Re: Review Swap

2013-04-28 Thread Matthias Runge
On 04/28/2013 01:48 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: > There are many review requests here. > > Can someone help do a review(even only one of them)? > It'll be way easier for you to find a reviewer, when you'd be reviewing other packages yourself. Matthias -- Matthias Runge -- devel mailing list de

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

2013-04-28 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2013/4/29 Eugene Pivnev > As pcmafm developer said - gvfm use gobject - but not gtk or gnome libs. > I showed only packages that I was surprised. > E.g. "ffmpeg requires gtk". > Very nice. It's probably because of opencv, It can probably be spitted carefully at runtime, but opencv-devel cannot b

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

2013-04-28 Thread Eugene Pivnev
As pcmafm developer said - gvfm use gobject - but not gtk or gnome libs. I showed only packages that I was surprised. E.g. "ffmpeg requires gtk". Very nice. On 04/28/2013 10:58 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Eugene Pivnev wrote: As I'm trying to create gtk-/gnome-/kde*-free environment (QtDesktop) - I

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

2013-04-28 Thread Farkas Levente
On 04/28/2013 10:58 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Eugene Pivnev wrote: > >> As I'm trying to create gtk-/gnome-/kde*-free environment (QtDesktop) - >> I tested - what about Fedora without them? >> So: >> 1. yum remove gtk3: >> ... >> * gvfs >> * qt-mobility >> * qtwebkit >> * ffmpeg >> * ffmpeg-libs >>

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

2013-04-28 Thread Rex Dieter
Eugene Pivnev wrote: > As I'm trying to create gtk-/gnome-/kde*-free environment (QtDesktop) - > I tested - what about Fedora without them? > So: > 1. yum remove gtk3: > ... > * gvfs > * qt-mobility > * qtwebkit > * ffmpeg > * ffmpeg-libs > * mplayer > * phonon > * smplayer > 2. yum remove gtk2:

Re: About /dev/console!

2013-04-28 Thread Sergio Belkin
2013/4/28 Nico Kadel-Garcia > > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 07:13:59PM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: >> > ls -l /dev/console\! >> > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 abr 27 13:55 /dev/console! >> >> That's strange. >> >> My copy of the console(4

Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

2013-04-28 Thread Eugene Pivnev
As I'm trying to create gtk-/gnome-/kde*-free environment (QtDesktop) - I tested - what about Fedora without them? So: 1. yum remove gtk3: ... * gvfs * qt-mobility * qtwebkit * ffmpeg * ffmpeg-libs * mplayer * phonon * smplayer 2. yum remove gtk2: + * ImageMagic 3. rpm -qa | grep gnome | xargs su

Re: audacity

2013-04-28 Thread drago01
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > MP3 is patented, and there are *no* licenses available for Linux > environments. This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that work on the linux. The point i

Re: audacity

2013-04-28 Thread Michael Scherer
Le dimanche 28 avril 2013 à 13:08 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit : > There's also the Penguin Liberation Front for a few components with > weird licensing that others haven't been able to resolve usable > licenses for. PLF closed a few weeks ago[1], and was for Mandriva. [1] http://www.mail-

Re: udev rules, ACL_MANAGE, udev-acl?

2013-04-28 Thread Eric Smith
Tomasz Torcz wrote: You need either to classify device in udev rules or tag it with "uaccess". I made a writeup some time ago: http://enotty.pipebreaker.pl/2012/05/23/linux-automatic-user-acl-management/ I hope it helps. Thanks Tomasz! That was extremely helpful! It completely solved my ud

Re: audacity

2013-04-28 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Richard Vickery < richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't > install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get > this particular build working? > > MP3 players, and the DVD

Re: audacity

2013-04-28 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 28.04.2013 16:50, schrieb Richard Vickery: > On Apr 28, 2013 7:21 AM, "Frank Murphy" > wrote: >> >> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:09:30 -0700 >> Richard Vickery > > wrote: >> >> > For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken

Re: About /dev/console!

2013-04-28 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 07:13:59PM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > ls -l /dev/console\! > > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 abr 27 13:55 /dev/console! > > That's strange. > > My copy of the console(4) man page doesn't mention this, and that's

Re: audacity

2013-04-28 Thread Álvaro Castillo
Please report that to RPMFusion. Not here. As have said before, Fedora does not support mp3 files because is not free and some countries could be prohibed by law. Please contact with RPMfusion people. Greetings! El 28/04/2013 16:28, "Richard Shaw" escribió: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Ri

Re: audacity

2013-04-28 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Richard Vickery < richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't > install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get > this particular build working? > I think what you're looking

Re: audacity

2013-04-28 Thread Richard Vickery
On Apr 28, 2013 7:21 AM, "Frank Murphy" wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:09:30 -0700 > Richard Vickery wrote: > > > For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't > > install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible > > to get this particular build workin

Re: audacity

2013-04-28 Thread Frank Murphy
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:09:30 -0700 Richard Vickery wrote: > For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't > install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible > to get this particular build working? Important or otherwise, Fedora don't build in mp3 support

audacity

2013-04-28 Thread Richard Vickery
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

F-19 Branched report: 20130428 changes

2013-04-28 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sun Apr 28 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [clementine] clementine-1.1.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libprotobuf.s

Re: udev rules, ACL_MANAGE, udev-acl?

2013-04-28 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 05:55:17PM -0600, Eric Smith wrote: > I'm trying to package something that talks to a USB device. Upstream > has a udev rule that uses the group "plugdev", which apparently is > not used in Fedora, and I've seen advice to instead use an > ACL_MANAGE variable and a udev-acl e

rawhide report: 20130428 changes

2013-04-28 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun Apr 28 08:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [deltacloud-core] deltacloud-core-1.0.5-2.fc19.noarch requires rub

Review Swap

2013-04-28 Thread Christopher Meng
Hi, There are many review requests here. Can someone help do a review(even only one of them)? I really appreciate your help. Here is the list: monitorix - A free, open source, lightweight system monitoring tool ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=947071) repsurgeon - A tool

Re: About /dev/console!

2013-04-28 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 07:13:59PM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > ls -l /dev/console\! > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 abr 27 13:55 /dev/console! That's strange. My copy of the console(4) man page doesn't mention this, and that's not exactly surprising since what you've got there is a regular file, no