On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:28:59AM +0200, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well I'm using updates-testing because I want to test the updates
> pretty obviously :)
>
> I didn't create a bugzilla ticket yet, I'll try to find some more
> clues and backtraces before opening that.
You should post to
Hi,
Well I'm using updates-testing because I want to test the updates
pretty obviously :)
I didn't create a bugzilla ticket yet, I'll try to find some more
clues and backtraces before opening that.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:49:49AM +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> - - Refactorig LLVM's build system to properly use versioned shared
> objects. I note that other distributions, and BSD, are still using
> static linking, so we appear to be the only ones attempting to package
> LLVM properly
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2013-02-25
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again tomorrow. We have the blocker process and
automatic blocker stuff from this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear all,
I will be reducing my involvement in packaging LLVM -- I am no longer
regularly using it, the work required to keep it up-to-date is
relatively straightforward, but there are several deficiencies that I
feel others are better positioned to a
Some more changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines have been made:
---
The Packaging Guidelines covering Desktop files have been amended to say
that for Fedora 19 and beyond, the vendor tag must not be used. If it
was being used in a previous release, it may continue to be used for
that previou
On Thu, 21 Feb, 2013 at 21:24:29 GMT, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Obsolete ('metapost-metauml', 'noarch', '0', '0.2.5', '11.fc19')
Retired. Part of texlive now.
--Ben
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Pierre ;
I didn't wanna mean "say this like blaming or doing he didn't know" I try
to understand problem. If he wanna test of course something good. If you
asked me I'm using F19 on my system. I also like testing. If It's
understand like this sorry for that.
On 24 February 2013 22:07, Pierre-Yv
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 21:55 +0200, Onuralp SEZER wrote:
> Also why did you enable "test" repository ? Is there any reason for to
> do that ?
Is there a reason not to do it? As in, if one wants to test and report
the problem as they appear, enabling testing seems like a good thing to
do. Also, the
Did you report the redhat.bugzilla.com. ? Also why did you enable "test"
repository ? Is there any reason for to do that ?
On 24 February 2013 19:47, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday I did an update of my x86_64 F18 through updates-testing
> repository. Upon reboot, I got a blue backgro
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Martin Sourada
wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:19:43 +0100
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
>> Removing: notification-daemon
>> clementine requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
>> gnome-session requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
>> guake requi
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
>
>> I have taken ownership of the following packages:
>>
>> gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme,
>> dbus-python, gpointing-device-settings, gnome-media,
>> gtk-solidity-settings
On 02/24/2013 08:28 AM, Martin Sourada wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:19:43 +0100
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Removing: notification-daemon
clementine requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
gnome-session requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
guake requires notification-daemo
- Original Message -
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:04:36 -0500,
>Matthew Miller wrote:
> >On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 07:38:30AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >> >Anyone else want to work with me on this, or at least help keep
> >> >it limping
> >> >along until the next release and maybe
- Original Message -
> I have taken ownership of the following packages:
>
> gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme,
> dbus-python, gpointing-device-settings, gnome-media,
> gtk-solidity-settings, udisks in addition to also recently taking
> ConsoleKit and cpp
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:04:36 -0500,
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 07:38:30AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>Anyone else want to work with me on this, or at least help keep it limping
>along until the next release and maybe make updating it a feature for F20?
I can provide
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 16:58:47 +0100,
Denis Arnaud wrote:
Yes, the massive rebuilds have occured. AFAIU, if Koji keeps reporting
unresolved dependencies, it means that the corresponding packages FTBFS.
So, if you are the owner or a co-maintainer, it would be nice to browse
through the root.
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:21:39 -0430
Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado
wrote:
> Thanks Johannes, but I mean, really in the first case that I show in
> my email, the load never reaches 100% or even begins. Whichever wait
> time
The new koji (1.7.1) that was deployed not long ago includes an
'Impro
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:57:50 +0100
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Is this thing done? Thanks.
The mass rebuild? yes.
See:
http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f19-failures.html
for a list of packages that failed to build and need to be fixed. ;)
If you maintain any of those, please fix them.
If you maint
Yes, the massive rebuilds have occured. AFAIU, if Koji keeps reporting
unresolved dependencies, it means that the corresponding packages FTBFS.
So, if you are the owner or a co-maintainer, it would be nice to browse
through the root.log/build.log and see why those packages are failing to
build.
H
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:19:43 +0100
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Removing: notification-daemon
> clementine requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
> gnome-session requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
> guake requires notification-daemon = 0.7.6-2.fc19
> notification-daemon-
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 07:38:30AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >Anyone else want to work with me on this, or at least help keep it limping
> >along until the next release and maybe make updating it a feature for F20?
> I can provide a little help.
Like, volunteering to be the main package owne
Compose started at Sun Feb 24 08:15:17 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-python-1.21.3-6.fc19.x86_64 requires
libboost_python.so.1.50.0()(64bit)
[condor]
condor-plumage-7.9.1-0.1.fc19.4.x86_64 requires
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:47:15 +0100,
Martin Sourada wrote:
Plus, as I'm also a user of echo-icon-theme I would like to have it in
repos ;-) I plan to add echo-perspective to repos when it has some
basic coverage ready and retire echo-icon-perspective when all its
icons are redesigned for e
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 05:36:00 -0500,
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:19:43AM +0100, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Package festival (orphan)
I put a lot of work into this package years ago, and would like to work on
it again, but it's big and a little scary and I reellly nee
Is this thing done? Thanks.
Dne 11.2.2013 17:37, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:02:17 +0100
Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi,
I'm still getting failed Koji builds e-mail and unresolved deps in
Rawhide warnings, should I do something about it, or you are still
trying to do it?
Well, the
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:53:18 +0100
Heiko Adams wrote:
> Am 24.02.2013 11:47, schrieb Martin Sourada:
>
> >
> > If that makes you happy, Heiko, it wouldn't be much of a problem
> > for me to add a couple of symlinks to work-around the issue with
> > xdg-folders. I don't see a terrible need for t
On 02/24/2013 11:19 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Package orca (orphan)
I have picked up orca.
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 02:49:25 -0800
Dan Mashal wrote:
> It'd probably be in your best interest to close any 4+ year old trac
> tickets and reply to whatever bugs you have open then.
Good suggestion. It needs some cleaning, even though most of the bugs
are tracking RFEs created by me back in the day
Am 24.02.2013 11:47, schrieb Martin Sourada:
>
> If that makes you happy, Heiko, it wouldn't be much of a problem for me
> to add a couple of symlinks to work-around the issue with xdg-folders. I
> don't see a terrible need for them to look different than plain
> folders...
>
That would be nice
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Martin Sourada
wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 02:31:24 -0800
> Dan Mashal wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Heiko Adams
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > I'd request to remove the echo-icon-theme package from Fedora for
>> > several reasons:
>> > - it's missing sup
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 02:31:24 -0800
Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Heiko Adams
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'd request to remove the echo-icon-theme package from Fedora for
> > several reasons:
> > - it's missing support for xdg folders
> > - there's no noteable developement action
On 24/02/13 11:19, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Package postgresql_autodoc (fails to build)
I just requested commit rights for postgresql_autodoc. If Devrim doesn't
like to, I'd take care of it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845688
Volker Fröhlich
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:19:43AM +0100, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Package festival (orphan)
I put a lot of work into this package years ago, and would like to work on
it again, but it's big and a little scary and I reellly need to not
commit to more things right now.
There's been (somewhat
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Heiko Adams wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd request to remove the echo-icon-theme package from Fedora for
> several reasons:
> - it's missing support for xdg folders
> - there's no noteable developement action upstream (last monthly news is
> from february 2009)
> - the current
Hi,
I'd request to remove the echo-icon-theme package from Fedora for
several reasons:
- it's missing support for xdg folders
- there's no noteable developement action upstream (last monthly news is
from february 2009)
- the current version shipped by fedora is a nearly 5 years old git
snapshot.
--
On 23/02/13 15:44, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 23/02/13 15:26, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2013-02-23 16:09, Tom Hughes wrote:
I'm not quite sure if this is a bug in fedora-review, python-fedora,
or whether pkgdb is returning broken responses or something?
Tom
Hm... Which f-r version are you running (re
Il 24/02/2013 10:39, gil ha scritto:
Il 23/02/2013 21:48, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
scala -http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5047288
"9 required artifacts are missing."
these artifacts should be used only for testing scala
i was advised to remove all references to maven
or use
ht
Il 23/02/2013 21:48, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
scala -http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5047288
"9 required artifacts are missing."
these artifacts should be used only for testing scala
i was advised to remove all references to maven
or use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
39 matches
Mail list logo
