On 12/27/2012 07:35 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:55:01 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
As I understand it, we have a policy handling unresponsive submitters or
reviewers. However, there is a third case when the complete process is
stalled.
The situation then becomes
Is kernel 3.7 expected to be available for Fedora 18?
If so, can you estimate how long it will take?
Thank you.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:48:45 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
Continue talking to the other people,
[snip]
Yes, this is the correct action. But it's hard to talk to people if
they don't reply at all or not in a meaningful way. I'm not talking
about reviews making progress, possibly
On 27.12.2012 10:34, M.M. wrote:
Is kernel 3.7 expected to be available for Fedora 18?
If so, can you estimate how long it will take?
Thank you.
See http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/46002.html
Quoting one part:
Fedora 18: […] The 3.7 kernel rebase will be available as an update via the
On 12/27/2012 10:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:48:45 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
Continue talking to the other people,
[snip]
Yes, this is the correct action. But it's hard to talk to people if
they don't reply at all or not in a meaningful way. I'm not talking
Thank you.
2012/12/27 Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info
On 27.12.2012 10:34, M.M. wrote:
Is kernel 3.7 expected to be available for Fedora 18?
If so, can you estimate how long it will take?
Thank you.
See http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/46002.html
Quoting one part:
Fedora 18:
Hello everyone,
I am Mark Klein, a 14-year-old high school student from Honolulu, Hawaii.
(UTC-10)
I am participating in the Google Code-In contest and for my task[0], I
designed an android application[1] for Planet Fedora[2], which is a website
that displays blog posts by Fedora developers. The
Compose started at Thu Dec 27 08:15:07 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[dogtag-pki]
dogtag-pki-10.0.0-0.16.b3.fc19.noarch requires dogtag-pki-server-theme
= 0:10.0.0
[ember]
ember-0.6.3-3.fc19.x86_64 requires
Compose started at Thu Dec 27 09:16:16 UTC 2012
Summary:
Added Packages: 0
Removed Packages: 0
Upgraded Packages: 0
Compose finished at Thu Dec 27 13:13:00 UTC 2012
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
I'm attempting to build a software requiring glib2-devel.i686, however when
attempting to yum install it, RPM generates a transaction error and states
that few files from glib2-devel.i686 conflict w/the x86_64 flavor.
The listed conflicting files seem related to gdb and systemtap (tools)
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:30:25 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
file /usr/bin/gdbus-codegen from install of
glib2-devel-2.32.4-2.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package
glib2-devel-2.32.4-2.fc17.x86_64
Not addressing here.
file /usr/share/glib-2.0/gdb/glib.pyc from install of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everyone.
Currently I use the latest version of Ekiga on Fedora 18 Spherical Cow.
My internet connection implicates an outdoor antenna equipped with a
management software that includes a firewall (as well as other
services like NAT, UPnP, DDNS,
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 15:49:33 -0700,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
[mygui]
mygui-3.2.0-1.fc19.i686 requires libCommon.so
mygui-3.2.0-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libCommon.so()(64bit)
mygui-demos-3.2.0-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libCommon.so()(64bit)
mygui-tools-3.2.0-1.fc19.x86_64 requires
On 12/27/2012 10:09 AM, Antonio wrote:
Hello everyone.
Currently I use the latest version of Ekiga on Fedora 18 Spherical Cow.
My internet connection implicates an outdoor antenna equipped with a
management software that includes a firewall (as well as other
services like NAT, UPnP, DDNS,
On 12/27/2012 05:30 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Hi,
I'm attempting to build a software requiring glib2-devel.i686, however
when attempting to yum install it, RPM generates a transaction error and
states that few files from glib2-devel.i686 conflict w/the x86_64 flavor.
The listed conflicting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 27/12/2012 16:27, Basil Mohamed Gohar ha scritto:
On 12/27/2012 10:09 AM, Antonio wrote:
Hello everyone.
Currently I use the latest version of Ekiga on Fedora 18
Spherical Cow. My internet connection implicates an outdoor
antenna equipped
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Josh Stone jist...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/27/2012 05:30 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Hi,
I'm attempting to build a software requiring glib2-devel.i686, however
when attempting to yum install it, RPM generates a transaction error and
states that few
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:11:10 -0600
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 15:49:33 -0700,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
[mygui]
mygui-3.2.0-1.fc19.i686 requires libCommon.so
mygui-3.2.0-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libCommon.so()(64bit)
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 16:09:51 +0100, Antonio wrote:
My internet connection implicates an outdoor antenna equipped with a
management software that includes a firewall (as well as other
services like NAT, UPnP, DDNS, ...);
After trying to workaround this and that ISP/WiFi router I have found most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 27/12/2012 17:47, Jan Kratochvil ha scritto:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 16:09:51 +0100, Antonio wrote:
My internet connection implicates an outdoor antenna equipped
with a management software that includes a firewall (as well as
other services like
On 12/27/2012 11:40 AM, Antonio wrote:
Il 27/12/2012 16:27, Basil Mohamed Gohar ha scritto:
On 12/27/2012 10:09 AM, Antonio wrote:
Hello everyone.
Currently I use the latest version of Ekiga on Fedora 18
Spherical Cow. My internet connection implicates an outdoor
antenna equipped with
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Basil Mohamed Gohar
basilgo...@librevideo.org wrote:
Someone with more networking experience than me should probably reply,
I'll do my best to help give some background information here that
might be useful. It's probably a bit more than you were expecting,
but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nella citazione in data gio 27 dic 2012 20:14:20 CET, Jared K. Smith ha
scritto:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Basil Mohamed Gohar
basilgo...@librevideo.org wrote:
Someone with more networking experience than me should probably reply,
I'll do
Brendan Jones brendan.jones.it at gmail.com writes:
If you look at the build status you can see pulseaudio is hardly
unmaintained.
Rex Dieter has also provided a backport of the latest pulseaudio to use
with early releases. I'm sure he is very amenable to cherry picking
patches from a
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hence the question: isn't there a easy way to avoid this somehow in the
future?
Just stop enabling updates-testing by default. That will fix both your case
(you'll have enabled=1 as a hand-edit and thus RPM will recognize your file
as modified and not overwrite it
Steve Clark wrote:
Then why is no one fixing the identified bugs?
Because Lennart insists on backporting only individual fixes to Fedora
releases as opposed to rebasing to a new version, and nobody has the time to
identify and backport the relevant commits.
IMHO, we should just upgrade
Alec Leamas wrote:
The situation then becomes problematic if the stalled process handles a
package you want that much that you are willing to package it yourself -
if you submit it it will (rightfully) be closed as a duplicate.
Don't let it go that far, instead immediately close the stalled
Julian Sikorski wrote:
Dear list, Dear Lennart,
a week ago I have submitted a pulseaudio bug alongside with the patch
[1]. There was no response so far.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888422
Updated submitted that includes the upstream fix,
On 12/03/2012 09:20 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
I'll try to take a look at this later this week (I'd do it now, but I'm
in all day meetings).
Hi Spot,
Did you have a chance to take a look at this?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890566
Bug ID: 890566
Summary: perl-Socket-2.008 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Socket
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890567
Bug ID: 890567
Summary: perl-Test-Strict-0.15 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Strict
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885594
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-0.7-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885594
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-0.7-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887458
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
api-sanity-checker-1.98-1.fc17, abi-compliance-checker-1.98.7-1.fc17 has been
pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887458
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887458
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
api-sanity-checker-1.98-1.fc16, abi-compliance-checker-1.98.7-1.fc16 has been
pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please
36 matches
Mail list logo
