16.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 872993] perl-Class-XSAccessor-1.16 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872993 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Class-XSAccessor-1.16- ||1.fc19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-12-03 09:15:54 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Apache-Htpasswd-1.9.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by xavierb
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Apache-Htpasswd: ee2ca41f9dd92d7a830a5ba65fcbeef0 Apache-Htpasswd-1.9.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Apache-Htpasswd] 1.9
commit 9b1f9234bd72343713808b1a51d130cea825fa8f
Author: Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org
Date: Mon Dec 3 21:20:20 2012 +0100
1.9
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Apache-Htpasswd.spec | 12
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index b6eb601..0dcda08 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
Apache-Htpasswd-1.8.tar.gz
+/Apache-Htpasswd-1.9.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Apache-Htpasswd.spec b/perl-Apache-Htpasswd.spec
index d55f582..742dfc5 100644
--- a/perl-Apache-Htpasswd.spec
+++ b/perl-Apache-Htpasswd.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Apache-Htpasswd
-Version:1.8
-Release:11%{?dist}
+Version:1.9
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Manage Unix crypt-style password file
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -10,9 +10,10 @@ Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/K/KM/KMELTZ/Apache-Htpass
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5)
-BuildRequires: perl(Digest::SHA1)
+BuildRequires: perl(Digest::SHA)
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(MIME::Base64)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
@@ -57,6 +58,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sun Dec 02 2012 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org - 1.9-1
+- Update to 1.9.
+
* Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.8-11
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 6a9c730..bdac307 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-ee2048044096b4259e89c9ed1c88ed92 Apache-Htpasswd-1.8.tar.gz
+ee2ca41f9dd92d7a830a5ba65fcbeef0 Apache-Htpasswd-1.9.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Net-SSH-Perl-1.35.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-SSH-Perl: 6d199022878582990c7d027123c43312 Net-SSH-Perl-1.35.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
