# F19 Final Blocker Review meeting #9
# Date: 2013-06-24
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's time for the (hopefully) last blocker bug review meeting for the
F19 cycle!
We'll be running through the final blockers and freeze exceptio
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
>
> convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
>
>
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2013-06-26 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets belo
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit Security Lab Spins are over their size limit of
700 MiB.
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Final Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5623#comment:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> websites are aware, spin maintainers were notified via the spins list,
>> no objections have been raised. not sure if its in the release notes.
>
> Hi,
>
> I can't speak for other spins but MATE-Compiz spins site has been
> created and wi
Hi,
I am going to switch enet.spec from using a version-generated soname
to upstream's soname, so libenet-1.3.3.so will become libenet.so.2
(based on 1.3.8) in rawhide only. Packages depending on enet will
(obviously) need a rebuild.
Best regards,
François
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedor
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 16:20 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 13:20:07 -0700,
>Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >I did not suggest that we ship the spin-kickstarts package as an update:
> >it can be pushed stable after the RC compose, and that's what we've done
> >before. The
2013/6/25 Dan Mashal :
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> websites are aware, spin maintainers were notified via the spins list,
>> no objections have been raised. not sure if its in the release notes.
>
> Hi,
>
> I can't speak for other spins but MATE-Compiz spins site ha
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 13:20:07 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
I did not suggest that we ship the spin-kickstarts package as an update:
it can be pushed stable after the RC compose, and that's what we've done
before. The point is that it doesn't actually go onto the _release
images_ themselve
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> websites are aware, spin maintainers were notified via the spins list,
> no objections have been raised. not sure if its in the release notes.
Hi,
I can't speak for other spins but MATE-Compiz spins site has been
created and will go live w
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 14:21 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:11:01 -0700,
>Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >I have it on my release checklist to ensure a matching spin-kickstarts
> >is *built*, but I've never considered it required to go into the frozen
> >package set at
Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2013-06-25, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Is there some common practice, where to place architecture specific
> > header files? From output of the following command, I can't see any
> > such place.
> >
> I dont't think so. SDL moves architecture specific header file into
> a priva
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:11:01 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
I have it on my release checklist to ensure a matching spin-kickstarts
is *built*, but I've never considered it required to go into the frozen
package set at the point of building the RCs. AFAIK it's always been OK
to get it done
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:11:01 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
I mostly agree with that, but it seems no-one ever wants to do it, and
I'm not sure of the logistics of freezing a git repo.
One way it could be implemented is for rel-eng to make their own local
branch of spin-kicktarts and ch
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 13:32 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:03:39 -0700,
>Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >I'm also not a fan of changes during freeze, but this one at least seems
> >to have worked out fine.
>
> In theory changing the kickstart files requires building
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:03:39 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
I'm also not a fan of changes during freeze, but this one at least seems
to have worked out fine.
In theory changing the kickstart files requires building a new spin-kickstarts
release for inclusion in the source DVD.
It woul
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 13:14 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Dennis Gilmore (au...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > > commit 6ae60d47bec0037c28ec158fed7ffd96b352493a
> > > Author: Dennis Gilmore
> > > Date: Mon Jun 24 21:53:30 2013 -0500
> > >
> > >
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 13:14 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dennis Gilmore (au...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > commit 6ae60d47bec0037c28ec158fed7ffd96b352493a
> > Author: Dennis Gilmore
> > Date: Mon Jun 24 21:53:30 2013 -0500
> >
> > add @basic-desktop to install so basic desktop environm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:14:14 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dennis Gilmore (au...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > commit 6ae60d47bec0037c28ec158fed7ffd96b352493a
> > Author: Dennis Gilmore
> > Date: Mon Jun 24 21:53:30 2013 -0500
> >
> > add @b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:32:11 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> (bringing back an old thread)
>
> Dennis Gilmore (den...@ausil.us) said:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Sun, 12 May 2013 17:56:20 +0200
> > Christoph Wic
(bringing back an old thread)
Dennis Gilmore (den...@ausil.us) said:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 12 May 2013 17:56:20 +0200
> Christoph Wickert wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > back in April we discussed the F19 spins and it was widely agreed
> > that http://fedorapr
Dennis Gilmore (au...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> commit 6ae60d47bec0037c28ec158fed7ffd96b352493a
> Author: Dennis Gilmore
> Date: Mon Jun 24 21:53:30 2013 -0500
>
> add @basic-desktop to install so basic desktop environment is available
We had to make cuts to the DVD for space reasons at
Il 25/06/2013 17:12, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
On 06/25/2013 04:59 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I plan to retire java-service-wrapper. I do not use it anymore. And it
need some time, which I do not have.
If you want to take over this package let me know. But rather then
taking over java-service-
Am 24.06.2013 21:47, schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
>> $ hardening-check ./usr/lib64/nbdkit/plugins/nbdkit-xz-plugin.so
>> ./usr/lib64/nbdkit/plugins/nbdkit-xz-plugin.so:
>> Position Independent Executable: no, regular shared library (ignored)
>> Stack protected: yes
>> Fortify Source functions:
On 06/25/2013 04:59 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I plan to retire java-service-wrapper. I do not use it anymore. And it
> need some time, which I do not have.
> If you want to take over this package let me know. But rather then
> taking over java-service-wrapper, it would be better to package
> http
I plan to retire java-service-wrapper. I do not use it anymore. And it
need some time, which I do not have.
If you want to take over this package let me know. But rather then
taking over java-service-wrapper, it would be better to package
http://yajsw.sourceforge.net/ instead.
--
Miroslav Suchy
On 2013-06-25, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Is there some common practice, where to place architecture specific
> header files? From output of the following command, I can't see any such
> place.
>
I dont't think so. SDL moves architecture specific header file into
a private directory:
# Rename SDL_con
Fedora 19 Release Candidate 1 cloud images are now available from:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/19-RC1/Images/
in either qcow2 or raw.xz format. You should be able to use Glance in
OpenStack to just import the qcow2 images directly and go.
They're also in Amazon EC2 in the US East
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952589
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|RAWHIDE
Hi,
Is there some common practice, where to place architecture specific
header files? From output of the following command, I can't see any such
place.
$ `gcc -print-prog-name=cc1` -v
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.1/include-fixed"
ignoring nonexistent
Compose started at Tue Jun 25 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[avgtime]
avgtime-0-0.5.git20120724.fc19.x86_64 requires
libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit)
[derelict]
derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 require
Compose started at Tue Jun 25 08:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[chmsee]
chmsee-2.0-5.git0acc572a.fc20.x86_64 requires libxpcom.so()(64bit)
[cxf]
1:cxf-rt-2.6.6-1.fc19.noarch requires asm2
[ekiga]
ekiga-4.0.1
Am Dienstag, den 25.06.2013, 08:29 +0100 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:39:59PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > >Note there is still a problem that an LDFLAGS hack was needed in the
> > >spec file, otherwise libtool (o
2013/6/21 Peter Lemenkov :
> Hello All.
>
> Recent Erlang bugfix release fixed a few issues but added another
> nasty one - actually almost all Erlang application will fail to start.
> I'm working on it. Meanwhile please stay with R16B or downgrade to it.
Fixed rabbitmq-server:
* https://admin.fe
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:39:59PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> >Note there is still a problem that an LDFLAGS hack was needed in the
> >spec file, otherwise libtool (or something) eats the hardening LDFLAGS.
>
> Too often Makefiles contain CFLAG
35 matches
Mail list logo
