time to check on where we are and where
we should be focusing our efforts. We can also follow up on the recent
criteria proposals.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20121210
to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20121210
The current proposed agenda is included below.
== Proposed Agenda Topics ==
1. Previous meeting follow-up
2. Fedora 18 Final status
3. Test case / criteria revision
4. Open floor
Addendum to the agenda: Enterprise storage
It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream desktop
defaults, AFAIK.
--
Adam Williamson
Hi Adam,
when I asked upstream on few similar simple tweaks usually answers was
something like this:
We don't care, you can change it the way you like it.
Any comments?
--
devel mailing
On 09/12/2012 at 10:03 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
MATE IS growing. And MATE developers are starting to contribute to
Gnome. :)
Dan
In the absence of any good reasons *not* to vote for any of the other
candidates, and in the face of at least one reason not to vote for you, I'm
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 05:45:25PM -0500, Mark Bidewell wrote:
I hear you. I will admit I haven't thought through all of the possible
permutations. Probably a better criterion would be impact of ABI changes.
What I would like to see changed is the fact that, right now (and this
goes
Classy.
On Dec 10, 2012 12:14 AM, dave.gibbo...@hushmail.com wrote:
On 09/12/2012 at 10:03 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
MATE IS growing. And MATE developers are starting to contribute to
Gnome. :)
Dan
In the absence of any good reasons *not* to vote for any of the other
On 12/08/2012 04:12 PM, Arun SAG wrote:
Not really! We are already a customer of RHEL. Money is not the problem. We
want our users to use the latest software out there but we also want to
reduce the upgrade cycle.
I don't understand what you're saying. If you want your users to use
latest
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for stompclt:
b0d46072c67be1ee43b65a7cc532ae43 stompclt-0.7.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 10/12/2012 at 9:42 AM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
Classy.
I wasn't going for classy ;) I was hoping to make an impact. But obviously
falling on deaf ears.
If anybody else is reading this car-crash thread, thank you for not voting for
Dan Mashal. This lad is clearly not material
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885448
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I think, though, that this tool, integrated well and supported, could really
help us in Fedora (and in EPEL). So, I'd like to
a) enumerate the problems with Software Collections in Fedora,
Nicolas's mail has
Compose started at Mon Dec 10 08:15:07 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[ansible]
ansible-fireball-0.9-1.fc19.noarch requires python-keyczar
ansible-node-fireball-0.9-1.fc19.noarch requires python-keyczar
[ape]
Compose started at Mon Dec 10 09:15:32 UTC 2012
New package: python-carbon-0.9.10-2.fc18
Back-end data caching and persistence daemon for Graphite
Updated Packages:
OpenLP-2.0-1.fc18
-
* Fri Nov 30 2012 Tim Bentley timbent...@openlp.org - 2.0-1
- Release 2.0
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 11:52:40PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:46:49 -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/SOURCE-RPM-NAME
e.g.
http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/gnome-packagekit
I introduced the switch-over as per this ticket
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884999
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to learn there
had been an election. After some digging I figured out what happened.
Robyn sends her announce emails to: announce@, devel-announce@,
test-announce@
I saw the nomination email and the election results email, but no
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 06:50:59 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote:
I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to learn there
had been an election. After some digging I figured out what happened.
Robyn sends her announce emails to: announce@, devel-announce@,
test-announce@
I saw the
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-X11-Protocol-Other:
94ca8832f86f8a6a0c886f5466fea5e6 X11-Protocol-Other-23.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 7b89c187b671be53c98a73c2e29167da8f834105
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 10 16:04:14 2012 +0100
23 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-X11-Protocol-Other.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2
2012/12/10 Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
I think, though, that this tool, integrated well and supported, could really
help us in Fedora (and in EPEL). So, I'd like to
a) enumerate the problems with Software
- Original Message -
I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to learn
there
had been an election. After some digging I figured out what happened.
Robyn sends her announce emails to: announce@, devel-announce@,
test-announce@
I saw the nomination email and the
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:10:54AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to learn
there
had been an election. After some digging I figured out what happened.
Robyn sends her announce emails to: announce@,
- Original Message -
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:10:54AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to
learn
there
had been an election. After some digging I figured out what
happened.
Robyn
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:20:55 -0500 (EST), Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
I think this is not good - every contributor should be subscribed
to
announce list (with cla_done).
So you're blaming people who didn't recieve the email they expected
on
devel-announce@ for not recieving it?
On 10 December 2012 15:25, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:20:55 -0500 (EST), Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
I think this is not good - every contributor should be subscribed
to
announce list (with cla_done).
So you're blaming people who didn't recieve
Here is the lock-free version
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/509
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/509/0001-Ticket-509-lock-free-access-to-be-be_suffixlock.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
...snip...
I'm going to call this subthread closed...
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com wrote:
I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to learn there
had been an election. After some digging I figured out what happened.
Robyn sends her announce emails to: announce@, devel-announce@,
test-announce@
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:28:22 +, Ian Malone wrote:
I think this is not good - every contributor should be subscribed
to
announce list (with cla_done).
So you're blaming people who didn't recieve the email they expected
on
devel-announce@ for not recieving it? Seems
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:59:03 -0600, inode0 wrote:
Looks like it was sent to the devel list as well.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174779.html
417 messages in December so far! Too easy to miss the announcement,
if one doesn't pay attention to that list for some
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:02:46 +0100
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Did anyone claim that? - No.
Years ago I've suggested creating a list where to address all
contributors. One list that would be mandatory to subscribe to.
Not multiple lists.
I fear that has a number of
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:59:03 -0600, inode0 wrote:
Looks like it was sent to the devel list as well.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174779.html
417 messages in December so far! Too
On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
c) how do you define 'contributor' ?
Active fas account...
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Or, as another thought:
announce - general announcements for all of fedora
devel-announce - only announcements that have to do with package
maintainers/developers.
and then make sure the announce posts also post to the devel-announce
list, as thats a subset and we want everyone to get those
- Original Message -
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:59:03 -0600, inode0 wrote:
Looks like it was sent to the devel list as well.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174779.html
417 messages in December so far! Too easy to miss the announcement,
if one doesn't
- Original Message -
On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
c) how do you define 'contributor' ?
Active fas account...
So cla_done as it's requirement for elections (Board, FAmSCo) -
at least it should suit elections announcement.
R.
JBG
--
devel mailing list
I've just found that kde-partitionmanager in F18 no more works...
I tried to make a new build in koji with latest upstream svn version,
the build process went fine, but kde-partitionmanager still doesn't
work: it doesn't find devices in the correct way (it shows random disk
partitions as
On Seg, 2012-12-10 at 09:05 +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream
desktop defaults, AFAIK.
--
Adam Williamson
Hi Adam, when I asked upstream on few similar simple tweaks usually
On 10 December 2012 16:02, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:28:22 +, Ian Malone wrote:
I think this is not good - every contributor should be subscribed
to
announce list (with cla_done).
So you're blaming people who didn't recieve the email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:35:52AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
I really like to see all contributors subscribed to one announce list.
And I was surprised when I realized, after four years in Fedora, that
announce list is optional (maybe I did not
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:33:33 -0600, inode0 wrote:
Looks like it was sent to the devel list as well.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174779.html
417 messages in December so far! Too easy to miss the announcement,
if one doesn't pay attention to that list
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:33:33 -0600, inode0 wrote:
Looks like it was sent to the devel list as well.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174779.html
417 messages in December so far!
I took a look at the features for the past few releases, and noticed they
fall into about 40% completely new leaf features, 40% upgrades to things we
already have, and 20% or fewer distro config changes. That is, not
necessarily new packages; rather plans to configure Fedora differently. (For
- Original Message -
I took a look at the features for the past few releases, and noticed
they
fall into about 40% completely new leaf features, 40% upgrades to
things we
already have, and 20% or fewer distro config changes. That is, not
necessarily new packages; rather plans to
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:55:37 -0600, inode0 wrote:
My recommendation at this point is to guarantee the announcement will
go to the main announce list. You can be sure you will get it if you
subscribe to that. We will also announce it all over the place as we
always do, on various mailing
On 12/08/2012 12:07 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Completely agree on this one. In my day job we started using Fedora as one
of our desktop os. Then support issues and upgrade cycle started giving
nightmares to corp IT. They are looking at other avenues now. I really wish
there is a LTS
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882835
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.98.6-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882835
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.98.6-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
16.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882835
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.98.6-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
There are problems with the requirement to format volumes in anaconda (either
autopart or Manual Partitioning.)
1. To properly install to hardware RAID 0, 10, 5, 6, I effectively have to
learn kickstart. I can properly create the volumes myself, informing the file
system at make time what the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832644
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The last week or so has seen a couple of patches going into fop in the Fedora
repositories. I recently became a co-maintainer of fop in EPEL5 and was trying
to bring fop into current there. Unfortunately there are many dependency
failures there
Brian's comments sound a lot like those that I made to another email group
that I was once part of - email may be awesome for communication, but it is
a truly horrible avenue for conducting parliamentary business of any sort,
the least of which are elections and voting. If there were money
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 04:20:34PM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
are not worth paying support for. I suggested to RedHat that they
provide a graceful switch-over to CENTOS in such case: it's possible
manually anyway, so it would be a nice gesture to do it
automatically for customers who let
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 08:35:33PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:55:37 -0600, inode0 wrote:
My recommendation at this point is to guarantee the announcement will
go to the main announce list. You can be sure you will get
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885660
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Glib-1.280-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Glib-1.280-1.fc18
--
You are receiving
* Przemek Klosowski [10/12/2012 23:08] :
I suggested to RedHat that they
provide a graceful switch-over to CENTOS in such case
When you are considering migrating from distribution A to distribution B,
you're probably better off asking distribution B's
On 12/10/2012 09:40 PM, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 04:20:34PM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
are not worth paying support for. I suggested to RedHat that they
provide a graceful switch-over to CENTOS in such case: it's possible
manually anyway, so it would be a nice gesture
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 17:32 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 9, 2012, at 4:31 PM, les hlhow...@pacbell.net wrote:
Ok, guys,
Here is the story. The command in the grub manual is wrong. You need
to use # grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
The upstream GRUB manual is correct,
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:42 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
c) how do you define 'contributor' ?
Active fas account...
So cla_done as it's requirement for elections (Board, FAmSCo) -
at least it should suit
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 14:43 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
1. To properly install to hardware RAID 0, 10, 5, 6, I effectively
have to learn kickstart. I can properly create the volumes myself,
informing the file system at make time what the chunk and stripe width
are. The anaconda requirement to
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 13:56 -0800, Richard Vickery wrote:
Brian's comments sound a lot like those that I made to another email
group that I was once part of - email may be awesome for
communication, but it is a truly horrible avenue for conducting
parliamentary business of any sort, the least
On 2012-12-10 15:56 (GMT-0800) Adam Williamson composed:
Windows is very keen on formatting disks, or at least was last time I
checked it.
Lately?
You had to go into an advanced dialog to do anything other
than let it have its way with an entire disk.
Not that I can remember seeing.
I
On Qui, 2012-12-06 at 09:33 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 12/05/2012 09:06 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Tried running it on a system with a
bunch of stuff from rpmfusion yet, for instance?
Yes.
Hi,
The wiki page Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum have instructions that we
should know and do, in
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:15:46PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Seg, 2012-12-10 at 09:05 +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream
desktop defaults, AFAIK.
--
Adam Williamson
Hi
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 02:02:57PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:15:46PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Seg, 2012-12-10 at 09:05 +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream
desktop
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com wrote:
All packages which depends on libjpeg.so will have to be rebuilt. Since I
have
provenpackager privileges, I will cook some script which will rebuild all
pkgs automatically so no action will be required from maintainers.
Greetings,
I am considering using one of the above to see if they can usefully
substitute the practice of peppering code with tracing statements (logging
or performance analysis are not the focus). As I would be a beginner in any
of them, I was curious about the current and expected state of
On Dec 10, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 14:43 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
1. To properly install to hardware RAID 0, 10, 5, 6, I effectively
have to learn kickstart. I can properly create the volumes myself,
informing the file system at
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Best:
40cecbb72869ab13b37426f0da68243b Best-0.15.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 528f44f762cccdadd9ee1f1ee46c3784bd946023
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 10 09:26:50 2012 +0100
0.15 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Best.spec | 21 ++---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885447
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885146
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
commit 5b8b173d9ee4f5164217c6e25768829f7468c5a3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 10 09:54:29 2012 +0100
YAML::Tiny is not needed at build time
perl-Module-Build.spec |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-Build.spec
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885146
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Hi,
I've been using cpanspec tool recently and there were several lines of
output, that I had to change manually afterwards, that could have been
automated.
I've forked the original tool, as it seems, no one is currently working on this.
Here's what I've changed:
- Removed
Got this message? Beause I cannot see it in the archive.
Thanks.
Miro Hrončok
Jabber: m...@hroncok.cz
Telefon: +420777974800
2012/12/8 Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz:
Hi,
I've been using cpanspec tool recently and there were several lines of
output, that I had to change manually afterwards,
commit e13db925d7a44fb07172ca90c63a03c00626289f
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Dec 10 09:20:16 2012 +
Update to 0.103005
- New upstream release 0.103005
- Add MPL 2.0
- BR: perl(File::Temp)
- Release tests moved to xt/
- Update patch for
The lightweight tag 'perl-Software-License-0.103005-1.fc19' was created
pointing to:
e13db92... Update to 0.103005
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885449
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 10:28:16PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi,
I've been using cpanspec tool recently and there were several lines of
output, that I had to change manually afterwards, that could have been
automated.
Hi Miro,
I've forked the original tool, as it seems, no one is currently
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Coro:
904113b17a6e7a85bc49f60b8899c28a Coro-6.23.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b11efc579e568b240365feaa967535f312aa1648
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 10 11:10:34 2012 +0100
6.23 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Coro.spec | 33 +
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 13
commit 2af182a57e7a50e61a746a52ca63e4cc8e7713ac
Author: Massimo massimo.pala...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Dec 10 11:26:31 2012 +0100
Update to 0.7, rhbz #885594.
.gitignore|1 +
sources |2 +-
stompclt.spec |5 -
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
Summary of changes:
2af182a... Update to 0.7, rhbz #885594. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
2af182a... Update to 0.7, rhbz #885594. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
2af182a... Update to 0.7, rhbz #885594. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
2af182a... Update to 0.7, rhbz #885594. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
2af182a... Update to 0.7, rhbz #885594. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885594
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-0.7-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stompclt-0.7-1.el5
--
You are receiving
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885594
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-0.7-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stompclt-0.7-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885594
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-0.7-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stompclt-0.7-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885594
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-0.7-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stompclt-0.7-1.el6
--
You are receiving
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885594
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-0.7-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stompclt-0.7-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885660
Bug ID: 885660
Summary: RFE: Upgrade to 1.280 for deps for
GLib-GObject-Introspection
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Glib
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885660
Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844966
Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789557
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789557
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Latest upstream release: 2.32
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.25
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Bio-Graphics/
Please
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885741
Bug ID: 885741
Summary: perl-Test-Module-Used-0.2.4 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Module-Used
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
