these driver is using kernel file (like header etc) if i use Fedora 17,
they are not working.
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Dom, 2012-12-16 at 01:46 +0200, Ebru Arslan wrote:
I am using Adlink cPCI 3970D board. and my system also include cPCI
3455
Hi,
Just testing the 2.20.16 release and everything looks good so far on GM45.
-Ilyes
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Dom, 2012-12-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ebru Arslan wrote:
I am using 32 bit Fedora 14 . our platform is Adlink cPCI-3970D and
this
and performance (blt and blending, cairo-demos) is way better than the
2.20.10 and 2.20.14 releases.
-Ilyes
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just testing the 2.20.16 release and everything looks good so far on GM45.
-Ilyes
On Sun, Dec 16,
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
spring-91.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
Failed to build, but not my fault:
/lib64/libIrrXML.so.1: undefined reference to
`irr::core::LOCALE_DECIMAL_POINTS'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Everything else rebuilt fine.
Compose started at Sun Dec 16 08:15:11 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[Agda]
Agda-2.3.0.1-4.fc19.x86_64 requires
ghc(Agda-2.3.0.1-ad754944fc95f11aa3b4710387ff959a)
[ansible]
ansible-fireball-0.9-1.fc19.noarch requires
Compose started at Sun Dec 16 09:16:47 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[marble]
1:python-marble-4.9.4-1.fc18.x86_64 requires sip-api(8) = 0:8.1
[python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure]
Hi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877623
Why was this rejected as a blocker? Even if one considers that it isn't
a regression compared to PreUpgrade, the situation has changed now that
Anaconda itself doesn't provide any upgrade method directly.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
On 12/10/2012 05:39 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Which is why I think it would be in every ones best interest if all
the RHEL clones ( even oracle ) would unite join our community
maintain and support Fedora LTS release instead risk being bitten by
any business decision Red Hat either
On 12/13/2012 04:38 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
1 - Here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Input_device_configuration#system-setup-keyboard
we need update this because:
Command system-setup-keyboard is not present in F18, now we got
localectl set-x11-keymap
For each of these suggestions,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
and performance (blt and blending, cairo-demos) is way better than the
2.20.10 and 2.20.14 releases.
-Ilyes
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just testing the 2.20.16
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
and performance (blt and blending, cairo-demos) is way better than the
2.20.10 and 2.20.14 releases.
-Ilyes
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 03:03:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877623
Why was this rejected as a blocker? Even if one considers that it
isn't a regression compared to PreUpgrade, the situation has changed
now that Anaconda itself doesn't provide
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877623
Why was this rejected as a blocker? Even if one considers that it isn't a
regression compared to PreUpgrade, the situation has changed now that
Anaconda itself
On 12/14/12 10:04 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Dne 13.12.2012 22:52, Eric Sandeen napsal(a):
I just spent too many hours re-triaging and re-discovering bug
851970, in which systemd + PrivateTmp does weird things with
namespaces, thereby making it impossible to unmount filesystems under
certain
Hi
Isn't it not a regression because _Anaconda_ never verified the source?
(That is, good old bug #998.)
I am aware of that bug but then media based upgrades have always been
supported as a workaround. Is that still the case?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Isn't it not a regression because _Anaconda_ never verified the source?
(That is, good old bug #998.)
I am aware of that bug but then media based upgrades have always been
supported as a workaround. Is that
Hi
fedup is supposed to support media upgrades yes.
At this point, fedup doesn't
--iso ISO[TODO] installation image file
So unless that feature is marked as a blocker, we would be releasing Fedora
18 with no secure method to upgrade to it. That seems irresponsible.
Rahul
--
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
So unless that feature is marked as a blocker, we would be releasing
Fedora 18 with no secure method to upgrade to it. That seems
irresponsible.
Except for Yum, which has for years been the only method that was both
secure and practical anyway, but I agree. As long as
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Björn Persson
bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.sewrote:
Except for Yum, which has for years been the only method that was both
secure and practical anyway, but I agree. As long as people are being
discouraged from upgrading by Yum because it's unsupported, removing
the
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 21:15 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Björn Persson
bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se wrote:
Except for Yum, which has for years been the only method that
was both
secure and practical anyway, but I agree. As long as
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 22:00 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 21:15 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Björn Persson
bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se wrote:
Except for Yum, which has for years been the only method that
was both
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2012-12-17
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again tomorrow. We're in full-on F18 final mode at
this point - let's just do what
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Compress:
6a5c15cd0864bc2071623baa063d0ae8 IO-Compress-2.059.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit ef929bfdb790acf985c7d9c8ad40c0ba9e8407dd
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sun Dec 16 13:25:57 2012 +
Update to 2.059
- New upstream release 2.059
- IO::Compress::Base
- Added Encode option
perl-IO-Compress.spec |9 +++--
sources
commit f5c71fe3f8881f847e952abf868e59b07c0ab94b
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Sun Dec 16 15:29:15 2012 +0100
various cleanups
perl-Test-Regression.spec | 16 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Compress-2.059-1.fc19' was created pointing to:
ef929bf... Update to 2.059
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Compress-Lzma:
e2a3872a484dbbf8a7dcd89ed3188505 IO-Compress-Lzma-2.059.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 960c51e343ec0230336bb6d90bd0a7647e4b7e56
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sun Dec 16 15:03:46 2012 +
Update to 2.059 (no changes)
perl-IO-Compress-Lzma.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit 96ce58cd6edd2be86c3dc0b7c01e3cfe26ac5d7d
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Sun Dec 16 16:07:47 2012 +0100
various cleanups
perl-Test-TempDir.spec | 16 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit f1d7de0610ef4f172b33c1747049d6b67f921b31
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Sun Dec 16 16:27:59 2012 +0100
Cleanups
perl-Test-Without-Module.spec | 12
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Compress-Lzma-2.059-1.fc19' was created pointing
to:
960c51e... Update to 2.059 (no changes)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Hash-MultiValue:
f8c7ade4955374ad52e5a743f0812724 Hash-MultiValue-0.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2c34e8536ff371b5b4d19c24b7f15c6b6681a1e6
Author: Robin Lee cheese...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Dec 17 13:52:44 2012 +0800
Update to 0.13
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Hash-MultiValue.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868495
Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|---
34 matches
Mail list logo
