04.02.2013 11:38, Kevin Kofler wrote:
David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:26:35PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com said:
My understanding is that /usr/bin/soffice is a symlink in order to
keep backwards maintainability.
04.02.2013 10:47, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Features/ApacheOpenOffice =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ApacheOpenOffice
Feature owner(s): Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
Add Apache OpenOffice, the free productivity suite, to Fedora.
A big -1 to this feature,
On 02/03/2013 06:24 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
01.02.2013 00:42, James Hogarth wrote:
I'd still say yes since the context of this discussion is mysql 5.5 to
mariadb 5.5 and nothing to do with mysql 5.6 and the time for mariadb
10/11 to become fully compatible to what's brought to the table in
On 3 February 2013 17:20, Pavel wrote:
I would like take dvtm and pstreams-devel.
I have released the ownership. You can claim them. Thank you.
Regards,
--
Rakesh Pandit
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rakesh
freedom, friends, features, first
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:14:48AM +0200, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
On 3 February 2013 17:20, Pavel wrote:
I would like take dvtm and pstreams-devel.
I have released the ownership. You can claim them. Thank you.
I've taken dvtm as I've been more or less maintaining it for
a while now (I missed
Hello All!
As a part of the planned Erlang upgrade to R16 I updated it to the
recently released R16A (Release Candidate). I'm expecting a lot of
breakage. Unfortunately all incompatibilities are hidden from end
users, and some applications will install fine but refuse to start.
Instead they will
Now that I have your attention...
Fedora Maven package is currently a mix of upstream release and our changes that
we need for building RPMs. We can clean it up, but we need to move packages from
BR: maven to BR:maven-local. That will enable users to install Maven package
without installing a lot
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org writes:
I tried ibus-kkc and it seems to be working to a certain degree.
So does this Feature mean that the default input method (for Japanese)
will be changed from ibus-anthy to ibus-kkc? If so, I think it is better
that wiki page explicitly suggest
Hi,
First of all, I'm sorry that I forgot to send this e-mail last week. The
fault's all mine.
Tomorrow (Feb 5) at 4 PM UTC there will be a SIG meeting at #fedora-meeting
channel at freenode.
Link: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting:Java_SIG_2013-02
The subject will be mostly the mass
2013/2/4 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Features/ApacheOpenOffice =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ApacheOpenOffice
Feature owner(s): Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
Add Apache OpenOffice, the free productivity suite, to Fedora.
A big -1
On 02/02/2013 02:49 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
If you're talking about RDRAND, it doesn't hand out entropy. That's
RDSEED, which will only come with Haswell.
RDRAND only hands out random numbers.
Huh? Random numbers is pretty much synonymous to entropy in the
On 04/02/13 01:37, Peter Boy wrote:
By the way: As I learnt on Linux Day last year, LibreOffice still
depends on OpenOffice and is in the process to rebase their code to
OpenOffice 3.4 (or something alike). So I'm wondering about different
set of features.
how exactly does LibreOffice
Andrea, all,
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:31 AM, David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:26:35PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com said:
My understanding is that /usr/bin/soffice is a symlink in order to
keep backwards
Kevin Kofler wrote:
* What benefit does this package have over LibreOffice, to justify carrying
2 packages doing essentially the same thing?
They are indeed two productivity suites, but they are evolving in
different directions. There's a Features link in the proposal
On 02/03/2013 09:15 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
01.02.2013 00:17, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 14:20 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:
I think that's not the point, one of the two suites will be dominant
and you can't
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:35:43 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
PPS: Oh, and this:
The /usr/bin/soffice alias is still a problem since (in the Fedora
packages) it would conflict between LibreOffice and Apache
OpenOffice: it is recommended to fix it in the LibreOffice packages
too, at least using
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:34:03 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
I wrote:
Sandro Mani wrote:
Can't we simply re-organize the fedoraproject website in such way
that the download button points to something similar to the
current More options page, maybe with a small description for
each desktop
Compose started at Mon Feb 4 08:15:37 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[bootconf]
bootconf-1.4-6.fc18.noarch requires grub
[compat-gcc-34]
compat-gcc-34-c++-3.4.6-24.fc17.x86_64 requires libstdc++ 0:4.8.0
[couchdb]
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 06:36:23 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Eric Smith wrote:
On 01/28/2013 08:47 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
I think switching the desktop that has been our default for over 10
years and 18 releases requires just a bit more research and reason
than that. ~m
I don't
On 04/02/13 13:59, Martin Sourada wrote:
Also, going by your reasoning there would be no point in having
Calligra either... Furthermore, technically LO is the fork ;-)
technically, both Apache OpenOffice and LibreOffice are forks, since
neither of them:
a) are under the OpenOffice.org
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
- Cinnamon started out as 'using GNOME components', but it is [now] a
full
fork of mutter, gnome-shell and nautilus, at least, and bug-fixes are not
going either way...
Those are
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:16:58 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
Big +1. What will an unsuspecting user think when he downloads, burns
and tries Fedora on 32bit machine? That it's broken,
From what I have reports even Fedora 32-bit does not boot on such machines
because nobody tests the bleeding edge
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907464
Bug ID: 907464
Summary: cpanm bundle lots of library and is not listed on
fesco page
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: perl-App-cpanminus
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:29:04PM +0300, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
As a part of the planned Erlang upgrade to R16 I updated it to the
recently released R16A (Release Candidate). I'm expecting a lot of
breakage. Unfortunately all incompatibilities are hidden from end
users, and some
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Scott Schmit i.g...@comcast.net wrote:
Current:
em1 - enp2s0
That is expected, and actually the right thing to do. Udev cannot
apply such it looks like it is embedded heuristics for very
practical technical reasons. There is no reliable information about
that
On 02/04/2013 06:28 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
I love GNOME 3 and detest KDE 4. I've tried MATE and Cinnamon on both
Linux Mint and Fedora and don't really see the point of either of them
as long as GNOME 3 offers fallback mode.
Fallback mode is going away in F19,
Summary of changes:
f3bdf5f... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Regexp-Grammars:
6d75f337154bbbcd754e75ba7dd48bdd Regexp-Grammars-1.026.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 02/04/2013 02:42 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:16:58 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
Big +1. What will an unsuspecting user think when he downloads, burns
and tries Fedora on 32bit machine? That it's broken,
From what I have reports even Fedora 32-bit does not boot on such
On 4 February 2013 12:39, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
* What benefit does this package have over LibreOffice, to justify
carrying
2 packages doing essentially the same thing?
They are indeed two productivity suites, but they are evolving in
different
2013/2/4 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
Are any changes required to C erl_interface / ei.h users? I mean
at the source level, not just recompiling.
Nope, no changes are necessary.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
5c4099c... Update to version 1.026 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Apologies for the accidental send before...
On 4 February 2013 12:39, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
* What benefit does this package have over LibreOffice, to justify
carrying
2 packages doing essentially the same thing?
They are indeed two
= Features/DracutHostOnly =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DracutHostOnly
... This results in a very big initramfs, which takes a long time to
load on system start and a long time to create on kernel updates.
For speed in creating an initramfs, please consider Requiring
the package
Summary of changes:
5c4099c... Update to version 1.026 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907124
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.026-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.026-1.fc18
--
week, mostly.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130204
The current proposed agenda is included below.
== Proposed Agenda Topics ==
1. Criteria Revision
2. Test Case Revision
3
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907124
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.026-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.026-1.fc17
--
Summary of changes:
5c4099c... Update to version 1.026 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Text-vFile-asData:
39fad8c1ca12d44a1bde955f74b3d470 Text-vFile-asData-0.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit d224f0dc1f3216ee2b83d20a61b249750e61e480
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Feb 4 16:06:19 2013 +0100
Upstream update.
- Modernize spec.
- Drop obsoletes/provides %{name}-utils.
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-Text-vFile-asData.spec
Am 04.02.2013 15:47, schrieb John Reiser:
= Features/DracutHostOnly =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DracutHostOnly
... This results in a very big initramfs, which takes a long time to
load on system start and a long time to create on kernel updates.
For speed in creating an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon 04 Feb 2013 04:56:23 AM EST, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Now that I have your attention...
Fedora Maven package is currently a mix of upstream release and our changes
that
we need for building RPMs. We can clean it up, but we need to move
On 02/04/2013 08:52 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I just realized that there is a change to the way polkit is packaged in
f19 that spin maintainers should be aware of: the polkit package is just
the service, which only provides the default policy as specified in the
action
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Are packages really expected to ship .rules files? I don't think so:
Right, as I understand it, with the new system, applications are never ever
supposed to ship such rules files.
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:23:45 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/04/2013 02:42 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
From what I have reports even Fedora 32-bit does not boot on such machines
because nobody tests the bleeding edge Fedora kernels on such obsolete
hardware.
Could you provide more
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Rebuilt by me:
4ti2
Actually, 4ti2 has been obsoleted by latte-integrale. I've reminded
the maintainer that he needs to retire this package.
--
Jerry James
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
1d5afe2... Perl 5.16 rebuild (*)
565c469... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass (*)
d224f0d... Upstream update. (*)
847d97c... Merge cleanup.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit 847d97c16d16fee47da03deef3335132fca001c3
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Feb 4 16:13:14 2013 +0100
Merge cleanup.
perl-Text-vFile-asData.spec |6 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Text-vFile-asData.spec
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
that are built at kernel build time? the issue with building it at
build time was making sure we knew exactly what sourcs we needed to
ship to match all the binaries in the initramfs. the initramfs's we
build and ship as
On 02/03/2013 03:47 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:54:23 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Looks like going from glpk 4.47 to 4.48 bumped the soname from
libglpk.so.0 to libglpk.so.33. Something tells me this was not expected
and is not correct. Can this be verified?
Could
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
Hmm, that makes it seem even more likely that upstream fat-fingered
something.
Although: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/glpk.html
does indicate that ABI has been broken (although it has been done so in the
past
Cleanup: cpp-4.8.0-0.7.fc19.x86_64215/262
Cleanup: gdb-7.5.50.20130118-2.fc19.x86_64216/262
Cleanup: 1:findutils-4.5.10-7.fc19.x86_64 217/262
Cleanup: spice-server-0.12.2-2.fc19.x86_64
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:38:08PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Yum is blocked on a futex:
I should add:
yum-3.4.3-57.fc19.noarch
Rawhide 64 bit, almost(!) up to date.
It looks as if rpm-libs was also updated moments earlier to
4.11.0-0.beta1.3.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization
Le lundi 04 févr. 2013 à 14:42:35 (+0100), Jan Kratochvil a écrit :
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:16:58 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
Big +1. What will an unsuspecting user think when he downloads, burns
and tries Fedora on 32bit machine? That it's broken,
From what I have reports even Fedora
There has been a request to remove instance specific scripts, and make
them generic and placed in /usr/sbin/
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/528
Should we remove all the scripts from /usr/lib64/dirsrv/slapd-INSTANCE:
bak2db db2index dn2rdnldif2ldap
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:41:25PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It looks as if rpm-libs was also updated moments earlier to
4.11.0-0.beta1.3.
Correction: RPM was just updated from 4.11.0-0.beta1.3 to 4.11.0.1-1.
It was beta1.2 which was the dodgy version, but I didn't have
that installed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907464
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
From what I have reports even Fedora 32-bit does not boot on such machines
because nobody tests the bleeding edge Fedora kernels on such obsolete
hardware.
Could you provide more details? I have Fedora 18 running on several
32bit machines and am wondering what you are referring to.
From
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:38:08PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Cleanup: cpp-4.8.0-0.7.fc19.x86_64
215/262
Cleanup: gdb-7.5.50.20130118-2.fc19.x86_64
216/262
Cleanup: 1:findutils-4.5.10-7.fc19.x86_64
On 01/29/2013 12:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, the other thing fedup does - and the other reason it's necessary
compared to a simple online yum upgrade - is provide a mechanism for
pretty much any package to hook in pretty much any action to be
performed as part of the upgrade. To be sure
On 02/04/2013 07:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:38:08PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Cleanup: cpp-4.8.0-0.7.fc19.x86_64215/262
Cleanup: gdb-7.5.50.20130118-2.fc19.x86_64216/262
Cleanup
It looks like openSUSE is providing both, MariaDB and MySQL, with MariaDB
as a default[1].
[1] - http://michal.hrusecky.net/2013/01/mysql-mariadb-and-opensuse-12-3/
2013/2/4 Honza Horak hho...@redhat.com
On 02/03/2013 06:24 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
01.02.2013 00:42, James Hogarth wrote:
I've not run into this on my rawhide laptop or rawhide vm today...
Perhaps some kind of race condition there?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
amit's response:
On (Sun) 03 Feb 2013 [10:30:49], Cole Robinson wrote:
On 02/01/2013 04:39 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
Feature owner(s): Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com, Amit Shah
amit.s...@redhat.com
Provide a paravirtual random number generator
On 02/04/2013 05:47 PM, Kévin Raymond wrote:
From what I have reports even Fedora 32-bit does not boot on such machines
because nobody tests the bleeding edge Fedora kernels on such obsolete
hardware.
Could you provide more details? I have Fedora 18 running on several
32bit machines and am
commit 4218ec632154822d30632f9620f3b707492e2ab2
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 4 17:11:56 2013 +0100
Sub-package Pod-Usage
perl-Pod-Parser.spec | 42 +-
1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 33aa8a21436966587bb3cac303a4e6bb7b2693fd
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 4 17:31:16 2013 +0100
Sub-package Pod-Checker
perl-Pod-Parser.spec | 26 ++
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Pod-Parser.spec
On 01/25/2013 12:12 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
So, you can ignore all of that, but then you have to think about what
you actually accomplished by your upgrade? You updated a couple of
libraries, and maybe managed to restart a few processes using them, but
for the rest of them the vulnerable
#5467: 2 Packages missing from mirrors
--+---
Reporter: limb | Owner: rel-eng@…
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: Fedora 19 Alpha | Component: koji
Resolution: | Keywords:
04.02.2013 13:28, Petr Šabata пишет:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:14:48AM +0200, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
On 3 February 2013 17:20, Pavel wrote:
I would like take dvtm and pstreams-devel.
I have released the ownership. You can claim them. Thank you.
I've taken dvtm as I've been more or less
Hi
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Lets pretend I'm still running Fedora 16 and every day I do yum-upgrade
and not rebooted from day zero.
I have exactly the same problem as during yum upgrade to next Fedora
release.
So we are ignoring this behaviour in middle of
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:16:36AM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
But the fact that the packages conflict should stand in the way.
We don't have any guidelines that forbids it.
Just a note for people searching the mailing list later:
We do have Guidelines that prohibit
On 30/01/13 05:22 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Given that OpenOffice and LibreOffice share a common history (and not
that far back), are there going to be any efforts made to allow them
to be parallel-installable on the system, or will they be
fully-fledged
On 02/04/2013 12:16 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/04/2013 09:42 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
There has been a request to remove instance specific scripts, and
make them generic and placed in /usr/sbin/
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/528
Should we remove all the scripts from
- Original Message -
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Are packages really expected to ship .rules files? I don't think
so:
Right, as I understand it, with the new system, applications are
never ever supposed to ship such rules files.
Yes, that's
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:13:33 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Hmm, that makes it seem even more likely that upstream fat-fingered
something.
Although: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/glpk.html
does indicate that ABI has been broken
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
My issue with Apache OpenOffice can be seen on LWN:
https://lwn.net/Articles/532665/ [...]
The Apache Software Foundation releases code under the Apache license;
they are, indeed, rather firm on that point. The Symphony repository,
though [...]
It's an outdated article
I've been experimenting with some UI ideas for reporting static analysis
results: I've linked to two different UI reports below.
My hope is that we'll have a server in the Fedora infrastructure for
browsing results, marking things as false positives etc.
However, for the purposes of simplicity
On Monday, February 04, 2013 15:04:36 David Malcolm wrote:
I've been experimenting with some UI ideas for reporting static analysis
results: I've linked to two different UI reports below.
My hope is that we'll have a server in the Fedora infrastructure for
browsing results, marking things as
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 18:11 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 01/29/2013 12:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, the other thing fedup does - and the other reason it's necessary
compared to a simple online yum upgrade - is provide a mechanism for
pretty much any package to hook in pretty much
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 22:13 +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote:
On Monday, February 04, 2013 15:04:36 David Malcolm wrote:
I've been experimenting with some UI ideas for reporting static analysis
results: I've linked to two different UI reports below.
My hope is that we'll have a server in the
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:31:11 +
James Hogarth wrote:
Might I suggest focusing on packaging 3.4.1 for rawhide and dealing
with the issues surrounding conflicts and if that gies well consider
the 4.0 release (or whatever lines up then) for F20?
That's mostly how I understand the proposal. The
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:34:18 +0100
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Still I believe it is probably true as I doubt Fedora QA tests
compatibility with old hosts.
Fedora QA AFAIK tests on their own hardware only + virtual machines. I
don't know about kernel upstream QA/devs though.
I'm running F18 on a
On 02/04/2013 09:13 AM, Jerry James wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
Hmm, that makes it seem even more likely that upstream fat-fingered
something.
Although: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/glpk.html
does indicate that ABI has been broken
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 07:17:35PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 02/04/2013 07:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:38:08PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Cleanup: cpp-4.8.0-0.7.fc19.x86_64
215/262
Cleanup:
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 06:56 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
2. Can't we just not have a default?
Not really. Others have touched on this, but the websites team really
wants the simplicity of a straightforward 'Download' link that gets you
a live image, and that pretty
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 07:47 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Features/ApacheOpenOffice =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ApacheOpenOffice
Feature owner(s): Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
Add Apache OpenOffice, the free productivity suite, to Fedora.
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 18:19 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/04/2013 05:47 PM, Kévin Raymond wrote:
From what I have reports even Fedora 32-bit does not boot on such
machines
because nobody tests the bleeding edge Fedora kernels on such obsolete
hardware.
Could you provide more
To all interested,
This is the upstream announcement:
[NOTE: NSS 3.14.2 does not include a fix for the attacks described
in
the paper "Lucky Thirteen: Breaking the TLS and DTLS Record
Protocols"
(http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/tls/).
An upcoming NSS
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 23:27 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:34:18 +0100
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Still I believe it is probably true as I doubt Fedora QA tests
compatibility with old hosts.
Fedora QA AFAIK tests on their own hardware only + virtual machines. I
don't
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 19:17 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 02/04/2013 07:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:38:08PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Cleanup: cpp-4.8.0-0.7.fc19.x86_64
215/262
Cleanup:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
You're a new Linux user, you go to our download page, and instead of a
simple big green Download button, it starts asking you questions about
what 'desktop environment' you want?
As I said earlier in this thread, and as the Fedora Board
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 20:14 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
You're a new Linux user, you go to our download page, and instead of a
simple big green Download button, it starts asking you questions about
what 'desktop environment' you want?
- Original Message -
From: Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, February 4, 2013 6:53:20 PM
Subject: Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 06:56 +0100,
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
You are putting the cart before the horse. You have to demonstrate its
feasible to fix them before excluding future uses. I don't see how it is
possible to fix the entire distribution to never use conflicts.
Aggressive renaming (see e.g. what I did to kdelibs to allow
Adam Williamson wrote:
...and forcing a choice - possibly between several things they are not
familiar with either in detail or in nature - is equally wrong for many
people. Probably *more* people. Lots of people don't really care what
desktop they get, and lots of people don't know what a
Martin Sourada wrote:
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:31:11 +
James Hogarth wrote:
Might I suggest focusing on packaging 3.4.1 for rawhide and dealing
with the issues surrounding conflicts and if that gies well consider
the 4.0 release (or whatever lines up then) for F20?
That's mostly how I
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 20:14 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
You're a new Linux user, you go to our download page, and instead of a
simple big green Download button, it starts asking
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 21:49 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Honestly, what kind of benefit to the community do you expect from a
user who gets confused just by looking at a couple nice screenshots
and reading some brief explanation? Have you ever met such a person
(incapable of understanding two
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
